切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (04) : 374 -377. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2020.04.016

所属专题: 机器人手术 文献

论著

"双U"三步法胰肠吻合术在机器人胰十二指肠切除术中的应用
朱洪银1, 霍天宇2, 崔王平1, 张昕宁1, 董烨1, 魏志刚2,()   
  1. 1. 030001 太原,山西医科大学第一临床医学院
    2. 030001 太原,山西医科大学普外科
  • 收稿日期:2019-12-16 出版日期:2020-08-26
  • 通信作者: 魏志刚

Application of "double-U" three-step pancreaticojejunostomy in robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy

Hongyin Zhu1, Tianyu Huo2, Wangping Cui1, Xinning Zhang1, Ye Dong1, Zhigang Wei2,()   

  1. 1. The First Medical College of Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi 030001, China
    2. Department of General Surgery, the First College of Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi 030001, China
  • Received:2019-12-16 Published:2020-08-26
  • Corresponding author: Zhigang Wei
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wei Zhigang, Email:
  • Supported by:
    Shanxi Key R&D Program Project(No. 201903D321144); Shanxi Province Graduate Education Innovation Project(2019SY248)
引用本文:

朱洪银, 霍天宇, 崔王平, 张昕宁, 董烨, 魏志刚. "双U"三步法胰肠吻合术在机器人胰十二指肠切除术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(04): 374-377.

Hongyin Zhu, Tianyu Huo, Wangping Cui, Xinning Zhang, Ye Dong, Zhigang Wei. Application of "double-U" three-step pancreaticojejunostomy in robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(04): 374-377.

目的

探讨"双U"三步法胰肠吻合术(PJ)在机器人胰十二指肠切除术(RPD)中的可行性。

方法

回顾性分析2017年6月至2019年6期间行RPD的28例患者病例资料,对术中情况及术后并发症进行分析。

结果

28例患者均顺利完成手术,"双U"三步法吻合时间为17~35 min,平均23.5 min,术中出血量50~600 ml,平均178.3 ml。术后5例患者出现并发症,其中3例(8.6%)出现术后胰瘘(POPF),均为B级,经抑制胰液分泌,延长腹腔引流时间及营养支持治疗后痊愈。2位患者出现胃排空延迟,经保守治疗后康复出院。平均术后住院时长13.9 d(3~63 d),无住院期间死亡病例。

结论

"双U"三步法PJ操作简便,利于学习,吻合质量安全可靠,愈合快,应用范围广,对减少并发症及降低POPF有一定优势。

Objective

To explore the feasibility of "double-U" three-step pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) in robot pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD).

Methods

The clincal data of 28 patients who underwent RPD from June 2017 to June 2019 were analyzed retrospectively, and the intraoperative conditions and postoperative complications were analyzed.

Results

All of 28 patients received successful operation. The anastomosis time of "double-U" three-step method ranged from 17 to 35 min, with an average of 23.5 min. The intraoperative blood loss ranged from 50 to 600 ml, with an average of 178.3 ml. Postoperative complications occurred in 5 patients, of which 3 (8.6%) had postoperative pancreatic fistula(POPF) with grade B, which were cured after inhibition of pancreatic juice secretion, prolongation of abdominal drainage time and nutritional support treatment. Two patients developed delayed gastric emptying and were discharged after conservative treatment. The average postoperative hospital stay was 13.9 days (3~63 days), and there was no death during hospitalization.

Conclusion

The "double-U" three-step PJ method is easy to operate, convenient for learning, safe and reliable for ensuring anastomosis quality, with faster recovery and potential wider clinical application. It has certain advantages in reducing complications such as POPF.

