切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (06) : 631 -635. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2023.06.013

论著

野生型RET与RET/PTC融合基因检测对甲状腺乳头状癌中央区淋巴结清扫的指导意义
樊丽超, 郭瑾瑛, 陈鑫()   
  1. 056200 河南三门峡,华北医疗健康集团峰峰总医院甲状腺乳腺外科
  • 收稿日期:2022-11-14 出版日期:2023-12-26
  • 通信作者: 陈鑫

The significance of detection of wild-type RET and RET/PTC fusion gene for lymph node dissection in the central region of papillary thyroid carcinoma

Lichao Fan, Jinying Guo, Xin Chen()   

  1. Department of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, Fengfeng General Hospital, North China Medical and Health Group, Sanmenxia Henan Province 056200, China
  • Received:2022-11-14 Published:2023-12-26
  • Corresponding author: Xin Chen
引用本文:

樊丽超, 郭瑾瑛, 陈鑫. 野生型RET与RET/PTC融合基因检测对甲状腺乳头状癌中央区淋巴结清扫的指导意义[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 631-635.

Lichao Fan, Jinying Guo, Xin Chen. The significance of detection of wild-type RET and RET/PTC fusion gene for lymph node dissection in the central region of papillary thyroid carcinoma[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(06): 631-635.

目的

探讨野生型RET(WT-RET)与RET/甲状腺乳头状癌(PTC)融合基因检测对PTC中央区淋巴结清扫的指导意义。

方法

选取2020年10月至2022年10月行中央区淋巴结清扫的300例PTC患者,术后行野生型RET与RET/PTC融合基因检测,按照中央区淋巴结是否转移分为两组,转移组(155例)和无转移组(145例)。应用SPSS 25.0软件对数据进行统计学分析,通过多因素Logistic回归分析影响PTC患者中央区淋巴结转移的独立危险因素,并构建列线图预测模型。P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

两组患者的年龄、病灶直径、病灶数量、肿瘤分期、浸润被膜、野生型RET、RET/PTC融合基因、淋巴结肿大、病变腺叶差异性有统计学意义(P<0.05);多因素Logistic回归分析提示影响PTC患者中央区淋巴结转移的独立危险因素有年龄<45岁、病灶直径≥1.0 cm、多发病灶数、T3-4期、有浸润被膜、野生型RET阳性、RET/PTC融合基因阳性、淋巴结肿大、病变腺叶单侧(P<0.05);列线图模型并验证,结果提示训练集和验证集的C-index分别为0.850、0.826,两集的曲线下面积分别为0.802、0.789,当阈值概率在0.01~0.91之间的决策曲线,净获益值比较高。

结论

野生型RET与RET/PTC融合基因是预测PTC患者发生中央区淋巴结转移的独立危险因素,能指导临床医生对这类患者谨慎选择中央区淋巴结清扫范围,基于临床特征及基因检测特征构建列线图风险预测模型,具有较高的预测性能,有助于指导临床决策。

Objective

The guiding significance of wild-type RET and RET/PTC fusion gene detection in central lymph node dissection of papillary thyroid carcinoma

Methods

A total of 300 PTC patients who underwent lymph node dissection in central region from October 2020 to October 2022 were selected, and wild-type RET and RET/PTC fusion gene detection were performed after surgery. They were divided into two groups according to whether central region lymph nodes were metastatic (155 cases) and no metastasis (145 cases). SPSS 25.0 software was used for statistical analysis of the data, and the independent risk factors affecting central lymph node metastasis in PTC patients were analyzed by multi-factor Logistic regression, and a nomogram prediction model was constructed. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

There were significant differences in age, lesion diameter, number of lesions, tumor stage, infiltrating membrane, wild type RET, RET/PTC fusion gene, lymph node enlargement and pathological gland and lobe between the two groups (P<0.05). Multivariate Logistic regression analysis suggested that the independent risk factors for central lymph node metastasis in PTC patients were age < 45 years and lesion diameter ≥1.0 cm, number of multiple lesions, stage T3-4, infiltrating membrane, wild type RET positive, RET/PTC fusion gene positive, lymph node enlargement, unilateral lobe lesions (P<0.05); The results show that the C-index of the training set and the verification set are 0.850 and 0.826, respectively, and the area under the curve of the two sets is 0.802 and 0.789, respectively. When the threshold probability is between 0.01 and 0.91, the net benefit value is higher.

