切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (05) : 510 -513. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2022.05.012

论著

腹腔镜D3淋巴结清扫结合CME与常规根治术治疗右半结肠癌的随访比较
孔宪诚1, 黄建平1, 阎良1, 汤雪峰1,()   
  1. 1. 201203 上海,上海中医药大学附属曙光医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2021-09-13 出版日期:2022-10-26
  • 通信作者: 汤雪峰

Follow up comparison of laparoscopic D3 lymph node dissection combined with CME and conventional radical resection in the treatment of right colon cancer

Xiancheng Kong1, Jianping Huang1, Liang Yan1, Xuefeng Tang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Shuguang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of traditional Chinese medicine, Shanghai 201203, China
  • Received:2021-09-13 Published:2022-10-26
  • Corresponding author: Xuefeng Tang
  • Supported by:
    Shanghai specialist capacity building project(ZY(2018-2020)-ZYBZ-07)
引用本文:

孔宪诚, 黄建平, 阎良, 汤雪峰. 腹腔镜D3淋巴结清扫结合CME与常规根治术治疗右半结肠癌的随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 510-513.

Xiancheng Kong, Jianping Huang, Liang Yan, Xuefeng Tang. Follow up comparison of laparoscopic D3 lymph node dissection combined with CME and conventional radical resection in the treatment of right colon cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(05): 510-513.

目的

探讨腹腔镜D3淋巴结清扫结合完整结肠系膜切除术(CME)与常规根治术治疗右半结肠癌的效果差异。

方法

收集2016年5月至2018年5月收治的172例右半结肠癌患者病例资料,根据手术方式不同,将采用常规根治术治疗的80例患者纳入常规组,采用腹腔镜D3淋巴清扫结合CME治疗的92例患者纳入联合组。采用SPSS 23.0软件进行处理数据,手术相关指标、生存质量核心问卷(QLQ C-30)评分以(

xˉ
±s)表示,行独立样本t检验;并发症发生率、肿瘤复发率用百分比表示,用χ2检验;生存率采用Log-Rank法检验。P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

联合组患者手术时间比常规组长,术中出血量比常规组少,肠道功能恢复时间比常规组短,淋巴结清扫数目比常规组多,QLQ C-30评分比常规组高(P<0.05);两组切除标本长度、住院天数、并发症发生率及患者术后1年、3年生存率及肿瘤复发率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

腹腔镜D3淋巴结清扫结合CME治疗右半结肠癌可减少术中出血量,提高淋巴结清扫数目,促进肠道功能恢复,且并发症发生率较低,但相对手术时间较长,与常规根治术比较无近中期预后差异。

Objective

To investigate the difference between laparoscopic D3 lymphatic dissection combined with complete mesenterectomy(CME)and conventional radical resection in the treatment of right colon cancer.

Methods

Data of 172 patients with right colon cancer admitted between May 2016 and May 2018 were collected. According to different surgical methods,80 patients treated with conventional radical resection were included in the conventional group,and 92 patients treated with laparoscopic D3 lymphatic dissection combined with CME were included in the combined group.SPSS23.0 software was used for processing,The operative indicators and quality of life core questionnaire(QLQ C-30)scores were expressed as(

xˉ
±s),and independent sample t test was performed. The complication rate and recurrence rate are expressed by percentage,using the χ2 test;the survival rate is tested by the Log-Rank method. P<0.05 was statistically significant.

Results

The combined group had longer operation time,less intraoperative blood loss,shorter recovery time of intestinal function,more lymph node dissection and higher QLQ C-30 score than the conventional group(P<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in the length of resection specimens,hospitalization time,complication rates,1-year and 3-year survival rates,and tumor recurrence rates between the two groups(P>0.05).

Conclusion

laparoscopic D3 lymphadenectomy combined with CME in the treatment of right colon cancer can reduce intraoperative bleeding,increase the number of lymph node dissection,promote the recovery of intestinal function,and the incidence of complications is lower,but the operation time is longer,compared with routine radical operation,there was no difference in short-term and medium-term prognosis.

