Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (05): 518-520. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2019.05.028

Special Issue:

• Original Article • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Surgical technique and efficacy of internal colon bypass in the protection of anastomotic stoma of low rectal cancer

Lianguo Yang1, Zongqing Peng1,()   

  1. 1. Xiangyang City, Hubei Province Central Hospital, Hubei Province, Xiangyang, Hubei 441021, China
  • Received:2018-09-06 Online:2019-10-26 Published:2019-10-26
  • Contact: Zongqing Peng
  • About author:
    Correspondent author: Peng Zongqing, Email:

Abstract:

Objective

To investigate the the surgical technique and evaluate the efficacy of internal colon bypass in the protection of anastomotic stoma of low rectal cancer.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was made on 140 patients who underwent anus-preserving operation for low rectal cancer combined with internal colon by-pass (the colonic bypass group) and 30 patients who underwent anus-preserving operation combined with loop ileostomy (the ileostomy group) from January 2012 to May 2018. SPSS20.0 statistical software was used to analyze. The intraoperative and postoperative related indicators were showed as " mean±standard deviation" , and compared with independent t test. Postoperative Dukes staging and anastomotic leakage were analyzed by chi square. P<0.05 meant a statistically significant difference.

Results

The operative time in the colon bypass group was significantly shorter than that in the ileostomy group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in anastomotic height and postoperative Dukes staging between the two groups (P>0.05). Compared with ileostomy group, the first anal exhaust time and first feeding time of colon bypass group were significantly longer, the hospitalization time was significantly shorter, and the hospitalization cost was significantly lower (P<0.05). The incidence of anastomotic leakage was 2.9% in the colon bypass group and 16.7% in the ileostomy group. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant(χ2=5.522, P<0.05). The drainage time after anastomotic leakage and the incidence of anastomotic stenosis 2 months after operation in the colon bypass group were significantly lower than those in the ileostomy group (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Colon bypass is a safe and effective way to protect anastomotic stoma in low rectal cancer.

Key words: Rectal neoplasms, Surgical stomas, Jejunoileal bypass, Treatment outcome

京ICP 备07035254号-3
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 66721881; 64049986 E-mail: zhpwkssx@126.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd