切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (05) : 458 -460. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2019.05.010

所属专题: 文献

论著

腹腔镜技术用于右半结肠癌手术的安全性及入路分析
谢斌耀1,(), 李世红1, 任旭1   
  1. 1. 628000 四川省广元市第一人民医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2018-07-24 出版日期:2019-10-26
  • 通信作者: 谢斌耀

Clinical analysis of safety and approach in laparoscopic surgery for right colon cancer

Binyao Xie1,(), Shihong Li1, Xu Ren1   

  1. 1. Department of general surgery, the first people’s hospital, Sichuan 628000, China
  • Received:2018-07-24 Published:2019-10-26
  • Corresponding author: Binyao Xie
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Xie Binyao, Email:
引用本文:

谢斌耀, 李世红, 任旭. 腹腔镜技术用于右半结肠癌手术的安全性及入路分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(05): 458-460.

Binyao Xie, Shihong Li, Xu Ren. Clinical analysis of safety and approach in laparoscopic surgery for right colon cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(05): 458-460.

目的

探究腹腔镜技术用于右半结肠癌手术的安全性及不同入路的临床效果。

方法

回顾性分析2012年5月至2017年5月行右半结肠癌根治术的患者145例资料,根据术式不同分为常规入路组(n=47,采用中间入路),侧方入路组(n=53,采用侧方入路),开腹术组(n=45)。数据采用SPSS20.0软件进行分析,术中术后指标、手术前后免疫指标等采用(±s)描述,F检验;术后并发症χ2检验,P<0.05差异有统计学意义。

结果

侧方入路组患者的出血量、清扫淋巴结数量、排气时间等指标均明显优于开腹组与常规入路组患者(P<0.05),而住院时间、镇痛时间、术后并发症的总发生率等指标明显优于开腹组(P<0.05),但与常规入路组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);手术时间方面,开腹术组则要显著低于两组入路组(P<0.05)。术后三组患者的免疫指标CD4、CD8、CD4/CD8均较治疗前明显改善(P<0.05),侧方入路组明显优于其他两组(P<0.05)。

结论

侧方入路在腹腔镜下右半结肠癌根治术中的临床效果显著,可减少并发症发生,提高免疫功能,安全可靠,值得进一步推广应用。

Objective

To investigate the safety of laparoscopic techniques for right colon cancer surgery and to explore the clinical outcomes by using different approaches.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed in 145 patients who underwent radical resection of right colon cancer from May 2012 to May 2017. According to the surgical approach, patients were divided into routine approach group (n=47, intermediate approach), into lateral approach group (n=53, lateral approach) and open surgery group (n=45). The data were analyzed by using SPSS20.0 software. Measurement data such as perioperative relevant indicators and immune function indicators were expressed as (±s) and were examined by independent F test. The incidence of complications were examined by chi square test. A P value of <0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

Results

The amount of bleeding, the number of lymph nodes, and the time of exhaustion in the lateral approach group were significantly better than those in the open group and the routine approach group respectively(P<0.05). Hospitalization time, analgesia time and the total incidence of complications in the lateral approach group were significantly better than those of the open group respectively (P<0.05), however there was no significant difference between routine approach group (P>0.05). In terms of operation time, the open surgery group was significantly lower than the other two groups (P<0.05). After treatment, the immune indexes such as CD4, CD8, CD4/CD8 of the three groups were significantly improved (P<0.05). The indexes of patients in the lateral approach group were significantly better than the other two groups (P<0.05).

Conclusion

The clinical effect of lateral approach in laparoscopic radical resection of right colon cancer is remarkable, which could reduce complications and improve immune function. It is safe and reliable and worthy of further promotion and application.

