切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (05) : 461 -464. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2019.05.011

所属专题: 文献

论著

三维高清腹腔镜下右半结肠癌根治术的入路选择及疗效分析
曹少祥1,(), 严想元1, 刘文明1   
  1. 1. 431700 湖北天门,天门市第一人民医院 普外2区
  • 收稿日期:2018-08-18 出版日期:2019-10-26
  • 通信作者: 曹少祥

Approach selection and efficacy analysis of three-dimensional high-definition laparoscopic radical resection of right colon cancer

Shaoxiang Cao1,(), Xiangyuan Yan1, Wenming Liu1   

  1. 1. The Second Department of General Surgery, The First people’s Hospital of Tianmen city, Hubei 431700, China
  • Received:2018-08-18 Published:2019-10-26
  • Corresponding author: Shaoxiang Cao
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Cao Shaoxiang, Email:
引用本文:

曹少祥, 严想元, 刘文明. 三维高清腹腔镜下右半结肠癌根治术的入路选择及疗效分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(05): 461-464.

Shaoxiang Cao, Xiangyuan Yan, Wenming Liu. Approach selection and efficacy analysis of three-dimensional high-definition laparoscopic radical resection of right colon cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(05): 461-464.

目的

探讨三维高清腹腔镜下右半结肠癌根治术的入路选择及临床疗效。

方法

回顾性选取2015年5月至2017年8月间我院收治的96例右半结肠癌患者资料,按照不同入路方式分为侧方入路组和中间入路组,分别54例、42例。应用统计学软件SPSS22.0完成分析。手术相关指标、中位生存期采用(±s)表示,独立样本t检验;并发症发生率及远期预后指标采用四格表χ2检验;P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

侧方入路组手术时间、术中出血量、排气时间均短于中间入路组(均P<0.05),两组的镇痛时间、住院时间及淋巴结清扫数目差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。侧方入路组术后并发症总发生率为3.7%,低于中间入路组的11.9%,而差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。侧方入路组中转开腹率为3.7%,低于中间入路组的16.7%,差异有统计学意义(χ2=7.080,P<0.05)。两组患者的中位生存期、术后1年复发率及1年生存率的差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。

结论

腹腔镜下右半结肠癌根治术采用侧方入路,可缩短手术时间,降低术中出血量及排气时间,并可有效降低中转开腹率,其预后效果与中间入路相当,值得在右半结肠癌根治术中推广应用。

Objective

To investigate the approach selection and clinical efficacy of three-dimensional high-definition laparoscopic radical resection of right colon cancer.

Methods

From May 2015 to August 2017, clinical data of 96 patients with right colon cancer were analyzed retrospectively. According to different approaches, they were divided into lateral approach group and intermediate approach group, 54 cases and 42 cases, respectively. Data analysis was performed by using statistical software SPSS22.0. Measurement data such as surgical indicators were expressed as (±s) and were examined by independent t test. The incidence of complications, conversion rate and survival rate were examined by chi square test. A P value of <0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

Results

The operation time, intraoperative blood loss and exhaust time in the lateral approach group were shorter than those in the intermediate approach group repectively (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in analgesia time, hospitalization time and number of lymph node dissection between the two groups (all P>0.05). The total incidence of complications in the lateral approach group was 3.7%, which was lower than that in the middle approach group (11.9%), however without significant difference (P>0.05). The conversion rate to open surgery in the lateral approach group was 3.7%, which was lower than that in the intermediate approach group (16.7%), with significant difference (χ2 = 7.080, P<0.05). There were no significant differences of median survival, 1-year recurrence rate and 1-year survival rate between the two groups (all P>0.05).

Conclusion

Laparoscopic radical resection of right colon cancer through lateral approach could shorten the operation time, reduce the amount of bleeding and exhaust time, and could effectively reduce the conversion rate to open surgery, with equivalent prognosis as well as the intermediate approach. It is worthy of promotion and application in the radical resection of right colon cancer.

