切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (03) : 283 -286. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2024.03.013

论著

全程新辅助治疗联合全直肠系膜切除术对局部进展期直肠癌预后的影响研究
李娇娇1,(), 张军1, 徐顺1   
  1. 1. 236000 安徽阜阳,阜阳市人民医院
  • 收稿日期:2023-11-28 出版日期:2024-06-26
  • 通信作者: 李娇娇

Effect of total neoadjuvant therapy combined with total mesorectal excision on prognosis of locally advanced rectal cancer

Jiaojiao Li1,(), Jun Zhang1, Shun Xu1   

  1. 1. Fuyang People’s Hospital, Fuyang Anhui Province 236000, China
  • Received:2023-11-28 Published:2024-06-26
  • Corresponding author: Jiaojiao Li
  • Supported by:
    Scientific Research Project of Anhui Provincial Health Commission in 2021(AHWJ2021a035)
引用本文:

李娇娇, 张军, 徐顺. 全程新辅助治疗联合全直肠系膜切除术对局部进展期直肠癌预后的影响研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 283-286.

Jiaojiao Li, Jun Zhang, Shun Xu. Effect of total neoadjuvant therapy combined with total mesorectal excision on prognosis of locally advanced rectal cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(03): 283-286.

目的

研究全程新辅助治疗(TNT)联合全直肠系膜切除(TME)对局部进展期直肠癌(LARC)预后的影响。

方法

选取50例2019年1月至2020年12月接受治疗的LARC患者为研究对象,按照数字表法将患者随机分为TNT组(TNT联合TME,n=25例)和传统组(传统新辅助治疗联合TME,n=25例)。采用SPSS 22.0统计软件分析数据,计量资料用()表示,采用独立样本t检验;计数资料用[例(%)]表示,采用秩和检验或χ2检验;生存分析采用Kaplan-Meier法并行Log-Rank检验。P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

两组患者临床完全缓解(cCR)率及不良反应情况比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组患者肿瘤消退分级(TRG)情况比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),且TNT组pCR率显著高于传统组(P<0.05);TNT组患者R0切除率显著高于传统组(P<0.05),两组患者围手术期的其他指标比较差异均未见统计学差异(P>0.05);Kaplan-Meier分析显示,TNT组和传统组患者的累积总生存率比较未见统计学差异(P>0.05),TNT组患者的累积无病生存率显著高于传统组(P<0.05)。

结论

TNT联合TME治疗LARC相较于传统新辅助治疗在不增加新辅助治疗不良反应、术后并发症及总生存率的前提下,近远期疗效显著,不仅可有效提高患者肿瘤的 pCR 率及 R0 切除率,还可提高患者的术后无病生存率,是一种安全、有效的治疗策略。

Objective

To investigate the effect of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) combined with total mesorectal excision (TME) on the prognosis of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC).

Methods

Fifty patients with LARC who received treatment from January 2019 to December 2020 were selected as the study objects, and the patients were randomly divided into the TNT group (TNT combined with TME, n=25 cases) and the traditional group (traditional neoadjuvant therapy combined with TME, n=25 cases) according to the numerical table method. SPSS 22.0 statistical software was used to analyze the data. The measurement data were expressed as () and independent sample t test was used. The count data were represented by [cases (%)] using Rank Sum test or χ2 test. Kaplan-Meier method and Log-Rank test were used for survival analysis. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

There was no significant difference in clinical complete response (cCR) rate and adverse reactions between the two groups (P>0.05). Tumor regression grade (TRG) was significantly different between the two groups (P<0.05), and the pCR rate of TNT group was significantly higher than that of traditional group (P<0.05). The R0 removal rate in TNT group was significantly higher than that in traditional group (P<0.05), and there were no significant differences in other perioperative indicators between the two groups (P>0.05). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that there was no significant difference in the cumulative overall survival rate between the TNT group and the traditional group (P>0.05), and the cumulative disease-free survival rate in the TNT group was significantly higher than that in the traditional group (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Compared with traditional neoadjuvant therapy, TNT combined with TME in the treatment of LARC has significant short-term and long-term efficacy without increasing adverse reactions, postoperative complications and overall survival rate of neoadjuvant therapy. It can not only effectively improve the pCR rate and R0 resection rate of patients' tumors, but also improve the postoperative disease-free survival rate of patients. It is a safe and effective treatment strategy.

