切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (02) : 172 -175. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2023.02.015

论著

改良食管胃吻合双肌瓣成形术与传统食管胃前壁吻合在腹腔镜近端胃癌根治术中的临床效果对比研究
张斌1, 陈进2,(), 谢智惠2   
  1. 1. 214062 江苏无锡,江南大学附属医院肿瘤科
    2. 214122 江苏无锡,江南大学附属医院肿瘤外科
  • 收稿日期:2022-11-19 出版日期:2023-04-26
  • 通信作者: 陈进

Comparative study on the clinical effect of esophagogastric double muscle flap anastomosis and traditional esophagogastric anterior wall anastomosis during laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for proximal gastric cancer

Bin Zhang1, Jin Chen2,(), Zhihui Xie2   

  1. 1. Department of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, Wuxi Jiangsu Province 214062, China
    2. Department of Surgical Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, Wuxi Jiangsu Province 214122, China
  • Received:2022-11-19 Published:2023-04-26
  • Corresponding author: Jin Chen
  • Supported by:
    Jiangsu Provincial Natural Science Foundation General Project(KB20151108)
引用本文:

张斌, 陈进, 谢智惠. 改良食管胃吻合双肌瓣成形术与传统食管胃前壁吻合在腹腔镜近端胃癌根治术中的临床效果对比研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 172-175.

Bin Zhang, Jin Chen, Zhihui Xie. Comparative study on the clinical effect of esophagogastric double muscle flap anastomosis and traditional esophagogastric anterior wall anastomosis during laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for proximal gastric cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(02): 172-175.

目的

对比分析腹腔镜近端胃癌根治术(LPRG)中食管胃吻合双肌瓣成形术(Kamikawa 吻合)与传统食管胃前壁吻合的临床效果。

方法

选取2020年1月至2022年4月接受LPRG治疗的80例胃肿瘤患者作为研究对象,采用随机数字表法将患者分为传统组和Kamikawa组,每组各40例。两组均行LPRG,传统组采用食管胃前壁吻合术,Kamikawa组采用Kamikawa 吻合术。数据应用软件SPSS 22.0处理,围手术期相关指标、营养状况指标等计量资料采用(

xˉ
±s)表示,组间比较行独立样本t检验,组内比较行配对t检验;术后并发症情况等计数资料行χ2检验。P<0.05表示差异有统计学意义。

结果

Kamikawa组手术时间及吻合时间均略长于传统组(P<0.05);两组患者术中出血量、淋巴结清扫数目、术后排气时间、术后进食流质时间及术后住院时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。Kamikawa组患者术后并发症的总发生率显著低于传统组(12.5% vs.32.5%),抗反流效果显著(P<0.05)。术后3个月两组患者血红蛋白(Hb)、白蛋白(ALB)、总蛋白(TP)、前白蛋白(PA)等营养指标较术前均显著降低(P<0.05),且Kamikawa组各营养指标均明显高于传统组(P<0.05)。

结论

LPRG中Kamikawa吻合是安全可行的,虽延长了手术时间及吻合时间,但并未增加围手术期相关风险,并可有效降低患者术后并发症发生的风险,且抗反流效果显著,更有利于患者术后营养恢复,是一种较为理想的消化道重建术式,值得临床应用推广。

Objective

To compare and analyze the clinical effects of laparoscopic radical gastrectomy(LPRG)for esophagogastric anastomosis(Kamikawa anastomosis)and traditional esophagogastric anterior wall anastomosis.

Methods

A total of 80 patients with gastric tumor who received LPRG treatment from January 2020 to April 2022 were selected as the research objects. The patients were divided into traditional group and Kamikawa group by random number table method,with 40 patients in each group. Both groups received LPRG,the traditional group received esophagogastric anterior wall anastomosis and the Kamikawa group received Kamikawa anastomosis. The data were processed by SPSS 22.0,and the measurement data of perioperative indicators and nutritional status indicators were expressed by(

xˉ
±s). Independent t test was performed for inter-group comparison,and paired t test was performed for intra-group comparison. The statistical data of postoperative complications were χ2 test. P<0.05 indicated statistically significant difference.

Results

The operation time and anastomosis time of Kamikawa group were slightly longer than those of traditional group(P<0.05). There was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss,number of lymph node dissection,postoperative exhaust time,postoperative fluid intake time and postoperative hospital stay between the two groups(P>0.05). The total incidence of postoperative complications in the Kamikawa group was significantly lower than that in the traditional group(12.5% vs. 32.5%),and the anti-reflux effect was significant(P<0.05). Three months after surgery,the nutritional indexes of hemoglobin(Hb),albumin(ALB),total protein(TP)and prealbumin(PA)in 2 groups were significantly decreased compared with those before surgery(P<0.05),and the nutritional indexes of Kamikawa group were significantly higher than those of traditional group(P<0.05).

Conclusion

Kamikawa anastomosis in LPRG is safe and feasible. Although it prolongs the operation time and anastomosis time,it does not increase perioperative related risks,and can effectively reduce the risk of postoperative complications in patients. Besides,the anti-reflux effect is significant,and it is more conducive to postoperative nutritional recovery of patients.

