切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (02) : 144 -147. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2018.02.017

所属专题: 文献

论著

肠系膜下动脉低位结扎和高位结扎对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术的疗效影响
许涛1,(), 胡江涛1   
  1. 1. 066600 秦皇岛市第二医院普外科 秦皇岛
  • 收稿日期:2017-06-01 出版日期:2018-02-26
  • 通信作者: 许涛

Effect of low ligation and high ligation of inferior mesenteric artery on laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer

Tao Xu1,(), Jiangtao Hu1   

  1. 1. Department of general surgery; the second hospital of Qinhuangda, Qinhuangdao 066600, China
  • Received:2017-06-01 Published:2018-02-26
  • Corresponding author: Tao Xu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Xu Tao, Email:
  • Supported by:
    Qinhuangdao science and technology research and development plan in 2016(No.201602A067)
引用本文:

许涛, 胡江涛. 肠系膜下动脉低位结扎和高位结扎对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术的疗效影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(02): 144-147.

Tao Xu, Jiangtao Hu. Effect of low ligation and high ligation of inferior mesenteric artery on laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(02): 144-147.

目的

分析肠系膜下动脉(IMA)低位结扎和高位结扎对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术的疗效影响。

方法

以2013年3月至2017年3月收治的215例接受腹腔镜直肠癌根治术的患者为研究对象,进行回顾性分析。按照患者治疗术式,将接受IMA低位结扎者纳入低位结扎组127例,将接受IMA高位结扎者纳入高危结扎组88例。采用SPSS18.0进行分析,术后短期并发症发生情况采用χ2检验;手术情况、恢复情况等计量资料以(±s)表示,独立t检验,以P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

低位结扎组术中残端缺血性改变发生率和术后首次排气时间均低于高位结扎组,其术后性功能障碍或尿失禁发生率高于后者,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

腹腔镜直肠癌根治术中,两种结扎方式疗效相当,IMA低位结扎对于患者术后早期恢复具有积极意义,但较高危结扎有着更高的盆腔自主神经损伤风险,需根据患者实际情况做出决策。

Objective

To analyze the effect of low ligation and high ligation of inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) on laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer.

Methods

A total of 215 patients undergoing laparoscopic radical resection for rectal cancer were selected from March 2013 to March 2017 for this retrospective study. According to the operative method, 127 patients treated with low ligation of IMA were enrolled in the low ligation group (n=127), while the patients with high ligation of IMA were enrolled in the high ligation group (n=88). The data was analyzed by SPSS 18.0, short-term postoperative complications were examined by χ2 test; the data of operation and recovery were represented by (±s) and examined by t test, P<0.05 showed that the difference was statistically significant.

Results

The margin ischemic change rate, postoperative exhaust time for the first time of low ligation group were lower than those in the high ligation group, the postoperative sexual dysfunction or urinary incontinence rate was higher than that of the latter, the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05).

Conclusion

The effect of two ligation methods is quite good. IMA low ligation has positive significance for early postoperative recovery, but it has higher risk of pelvic autonomic nerve damage than high ligation. The decisions should be made based on the patient's actual situation.