表1 两组患者基线资料比较
表2 两组患者新辅助治疗疗效评估[例(%)]
表3 两组患者围手术期指标比较
图1 两组患者术后生存曲线
[1]
Qiu HCao SXu R. Cancer incidence,mortality,and burden in China: a time-trend analysis and comparison with the United States and United Kingdom based on the global epidemiological data released in 2020[J]. Cancer Commun(Lond)202141(10): 1037-1048.
[2]
郑民华,马君俊,赵轩. 中国腹腔镜直肠癌根治术式选择原则与规范化[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版)202216(01): 5-8.
[3]
Benson ABVenook APAl-Hawary MM,et al. Rectal Cancer,Version 2.2022,NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology[J]. J Natl Compr Canc Netw202220(10): 1139-1167.
[4]
王小豪,周程静,张术,等. 直肠癌新辅助治疗后临床完全缓解患者应用等待观察策略与根治性手术治疗的远期疗效对比分析[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志202023(03): 266-273.
[5]
Feng LLiu ZLi C,et al. Development and validation of a radiopathomics model to predict pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: a multicentre observational study[J]. Lancet Digit Health20224(1): e8-e17.
[6]
Kasi AAbbasi SHanda S,et al. Total Neoadjuvant Therapy vs Standard Therapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis[J]. JAMA Netw Open20203(12): e2030097.
[7]
赵鹏飞,满新贺,赵宏,等. 局部晚期直肠癌全程新辅助治疗的系统评价[J]. 中国医院用药评价与分析202323(02): 219-225.
[8]
Freites-Martinez ASantana NArias-Santiago S,et al. Using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events(CTCAE-Version 5.0)to Evaluate the Severity of Adverse Events of Anticancer Therapies[J]. Actas Dermo-Sifiliográficas2020112(1): 90-92.
[9]
顾晋. 腹腔镜直肠癌外科临床诊治中的问题与对策[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版)202216(01): 9-12.
[10]
Liu SJiang TXiao L,et al. Total Neoadjuvant Therapy(TNT)versus Standard Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis[J]. Oncologist202126(9): e1555-e1566.
[11]
Benson ABVenook APAl-Hawary MM,et al. Rectal Cancer,Version 2.2022,NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology[J]. J Natl Compr Canc Netw202220(10): 1139-1167.
[12]
王晔,楼征,季力强,等. 局部进展期直肠癌全程新辅助治疗临床应用进展[J]. 中国实用外科杂志202343(04): 461-464.
[1] 王振宁, 杨康, 王得晨, 邹敏, 归明彬, 王雅楠, 徐明. 机器人与腹腔镜手术联合经自然腔道取标本对中低位直肠癌患者远期疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 437-442.
[2] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[3] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[4] 吴晖, 佴永军, 施雪松, 魏晓为. 两种解剖入路下行直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 40-43.
[5] 周世振, 朱兴亚, 袁庆港, 刘理想, 王凯, 缪骥, 丁超, 汪灏, 管文贤. 吲哚菁绿荧光成像技术在腹腔镜直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫中的应用效果分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 44-47.
[6] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[7] 徐逸男. 不同术式治疗梗阻性左半结直肠癌的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 72-75.
[8] 李代勤, 刘佩杰. 动态增强磁共振评估中晚期低位直肠癌同步放化疗后疗效及预后的价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 100-103.
[9] 庄宝雄, 邓海军. 单孔+1腹腔镜直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 601-601.
[10] 李伟, 宋子健, 赖衍成, 周睿, 吴涵, 邓龙昕, 陈锐. 人工智能应用于前列腺癌患者预后预测的研究现状及展望[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 541-546.
[11] 陈樽, 王平, 金华, 周美玲, 李青青, 黄永刚. 肌肉减少症预测结直肠癌术后切口疝发生的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 639-644.
[12] 韩加刚, 王振军. 梗阻性左半结肠癌的治疗策略[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 450-458.
[13] 梁轩豪, 李小荣, 李亮, 林昌伟. 肠梗阻支架置入术联合新辅助化疗治疗结直肠癌急性肠梗阻的疗效及其预后的Meta 分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 472-482.
[14] 王景明, 王磊, 许小多, 邢文强, 张兆岩, 黄伟敏. 腰椎椎旁肌的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 846-852.
[15] 郭曌蓉, 王歆光, 刘毅强, 何英剑, 王立泽, 杨飏, 汪星, 曹威, 谷重山, 范铁, 李金锋, 范照青. 不同亚型乳腺叶状肿瘤的临床病理特征及预后危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 524-532.
阅读次数
全文


摘要