切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (01) : 100 -103. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2025.01.027.

论著

动态增强磁共振评估中晚期低位直肠癌同步放化疗后疗效及预后的价值
李代勤1,(), 刘佩杰1   
  1. 1.614000 四川乐山,武警四川省总队医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2024-11-20 出版日期:2025-02-26
  • 通信作者: 李代勤

Value of dynamic enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating the efficacy and prognosis of middle and advanced low rectal cancer after concurrent chemoradiotherapy

Daiqin Li1,(), Peijie Liu1   

  1. 1.Department of General Surgery, Sichuan Provincial Armed Police Corps Hospital, Leshan Sichuan Province 614000, China
  • Received:2024-11-20 Published:2025-02-26
  • Corresponding author: Daiqin Li
引用本文:

李代勤, 刘佩杰. 动态增强磁共振评估中晚期低位直肠癌同步放化疗后疗效及预后的价值[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 100-103.

Daiqin Li, Peijie Liu. Value of dynamic enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating the efficacy and prognosis of middle and advanced low rectal cancer after concurrent chemoradiotherapy[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(01): 100-103.

目的

研究动态增强磁共振(DCE-MRI)评估中晚期低位直肠癌同步放化疗后疗效及预后的价值。

方法

选取2019年1月至2022年1月收治的112例中晚期低位直肠癌同步放化疗患者,根据实体瘤疗效评价标准分为稳定组(n=53例,病灶稳定)和进展组(n=59例,病灶进展)。均行DCE-MRI检查。对比两组同步放化疗前后DCE-MRI参数[容积转移产量(Ktrans)、速率常数(Kep)、血管外细胞外间隙容积分数(Ve)]。采用SPSS 22.0统计学软件处理数据,肿瘤形态指标、DCE-MRI参数采用(x± s)表示,组间对比采用独立样本t检验;复发率等计数资料计算其构成比,采用卡方检验;一致性分析采取kappa检验。 P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

与同步放化疗前比较,放化疗后及放化疗结束1个月后直肠癌肿瘤长度、肿瘤肠壁厚度均明显降低(P<0.05),但两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组同步放化疗前直肠癌肿瘤长度、肿瘤肠壁厚度比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),稳定组放化疗后及放化疗1个月后直肠癌肿瘤长度、肿瘤肠壁厚度均低于进展组(P<0.05)。稳定组同步放化疗前Ktrans、Kep高于进展组(P<0.05),Ve较进展组比较差异无统计意义(P>0.05);两组同步放化疗后Ktrans、Kep、Ve均较同步放化疗前降低(P<0.05);稳定组同步放化疗后Ktrans、Kep低于进展组(P<0.05),Ve较进展组比较差异无统计意义(P>0.05)。随访1年,112例中晚期低位直肠癌患者中,失访6例,其中死亡6例;经病理学检查其余100例中晚期低位直肠癌患者中,复发16例,复发率为16%(16/100),DCE-MRI检查复发14例,复发率为14%(14/100),DCE-MRI与病理检查结果相比有较好一致性(Kappa=0.813,P=0.000)。

结论

DCE-MRI在中晚期低位直肠癌同步放化疗预后评估中有重要价值,值得推广。

Objective

To investigate the value of dynamic enhanced magnetic resonance imaging(DCE-MRI) in evaluating the efficacy and prognosis of middle and advanced low rectal cancer after concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

