切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (02) : 176 -179. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2023.02.016

论著

传统腔镜与达芬奇机器人手术治疗低危甲状腺癌的对比研究
阳敏1, 张婷2, 钟玲2, 刘军兰2, 杜俊泽2, 崔翔2, 张晔2, 范林军2,()   
  1. 1. 641000 四川内江,四川省内江市中医医院;400038 重庆,陆军军医大学西南医院
    2. 400038 重庆,陆军军医大学西南医院
  • 收稿日期:2022-06-12 出版日期:2023-04-26
  • 通信作者: 范林军

A comparative study of traditional endoscopic surgery and Da Vinci robotic surgery for low-risk thyroid cancer

Min Yang1, Ting Zhang2, Ling Zhong2, Junlan Liu2, Junze Du2, Xiang Cui2, Ye Zhang2, Linjun Fan2,()   

  1. 1. Neijiang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Neijiang Sichuan Province 641000, China; Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing 400038, China
    2. Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing 400038, China
  • Received:2022-06-12 Published:2023-04-26
  • Corresponding author: Linjun Fan
  • Supported by:
    the Science and Technology Innovation Project for Social Livelihood of Chongqing(cstc2019jscx-msxmX0284, cstc2019jscx-msxmX0140)
引用本文:

阳敏, 张婷, 钟玲, 刘军兰, 杜俊泽, 崔翔, 张晔, 范林军. 传统腔镜与达芬奇机器人手术治疗低危甲状腺癌的对比研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 176-179.

Min Yang, Ting Zhang, Ling Zhong, Junlan Liu, Junze Du, Xiang Cui, Ye Zhang, Linjun Fan. A comparative study of traditional endoscopic surgery and Da Vinci robotic surgery for low-risk thyroid cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(02): 176-179.

目的

探讨并对比单侧腋窝双侧乳晕(UABA)入路腔镜与达芬奇机器人手术行单侧腺叶切除+单侧中央区淋巴结清扫术治疗低危甲状腺癌的疗效和安全性。

方法

回顾性分析2019年1月至2019年12月经UABA入路行单侧腺叶切除+单侧中央区淋巴结清扫的腔镜与机器人手术124例甲状腺癌的临床资料。根据术式不同分为两组,机器人手术61例(机器人组),腔镜手术63例(腔镜组)。采用SPSS 25.0软件进行统计分析。围手术期各项指标以(均数±标准差)表示,采用t检验;年龄、肿瘤大小和中央区淋巴结数量以MQR)表示,采用Mann-Whitney U检验;性别、肿瘤位置、移植旁腺数、术后低血钙和暂时性甲状旁腺功能减退的例数以频数和百分比表示,采用χ2检验。P<0.05差异有统计学意义。

结果

机器人组手术时间、甲状旁腺移植例数均少于腔镜组(P<0.001)。机器人组清扫的中央区淋巴结数目明显多于腔镜组[8(6,12)vs. 6(3,8),P=0.021]。两组患者淋巴结转移数目和术后并发症发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

经UABA入路腔镜与机器人手术行单侧腺叶切除+单则中央区清扫对于低危甲状腺癌均是安全有效的,比较而言机器人手术能更好地原位保留甲状旁腺。

Objective

To investigate and compare the efficacy and safety of unilateral axillary bilateral areola(UABA)approach and Da Vinci robotic surgery in the treatment of low-risk thyroid cancer with unilateral adenolotomy and unilateral central lymph node dissection.

Methods

The clinical data of 124 patients with thyroid cancer who underwent unilateral adenolotomy plus unilateral central lymph node dissection through the UABA approach from January 2019 to December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. They were divided into two groups according to different operation methods:61 cases(robot group)and 63 cases(endoscopic group). SPSS 25.0 software was used for statistical analysis. Perioperative indicators were expressed as(mean ± standard)deviation,and t test was used. Age,tumor size and number of central lymph nodes were represented by MQR),and Mann-Whitney U test was used. Gender,tumor location,number of transplanted parathyroid glands,postoperative hypocalcemia and transient hypoparathyroidism were expressed by frequency and percentage using χ2 test. P<0.05 was statistically significant.

Results

The operative time and the number of parathyroid transplantation cases in the robot group were less than those in the endoscopic group(P<0.001). The number of central lymph nodes in the robot group was significantly higher than that in the endoscopic group[8(6,12)vs. 6(3,8),P=0.021]. There was no significant difference in the number of metastatic lymph nodes and the incidence of postoperative complications between 2 groups(P > 0.05).

Conclusions

Unilateral lobotomy via UABA approach and robotic surgery plus single central region dissection are both safe and effective for low-risk thyroid cancer,and robotic surgery can better preserve parathyroid glands in situ.