图1 "双U"三步法示意图
图2 A:第一步,在胰管两侧贯穿胰腺与空肠浆肌层进行两个垂直U形缝合。B:第一步完成后,空肠被插入胰腺后面。C:第二步,于12点及6点方向将胰管及其周围胰腺与空肠全层进行两个纵向U行缝合。D:第三步将胰管前壁及其前面的胰腺组织与空肠全层间断缝合。
[1]
Kim HS, Han Y, Kang JS, et al.Comparison of surgical outcomes between open and robot-assisted minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy[J]. J HepatoBiliary Pancreat Sci,2018,25(2): 142-149.
[2]
Andrianello S, Pea A, Pulvirenti A, et al. Pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: Suture material and incidence of post-operative pancreatic fistula[J]. Pancreatology, 2016,16(1): 138-141.
[3]
Peng L, Lin S, Li Y, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy[J]. Surg Endosc,2017,31(8): 3085-3097.
[4]
Chen BP, Bennett S, Bertens KA,et al.Use and acceptance of the International Study Group for Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF) definition and criteria in the surgical literature[J]. HPB(Oxford), 2018,20(1): 69-75.
[5]
Grobmyer SR, Kooby D, Blumgart LH,et al.Novel pancreaticojejunostomy with a low rate of anastomotic failure-related complications[J]. J Am Coll Surg,2010,210(1): 54-59.
[6]
Zizzo M, Ugoletti L, Morini A,et al.Pancreaticojejunostomy with or without reinforcement after pancreaticoduodenectomy: surgical technique of ligamentum teres hepatis wrap around pancreaticojejunostomy[J]. World J Surg Oncol,2018,16(1): 181.
[7]
魏志刚,魏宇轩,霍天宇,等. "G"形手术路径的腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术33例临床疗效分析[J].中华普通外科杂志,2018,33(7): 575-577.
[8]
Rosemurgy A, Ross S, Bordeau T,et al. Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomy Is the Future: Here and Now[J]. J Am Coll Surg,2019,228(4): 613-624.
[9]
Broeders IA. Robotics: The next step?[J]. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol, 2014, 28(1): 225-232.
[10]
Yardimci S, Kara YB, Tuney D, et al. A Simple Method to Evaluate Whether Pancreas Texture Can Be Used to Predict Pancreatic Fistula Risk After Pancreatoduodenectomy[J]. J Gastrointest Surg,2015,19(9): 1625-1631.
[11]
Zhou Y, Yu J, Wu L,et al. Meta-analysis of pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy on occurrences of postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy[J]. Asian J Surg,2015,38(3): 155-160.
[12]
Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C, et al. The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 Years After[J]. Surgery,2017,161(3): 584-591.
[13]
Wu T, Guo Y, Bi J, et al. Modified duct-to-mucosa versus conventional pancreaticoenterostomy for pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective cohort study based on propensity score matching analysis[J]. World J Surg Oncol,2019,17(1): 5.
[14]
Wang M, Xu S, Zhang H, et al. Imbedding pancreaticojejunostomy used in pure laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for nondilatated pancreatic duct[J]. Surg Endosc,2017,31(4): 1986-1992.
[1] 孙佳丽, 金琳, 沈崔琴, 陈晴晴, 林艳萍, 李朝军, 徐栋. 机器人辅助超声引导下经皮穿刺的体外实验研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 884-889.
[2] 王振宁, 杨康, 王得晨, 邹敏, 归明彬, 王雅楠, 徐明. 机器人与腹腔镜手术联合经自然腔道取标本对中低位直肠癌患者远期疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 437-442.
[3] 冷建军, 朴成林, 司振铎. 胰十二指肠切除术联合小范围肝切除、血管切除重建[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 384-384.
[4] 张超, 张珍, 马梁, 穆欢欢, 刘彩玲. 腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术术后C级胰瘘患者临床特征及影响因素研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 675-678.
[5] 付成旺, 杨大刚, 王榕, 李福堂. 营养与炎症指标在可切除胰腺癌中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 704-708.
[6] 庞名扬, 魏勇, 沈露明, 朱清毅. 运用国产单孔机器人完成经膀胱入路膀胱部分切除术治疗膀胱癌一例报道[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 638-643.
[7] 施一辉, 张平新, 朱勇, 杨德林. 机器人辅助前列腺根治术后切缘阳性的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 633-637.
[8] 王岩, 钱宏阳, 朱寅杰, 董柏君, 潘家骅, 薛蔚. 机器人辅助单孔腹膜外根治性前列腺切除治疗高危前列腺癌的瘤控效果初探[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 435-440.
[9] 李义亮, 苏拉依曼·牙库甫, 麦麦提艾力·麦麦提明, 克力木·阿不都热依木. 机器人与腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术联合Nissen 胃底折叠术短期疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 512-517.
[10] 罗迎吉星, 隗瑞丽, 王天晓, 黄笳, 徐力, 孙永亮, 杨志英. 开放、腔镜、机器人辅助肝血管瘤剥除术治疗巨大肝血管瘤对比[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 277-283.
[11] 魏孔源, 仵正, 王铮, 黎韡. 机器人胰腺中段切除后远端胰腺消化道不同重建方式初探[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 295-300.
[12] 李澄清, 郭文毅, 王磊. 腹腔镜保留脾脏胰体尾切除术:微创胰腺外科的合理决策[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 620-624.
[13] 罗柳平, 吴萌萌, 陈欣磊, 林科灿. 胰腺全系膜切除在胰头癌根治术中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 651-656.
[14] 韩青雷, 丛赟, 李佳隆, 邵英梅. 术前减黄方式对壶腹周围癌胰十二指肠切除术后并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 665-669.
[15] 李元新, 徐田磊, 刘伯涛. 第四代达芬奇机器人辅助慢性放射性肠炎确定性手术一例(附视频)[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 435-440.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?