Methods

A total of 112 patients with concurrent chemoradiotherapy for middle and advanced low rectal cancer treated from January 2019 to January 2022 were selected and divided into stable group (n=53 cases, stable lesion) and progressive group (n=59 cases, progressive lesion) according to the evaluation criteria of solid tumor efficacy.All patients were examined by DCE-MRI.DCE-MRI parameters (volume transfer yield (Ktrans), rate constant (Kep), extracellular space volume fraction (Ve)) were compared between the two groups before and after simultaneous chemoradiotherapy.SPSS 22.0 was used to process the data.Tumor morphological indexes and DCE-MRI parameters were expressed as (x ± s), and independent sample t test was used for comparison between groups.The composition ratio was calculated by counting data such as recurrence rate and Chi-Square test was used.Kappa test was used for consistency analysis.P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Compared with before chemoradiotherapy, the length of rectal cancer tumor and the thickness of tumor intestinal wall were significantly decreased after chemoradiotherapy and 1 month after chemoradiotherapy (P<0.05), but there was no statistical significance between the two groups (P>0.05).There was no significant difference in the length and thickness of rectal cancer before chemoradiotherapy between the two groups (P>0.05).The length and thickness of rectal cancer after chemoradiotherapy and 1 month after chemoradiotherapy in the stable group were lower than those in the advanced group (P<0.05).Before chemoradiotherapy, Ktrans and Kep in stable group were higher than those in advanced group(P<0.05), but there was no statistical difference in Ve group (P>0.05).Ktrans, Kep and Ve were decreased after chemoradiotherapy in both groups compared with before chemoradiotherapy (P<0.05).After concurrent chemoradiotherapy, Ktrans and Kep in stable group were lower than those in advanced group (P<0.05), and there was no statistical significance in Ve group compared with advanced group (P>0.05).1 year follow-up, 112 patients with middle and advanced low rectal cancer, 6 cases lost follow-up, including 6 cases died; Among the other 100 patients with middle and advanced low rectal cancer, 16 cases recurred by pathological examination,with a recurrence rate of 16% (16/100), and 14 cases recurred by DCE-MRI examination, with a recurrence rate of 14% (14/100).Compared with the results of pathological examination, there was a good consistency between DCE-MRI and pathological examination (Kappa=0.813, P=0.000).

Conclusion

DCE-MRI has important value in the prognosis assessment of concurrent chemoradiotherapy for middle and advanced low rectal cancer,and is worth popularizing.

