切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (02) : 209 -212. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2023.02.024

论著

新型吻合口减压引流装置在腹腔镜直肠癌保肛手术中的应用研究
菅锎宇1, 蒋麟1, 顼倩茹1, 鲁鑫1, 符永瑰2, 梁峰3,()   
  1. 1. 100039 北京,解放军总医院第五医学中心普通外科
    2. 100037 北京,解放军总医院第六医学中心影像科
    3. 100853 北京,解放军总医院第一医学中心普通外科医学部
  • 收稿日期:2022-11-01 出版日期:2023-04-26
  • 通信作者: 梁峰

Application of a new type of anastomotic decompression and drainage device in laparoscopic anal preservation surgery for rectal cancer

Kaiyu Jian1, Lin Jiang1, Qianru Xu1, Xin Lu1, Yonggui Fu2, Feng Liang3,()   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, the Fifth Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100039, China
    2. Department of Radiology, the Sixth Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100037, China
    3. General Surgery Department, the First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
  • Received:2022-11-01 Published:2023-04-26
  • Corresponding author: Feng Liang
引用本文:

菅锎宇, 蒋麟, 顼倩茹, 鲁鑫, 符永瑰, 梁峰. 新型吻合口减压引流装置在腹腔镜直肠癌保肛手术中的应用研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 209-212.

Kaiyu Jian, Lin Jiang, Qianru Xu, Xin Lu, Yonggui Fu, Feng Liang. Application of a new type of anastomotic decompression and drainage device in laparoscopic anal preservation surgery for rectal cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(02): 209-212.

目的

探讨腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后经肛门放置新型吻合口减压引流装置对预防吻合口漏的临床效果。

方法

回顾性分析2019年5月至2021年12月77例接受腹腔镜直肠癌根治术患者的临床资料。经肛门放置新型吻合口减压引流装置的34例患者为观察组,未留置该装置的43例患者为对照组。采用SPSS 22.0软件对临床数据进行统计学分析,两组术前血清白蛋白水平、术后排气时间及术后住院时间等计量资料以(

xˉ
±s)表示,采用独立样本t检验;术后吻合口漏发生率等计数资料比较采用χ2检验。P<0.05时为差异有统计学意义。

结果

观察组患者的吻合口漏的发生率较对照组低[2.9%(1/34)vs.18.6%(8/43),P=0.034],术后排气较早[(3.5±1.4)d vs.(4.4±1.9)d,P=0.012];两组患者术后住院时间比较差异无统计学意义(P=0.393)。

结论

腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后经肛门留置新型吻合口减压引流装置可有效减少吻合口漏的发生。

Objective

To investigate the clinical effect of placing a new type of anastomotic decompression and drainage device through the anus to prevent anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer.

Methods

Clinical data of 77 patients who underwent laparoscopic radical resection for rectal cancer from May 2019 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The observation group included 34 patients with a new type of anastomotic decompression and drainage device placed through the anus,and the control group included 43 patients without the device. SPSS 22.0 software was used for statistical analysis of the clinical data. The measurement data of preoperative serum albumin level,postoperative exhaust time and postoperative hospital stay of the two groups were expressed as(

xˉ
±s),and independent sample t test was used. Statistical data such as the incidence of postoperative anastomotic leakage were compared using χ2 test. When P<0.05,the difference was statistically significant.

Results

The incidence of anastomotic leakage in the observation group was lower than that in the control group[2.9%(1/34)vs. 18.6%(8/43),P=0.034],and the postoperative exhaust was earlier[(3.5±1.4)d vs.(4.4±1.9)d,P=0.012]. There was no significant difference in postoperative hospital stay between the two groups(P=0.393).

Conclusion

After laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer,a new type of anastomotic decompression and drainage device can effectively reduce the incidence of anastomotic leakage.

