切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (06) : 672 -675. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2021.06.024

论著

腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术中腹膜后神经清扫在早期胰腺癌中的应用价值
吉韬1, 董仁华1,()   
  1. 1. 620010,四川省眉山市四川大学华西医院眉山医院
  • 收稿日期:2021-02-02 出版日期:2021-12-26
  • 通信作者: 董仁华

The clinical value of retroperitoneal nerve dissection in laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy for early pancreatic cancer

Tao Ji1, Renhua Dong1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Meishan Hospital, West China Hospital, Sichuan University Meishan, Sichuan 620010, China
  • Received:2021-02-02 Published:2021-12-26
  • Corresponding author: Renhua Dong
  • Supported by:
    Sichuan Medical (Youth Innovation) Scientific Research Project in 2019(Q19062); 2018 Scientific Research Project of Sichuan Provincial Health and Family Planning Commission (Key Research Project)(18ZD022)
引用本文:

吉韬, 董仁华. 腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术中腹膜后神经清扫在早期胰腺癌中的应用价值[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(06): 672-675.

Tao Ji, Renhua Dong. The clinical value of retroperitoneal nerve dissection in laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy for early pancreatic cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(06): 672-675.

目的

探讨腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术(LPD)中腹膜后神经清扫在早期胰腺癌中的应用价值。

方法

回顾性分析2018年1月至2019年12月86例行LPD早期胰腺癌患者的临床资料,按照淋巴结清扫范围分为标准组(n=46)和研究组(n=40)。标准组:采用标准的淋巴结清扫;研究组:采用腹膜后神经清扫。数据采用软件SPSS 22.0进行统计学分析。围术期指标等计量资料采用(±s)表示,行独立t检验;术后并发症等计数资料采用χ2检验分析。生存分析采用Kaplan-Meier法并行Log-rank检验。P<0.05差异有统计学意义。

结果

与标准组相比,研究组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、淋巴结清扫数目、阳性淋巴结检出数及R0切除率较标准组均显著提高(P<0.05);而两组患者的术后住院时间及术后总并发症的发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);随访期间,术后1年无病生存率标准组患者为69.6%,研究组患者为87.5%,两组差异有统计学意义(χ2=3.998, P=0.046)。

结论

LPD联合神经清扫治疗早期胰腺癌虽然使手术时间有所延长且术中出血量也有所增加,但提高了患者的R0切除率和术后1年无病生存率。

Objective

To investigate the clinical value of retroperitoneal nerve dissection in laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) in the treatment of early pancreatic cancer.

Methods

The clinical data of 86 patients with early pancreatic cancer who underwent LPD from January 2018 to December 2019 were analyzed retrospectively . And according to the scope of lymph node dissection, 46 cases were divided into the standard group received standard lymph node dissection, while 40 cases were divided into the study group received retroperitoneal nerve dissection. Statistical analysis were performed by using SPSS 22.0 software Measurement data such as perioperative indexes were expressed as (±s), and were examined by using t-test. Count data such as postoperative complications were examined by using χ2 test. The survival were analyzed by using Kaplan-Meier method and parallel log-rank test. A P value of <0.05 was considered as statistically significant difference.

Results

Compared with the standard group, much longer operation time, more intraoperative blood loss and harvested lymph nodes, and increased number of positive lymph nodes detected and R0 resection rate were observed respectively in the study group (P<0.05); There was no significant difference between two groups in terms of the length of hospitalization and the incidence of complications (P>0.05); During the follow-up, the 1-year disease-free survival rate of 87.5% in the study group was significantly higher than 69.6% in the standard group (χ2=3.998, P=0.046).

Conclusion

Although LPD combined with nerve dissection in the treatment of early pancreatic cancer would increase the operation time and blood loss, it could improve the R0 resection rate and the 1-year disease-free survival rate.