Conclusion

Wild-type RET and RET/PTC fusion genes are independent risk factors for predicting central lymph node metastasis in PTC patients, which can guide clinicians to carefully select the scope of central lymph node dissection for such patients, and construct a nomoimagedata risk prediction model based on clinical characteristics and gene detection characteristics, which has high prediction performance and is helpful to guide clinical decision-making.

表1 300例甲状腺乳头状癌中央区淋巴结是否转移两组患者一般临床特征资料与实验室检查指标比较[例(%)]
表2 影响PTC患者中央区淋巴结转移Logistic多因素回归分析
图1 预测PTC患者发生发生中央区淋巴结转移的列线图模型
图2 列线图预测模型校准曲线验证图
图3 列线图预测模型的ROC曲线
图4 列线图预测模型的临床决策曲线
[1]
Renaud ERiegel KRomero R,et al. Multiomic analysis of papillary thyroid cancers identifies BAIAP2L1-BRAF fusion and requirement of TRIM25,PDE5A and PKCδ for tumorigenesis[J]. Mol Cancer, 2022, 21(1): 195.
[2]
Calapkulu MGul OOCander S,et al. Co-existence of Papillary and Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma: Reports of Three Cases[J]. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak, 2022, 32(8): S156-S158.
[3]
刘信攸,张晨波,陈跃达,等. 甲状腺微小乳头状癌中央区淋巴结转移的危险因素分析[J]. 中国血液流变学杂志, 2020, 30(01): 89-92.
[4]
刘川,吴干勋,赵瑞力,等. 前哨淋巴结活检在甲状腺乳头状癌中研究现状[J]. 中国医学文摘(耳鼻咽喉科学), 2021, 36(01): 177-182.
[5]
李俊强,李南林,代引海. 甲状腺癌中央区淋巴结清扫术后并发乳糜漏临床诊治分析[J]. 现代肿瘤医学, 2020, 28(21): 3703-3706.
[6]
Cuomo FGiani CCobellis G. The Role of the Kinase Inhibitors in Thyroid Cancers[J]. Pharmaceutics, 2022, 14(5): 1040.
[7]
Takeda KKawamoto YNagasaki Y,et al. Peptides containing the MXXCW motif inhibit oncogenic RET kinase activity with a novel mechanism of action. Am J Cancer Res[J]. 2020, 10(1): 336-349.
[8]
龚勤俭,张莹华,杨再军,等. 纳米碳示踪剂用于cN0T1/T2期甲状腺乳头状癌中央区淋巴结清扫的效果及影响因素[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(05): 517-521.
[9]
Sun JJiang QWang X,et al. Nomogram for Preoperative Estimation of Cervical Lymph Node Metastasis Risk in Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma[J]. Front Endocrinol(Lausanne), 2021, 12: 613974.
[10]
Heng YYang ZCao P,et al. Lateral Involvement in Different Sized Papillary Thyroid Carcinomas Patients with Central Lymph Node Metastasis: A Multi-Center Analysis[J]. J Clin Med, 2022, 11(17): 4975.
[11]
Parvathareddy SKSiraj AKAnnaiyappanaidu P,et al. Risk Factors for Cervical Lymph Node Metastasis in Middle Eastern Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma[J]. J Clin Med, 2022, 11(15): 4613.
[12]
李全,张景华,宋冀涛,等. 甲状腺系膜切除术在中央区淋巴结清扫的临床研究[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(02): 207-210.
[13]
Dadafarin SRodríguez TCCarnazza MA,et al. MEG3Expression Indicates Lymph Node Metastasis and Presence of Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts in Papillary Thyroid Cancer[J]. Cells, 2022, 11(19): 3181.
[14]
Sudoko CKJenks CMBauer AJ,et al. Thyroid Lobectomy for T1Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma in Pediatric Patients[J]. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2021, 147(11): 943-950.
[15]
Feng JWQu ZQin AC,et al. Significance of multifocality in papillary thyroid carcinoma[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2020, 46(10Pt A): 1820-1828.
[16]
Feng JWPan HWang L,et al. Total tumor diameter: the neglected value in papillary thyroid microcarcinoma[J]. J Endocrinol Invest, 2020, 43(5): 601-613.
[17]