表1 172例右半结肠癌不同术式两组患者基线资料比较[(
xˉ
±s),例]
表2 172例右半结肠癌不同术式两组患者手术相关指标比较(
xˉ
±s)
表3 172例右半结肠癌不同术式两组患者并发症比较[例(%)]
表4 172例右半结肠癌不同术式两组患者近中期预后比较[例(%)]
图1 172例右半结肠癌不同术式两组患者累积生存曲线
表5 172例右半结肠癌不同术式两组患者QLQ C-30评分比较[(
xˉ
±s),分]
[1]
刁德昌,廖伟林. 右半结肠癌D3淋巴清扫术与完整结肠系膜切除术的异同[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志202124(1):81-84.
[2]
冯波,周乐其. 右半结肠癌D3淋巴结清扫范围及入路选择[J]. 中国实用外科杂志202040(3):274-278.
[3]
Chaouch MADougaz MWMesbehi M,et al. A meta-analysis comparing hand-assisted laparoscopic right hemicolectomy and open right hemicolectomy for right-sided colon cancer[J]. World J Surg Oncol202018(1):91.
[4]
贺燕芳. 右半结肠癌患者行腹腔镜下D3淋巴结清扫术+完整结肠系膜切除术效果观察[J]. 慢性病学杂志202022(5):707-708,711.
[5]
马松,席浩,杨建伟. 以肠系膜上动脉左侧为右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫内侧界的可行性研究[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志202126(4):277-281.
[6]
国家卫生计生委医政医管局中华医学会肿瘤学分会. 中国结直肠癌诊疗规范(2017年版)[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志201821(1):92-106.
[7]
中华医学会外科学分会腹腔镜与内镜外科学组,中国抗癌协会大肠癌专业委员会腹腔镜外科学组. 腹腔镜结直肠癌根治手术操作指南(2008版)[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志200912(3):310-312.
[8]
石军梅,王晓翔,刘英,等. EORTC QLQ-C30量表应用于胃癌术后化疗患者的信效度检验[J].河北医科大学学报201536(4):448-451.
[9]
Enomoto MKatsumata KKasahara K,et al. Laparoscopic middle colic artery-preserved right hemicolectomy with true D3 lymph node dissection for right-sided colon cancer:modified complete mesocolic excision[J]. Surg Endosc202135(5):2386-2388.
[10]
王芳红,张辉,储怀祝,等. 老年Ⅲ期右半结肠癌经腹腔镜全结肠系膜切除治疗的临床效果及预后分析[J]. 中国普外基础与临床杂志202027(1):69-74.
[11]
王甲南,卢涛,崔大炜,等. 腹腔镜下全结肠系膜切除对右半结肠癌根治术患者手术效果及恢复情况的影响[J]. 中国内镜杂志202026(3):38-42.
[12]
于亮,段绍斌,刘郁,等. 腹腔镜下右半结肠癌根治术血管解剖技巧:附45例报告[J]. 中国微创外科杂志201919(8):750-752.
[13]
郭建辉,童宜欣. 腹腔镜辅助下右半结肠根治性切除术(D3+CME)[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志201821(1):28.
[14]
陈建勋,许东波,林双明,等. 中尾联合入路腹腔镜下全肠系膜切除术治疗右半结肠癌的疗效评价[J].局解手术学杂志202029(6):487-490.
[15]
梁鸿,张辉,张超,等. 3D与2D全腹腔镜中间入路完整结肠系膜切除右半结肠癌根治术的对比分析[J]. 中国现代医学杂志201929(9):72-75.
[16]
陈庆永,帅晓明,陈立波. 中间尾侧联合入路行腹腔镜D3淋巴结清扫加完整结肠系膜切除术治疗右半结肠癌合并不全性肠梗阻的安全性和可行性[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志201821(9):1039-1044.
[17]
Wang XEfetov SKLiu Z,et al. Transrectal specimen extraction after laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with extended D3 lymph node dissection(anterior medial to lateral approach)- a video vignette[J]. Colorectal Dis202022(4):471-472.
[18]
阳雪松,赵琦. 腹腔镜下完整全结肠系膜切除治疗右半结肠癌的临床疗效分析[J].实用医院临床杂志202017(4):212-215.
[1] 燕速, 霍博文. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治性切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 13-13.
[2] 母德安, 李凯, 张志远, 张伟. 超微创器械辅助单孔腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 14-14.
[3] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[4] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[5] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[6] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[7] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[8] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[9] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[10] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[11] 李博, 贾蓬勃, 李栋, 李小庆. ERCP与LCBDE治疗胆总管结石继发急性重症胆管炎的效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 60-63.
[12] 韩戟, 杨力, 陈玉. 腹部形态CT参数与完全腹腔镜全胃切除术术中失血量的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 88-91.
[13] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[14] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[15] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
阅读次数
全文


摘要