表1 96例右半结肠癌患者不同手术入路两组患者基本资料比较[(±s)、例]
表2 96例右半结肠癌患者不同手术入路两组患者术后并发症及中转开腹率比较(例)
表3 96例右半结肠癌患者不同手术入路两组患者手术相关指标比较(±s)
表4 96例右半结肠癌患者不同手术入路两组患者预后情况比较[(±s),例(%)]
[1]
Lee SJ,Park SC,Kim MJ, et al. Vascular Anatomy in Laparoscopic Colectomy for Right Colon Cancer[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2016, 59(8): 718-724.
[2]
Jian-Cheng T,Shu-Sheng W,Bo Z, et al. Total laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with 3-step stapled intracorporeal isoperistaltic ileocolic anastomosis for colon cancer: An evaluation of short-term outcomes[J]. Medicine, 2016, 95(48): e5538-e5538.
[3]
王峰,李正平.不同入路腹腔镜根治术治疗右半结肠癌的临床效果[J].中国医药导报,2016, 13(25): 80-83.
[4]
Benz S,Tannapfel A,Tam Y, et al. Proposal of a new classification system for complete mesocolic excison in right-sided colon cancer[J]. Tech Coloproctol, 2019 , 23(3): 251-257.
[5]
丁闯,陈焰,朱信强,等.腹腔镜下不同入路右半结肠癌根治术的疗效比较[J].局解手术学杂志,2017, 26(9): 687-690.
[6]
He Z,Zhang S,Xue P, et al.Completely medial access by page-turning approach for laparoscopic right hemi-colectomy: 6-year-experience in single center[J]. Surg Endosc, 2019, 33(3): 959-965.
[7]
Xie D,Yu C,Gao C, et al.An Optimal Approach for Laparoscopic D3 Lymphadenectomy Plus Complete Mesocolic Excision (D3+CME) for Right-Sided Colon Cancer[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2017, 24(5): 1312-1313.
[8]
池畔,官国先.不断提高腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术规范化水平[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(2): 91-94.
[9]
Yun JA,Yun SH,Park YA, et al.Oncologic Outcomes of Single-incision Laparoscopic Surgery Compared With Conventional Laparoscopy for Colon Cancer[J]. Ann Surg, 2016, 263(5): 973-978.
[10]
林中满,王德奋,吴惠慈.腹腔镜下不同入路方式行右半结肠癌根治术的疗效及对免疫功能的影响[J].检验医学与临床,2017, 14(19): 2941-2944.
[11]
Miyo M,Takemasa I,Ishihara H, et al.Long-term Outcomes of Single-Site Laparoscopic Colectomy With Complete Mesocolic Excision for Colon Cancer: Comparison With Conventional Multiport Laparoscopic Colectomy Using Propensity Score Matching[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2017, 60(7): 664-673.
[12]
史建中,钱山青,孙卫东,等.中间入路法腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术55例临床体会[J].腹腔镜外科杂志,2016, 21(10): 742-745.
[13]
Rex DK. How I Approach Retroflexion and Prevention of Right-Sided Colon Cancer Following Colonoscopy[J].Am Journal Gastroenterol, 2016, 111(1): 9-11.
[14]
李建.腹腔镜下D3清扫联合CEM治疗右半结肠癌的效果分析[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(4): 329-331.
[15]
Matsuda T,Sumi Y,Yamashita K, et al.Optimal Surgery for Mid-Transverse Colon Cancer: Laparoscopic Extended Right Hemicolectomy Versus Laparoscopic Transverse Colectomy[J]. World J Surg, 2018, 42(10): 3398-3404.
[16]
Watanabe J,Ishibe A,Suwa Y, et al. Real-Time Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Imaging-Guided Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy in Hepatic Flexural Colon Cancer[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2018, 61(11): 1333-1334.
