切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (03) : 283 -286. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2024.03.013

论著

全程新辅助治疗联合全直肠系膜切除术对局部进展期直肠癌预后的影响研究
李娇娇1,(), 张军1, 徐顺1   
  1. 1. 236000 安徽阜阳,阜阳市人民医院
  • 收稿日期:2023-11-28 出版日期:2024-06-26
  • 通信作者: 李娇娇

Effect of total neoadjuvant therapy combined with total mesorectal excision on prognosis of locally advanced rectal cancer

Jiaojiao Li1,(), Jun Zhang1, Shun Xu1   

  1. 1. Fuyang People’s Hospital, Fuyang Anhui Province 236000, China
  • Received:2023-11-28 Published:2024-06-26
  • Corresponding author: Jiaojiao Li
  • Supported by:
    Scientific Research Project of Anhui Provincial Health Commission in 2021(AHWJ2021a035)
引用本文:

李娇娇, 张军, 徐顺. 全程新辅助治疗联合全直肠系膜切除术对局部进展期直肠癌预后的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 283-286.

Jiaojiao Li, Jun Zhang, Shun Xu. Effect of total neoadjuvant therapy combined with total mesorectal excision on prognosis of locally advanced rectal cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(03): 283-286.

目的

研究全程新辅助治疗(TNT)联合全直肠系膜切除(TME)对局部进展期直肠癌(LARC)预后的影响。

方法

选取50例2019年1月至2020年12月接受治疗的LARC患者为研究对象,按照数字表法将患者随机分为TNT组(TNT联合TME,n=25例)和传统组(传统新辅助治疗联合TME,n=25例)。采用SPSS 22.0统计软件分析数据,计量资料用()表示,采用独立样本t检验;计数资料用[例(%)]表示,采用秩和检验或χ2检验;生存分析采用Kaplan-Meier法并行Log-Rank检验。P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

两组患者临床完全缓解(cCR)率及不良反应情况比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组患者肿瘤消退分级(TRG)情况比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),且TNT组pCR率显著高于传统组(P<0.05);TNT组患者R0切除率显著高于传统组(P<0.05),两组患者围手术期的其他指标比较差异均未见统计学差异(P>0.05);Kaplan-Meier分析显示,TNT组和传统组患者的累积总生存率比较未见统计学差异(P>0.05),TNT组患者的累积无病生存率显著高于传统组(P<0.05)。

结论

TNT联合TME治疗LARC相较于传统新辅助治疗在不增加新辅助治疗不良反应、术后并发症及总生存率的前提下,近远期疗效显著,不仅可有效提高患者肿瘤的 pCR 率及 R0 切除率,还可提高患者的术后无病生存率,是一种安全、有效的治疗策略。

Objective

To investigate the effect of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) combined with total mesorectal excision (TME) on the prognosis of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC).

Methods

Fifty patients with LARC who received treatment from January 2019 to December 2020 were selected as the study objects, and the patients were randomly divided into the TNT group (TNT combined with TME, n=25 cases) and the traditional group (traditional neoadjuvant therapy combined with TME, n=25 cases) according to the numerical table method. SPSS 22.0 statistical software was used to analyze the data. The measurement data were expressed as () and independent sample t test was used. The count data were represented by [cases (%)] using Rank Sum test or χ2 test. Kaplan-Meier method and Log-Rank test were used for survival analysis. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

There was no significant difference in clinical complete response (cCR) rate and adverse reactions between the two groups (P>0.05). Tumor regression grade (TRG) was significantly different between the two groups (P<0.05), and the pCR rate of TNT group was significantly higher than that of traditional group (P<0.05). The R0 removal rate in TNT group was significantly higher than that in traditional group (P<0.05), and there were no significant differences in other perioperative indicators between the two groups (P>0.05). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that there was no significant difference in the cumulative overall survival rate between the TNT group and the traditional group (P>0.05), and the cumulative disease-free survival rate in the TNT group was significantly higher than that in the traditional group (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Compared with traditional neoadjuvant therapy, TNT combined with TME in the treatment of LARC has significant short-term and long-term efficacy without increasing adverse reactions, postoperative complications and overall survival rate of neoadjuvant therapy. It can not only effectively improve the pCR rate and R0 resection rate of patients' tumors, but also improve the postoperative disease-free survival rate of patients. It is a safe and effective treatment strategy.

