切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (06) : 615 -618. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2024.06.008

论著

系膜肥厚低位直肠癌患者改良NOSES Ⅰ式手术的临床效果评价
吴胜伟1, 王志伟1, 陈贵进1, 刘序1, 吴晓翔1,()   
  1. 1. 510180 广州,中国人民解放军南部战区总医院普通外科
  • 收稿日期:2024-03-06 出版日期:2029-12-26
  • 通信作者: 吴晓翔

Evaluation of clinical effects of modified NOSESⅠ surgery in patients with mesangial hypertrophy and low rectal cancer

Shengwei Wu1, Zhiwei Wang1, Guijin Chen1, Xu Liu1, Xiaoxiang Wu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, General Hospital of PLA Southern Theater Command, Guangzhou Guangdong Province 510180, China
  • Received:2024-03-06 Published:2029-12-26
  • Corresponding author: Xiaoxiang Wu
引用本文:

吴胜伟, 王志伟, 陈贵进, 刘序, 吴晓翔. 系膜肥厚低位直肠癌患者改良NOSES Ⅰ式手术的临床效果评价[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 615-618.

Shengwei Wu, Zhiwei Wang, Guijin Chen, Xu Liu, Xiaoxiang Wu. Evaluation of clinical effects of modified NOSESⅠ surgery in patients with mesangial hypertrophy and low rectal cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(06): 615-618.

目的

评价系膜肥厚的低位直肠癌经自然腔道取标本术(NOSES)Ⅰ式手术的改进效果。

方法

选取2021年1月至2023年6月60例行NOSESⅠ式手术的系膜肥厚低位直肠癌患者为研究对象,按照住院病床号随机分为对照组和改进组,每组各30例。对照组行常规腹腔镜直肠癌NOSESⅠ式A法手术,改进组行改进后的腹腔镜直肠癌NOSESⅠ式手术。应用软件SPSS 22.0分析数据,围手术期指标、肛门功能指标等计量资料以()表示,采用独立样本t检验;并发症发生率等计数资料用[例(%)]表示,采用χ2检验。P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

改进组在手术时长及住院费用上较对照组显著降低(P<0.05),拖出成功率显著提高(P<0.05),而两组在其他手术相关指标及并发症的总发生率上比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。时间与方法在大便失禁严重严重程度评分(Wexner评分)、St. Marks大便失禁评分(Vaizey评分)及低位直肠前切除综合征评分(LARS评分)上不存在交互作用(P>0.05);时间在Wexner、Vaizey及LARS评分上主效应显著(P<0.05);方法在Wexner、Vaizey及LARS评分上主效应不显著(P>0.05)。

结论

NOSESⅠ式手术的改进在治疗系膜肥厚的低位直肠癌中是安全可行的,在获得与NOSESⅠ式A法手术相当的疗效的同时,具有手术时间短、治疗费用低及拖出成功率高等优势,更值得临床的重视及推广。

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy of NOSESⅠ surgery for low rectal cancer with mesangial hypertrophy.

Methods

Sixty patients with mesangial hyperplasia and low rectal cancer who underwent NOSESⅠ surgery from January 2021 to June 2023 were selected as study subjects and randomly divided into control group and improved group according to hospital bed number, with 30 patients in each group. The control group underwent conventional laparoscopic NOSESⅠ type A surgery, and the improvement group underwent improved laparoscopic NOSESⅠ type surgery. SPSS 22.0 software was used to analyze the data. Measurement data such as perioperative indexes and anal function indexes were expressed as (), and independent sample t test was used. Statistical data such as complication rate were expressed by [cases (%)] using χ2 test. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Compared with the control group, the operation duration and hospitalization cost in the improved group were significantly reduced (P<0.05), and the success rate of pulling out was significantly increased (P<0.05), while there were no statistically significant differences in other operation-related indicators and the total incidence of complications between the two groups (P>0.05). There was no interaction between time and method on the severity of fecal incontinence score (Wexner score), St. Marks fecal incontinence score (Vaizey score) and LARS score (LARS score) (P>0.05). The main effect of time on Wexner, Vaizey and LARS scores was significant (P<0.05). Methods The main effect on Wexner, Vaizey and LARS scores was not significant (P>0.05).

Conclusion

The improvement of NOSESⅠ surgery is safe and feasible in the treatment of low rectal cancer with mesangial hyperplasia, and has the advantages of short operation time, low treatment cost and high success rate of NOSESⅠ surgery, so it deserves clinical attention and promotion.