Forleo RGrani GAlfò M,et al. Minimal Extrathyroidal Extension in Predicting 1-Year Outcomes: A Longitudinal Multicenter Study of Low-to-Intermediate-Risk Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma(ITCO#4)[J]. Thyroid, 2021, 31(12): 1814-1821.
[18]
Tabriz NGrone JUslar V,et al. BRAF V600E mutation correlates with aggressive clinico-pathological features but does not influence tumor recurrence in papillary thyroid carcinoma-10-year single-center results[J]. Gland Surg, 2020, 9(6): 1902-1913.
[19]
Zhong LKGan XXDeng XY,et al. Potential five-mRNA signature model for the prediction of prognosis in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma[J]. Oncol Lett, 2020, 20(3): 2302-2310.
[20]
郑福庆,张立永,王波,等. 甲状腺乳头状癌颈侧区淋巴结转移的危险因素研究进展[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(05): 384-387.
[21]
Liu YLiu CPan Y,et al. Pyruvate carboxylase promotes malignant transformation of papillary thyroid carcinoma and reduces iodine uptake[J]. Cell Death Discov, 2022, 8(1): 423.
[22]
Liu XWang CSu Z,et al. Circ_0001658regulates PI3K/AKT signaling via the miR-671-5p/ITGA2axis and affects the progress of papillary thyroid carcinoma[J]. Ann Transl Med, 2022, 10(18): 1001.
[23]
Rangel-Pozzo ASisdelli LCordioli MIV,et al. Genetic Landscape of Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma and Nuclear Architecture: An Overview Comparing Pediatric and Adult Populations[J]. Cancers(Basel), 2020, 12(11): 3146.
[24]
Zhou LZhu QYao J,et al. Correlation Analysis of Nodular Sonoimagedata Parameters with Cervical Lymph Node Metastases in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2022, 2022: 4680064.
[1] 葛睿, 陈飞, 李杰, 李娟娟, 陈涵. 多基因检测在早期乳腺癌辅助治疗中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 257-263.
[2] 王聪, 李云涛, 唐甜甜, 王鑫蕊, 吕鑫, 范志刚. 多基因检测对激素受体阳性、HER-2阴性乳腺癌新辅助化疗疗效预测的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 292-296.
[3] . 美国临床肿瘤学会关于乳腺癌胚系基因检测的相关建议[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 255-255.
[4] 孙莲, 马红萍, 吴文英. 局部进展期甲状腺癌患者外科处理[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 112-114.
[5] 麻紫月, 王贞文, 张强, 赵代伟, 张翊伦. 右侧喉不返神经1例报告[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 115-116.
[6] 顾雯, 凌守鑫, 唐海利, 甘雪梅. 两种不同手术入路在甲状腺乳头状癌患者开放性根治性术中的应用比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 687-690.
[7] 王宇, 徐芳泉, 周旋, 姚晓峰, 李强. 不断提高分化型甲状腺癌根治性切除规范化[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 473-476.
[8] 孙辉, 李长霖. 分化型甲状腺癌根治性切除术中的关键考量与策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 477-481.
[9] 高一飞, 刘根祥, 孙长华, 周广军. 喉返神经监测在无充气腋窝入路腔镜单侧甲状腺切除+中央区淋巴结清扫术中的应用效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 483-486.
[10] 李云龙, 夏旭良, 江志强, 刘伟, 刘凯, 唐立, 刘昊中, 张思远. 三种方法治疗分化型甲状腺癌的临床疗效[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 487-489.
[11] 韩婧, 郝少龙, 康骅. 北京市单中心甲状腺癌患者临床特征的回顾分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 490-493.
[12] 田文. 甲状腺癌功能性根治颈淋巴结清扫术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 482-482.
[13] 何羽. 腔镜微创手术治疗分化型甲状腺癌的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 456-458.
[14] 赵超, 史帝, 王暖, 陈国芳. 肯尼迪病合并血清抗体阴性重症肌无力一例[J/OL]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 236-240.
[15] 张成惠, 闫中瑞, 盛志强, 袁嫣然. 脑肌酸缺乏症诊断与治疗研究进展[J/OL]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 270-275.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?