表1 215例腹腔镜直肠癌根治术不同结扎方式两组患者一般临床资料比较(例)
表2 215例腹腔镜直肠癌根治术不同结扎方式两组患者手术情况比较(±s)
表3 215例腹腔镜直肠癌根治术不同结扎方式两组患者恢复情况比较(±s)
表4 215例腹腔镜直肠癌根治术不同结扎方式两组患者术后短期并发症比较(例)
[1]
Huang CW, Yeh YS, Su WC, et al. Robotic surgery with high dissection and low ligation technique for consecutive patients with rectal cancer following preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy[J]. International journal of colorectal disease, 2016, 31(6):1169-1177.
[2]
闾仁,黄盛,张再重,等. 腹腔镜下低位结扎肠系膜下动脉的Dixon观察[J]. 现代临床医学,2014, 40(1):17-19.
[3]
胡建昆,赵林勇.腹腔镜胃癌根治联合脏器切除的现状与发展[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2017,11(6):457-460.
[4]
Matsuda K, Hotta T, Takifuji K, et al. Randomized clinical trial of defaecatory function after anterior resection for rectal cancer with high versus low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery[J]. British Journal of Surgery, 2015, 102(5):501-508.
[5]
Matsuda M, Tsuruta M, Hasegawa H, et al. Transanal drainage tube placement to prevent anastomotic leakage following colorectal cancer surgery with double stapling reconstruction[J]. Surgery today, 2016, 46(5):613-620.
[6]
章斐然,李威,王怀明,等. 腹腔镜全直肠系膜联合经肛门内括约肌切除治疗低位直肠癌的疗效探讨[J/CD]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2014, 8(3):204-208.
[7]
兰平,何晓生. 腹腔镜直肠癌全直肠系膜切除术的标准化国际专家共识的解读[J]. 中国普外基础与临床杂志,2015, 22(5):517-519.
[8]
Bae SU, Min BS, Kim NK. Robotic low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery for rectal cancer using the firefly technique[J]. Yonsei medical journal, 2015, 56(4):1028-1035.
[9]
Shiomi A, Ito M, Maeda K, et al. Effects of a diverting stoma on symptomatic anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis of 1,014 consecutive patients[J]. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 2015, 220(2):186-194.
[10]
韩玉栋. 直肠癌手术肠系膜下动脉低位与高位结扎的临床研究[D]. 福建医科大学,2014.
[11]
Katsuno H, Shiomi A, Ito M, et al. Comparison of symptomatic anastomotic leakage following laparoscopic and open low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis of 1014 consecutive patients[J]. Surgical endoscopy, 2016, 30(7):2848-2856.
[12]
黄甫达,杨昌谋,郭俊宇,等. 腹腔镜直肠癌根治术与Dixon直肠癌根治术的临床疗效对比[J][J]. 世界华人消化杂志,2014, 22(2):291-295.
[13]
Jeong SY, Park JW, Nam BH, et al. Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid-rectal or low-rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): survival outcomes of an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial[J]. The Lancet Oncology, 2014, 15(7):767-774.
[14]
Yasuda K, Kawai K, Ishihara S, et al. Level of arterial ligation in sigmoid colon and rectal cancer surgery[J]. World journal of surgical oncology, 2016, 14(1):99.
[15]
谢铭,杨雪峰,黄韩冬. 超低位直肠癌保肛术[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2016, 10(3):198-198.
[16]
S?ndenaa K, Quirke P, Hohenberger W, et al. The rationale behind complete mesocolic excision (CME) and a central vascular ligation for colon cancer in open and laparoscopic surgery[J]. International journal of colorectal disease, 2014, 29(4):419-428.
[17]
Denost Q, Adam JP, Rullier A, et al. Perineal transanal approach: a new standard for laparoscopic sphincter-saving resection in low rectal cancer, a randomized trial[J]. Annals of surgery, 2014, 260(6):993-999.
[18]
Asari SA, Cho MS, Kim NK. Safe anastomosis in laparoscopic and robotic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a narrative review and outcomes study from an expert tertiary center[J]. European Journal of Surgical Oncology (EJSO), 2015, 41(2):175-185.
[1] 王振宁, 杨康, 王得晨, 邹敏, 归明彬, 王雅楠, 徐明. 机器人与腹腔镜手术联合经自然腔道取标本对中低位直肠癌患者远期疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 437-442.
[2] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[3] 吴晖, 佴永军, 施雪松, 魏晓为. 两种解剖入路下行直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 40-43.
[4] 周世振, 朱兴亚, 袁庆港, 刘理想, 王凯, 缪骥, 丁超, 汪灏, 管文贤. 吲哚菁绿荧光成像技术在腹腔镜直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫中的应用效果分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 44-47.
[5] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[6] 徐逸男. 不同术式治疗梗阻性左半结直肠癌的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 72-75.
[7] 李代勤, 刘佩杰. 动态增强磁共振评估中晚期低位直肠癌同步放化疗后疗效及预后的价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 100-103.
[8] 许月芳, 刘旺, 曾妙甜, 郭宇姝. 多粘菌素B和多粘菌素E治疗外科多重耐药菌感染临床疗效及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 700-703.
[9] 郑民华, 蒋天宇, 赵轩, 马君俊. 中国腹腔镜直肠癌根治术30年发展历程与未来[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 591-595.
[10] 池畔, 黄胜辉. 中国腹腔镜直肠癌根治术30年来的巨大进步[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 596-600.
[11] 李明, 屠松, 闫鹏, 钱军, 高鹏程, 许文山, 杨发英, 胡振涛, 单永玮. 应用前列腺电切镜引导置管治疗直肠低位吻合口漏研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 603-606.
[12] 李玲, 刘亚, 李培玲, 张秀敏, 李萍. 直肠癌患者术后肠道菌群的变化与抑郁症相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 607-610.
[13] 赵梓竣, 兰运升. 改良一针法末端回肠造口术对低位直肠癌保肛术后应激反应及安全性的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 611-614.
[14] 吴胜伟, 王志伟, 陈贵进, 刘序, 吴晓翔. 系膜肥厚低位直肠癌患者改良NOSES Ⅰ式手术的临床效果评价[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 615-618.
[15] 刘福成, 赵欣, 乔海朋, 刘晓峰, 张翀, 张宗明. 保留左结肠动脉的肠系膜下动脉根部淋巴结清扫对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术的疗效影响[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 647-653.
阅读次数
全文


摘要