表1 两组患者基线资料比较
表2 两组患者新辅助治疗疗效评估[例(%)]
表3 两组患者围手术期指标比较
图1 两组患者术后生存曲线
[1]
Qiu HCao SXu R. Cancer incidence,mortality,and burden in China: a time-trend analysis and comparison with the United States and United Kingdom based on the global epidemiological data released in 2020[J]. Cancer Commun(Lond)202141(10): 1037-1048.
[2]
郑民华,马君俊,赵轩. 中国腹腔镜直肠癌根治术式选择原则与规范化[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版)202216(01): 5-8.
[3]
Benson ABVenook APAl-Hawary MM,et al. Rectal Cancer,Version 2.2022,NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology[J]. J Natl Compr Canc Netw202220(10): 1139-1167.
[4]
王小豪,周程静,张术,等. 直肠癌新辅助治疗后临床完全缓解患者应用等待观察策略与根治性手术治疗的远期疗效对比分析[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志202023(03): 266-273.
[5]
Feng LLiu ZLi C,et al. Development and validation of a radiopathomics model to predict pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: a multicentre observational study[J]. Lancet Digit Health20224(1): e8-e17.
[6]
Kasi AAbbasi SHanda S,et al. Total Neoadjuvant Therapy vs Standard Therapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis[J]. JAMA Netw Open20203(12): e2030097.
[7]
赵鹏飞,满新贺,赵宏,等. 局部晚期直肠癌全程新辅助治疗的系统评价[J]. 中国医院用药评价与分析202323(02): 219-225.
[8]
Freites-Martinez ASantana NArias-Santiago S,et al. Using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events(CTCAE-Version 5.0)to Evaluate the Severity of Adverse Events of Anticancer Therapies[J]. Actas Dermo-Sifiliográficas2020112(1): 90-92.
[9]
顾晋. 腹腔镜直肠癌外科临床诊治中的问题与对策[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版)202216(01): 9-12.
[10]
Liu SJiang TXiao L,et al. Total Neoadjuvant Therapy(TNT)versus Standard Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis[J]. Oncologist202126(9): e1555-e1566.
[11]
Benson ABVenook APAl-Hawary MM,et al. Rectal Cancer,Version 2.2022,NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology[J]. J Natl Compr Canc Netw202220(10): 1139-1167.
[12]
王晔,楼征,季力强,等. 局部进展期直肠癌全程新辅助治疗临床应用进展[J]. 中国实用外科杂志202343(04): 461-464.
[1] 杨立胜, 刘梦鸾, 任维聃, 姜国胜, 刘桂伟. 基于血清肿瘤标志物预测结直肠癌肝转移模型价值分析[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 39-43.
[2] 王晓梅, 刘冰, 马丽琼, 卢祖静, 苗建军. 基于LASSO-Cox回归分析的非轻症急性胰腺炎死亡风险列线图预测模型的建立和临床应用效果分析[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 44-50.
[3] 沈海龙, 张建国, 邵一阳, 周晓超, 郭春来, 匡哲. 局部进展期低位直肠癌伴侧方淋巴短径<10 mm新辅助治疗后TME+LLND术的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 192-195.
[4] 刘政宏, 王凤力, 吉亚君, 高佳. 胃癌中ELK3蛋白的表达与临床病理特征和预后的关系研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 155-159.
[5] 张琳, 李婷. CRIP1在胃癌中的表达及与临床病理指标和预后的关系研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 171-175.
[6] 朱显钟, 李金雨, 于忠英, 温路生. 淋巴结平均直径与无淋巴结转移肾癌病理特征及预后关系研究[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 146-151.
[7] 陈显育, 曾谣, 莫钊鸿, 翟航, 张广权, 钟造茂, 陈署贤. 生物信息学分析CETP基因在肝癌中表达及其对预后和免疫的影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(02): 214-219.
[8] 胡欣芫, 杨智義, 赵成俊, 张秋雨, 张挽乾, 潘佰猛, 张灵强. 急性胰腺炎评分系统预测病情严重程度的研究进展[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(02): 239-243.
[9] 王礼光, 严庆, 廖珊, 符荣党, 陈焕伟. 微血管侵犯及手术切缘对肝细胞癌患者术后生存预后的影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(02): 151-157.
[10] 马振威, 朱博, 刘赋斌, 邓正栋, 王剑明. 血小板和淋巴细胞比值联合CA19-9在胆囊癌术后患者预后评估中的价值[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(02): 163-168.
[11] 夏辉, 戴斌, 冉君, 王威, 龚昭, 周程. DEP结构域蛋白1B在肝细胞癌中的表达及功能[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(02): 205-213.
[12] 卓长华, 叶韵斌, 陈昌江, 简锦亮, 王志纬. 林奇综合征相关性异时性结直肠癌的治疗[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(01): 32-37.
[13] 马宁, 刘威, 陈志奇, 陈旭, 范宏伟, 殷响. "膜"解剖引导下的DaVinci机器人直肠癌手术与腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术临床疗效的对照研究[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(01): 45-53.
[14] 陈憩, 顾于蓓. 不同亚型上消化道克罗恩病的临床特点和预后差异研究[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(02): 121-127.
[15] 朱菡, 卓士超, 吴迪, 朱雅楠, 韩佳欣. 术前血浆纤维蛋白原、血脂水平及MMR表达与结直肠癌病理特点及预后的相关性[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(02): 141-145.
阅读次数
全文


摘要