切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (04) : 370 -373. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2020.04.015

所属专题: 文献

论著

金属支架联合腹腔镜与急诊开腹手术治疗结直肠癌并急性肠梗阻近期疗效比较
郭洋1,(), 骆成玉1   
  1. 1. 100029 北京,首都医科大学附属北京安贞医院普外二科
  • 收稿日期:2020-02-17 出版日期:2020-08-26
  • 通信作者: 郭洋

Comparison of the short-term clinical outcome of metal stent combined with laparoscopic surgery and emergency laparotomy in the treatment of colorectal cancer with the acute intestinal obstruction

Yang Guo1,(), Chengyu Luo1   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery Department 2, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100029, China
  • Received:2020-02-17 Published:2020-08-26
  • Corresponding author: Yang Guo
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Guo Yang, Email:
  • Supported by:
    Beijing Municipal Health Development Research Project(2017-4025-03)
引用本文:

郭洋, 骆成玉. 金属支架联合腹腔镜与急诊开腹手术治疗结直肠癌并急性肠梗阻近期疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(04): 370-373.

Yang Guo, Chengyu Luo. Comparison of the short-term clinical outcome of metal stent combined with laparoscopic surgery and emergency laparotomy in the treatment of colorectal cancer with the acute intestinal obstruction[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(04): 370-373.

目的

比较金属支架联合腹腔镜与急诊开腹手术治疗结直肠癌并急性肠梗阻的近期疗效,寻求安全有效的治疗方法。

方法

回顾性分析2017年1月至2019年3月120例结直肠癌并急性肠梗阻患者资料,根据手术方法分为两组,金属支架联合腹腔镜治疗的57例为联合组,63例行急诊开腹手术的患者为开腹组。应用SPSS19.0统计软件进行数据分析,围术期指标以(±s)表示,独立t检验,并发症发生率、二期手术率等采用χ2检验,P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

联合组手术时间为(179.8±17.3) min,术后排气时间为(2.3±0.5) d,术后住院时间为(7.3±1.9) d,均短于开腹组的(209.5±21.0) min、(4.6±0.8) d、(11.9±3.2) d;联合组淋巴结清扫数为(16.7±2.1)个,多于开腹组的(12.4±1.7)个,术中出血量为(27.9±4.1) ml,少于开腹组的(75.5±9.3) ml,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。联合组造口4例,二期行造口关闭术4例,开腹组造口17例,二期行造口关闭术17例,联合组并发症发生率为12.3%,二期手术率为7.0%,均低于开腹组的44.4%、27.0%,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

金属支架联合腹腔镜治疗结直肠癌并急性肠梗阻安全、可行,且手术根治效果好,能有效降低二期手术率。

Objective

To compare the short-term clinical outcome of metal stent combined with laparoscopic surgery and emergency laparotomy in the treatment of colorectal cancer with the acute intestinal obstruction.

Methods

From January 2017 to March 2019, clinical data of 120 patients with colorectal cancer and acute ileus were analyzed retrospectively. According to the operation method, 120 patients divided into combined group (57 cases) and open group (63 cases). Statistical analysis were performed by using Spss19.0 software. The perioperative indexes were expressed as (±s) and were examined by using independent t-test. Complication rate and secondary operation rate were analyzed by using χ2 test (P<0.05).

Results

In the combined group, the operation time was (179.8±17.3) min, the postoperative anal exhaust time was (2.3±0.5) d, the postoperative hospitalization time was (7.3±1.9) d, which were shorter than (209.5±21.0) min, (4.6±0.8) d and (11.9±3.2) d in the open group respectively. The harvested lymph nodes of (16.7±2.1) in the combined group was more than (12.4±1.7) in the open group. The amount of intraoperative hemorrhage of (27.9±4.1) ml in the combined group was less than (75.5±9.3) ml in the open group, with statistically significant difference (P<0.05). There were 4 cases of colostomy in the combined group, then received secondary closure surgery. There were 17 cases of colostomy in the open group, then received secondary closure surgery. The incidence of complications in the combined group was 12.3% and secondary closure surgery rate of 7.0%, which were lower than 44.4% and 27.0% in the open group respectively(P<0.05).