[17]
徐东楚,郭云虎,包磊,等.腹腔镜下右半结肠癌根治术不同手术入路的疗效比较[J].中国现代普通外科进展,2016, 19(3): 226-228.
[18]
Stepinska G,Kwiatkowski A.Implementation of Laparoscopy in Colorectal Surgery: An Evaluation of Advanced Laparoscopic Surgeons[J].Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 2017, 225(4): e68-e68.
[19]
夷青,申俊龙,吕顺军.背侧入路腹腔镜辅助右半结肠切除术的临床探讨[J].中国医师杂志,2016, 18(10): 1552-1554.
[20]
Doubeni CA,Corley DA,Quinn VP, et al. Effectiveness of screening colonoscopy in reducing the risk of death from right and left colon cancer: a large community-based study[J]. Gut, 2018, 67(2): 291-298.
[21]
李闯,刘昕,陈小红,等.腹腔镜下右半结肠癌根治术两种入路手术方式的临床效果对比分析[J].山西医药杂志,2017, 46(13): 1601-1602.
[22]
Xie D,Yu C,Gao C, et al.An Optimal Approach for Laparoscopic D3 Lymphadenectomy Plus Complete Mesocolic Excision (D3+CME) for Right-Sided Colon Cancer[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2017, 24(5): 1312-1313.
[1] 姚宏伟, 魏鹏宇, 高加勒, 张忠涛. 不断提高腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术的规范化[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 1-4.
[2] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[3] 周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[4] 燕速, 霍博文, 徐惠宁. 4K荧光腹腔镜扩大右半结肠CME+D3根治术及No.206、No.204组淋巴结清扫术[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 14-14.
[5] 莫波, 王佩, 王恒, 何志军, 梁俊, 郝志楠. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术与改良胃癌根治术治疗早期胃癌的疗效[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 644-647.
[6] 索郎多杰, 高红桥, 巴桑顿珠, 仁桑. 腹腔镜下不同术式治疗肝囊型包虫病的临床疗效分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 670-673.
[7] 唐浩, 梁平, 徐小江, 曾凯, 文拨辉. 三维重建指导下腹腔镜右半肝加尾状叶切除治疗Bismuth Ⅲa型肝门部胆管癌的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 688-692.
[8] 汪毅, 许思哲, 任章霞. 胸乳入路腔镜单侧甲状腺叶切除术与开放手术对分化型甲状腺癌患者术后恢复的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 542-545.
[9] 徐伯麒, 陶亮, 章帆, 毛忠琦. 结肠癌患者淋巴结转移预测模型的建立[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 393-397.
[10] 王新团, 李博, 李栋, 马宁, 李宝平, 刘淑萍. Laennec膜入路与Glisson鞘入路在腹腔镜解剖性肝切除中的对比研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 418-422.
[11] 范伟强, 林师佈, 孙传伟, 宋奇锋, 李望, 符誉, 陈艾. 不同切除范围的Bismuth-Corlette Ⅲ、Ⅳ型腹腔镜肝门部胆管癌手术临床对比分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 423-426.
[12] 蓝冰, 王怀明, 王辉, 马波. 局部晚期结肠癌膀胱浸润的研究进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 505-511.
[13] 侯文运, 刘恒昌, 窦利州, 陈海鹏, 郑朝旭, 王贵齐, 王锡山. 腹部无辅助切口内镜引导下取标本的腹腔镜辅助右半结肠癌根治术(保留回盲部)(附视频)[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 436-440.
[14] 唐新, 刁德昌, 廖伟林, 林佳鑫, 汪佳豪, 李文娟, 谢嘉欣, 敖琳, 李洪明, 易小江, 卢新泉, 冯晓创. 保留神经的鞘外游离技术在腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术中的近远期疗效分析:基于倾向性评分匹配的回顾性队列研究[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 372-380.
[15] 陈润芝, 杨东梅, 徐慧婷. 信迪利单抗联合索凡替尼后线治疗MSS型BRAF突变的转移性结肠癌:个案报道并文献复习[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 431-435.
阅读次数
全文


摘要