表1 124例低危甲状腺癌不同手术方法两组患者基本临床资料[(
xˉ
±s),例]
图1 经UABA入路机器人辅助下甲状腺癌手术切口位置和Trocar穿刺径路
图2 经UABA入路机器人甲状腺癌术中术者在操控台旁进行手术操作
图4 经UABA入路腔镜甲状腺癌手术中术者与助手分别在手术床两旁进行操作
表2 124例低危甲状腺癌不同手术方法两组患者手术数据对比[(
xˉ
±s),例]
表3 124例低危甲状腺癌不同手术方法两组患者术后并发症对比[例(%)]
[1]
Zheng RZhang SZeng H,et al. Cancer incidence and mortality in China,2016[J]. J Nation Cancer Center2022,In Press.
[2]
Liu PZhang YQi X,et al. Unilateral Axilla-Bilateral Areola Approach for Thyroidectomy by da Vinci Robot:500 Cases Treated by the Same Surgeon[J]. J Cancer201910(16):3851-3859.
[3]
于晓天,沈振伟,唐晓燕,等. 经胸乳入路腔镜甲状腺手术,低位小切口手术与传统甲状腺切除手术的临床疗效观察[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版)202115(05):574-577.
[4]
Zhang YDu JMa J,et al. Unilateral axilla-bilateral areola approach for thyroidectomy by da Vinci robot vs. open surgery in thyroid cancer:a retrospective observational study[J]. Gland Surg202110(4):1291-1299.
[5]
Kim EBCho JWLee YM,et al. Postsurgical Outcomes and Surgical Completeness of Robotic Thyroid Surgery:A Single Surgeon's Experience on 700 Cases[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A201828(5):540-545.
[6]
Park JOAnuwong AKim MR,et al. Transoral endoscopic thyroid surgery in a Korean population[J]. Surg Endosc201933(7):2104-2113.
[7]
Sukpanich RSanglestsawai SSeib CD,et al. The Influence of Cosmetic Concerns on Patient Preferences for Approaches to Thyroid Lobectomy:A Discrete Choice Experiment[J]. Thyroid202030(9):1306-1313.
[8]
Choi JYLee KEChung KW,et al. Endoscopic thyroidectomy via bilateral axillo-breast approach(BABA):review of 512 cases in a single institute[J]. Surg Endosc201226(4):948-955.
[9]
Bae DSKoo DH. A Propensity Score-matched Comparison Study of Surgical Outcomes in Patients with Differentiated Thyroid Cancer After Robotic Versus Open Total Thyroidectomy[J]. World J Surg201943(2):540-551.
[10]
Chai YJSuh HWoo JW,et al. Surgical safety and oncological completeness of robotic thyroidectomy for thyroid carcinoma larger than 2 cm[J]. Surg Endosc201731(3):1235-1240.
[11]
Pan JHZhou HZhao XX,et al. Robotic thyroidectomy versus conventional open thyroidectomy for thyroid cancer:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Surg Endosc201731(10):3985-4001.
[12]
Liu PZhang YQi X,et al. Unilateral Axilla-Bilateral Areola Approach for Thyroidectomy by da Vinci Robot:500 Cases Treated by the Same Surgeon[J]. J Cancer201910(16):3851-3859.
[13]
Lee DWBang HSJeong JH,et al. Cosmetic outcomes after transoral robotic thyroidectomy:Comparison with transaxillary,postauricular,and conventional approaches[J]. Oral Oncol2021114:105139.
[14]
You JYKim HYPark DW,et al. Transoral robotic thyroidectomy versus conventional open thyroidectomy:comparative analysis of surgical outcomes using propensity score matching[J]. Surg Endosc202135(1):124-129.
[15]
Yang SMPark WSYou JY,et al. Comparison of postoperative outcomes between bilateral axillo-breast approach-robotic thyroidectomy and transoral robotic thyroidectomy[J]. Gland Surg20209(6):1998-2004.
[1] 曹迪, 张玉茹. 经腹腔镜生物补片修补直肠癌根治术后盆底疝1例[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 115-116.
[2] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[3] 周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[4] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[5] 王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[6] 李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[7] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[8] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[9] 杨体飞, 杨传虎, 陆振如. 改良无充气经腋窝入路全腔镜下甲状腺手术对喉返神经功能的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 74-77.
[10] 李凯, 陈淋, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种U型记忆合金线在经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 15-15.
[11] 唐健雄, 李绍杰. 不断推进中国腹腔镜疝手术规范化[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 591-594.
[12] 田文, 杨晓冬. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术式选择及注意事项[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 595-597.
[13] 李涛, 陈纲, 李世拥. 腹腔镜下右侧腹股沟斜疝修补术(TAPP)[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 598-598.
[14] 易明超, 汪鑫, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种T型记忆金属线在经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 599-599.
[15] 罗佳, 赵晶晶, 曹小珍, 钟玲, 范林军, 曾令娟. 单侧腋窝双侧乳晕入路机器人甲状腺术后局部加压预防皮下隧道出血的对照研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 603-606.
阅读次数
全文


摘要