表1 两组患者基本资料比较
表2 两组患者围手术期指标比较(
表3 两组患者术后并发症情况比较[例(%)]
表4 两组患者术后不同时间肛门功能评分情况比较(分,
[1]
郑莹,王泽洲. 全球结直肠癌流行数据解读[J].中华流行病学杂志202142(01): 149-152.
[2]
Stoffel EMMurphy CC. Epidemiology and mechanisms of the increasing incidence of colon and rectal cancers in young adults[J]. Gastroenterology2020158(2): 341-353.
[3]
Zhou ZChen LLiu J,et al. Laparoscopic Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery versus Conventional Surgery in Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials[J]. Gastroenterol Res Pract20222022: 6661651.
[4]
徐福建,谢铭. 经自然腔道取标本在腹腔镜直肠癌根治术中的应用进展[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版)202115(01):107-110.
[5]
刘孟承,黄贲,任志鹏,等. 超重直肠癌患者NOSES手术可行性的影响因素分析[J/CD].中华结直肠疾病电子杂志202110(03):243-249.
[6]
Li ZWang QFeng Q,et al. Laparoscopic intersphincteric resection vs. transanal total mesorectal excision in overweight patients with low rectal cancer[J]. Front Surg20229:984680.
[7]
Yu LLang J. Diagnosis-related Groups(DRG)pricing and payment policy in China: where are we[J]. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr20209(6):771-773.
[8]
中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会. 中国结直肠癌诊疗规范(2020年版)[J].中国实用外科杂志202040(06): 601-625.
[9]
亓军,周童,刘伟,等. 腹部无切口经肛门外翻切除的腹腔镜下低位直肠癌根治术的疗效分析[J].中国现代普通外科进展202023(07): 515-517,522.
[10]
王小林,马任远,尹金祥,等. 腹腔镜经自然腔道取标本与传统腹腔镜直肠低位前切除术的临床疗效对比分析[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版)202014(01): 50-53.
[11]
Zhang MLiu ZWang X. Is natural orifice specimen extraction surgery the future direction of minimally invasive colorectal surgery[J]. Surg Open Sci202210: 106-110.
[12]
白东晓,李磊,郭志朋,等. DRGs下的腹腔镜结直肠癌NOSES手术改进[J].中国肿瘤临床202350(07): 352-355.
[13]
陈海鹏,马晓龙,卢召,等. 系膜优先,外拉内推外翻法在直肠癌NOSES手术中的应用[J/CD].中华结直肠疾病电子杂志202110(05): 532-535.
[1] 王振宁, 杨康, 王得晨, 邹敏, 归明彬, 王雅楠, 徐明. 机器人与腹腔镜手术联合经自然腔道取标本对中低位直肠癌患者远期疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 437-442.
[2] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[3] 吴晖, 佴永军, 施雪松, 魏晓为. 两种解剖入路下行直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 40-43.
[4] 周世振, 朱兴亚, 袁庆港, 刘理想, 王凯, 缪骥, 丁超, 汪灏, 管文贤. 吲哚菁绿荧光成像技术在腹腔镜直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫中的应用效果分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 44-47.
[5] 徐逸男. 不同术式治疗梗阻性左半结直肠癌的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 72-75.
[6] 李代勤, 刘佩杰. 动态增强磁共振评估中晚期低位直肠癌同步放化疗后疗效及预后的价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 100-103.
[7] 郑民华, 蒋天宇, 赵轩, 马君俊. 中国腹腔镜直肠癌根治术30年发展历程与未来[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 591-595.
[8] 池畔, 黄胜辉. 中国腹腔镜直肠癌根治术30年来的巨大进步[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 596-600.
[9] 李明, 屠松, 闫鹏, 钱军, 高鹏程, 许文山, 杨发英, 胡振涛, 单永玮. 应用前列腺电切镜引导置管治疗直肠低位吻合口漏研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 603-606.
[10] 李玲, 刘亚, 李培玲, 张秀敏, 李萍. 直肠癌患者术后肠道菌群的变化与抑郁症相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 607-610.
[11] 赵梓竣, 兰运升. 改良一针法末端回肠造口术对低位直肠癌保肛术后应激反应及安全性的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 611-614.
[12] 韩加刚, 王振军. 梗阻性左半结肠癌的治疗策略[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 450-458.
[13] 梁轩豪, 李小荣, 李亮, 林昌伟. 肠梗阻支架置入术联合新辅助化疗治疗结直肠癌急性肠梗阻的疗效及其预后的Meta 分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 472-482.
[14] 严虹霞, 王晓娟, 张毅勋. 2 型糖尿病对结直肠癌患者肿瘤标记物、临床病理及预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 483-487.
[15] 赵磊, 刘文志, 林峰, 于剑, 孙铭骏, 崔佑刚, 张旭, 衣宇鹏, 于宝胜, 冯宁. 深部热疗在改善结直肠癌术后辅助化疗副反应及生活质量中的作用研究[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 488-493.
阅读次数
全文


摘要