表1 两组患者一般临床资料比较
表2 两组患者肿瘤形态变化比较(±s
表3 两组患者同步放化疗前后DCE-MRI参数比较(±s
表4 DCE-MRI与病理学检查评估复发率一致性分析(例)
[1]
马翔,刘安文,邱建夫,等.不同腹腔镜经腹会阴联合切除术治疗低位直肠癌的近中期随访比较[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(01): 48-51.
[2]
周振,沈浮,陆海迪,等.动态增强磁共振成像术前评估直肠癌肿瘤出芽等级的价值[J].中国医学计算机成像杂志, 2022,28(04): 379-384.
[3]
郭晓霖,薛良圆,田春梅,等.多模态磁共振成像在评估直肠癌术前分期、放化疗后再分期、放化疗疗效中的应用研究进展[J].磁共振成像, 2023, 14(09): 181-185.
[4]
肖建云,杨志勇,肖志锋.磁共振T2WI图像纹理分析在直肠癌T2/3分期中的应用价值[J].中国医药导报, 2023, 20(16):154-157.
[5]
孙静,陈阳,侯学文,等.基于多模态磁共振图像的直肠癌TN分期方法研究进展[J].国际生物医学工程杂志, 2023, 46(01):66-73.
[6]
王晨,徐青,余静,等.MRI影像组学评估直肠癌新辅助放化疗疗效[J].实用放射学杂志, 2022, 38(5): 759-763.
[7]
中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会医政医管局, 中华医学会肿瘤学分会.结直肠癌诊疗规范(2015年版[)J].肿瘤综合治疗电子杂志, 2017, 3(01): 19-19.
[8]
郑民华,马君俊,赵轩.中国腹腔镜直肠癌根治术式选择原则与规范化[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2022,16(01): 5-8.
[9]
王振,高星,王金勇.多层螺旋CT显像对结直肠癌术后再分期、区域淋巴结转移及疗效的评估价值[J].实用癌症杂志,2022, 37(07): 1125-1127, 1139.
[10]
王智清,陶芳旭,彭容,等.DCE-MRI预测进展期直肠癌新辅助放化疗效果中的应用价值[J].中国CT和MRI杂志, 2020,18(01): 137-139.
[11]
黄文,代欢欢,张文娟.DCE-MRI及IVIM在评估直肠癌患者胸苷酸合成酶表达水平中的价值[J].临床放射学杂志, 2021,40(04): 746-750.
[12]
陈照宏,尹建东,李晓晗,等.直肠癌血管生成参数及临床病理参数与动态增强磁共振血流灌注参数的相关性[J].现代肿瘤医学, 2020, 28(16): 2817-2821.
[13]
中华医学会放射学分会医学影像大数据与人工智能工作委员会,中国研究型医院学会医学影像与人工智能专业委员会,中国医师协会临床精准医疗专业委员会,等.影像组学多模态MRI量化分析用于直肠癌新辅助治疗后疗效及预后评估的方法学专家共识[J].中华放射学杂志, 2022, 56(06): 608-615.
[14]
张玉英,马骏,孙晓峰.基于磁共振T2加权图像的纹理分析评估直肠癌化疗后疗效的价值[J].分子影像学杂志, 2023,46(02): 307-310.
[15]
梁良,傅丽晖,王波,等.高分辨率磁共振成像辅助腹腔镜低位直肠癌手术的效果分析[J].中国内镜杂志, 2022, 28(05):20-26.
[1] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[2] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[3] 屈翔宇, 张懿刚, 李浩令, 邱天, 谈燚. USP24及其共表达肿瘤代谢基因在肝细胞癌中的诊断和预后预测作用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 659-662.
[4] 顾雯, 凌守鑫, 唐海利, 甘雪梅. 两种不同手术入路在甲状腺乳头状癌患者开放性根治性术中的应用比较[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 687-690.
[5] 付成旺, 杨大刚, 王榕, 李福堂. 营养与炎症指标在可切除胰腺癌中的研究进展[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 704-708.
[6] 梁孟杰, 朱欢欢, 王行舟, 江航, 艾世超, 孙锋, 宋鹏, 王萌, 刘颂, 夏雪峰, 杜峻峰, 傅双, 陆晓峰, 沈晓菲, 管文贤. 联合免疫治疗的胃癌转化治疗患者预后及术后并发症分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 619-623.
[7] 张志兆, 王睿, 郜苹苹, 王成方, 王成, 齐晓伟. DNMT3B与乳腺癌预后的关系及其生物学机制[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 624-629.
[8] 孙建娜, 孔令军, 任崇禧, 穆坤, 王晓蕊. 266例首诊Ⅳ期乳腺癌手术患者预后分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 502-505.
[9] 袁庆港, 刘理想, 张亮, 周世振, 高波, 丁超, 管文贤. 尿素-肌酐比值(UCR)可预测结直肠癌患者术后的长期预后[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 506-509.
[10] 黄福, 王黔, 金相任, 唐云川. VEGFR2、miR-27a-5p在胃癌组织中的表达与临床病理参数及预后的关系研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 558-561.
[11] 李伟, 宋子健, 赖衍成, 周睿, 吴涵, 邓龙昕, 陈锐. 人工智能应用于前列腺癌患者预后预测的研究现状及展望[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 541-546.
[12] 关小玲, 周文营, 陈洪平. PTAAR在乙肝相关慢加急性肝衰竭患者短期预后中的预测价值[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 841-845.
[13] 张润锦, 阳盼, 林燕斯, 刘尊龙, 刘建平, 金小岩. EB病毒相关胆管癌伴多发转移一例及国内文献复习[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 865-869.
[14] 陈晓鹏, 王佳妮, 练庆海, 杨九妹. 肝细胞癌VOPP1表达及其与预后的关系[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 876-882.
[15] 郭曌蓉, 王歆光, 刘毅强, 何英剑, 王立泽, 杨飏, 汪星, 曹威, 谷重山, 范铁, 李金锋, 范照青. 不同亚型乳腺叶状肿瘤的临床病理特征及预后危险因素分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 524-532.
阅读次数
全文


摘要