表1 145例右半结肠癌根治术患者不同术式三组患者的基本临床资料[(±s),例]
表2 145例右半结肠癌根治术患者不同术式三组患者术中术后指标比较(±s)
表3 145例右半结肠癌患者不同术式三组患者术后并发症比较[例(%)]
表4 145例右半结肠癌患者不同术式三组患者手术前后免疫指标情况对比(±s)
[1]
GarciaGranero A,Sánchez-Guillén L,Fletcher-Sanfeliu D, et al. Application of three-dimensional printing in laparoscopic dissection to facilitate D3-lymphadenectomy for right colon cancer[J]. Tech Coloproctol, 2018, 22(2): 129-133.
[2]
苏向前,张成海. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌CME根治术与策略[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(2): 95-98.
[3]
池畔,陈致奋. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术解剖学基础与规范化手术[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志:电子版,2015, 9(1): 7-13.
[4]
Pelz JOW,Wagner J,Lichthardt S, et al. Laparoscopic right-sided colon resection for colon cancer-has the control group so far been chosen correctly?[J]. World J Surg Oncol, 2018, 16(1): 117-117.
[5]
徐东楚,郭云虎,包磊,等. 腹腔镜下右半结肠癌根治术不同手术入路的疗效比较[J]. 中国现代普通外科进展,2016, 19(3): 226-228.
[6]
党建锋. 中国腹腔镜和开腹右半结肠癌根治术临床对比研究[J].中国实用医刊,2016, 43(11): 58-60.
[7]
Grieco M,Apa D,Spoletini D, et al. Major vessel sealing in?laparoscopic?surgery for colorectal?cancer: a single-center experience with 759 patients[J].World J Surg Oncol, 2018, 16(1): 101-101.
[8]
李松岩,杜晓辉,张维涛,等. 腹腔镜内侧入路右半结肠癌根治术临床观察[J]. 军医进修学院学报,2012, 33(8): 822-824.
[9]
顾德智,王正冬. 腹腔镜下不同入路右半结肠癌根治术治疗效果比较[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(6): 507-509.
[10]
张陈,魏健,杨玉辉,等. 腹腔镜"中间入路"全结肠系膜切除术治疗右半结肠癌[J].腹腔镜外科杂志,2015, 20(6): 433-436.
[11]
邹瞭南,李洪明,万进. 腹腔镜尾侧入路右半结肠癌根治性切除的安全性、可行性及临床应用价值[J/CD]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志,2016, 5(3): 238-243.
[12]
张明金,何俊峰,王仕琛,等. 基于3个外科平面的手术路径行右半结肠癌腹腔镜全结肠系膜切除术的临床效果分析[J/CD]. 中国医学前沿杂志(电子版), 2017, 9(1): 99-102.
[13]
史建中,钱山青,孙卫东,等. 中间入路法腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术55例临床体会[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志,2016, 21(10): 742-745.
[14]
Ioannidis A,Kontzoglou K,Kouraklis G, et al. Short-term outcomes in patients with colon cancer treated with robotic right colectomy[J]. J BUON, 2018, 23(2): 317-321.
[15]
钟俊斌,杨平,孙政,等. 腹腔镜辅助右半结肠癌根治术与传统开腹术对免疫功能及疗效的临床观察[J]. 广州医药,2017, 48(2): 99-101.
[16]
莫波,马娟,郝志楠,等. 结肠癌应用腹腔镜以及开腹手术治疗对机体免疫功能的影响比较[J]. 中国内镜杂志,2016, 22(6): 24-26.
[1] 张启龙, 柳亿, 卢会丽, 罗慧, 李成林, 王菁, 王辉. 奥妥珠单抗治疗磷脂酶A2受体相关膜性肾病的疗效与安全性:单中心回顾性分析[J/OL]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 379-384.
[2] 王杰, 袁泉, 王玥琦, 乔佳君, 谭春丽, 夏仲元, 刘守尧. 溃疡油在糖尿病足溃疡治疗中的应用效果及安全性观察[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 480-484.
[3] 王振宁, 杨康, 王得晨, 邹敏, 归明彬, 王雅楠, 徐明. 机器人与腹腔镜手术联合经自然腔道取标本对中低位直肠癌患者远期疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 437-442.
[4] 朴成林, 蓝炘, 司振铎, 李强, 冯健, 安峰铎, 冷建军. 胰十二指肠切除联合肝切除术疗效分析:附5例报告(附视频)[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 363-367.
[5] 崔宏帅, 冯丽明, 东维玲, 韩博. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术+IGLN清扫术治疗局部进展期结肠肝曲癌的临床效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 566-569.
[6] 丁志翔, 于鹏, 段绍斌. 血浆BRAF基因检测对腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术中行幽门淋巴结清扫的指导价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 570-573.
[7] 王维花, 王楠, 乔庆, 罗红. 完全腹腔镜右半结肠癌切除术两种腔内消化道重建方案对比研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 574-577.
[8] 孙龙凤, 侯高峰, 王幼黎, 刘磊. 腹腔镜下右半结肠癌D3根治术中SMA或SMV入路的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 438-441.
[9] 王浩源, 汪海洋, 孙建明, 陈以宽, 祁小桐, 唐博. 腹腔镜与开放修补对肝硬化腹外疝患者肝功能及凝血的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 654-659.
[10] 王鹏, 邵欣欣, 胡海涛, 田艳涛, 钟宇新. 改良MOBS 吻合法在全腹腔镜近端胃大部分切除中的应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 267-270.
[11] 何慧玲, 鲁祖斌, 冯嘉莉, 梁声强. 术前外周血NLR和PLR对结肠癌术后肝转移的影响[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 682-687.
[12] 关国欣, 罗福文. 结肠癌合并急性梗阻的个性化处理[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 459-463.
[13] 石阳, 于剑锋, 曹可, 翟志伟, 叶春祥, 王振军, 韩加刚. 可扩张金属支架置入联合新辅助化疗治疗完全梗阻性左半结肠癌围手术期并发症分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 464-471.
[14] 靳英, 付小霞, 陈美茹, 袁璐, 郝力瑶. CD147调控MAPK信号通路对结肠癌细胞增殖和凋亡的影响及机制研究[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 474-480.
[15] 傅新露, 李之岳, 卢丹. 妊娠合并结肠癌穿孔致脓毒症休克一例并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 227-231.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?