切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (03) : 315 -318. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2024.03.021

论著

SII对局部进展期胃癌nCRT+腹腔镜胃癌根治术后并发症及预后的影响研究
王东阳1,(), 林琳1, 娄熙彬1   
  1. 1. 350001 福州,联勤保障部队第900医院普通外科
  • 收稿日期:2023-06-15 出版日期:2024-06-26
  • 通信作者: 王东阳

Effect of SII on complications and prognosis after nCRT+ laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer

Dongyang Wang1,(), Lin Lin1, Xibin Lou1   

  1. 1. The 900th Hospital General Surgery, Fuzhou 350001, China
  • Received:2023-06-15 Published:2024-06-26
  • Corresponding author: Dongyang Wang
引用本文:

王东阳, 林琳, 娄熙彬. SII对局部进展期胃癌nCRT+腹腔镜胃癌根治术后并发症及预后的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 315-318.

Dongyang Wang, Lin Lin, Xibin Lou. Effect of SII on complications and prognosis after nCRT+ laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(03): 315-318.

目的

分析系统炎症反应指数(SII)对局部进展期胃癌新辅助治疗(nCRT)+腹腔镜胃癌根治术后并发症及预后的影响。

方法

回顾性分析2018年1月至2020年12月行nCRT+腹腔镜胃癌根治术的103例患者资料,根据术前SII的中位数分为高SII组(≥551.9,n=55例)和低SII组(<551.9,n=48例)。采用SPSS 21.0完成数据分析。并发症等计数资料比较采用χ2检验,水肿和纤维化分级等比较采用秩和检验;围手术期指标等计量资料用()表示,行独立样本t检验;采用Kaplan-Meier生存函数分析不同SII组患者预后情况。P<0.05差异有统计学意义。

结果

高SII组患者手术时间、胃/食管-空肠Roux-Y吻合时间、术后住院时间显著长于低SII组(P<0.05);两组患者术中胃、胃周围淋巴结和周围肠管等组织水肿、纤维化分级比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组患者术后并发症总发生率比较(16.4% vs. 8.3%),差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但高SII组并发症Clavien-Dindo分级Ⅲ级患者占比明显多于低SII组(P<0.05);高SII组患者累积总生存期(OS)和累积无病生存期(DFS)显著低于低SII组(Log-rank χ2=4.790、3.986,P=0.032、0.044)。

结论

nCRT后腹腔镜胃癌根治术术前SII越高的患者,其胃、胃周围淋巴结和周围肠管等组织水肿和纤维化程度越严重,增加了手术和吻合难度,延长了手术时间,患者术后并发症分级更高,预后更差。

Objective

To analyze the effects of systemic inflammatory response index (SII) on complications and prognosis after neoadjuvant therapy (nCRT) + laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer.

Methods

The data of 103 patients who underwent nCRT+ laparoscopic radical gastrectomy from January 2018 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed, and according to the median preoperative SII, they were divided into high SII group (≥551.9, n=55) and high SII group (<551.9, n=48). SPSS 21.0 was used to complete the data analysis. χ2 test was used to compare the count data of complications, rank sum test was used to compare the grade of edema and fibrosis. Measurement data such as perioperative indexes were expressed as (), and independent sample t test was used. Kaplan-Meier survival function was used to analyze the prognosis of patients in different SII groups. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Operation time, gastric/esophago-jejunal Roux-Y anastomosis time and postoperative hospitalization time in high SII group were significantly longer than those in low SII group, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). There were statistically significant differences in the grade of edema and fibrosis in stomach, perigastric lymph nodes and surrounding intestinal duct between the two groups (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the total incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups (16.4% vs. 8.3%) (P>0.05). However, the proportion of Clavien-Dindo grade Ⅲ patients with complications in the high SII group was significantly higher than that in the low SII group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The cumulative OS and DFS in the high SII group were significantly lower than those in the low SII group (Log-rank χ2=4.790, 3.986, P=0.032, 0.044).

Conclusion

After neoadjuvant therapy, patients with higher SII before laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer had more severe edema and fibrosis in the stomach, perigastric lymph nodes and surrounding intestinal duct, which increased the difficulty of surgery and anastomosis, prolonged the operation time, and resulted in higher grade of postoperative complications and worse prognosis.

表1 高低SII两组患者临床资料比较
表2 高低SII两组患者围手术期指标比较(
表3 高低SII两组患者术中水肿、纤维化情况比较[例(%)]
表4 高低SII两组患者术后并发症比较(例)
图1 高低SII两组患者累积OS和DFS分析
[1]
Wang ZHan WXue F,et al. Nationwide gastric cancer prevention in China,2021-2035: a decision analysis on effect,affordability and cost-effectiveness optimisation[J]. Gut2022,71(12):2391-2400.
[2]
李磊,费建东,宋利琴,等.新辅助化疗结合腹腔镜胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的生存质量及生存率分析[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2020,14(01):66-69.
[3]
国家卫生健康委员会.胃癌诊疗规范(2018年版)[J].中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版),2019,9(03):118-144.
[4]
Fong CJohnston EStarling N. Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Therapy Approaches to Gastric Cancer[J]. Curr Treat Options Oncol2022,23(9):1247-1268.
[5]
Chen LKong XWang Z,et al. Pre-treatment systemic immune-inflammation index is a useful prognostic indicator in patients with breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy[J]. J Cell Mol Med2020,24(5):2993-3021.
[6]
Feng LXu RLin L,et al. Effect of the systemic immune-inflammation index on postoperative complications and the long-term prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study[J]. J Gastrointest Oncol2022,13(5):2333-2339.
[7]
Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2014(ver. 4)[J]. Gastric Cancer2017,20(1):1-19.
[8]
Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2018(5th edition)[J]. Gastric Cancer2021,24(1):1-21.
[9]
Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2018(5th edition)[J]. Gastric Cancer2021,24(1):1-21.
[10]
Xie HRuan GGe Y,et al. Inflammatory burden as a prognostic biomarker for cancer[J]. Clin Nutr2022,41(6):1236-1243.
[11]
Namikawa TYokota KYamaguchi S,et al. Evaluation of Systemic Inflammatory Response and Nutritional Biomarkers as Predictive Factors in Patients with Recurrent Gastric Cancer[J]. Oncology2020,98(7):452-459.
[12]
Zhao DBZhang XJ. Thinking of the application of membrane anatomy in gastric cancer surgery after neoadjuvant therapy[J]. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi2020,23(7):657-660.
[13]
Capovilla GFroiio CLang H,et al. Complete response after neoadjuvant therapy for gastric cancer: implications for surgery[J]. Chirurg, 2022,93(2):138-143.
[14]
Seika PBiebl MRaakow J,et al. The Association between Neoadjuvant Radio-Chemotherapy and Prolonged Healing of Anastomotic Leakage after Esophageal Resection Treated with EndoVAC Therapy[J]. J Clin Med2022,11(16):4773.
[15]
Nakazawa NSohda MTateno K,et al. Albumin-derived Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Score as a Marker of Nivolumab Treatment Sensitivity in Gastric Cancer: A Multicenter Study[J]. In Vivo, 2023,37(2):818-824.
[16]
何可,臧洲.T4期胃癌患者行腹腔镜根治术后远期预后的影响因素研究[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2021,15(04):404-406.
[17]
Tokumaru SKoizumi TSekino Y,et al. Lymphocyte-to-Monocyte Ratio Is a Predictive Biomarker of Response to Treatment with Nivolumab for Gastric Cancer[J]. Oncology2021,99(10):632-640.
[18]
Nøst THAlcala KUrbarova I,et al. Systemic inflammation markers and cancer incidence in the UK Biobank[J]. Eur J Epidemiol2021,36(8):841-848.
[1] 杨尹默, 陈依然, 田孝东. 努力提高腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术的规范化水平[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 237-242.
[2] 张太平, 刘悦泽. 腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术要点与原则[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 243-245.
[3] 王槐志, 孙丕绛, 崔上. 腹腔镜下胰十二指肠切除术的难点与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 246-248.
[4] 孟宇, 李金超, 刘金来, 刘晨, 王振勇. 新辅助化疗后LPD钩突切除中先动脉后静脉原则的安全性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 251-254.
[5] 浦凌宵, 诸俊浩, 陶亮, 王峰, 王萌, 管文贤. 低黏附性胃癌PET/CT影像学特征和脂代谢相关机制研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 255-260.
[6] 丁关棣, 黄云, 曹震, 刘刚. 胃癌根治术后感染性并发症预测:基于真实世界数据的Nomogram模型开发与验证[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 261-266.
[7] 宫向良, 刘征, 丁梅. 基于膜解剖D2+CME根治术治疗胃癌的近中期随访研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 267-270.
[8] 金田力, 袁文正, 付涛. 单孔腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术后尿管拔除时机探讨[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 271-274.
[9] 杜彦斌, 黄涛, 寇天阔, 石英. 双镜联合根治术与腹腔镜根治术在早期结肠癌患者中的应用效果[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 275-278.
[10] 张聃, 王毅, 冯文迪, 方兴中. 完整结肠系膜切除术与传统根治术治疗结肠癌对患者生存期的影响观察[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 279-282.
[11] 李娇娇, 张军, 徐顺. 全程新辅助治疗联合全直肠系膜切除术对局部进展期直肠癌预后的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 283-286.
[12] 张阳, 纽燕娜, 常丽蓉, 唐国华, 赵萍. ERAS理念下肝棘球蚴病术后并发症风险预测模型构建[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 287-290.
[13] 唐浩, 梁平, 程千里, 徐小江, 曾凯, 文拨辉. 基于数字化微创技术对复杂性肝胆管结石患者胆道、肝静脉、门静脉解剖与变异情况及应用效果研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 291-294.
[14] 张立一, 徐春晓, 单玉玺. sEST联合不同扩张时间EPBD治疗胆总管结石的随机临床试验[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 295-298.
[15] 邢益民, 张天飞, 戴慧勇. 胃肠充盈超声造影检查在反酸、嗳气患者临床诊断中的应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 303-306.
阅读次数
全文


摘要