图1 新型吻合口减压引流装置结构示意图注:1=导管;2=第一引流孔;3=球囊;4=第二引流孔;5=球囊注射口;51=注射部;52=连接管;53=注射接头。
表1 77例腹腔镜直肠癌根治术两组患者一般临床资料比较[(
xˉ
±s),例]
表2 77例腹腔镜直肠癌根治术两组患者术后观察指标[(
xˉ
±s),例]
[1]
Sung HFerlay JSiegel RL,et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020:GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin202171(3):209-249.
[2]
姚宏伟,李心翔,崔龙,等. 中国结直肠癌手术病例登记数据库2019年度报告:一项全国性登记研究[J]. 中国实用外科杂志202040(01):106-110,116.
[3]
Damen NSpilsbury KLevitt M,et al. Anastomotic leaks in colorectal surgery[J]. ANZ J Surg201484(10):763-768.
[4]
Davis BRivadeneira DE. Complications of colorectal anastomoses:leaks,strictures,and bleeding[J]. Surg Clin North Am201393(1):61-87.
[5]
Hammond JLim SWan Y,et al. The burden of gastrointestinal anastomotic leaks:an evaluation of clinical and economic outcomes[J]. J Gastrointest Surg201418(6):1176-1185.
[6]
梁峰,鲁鑫,张宏艳,等. 低位直肠吻合口减压引流装置[P]. 中国:ZL 2020 2 1715346.7,2021年06月01日.
[7]
Rahbari NNWeitz JHohenberger W,et al. Definition and grading of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rectum:a proposal by the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer[J]. Surgery2010147(3):339-351.
[8]
中华医学会外科学分会结直肠外科学组. 中国直肠癌手术吻合口漏诊断、预防及处理专家共识(2019版)[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志201922(03):201-206.
[9]
吴清,陈海军,周进. 直肠癌全系膜切除术后吻合口漏形成的危险因素分析[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版)202115(01):43-45.
[10]
童院生,姜宝,郑涛,等. 2015年~2020年老年直肠癌患者术后吻合口漏的高危因素分析[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版)202216(01):56-58.
[11]
Morris MSGraham LAChu DI,et al. Oral Antibiotic Bowel Preparation Significantly Reduces Surgical Site Infection Rates and Readmission Rates in Elective Colorectal Surgery[J]. Ann Surg2015261(6):1034-1040.
[12]
Scarborough JEMantyh CRSun Z,et al. Combined Mechanical and Oral Antibiotic Bowel Preparation Reduces Incisional Surgical Site Infection and Anastomotic Leak Rates After Elective Colorectal Resection:An Analysis of Colectomy-Targeted ACS NSQIP[J]. Ann Surg2015262(2):331-337.
[13]
Shiomi AIto MMaeda K,et al. Effects of a diverting stoma on symptomatic anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectal cancer:a propensity score matching analysis of 1,014 consecutive patients[J]. J Am Coll Surg2015220(2):186-194.
[14]
朱汉建,徐家明,高进,等. 预防性回肠造口对腹腔镜直肠癌保肛患者术后肛门功能和心理因素状况的影响[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版)202216(01):27-31.
[15]
Mrak KUranitsch SPedross F,et al. Diverting ileostomy versus no diversion after low anterior resection for rectal cancer:A prospective,randomized,multicenter trial[J]. Surgery2016159(4):1129-1139.
[16]
Frouws MASnijders HSMalm SH,et al. Clinical Relevance of a Grading System for Anastomotic Leakage After Low Anterior Resection:Analysis From a National Cohort Database[J]. Dis Colon Rectum201760(7):706-713.
[17]
Nishigori HIto MNishizawa Y,et al. Effectiveness of a transanal tube for the prevention of anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery[J]. World J Surg201438(7):1843-1851.
[18]
Lee SYKim CHKim YJ,et al. Impact of anal decompression on anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectal cancer:a propensity score matching analysis[J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg2015400(7):791-796.
[19]
邵冬冬,周建平,盛伟伟,等. 经肛气囊型气管插管对低位直肠癌术后吻合口漏影响的临床研究[J]. 辽宁医学杂志202034(05):1-4.
[20]
Yang CSChoi GSPark JS,et al. Rectal tube drainage reduces major anastomotic leakage after minimally invasive rectal cancer surgery[J]. Colorectal Dis201618(12):O445-O452.
[21]
Matsuda MTsuruta MHasegawa H,et al. Transanal drainage tube placement to prevent anastomotic leakage following colorectal cancer surgery with double stapling reconstruction[J]. Surg Today201646(5):613-620.
[22]
Goto SHida KKawada K,et al. Multicenter analysis of transanal tube placement for prevention of anastomotic leak after low anterior resection[J]. J Surg Oncol2017116(8):989-995.
[23]
Nishigori HIto MNishizawa Y. A novel transanal tube designed to prevent anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery:the WING DRAIN[J]. Surg Today201747(4):513-520.
[24]
Kawada KTakahashi RHida K,et al. Impact of transanal drainage tube on anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic low anterior resection[J]. Int J Colorectal Dis201833(3):337-340.
[25]
Li YGu F. Effectiveness of a large-calibre transanal drainage tube on the prevention of anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer[J]. J BUON202025(2):933-938.
[26]
Wang FGYan WMYan M,et al. Comparison of anastomotic leakage rate and reoperation rate between transanal tube placement and defunctioning stoma after anterior resection:A network meta-analysis of clinical data[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol201945(8):1301-1309.
[27]
Xiao LZhang WBJiang PC,et al. Can transanal tube placement after anterior resection for rectal carcinoma reduce anastomotic leakage rate?A single-institution prospective randomized study[J]. World J Surg201135(6):1367-1377.
[1] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[2] 周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[3] 唐旭, 韩冰, 刘威, 陈茹星. 结直肠癌根治术后隐匿性肝转移危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 16-20.
[4] 张生军, 赵阿静, 李守博, 郝祥宏, 刘敏丽. 高糖通过HGF/c-met通路促进结直肠癌侵袭和迁移的实验研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 21-24.
[5] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[6] 王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[7] 李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[8] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[9] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[10] 曹迪, 张玉茹. 经腹腔镜生物补片修补直肠癌根治术后盆底疝1例[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 115-116.
[11] 李凯, 陈淋, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种U型记忆合金线在经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 15-15.
[12] 李三祥, 李佳, 刘俊峰, 吕东晨, 方晖东, 谭朝晖, 刘杰, 潘佐, 乔建坤. 基于CT影像的三维重建成像技术在腹腔镜大肾上腺肿瘤切除术中的应用[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 570-574.
[13] 赵佳晖, 王永兴, 彭涛, 李明川, 魏德超, 韩毅力, 侯铸, 姜永光, 罗勇. 后腹腔镜根治性肾切除手术时间延长和术中出血量增多的影响因素分析[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 575-580.
[14] 林文斌, 郑泽源, 郑文能, 郁毅刚. 外伤性脾破裂腹腔镜脾切除术患者中转开腹风险预测模型构建[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 619-623.
[15] 牛朝, 李波, 张万福, 靳文帝, 王春晓, 李晓刚. 腹腔镜袖状胃切除联合胆囊切除治疗肥胖合并胆囊结石安全性和疗效[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 635-639.
阅读次数
全文


摘要