Conclusion

Metal stent combined with laparoscopy is safe and feasible in the treatment of colorectal cancer with acute intestinal obstruction, and the short-term effect of radical operation is good, which could effectively reduce the secondary closure surgery rate.

表1 120例结直肠癌并急性肠梗阻患者不同疗法两组患者一般资料比较[(±s),例]
表2 120例结直肠癌并急性肠梗阻患者不同疗法两组手术相关指标比较(±s)
表3 120例结直肠癌并急性肠梗阻患者不同疗法两组并发症发生率与再次手术率比较(%)
[1]
周晓刚,王林,覃先蓬,等.腹腔镜与肠梗阻导管联合治疗老年梗阻性结直肠癌临床观察[J].现代肿瘤医学,2019,27(6): 998-1001.
[2]
Schaeva SN.Surgical treatment of colorcetal cancer complicated with acute intestinal obstruction[J].Onkologiceskaa Iolopr-oktologia,2016,6(3): 8-16.
[3]
邹科见,胡艳,贺雄辉,等.介入引导肠梗阻导管放置在老年左半结直肠癌性肠梗阻患者的临床应用价值[J].中国医师杂志,2018,20(11): 1687-1688.
[4]
邓建中,张梓朗,林义办,等.单孔腹腔镜直肠前切除术治疗乙状结肠及直肠癌的体会[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2019,22(8): 786-788.
[5]
曾子威,张兴伟,陈俊辑,等.经肛入路侧方淋巴结清扫手术治疗中低位直肠癌五例[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2019,22(8): 781-785.
[6]
杨丰帅,彭玲.自膨胀式肠道支架在结直肠癌合并急性肠梗阻中的应用[J].中国现代普通外科进展,2018,21(10): 798-800.
[7]
严正蓉,雷玲,杨华,等.腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术术后动力性肠梗阻的相关因素分析[J].中国医药导报,2018,15(29): 88-91.
[8]
周腾,郑皓,达布·西力特,等.术前经肛间断低负压冲洗引流治疗结直肠癌合并肠梗阻的效果[J].武警医学,2018,29(9): 892-894,900.
[9]
王天.结直肠癌手术后患者血浆降钙素原、C反应蛋白、肿瘤坏死因子α水平的变化与术后肠梗阻的关系[J].中国基层医药,2019,26(13): 1570-1573.
[10]
苏德望,朱艳丽,杜井峰,等.腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术对结直肠癌患者氧化应激及能量代谢的影响[J].重庆医学,2019,48(10): 1787-1789.
[11]
李忠南,张强,马英杰,等.自膨式金属支架植入术治疗急性左半结直肠癌性梗阻[J].中国介入影像与治疗学,2019,16(4): 211-214.
[12]
Zhou JM, Yao LQ, Xu JM,et al.Self-expandable metallic stent placement plus laparoscopy for acute malignant colorectal obstruction[J].World J Gastroenterol,2013,19(33): 5513-5519.
[13]
吕国恩,邹文书,梁宇通,等.结直肠支架序贯联合腹腔镜手术在左半结肠癌伴肠梗阻中的应用[J/CD].中华普通外科学文献(电子版),2018,12(3): 165-169.
[14]
黎娜,肖天保.腹腔镜与传统开腹手术治疗结直肠癌术后并发症的Meta分析比较[J].贵阳中医学院学报,2019,41(4): 58-62,90.
[15]
Ji WB, Kwak JM, Kang DW,et al.Clinical benefits and oncologic equivalence of self-expandable metallic stent insertion for right=sided milignant colonic obstruction[J].Surg Endosc,2017,31(1): 153-158.
[1] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[2] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[3] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[4] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[5] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[6] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[7] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[8] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[9] 李博, 贾蓬勃, 李栋, 李小庆. ERCP与LCBDE治疗胆总管结石继发急性重症胆管炎的效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 60-63.
[10] 徐逸男. 不同术式治疗梗阻性左半结直肠癌的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 72-75.
[11] 韩戟, 杨力, 陈玉. 腹部形态CT参数与完全腹腔镜全胃切除术术中失血量的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 88-91.
[12] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[13] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[14] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[15] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?