切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (06) : 653 -656. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2021.06.019

论著

单孔+1孔腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术的安全性评价
马博1,(), 周军2, 李建刚1, 王俊1   
  1. 1. 830063 新疆,新疆医科大学第二附属医院
    2. 510120 广州,中山大学附属孙逸仙纪念医院胃肠外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-10-29 出版日期:2021-12-26
  • 通信作者: 马博

Safety evaluation of single incision plus one port laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for distal gastric cancer

Bo Ma1,(), Jun Zhou2, Jiangang Li1, Jun Wang1   

  1. 1. Second Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Xinjiang 830063, China
    2. Gastrointestinal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University stomach enterochirurgia, Guangzhou 510120, China
  • Received:2020-10-29 Published:2021-12-26
  • Corresponding author: Bo Ma
  • Supported by:
    Natural Science Foundation of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region(2019D02C256); Hospital Project of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University(20190215); Scientific Research Projects of Guangdong Science and Technology Department(2018ZC0181)
引用本文:

马博, 周军, 李建刚, 王俊. 单孔+1孔腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术的安全性评价[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(06): 653-656.

Bo Ma, Jun Zhou, Jiangang Li, Jun Wang. Safety evaluation of single incision plus one port laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for distal gastric cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(06): 653-656.

目的

研究单孔+1孔(SILS+1)腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术的安全性及可行性。

方法

回顾性分析2019年1月至2019年12月收治的SILS+1腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术患者临床资料41例,设为SILS+1组;纳入2018年1月至12月行五孔腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术患者临床资料68例进行比较,设为五孔组。使用统计学软件SPSS 24.0进行数据分析,手术相关指标、疼痛VAS评分等计量资料采用(±s)表示,组间比较采用独立样本t检验;术后并发症等计数资料采用χ2检验。以P<0.05差异有统计学意义。

结果

SILS+1组手术时间较五孔组略长,腹腔引流管拔除时间及住院时间均较五孔组短,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。SILS+1组术后并发症总发生率为4.9%,五孔组总发生率为5.9%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。SILS+1组术后12 h、1 d、2 d、3 d的VAS评分明显低于五孔组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

与五孔法相比,临床在掌握丰富的腹腔镜操作技术下,开展SILS+1腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术安全可行。

Objective

To investigate the safety and feasibility of single-port + 1-port (SILS+ 1) laparoscopic radical resection of distal gastric cancer.

Methods

Clinical data of 41 patients with SILS+ 1 laparoscopic radical resection of distal gastric cancer admitted from January 2019 to December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed, who were assigned to the SILS+ 1 group. Clinical data of 68 patients who received five-hole laparoscopic radical resection of distal gastric cancer from January to December 2018 were included for comparison, and they were assigned to the five-hole group. Statistical software SPSS 24.0 was used for data analysis, operation related indicators, VAS score and other measurement data were expressed by (±s), independent sample t-test was used for comparison between groups. Postoperative complications were tested by χ2 test. P<0.05 was statistically significant.

Results

The operation time of the SILS+ 1 group was slightly longer than that of the Five hole group, postoperative abdominal drainage tube extraction time and hospitalization time were shorter than those of the Five hole group, and the differences between the two groups were statistically significant (P<0.05); There were no significant differences in intraoperative blood loss, number of lymph node dissection and hospitalization cost between 2 groups (P>0.05). The total incidence of postoperative complications was 4.9% in the SILS+ 1 group and 5.9% in the Five hole group group. The VAS scores of SILS+ 1 group at 12 h, 1 d, 2 d and 3 d after surgery were significantly lower than those of the five-well group, with statistical significance (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Compared with the five-hole method, it is safe and feasible to perform SILS+ 1 laparoscopic radical resection of distal gastric cancer under abundant laparoscopic operation techniques.

表1 109例远端胃癌不同腹腔镜术式两组患者一般临床资料比较[(±s),例]
表2 109例远端胃癌不同腹腔镜术式两组患者围手术期指标比较(±s)
表3 109例远端胃癌不同腹腔镜术式两组患者术后并发症发生情况比较(例)
表4 109例远端胃癌不同腹腔镜术式两组患者术后疼痛VAS评分比较(±s)
[1]
何裕隆. 腹腔镜根治手术在胃癌中应用的现状与争议[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版)201913(2):114-120.
[2]
Gong J, Gao Y, Luo G, et al. Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic D2 Radical Gastrectomy: A Promising Surgical Approach[J]. American Surgeon, 2019, 85(3) : e130-e132.
[3]
Kim HO, Choi DJ, Lee D, et al. Hybrid Single-Incision Laparoscopic Colon Cancer Surgery Using One Additional 5 mm Trocar[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2018, 28(2) : 127-133.
[4]
Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2018, 68(6) : 394-424.
[5]
王宁,刘硕,杨雷,等. 2018全球癌症统计报告解读[J/CD].肿瘤综合治疗电子杂志20195(1):87-97.
[6]
Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2014 (ver. 4)[J]. Gastric Cancer, 2017, 20(1) : 1-19.
[7]
Omori T, Oyama T, Akamatsu H, et al. Transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer[J]. Surg Endosc, 2011, 25(7) : 2400-2404.
[8]
燕速,马新福,赵康. 经脐小切口联合左上腹单孔腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版)201913(5):450.
[9]
Ishikawa D, Yoshikawa K, Higashijima J, et al. Anastomotic recurrence after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with delta-shaped anastomosis : report of a case[J]. The Journal of Medical Investigation, 2020, 67(1.2) : 211-213.
[10]
Lee B, Lee YT, Park YS, et al. Learning Curve of Pure Single-Port Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer[J]. J Gastric Cancer, 2018, 18(2) : 182-188.
[11]
程之逸,赵小军,尤小兰,等. 腹腔镜胃楔形切除术与经脐单孔腔镜胃楔形切除术的临床疗效对比分析[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版)202014(5):495-498.
[12]
Lee Y, Kim HH. Single-incision Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer[J]. J Gastric Cancer, 2017, 17(3) : 193-203.
[13]
Katsuyama S, Nakajima K, Kurokawa Y, et al. Single-Incision Laparoscopic Intragastric Surgery for Gastric Submucosal Tumor Located Adjacent to Esophagogastric Junction: Report of Four Cases[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2018, 28(1) : 78-82.
[14]
Tei M, Otsuka M, Suzuki Y, et al. Safety and feasibility of single-port laparoscopic multivisceral resection for locally advanced left colon cancer[J]. Oncol Lett, 2018, 15(6) : 10091-10097.
[15]
Liu X, Li JB, Shi G, et al. Systematic review of single-incision versus conventional multiport laparoscopic surgery for sigmoid colon and rectal cancer[J]. World J Surg Oncol, 2018, 16(1) : 220.
[1] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[2] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[3] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[4] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[5] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[6] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[7] 刘世君, 马杰, 师鲁静. 胃癌完整系膜切除术+标准D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[8] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[9] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[10] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[11] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[12] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
[13] 郭兵, 王万里, 何凯, 黄汉生. 腹腔镜下肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 143-143.
[14] 李凯, 陈淋, 苏怀东, 向涵, 张伟. 超微创器械在改良单孔腹腔镜巨大肝囊肿开窗引流及胆囊切除中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 144-144.
[15] 魏丽霞, 张安澜, 周宝勇, 李明. 腹腔镜下Ⅲb型肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 145-145.
阅读次数
全文


摘要