表1 86例早期胰腺癌行LPD不同术式两组患者一般资料对比[(±s),例]
表2 86例早期胰腺癌行LPD不同术式两组患者围术期相关指标比较[(±s),例]
表3 86例早期胰腺癌行LPD不同术式两组患者术后并发症情况[例(%)]
[1]
赵玉沛,崔铭,张太平. 腹腔镜胰腺癌根治术的热点与展望[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版)201913(4):325-327.
[2]
Hung YH, Hsu MC, Chen LT, et al. Alteration of epigenetic modifiers in pancreatic cancer and its clinical implication [J]. J Clin Med, 2019, 8(6) : 903.
[3]
吕翼,魏若征,吴河水. 胰腺癌的早期诊断[J]. 临床急诊杂志201819(3):149-151.
[4]
中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会. 胰腺癌诊疗规范(2018年版)[J/CD]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版)201913(4):253-262.
[5]
司伟,刘军. 腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术手术方式的几个问题[J]. 中国临床新医学202013(11):1091-1094.
[6]
蒋奎荣,时国东,苗毅. 胰腺癌神经侵犯的研究进展[J]. 肝胆外科杂志201927(2):81-83.
[7]
陈汝福,周泉波. 胰头癌行根治性胰十二指肠切除术神经清扫指征与技巧[J]. 中国实用外科杂志201636(8):847-850.
[8]
Suzuki S, Shimoda M, Shimoda J, et al. Predictive Early Recurrence Factors of Preoperative Clinicophysiological Findings in Pancreatic Cancer[J]. Eur Surg Res, 2018, 59(5-6) : 329-338.
[9]
刘梦奇,吉顺荣,徐晓武,等. 2019年胰腺癌研究及诊疗新进展[J]. 中国癌症杂志202030(1):1-10.
[10]
陈凯,杨洪吉,邓小凡,等. 淋巴结转移对胰腺癌患者预后的影响[J]. 中华普通外科杂志201833(6):452-455.
[11]
Hoshikawa M, Ogata S, Nishikawa M, et al. Pathomorphological features of metastatic lymph nodes as predictors of postoperative prognosis in pancreatic cancer[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2019, 98(5) : e14369.
[12]
杨延辉,张玉祥,桂洋,等. 胰腺癌与细胞自噬,神经浸润的关系[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志201834(11):2475-2479.
[13]
Gasparini G, Pellegatta M, Crippa S, et al. Nerves and Pancreatic Cancer: New Insights into a Dangerous Relationship[J]. Cancers(Basel), 2019, 11(7) : 893.
[14]
Masiak-Segit W, Rawicz-Pruszynski K, Skorzewska M, et al. Surgical treatment of pancreatic cancer[J]. Pol Przegl Chir, 2018, 90(2):45-53.
[15]
Fortner JG. Regional resection of cancer of the pancreas: A new surgical approach[J]. Surgery, 1973, 73(2) : 307-320.
[16]
田轩,杨永生,曲仙智,等. 胰十二指肠切除术淋巴结清扫范围的共识与争议[J]. 国际外科学杂志201845(5):292-295.
[17]
沈璟,郭世伟,金钢. 胰腺癌临床研究进展:从"切除"到"治愈" [J]. 中华外科杂志2019, 57(1):72-77.
[18]
黄鹤光,陆逢春. 胰十二指肠切除淋巴结清扫原则及意义[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版)201913(4):328-331.
[19]
Umemura A, Nitta H, Takahara T, et al. Current status of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy and pancreatectomy[J]. Asian J Surg, 2018, 41(2) : 106-114.
[20]
Qin R, Kendrick ML, Wolfgang CL, et al. International expert consensus on laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy[J]. HepatoBiliary Surg Nutr, 2020, 9(4) : 464-483.
[1] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[2] 周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[3] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[4] 王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[5] 李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[6] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[7] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[8] 曹迪, 张玉茹. 经腹腔镜生物补片修补直肠癌根治术后盆底疝1例[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 115-116.
[9] 李凯, 陈淋, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种U型记忆合金线在经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 15-15.
[10] 易明超, 汪鑫, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种T型记忆金属线在经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 599-599.
[11] 莫波, 王佩, 王恒, 何志军, 梁俊, 郝志楠. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术与改良胃癌根治术治疗早期胃癌的疗效[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 644-647.
[12] 鲁鑫, 许佳怡, 刘洋, 杨琴, 鞠雯雯, 徐缨龙. 早期LC术与PTCD续贯LC术治疗急性胆囊炎对患者肝功能及预后的影响比较[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 648-650.
[13] 马涛, 叶春伟, 刘滔, 彭文希, 李志鹏. 腹腔镜与开放性离断式肾盂成形术治疗小儿肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻的比较[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 605-610.
[14] 刘成, 赖聪, 黄健, 王建辰, 罗茜芸, 许可慰. EDGE SP1000单孔手术机器人辅助腹腔镜下猪输尿管部分切除联合端端吻合术的可行性研究[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 642-646.
[15] 孙秀艳, 徐庆蕾, 马鹏涛, 胡志元, 郭传真, 祝成红. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术中患者体温变化与压力性损伤及受压部位微环境的相关性分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 480-484.
阅读次数
全文


摘要