表1 80例胃肿瘤行LPRG不同吻合方式两组患者一般资料比较[(
xˉ
±s),例]
图1 腹腔镜近端胃癌根治术Kamikawa吻合注:A=亚甲蓝做“H”形标记(箭头所示);B=沿“H”形用超声刀将胃壁浆肌层切开;C=缝合胃前壁浆肌瓣(箭头所示);D=完成Kamikawa吻合。
表2 80例胃肿瘤行LPRG不同吻合方式两组患者围手术期相关指标比较(
xˉ
±s)
表3 80例胃肿瘤行LPRG不同吻合方式两组患者术后并发症情况比较[例(%)]
表4 80例胃肿瘤行LPRG不同吻合方式两组患者术后营养状况指标比较(
xˉ
±s)
[1]
Wu CLi MMeng H,et al. Analysis of status and countermeasures of cancer incidence and mortality in China[J]. Sci China Life Sci201962(5):640-647.
[2]
中华医学会肿瘤学分会,中华医学会杂志社. 中华医学会胃癌临床诊疗指南(2021版)[J]. 中华医学杂志2022102(16):1168-1189.
[3]
胡建昆,张维汉. 中国腹腔镜胃癌手术20年术式变迁与发展[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版)202115(02):129-132.
[4]
Zhao LLing RChen J,et al. Clinical outcomes of proximal gastrectomy versus total gastrectomy for proximal gastric cancer:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Dig Surg202138(1):1-13.
[5]
王林俊,李铮,徐泽宽. 腹腔镜近端胃切除后抗反流消化道重建术式的临床评价[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志202225(05):367-372.
[6]
Ohi MToiyama YKitajima T,et al. Laparoscopic esophagogastrostomy using a knifeless linear stapler after proximal gastrectomy[J]. Surg Today201949(12):1080-1086.
[7]
廖新华,仇广林,朱梦珂,等. 腹腔镜近端胃切除术后消化道重建方式及食管胃双肌瓣吻合应用前景[J]. 中华消化外科杂志202221(03):355-361.
[8]
Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2018(5th edition)[J]. Gastric Cancer202124(1):1-21.
[9]
杨之洵,郑荣寿,张思维,等. 中国胃癌发病趋势及预测[J]. 中国肿瘤201928(05):321-326.
[10]
Sung HFerlay JSiegel RL,et al. Global cancer statistics 2020:GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin202171(3):209-249.
[11]
Nunobe SIda S. Current status of proximal gastrectomy for gastric and esophagogastric junctional cancer:A review[J]. Ann Gastroenterol Surg20204(5):498-504.
[12]
Ma FWang WGuo D,et al. Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction for Siewert type Ⅱ and Ⅲ adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction:a retrospective observational study of consecutive patients[J]. Ann Transl Med20219(4):352.
[13]
黄昌明,陈起跃,刘治羽,等. 中国腹腔镜胃癌手术20年发展、问题与对策[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版)202115(02):123-128.
[14]
马君俊,何子锐,臧潞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜近端胃切除后消化道重建方式选择策略[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志202225(02):124-130.
[15]
Chia DKAKim GChang HSY,et al. Kamikawa Double-Flap Reconstruction After Minimally Invasive Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy[J]. Ann Thorac Surg. 2019108(1):e57-e59.
[1] 曹迪, 张玉茹. 经腹腔镜生物补片修补直肠癌根治术后盆底疝1例[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 115-116.
[2] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[3] 周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[4] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[5] 王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[6] 李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[7] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[8] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[9] 李凯, 陈淋, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种U型记忆合金线在经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 15-15.
[10] 唐健雄, 李绍杰. 不断推进中国腹腔镜疝手术规范化[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 591-594.
[11] 李三祥, 李佳, 刘俊峰, 吕东晨, 方晖东, 谭朝晖, 刘杰, 潘佐, 乔建坤. 基于CT影像的三维重建成像技术在腹腔镜大肾上腺肿瘤切除术中的应用[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 570-574.
[12] 赵佳晖, 王永兴, 彭涛, 李明川, 魏德超, 韩毅力, 侯铸, 姜永光, 罗勇. 后腹腔镜根治性肾切除手术时间延长和术中出血量增多的影响因素分析[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 575-580.
[13] 汪帮琦, 陈波特, 林浩坚, 许晖阳, 王镇伟, 袁雪峰, 林康健, 邱晓拂. 经腹入路3D腹腔镜联合输尿管硬镜同期处理肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻并肾盏结石的应用[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 597-600.
[14] 林文斌, 郑泽源, 郑文能, 郁毅刚. 外伤性脾破裂腹腔镜脾切除术患者中转开腹风险预测模型构建[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 619-623.
[15] 牛朝, 李波, 张万福, 靳文帝, 王春晓, 李晓刚. 腹腔镜袖状胃切除联合胆囊切除治疗肥胖合并胆囊结石安全性和疗效[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 635-639.
阅读次数
全文


摘要