切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (04) : 407 -410. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2020.04.025

所属专题: 文献

论著

不同消化道重建方式在腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术的应用对比研究
张涛1, 马海婧2,()   
  1. 1. 710018 西安市第三医院
    2. 712000 咸阳市第一人民医院
  • 收稿日期:2019-08-26 出版日期:2020-08-26
  • 通信作者: 马海婧

A comparative study of different digestive tract reconstruction methods in laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for distal gastric cancer

Tao Zhang1, Haijing Ma2,()   

  1. 1. Xi ’an third hospital 710018
    2. Xianyang first people’s hospital 712000
  • Received:2019-08-26 Published:2020-08-26
  • Corresponding author: Haijing Ma
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Ma Haijing, Email:
  • Supported by:
    Shaanxi provincial department of science and technology key research and development program(2017JM0065)
引用本文:

张涛, 马海婧. 不同消化道重建方式在腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术的应用对比研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(04): 407-410.

Tao Zhang, Haijing Ma. A comparative study of different digestive tract reconstruction methods in laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for distal gastric cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(04): 407-410.

目的

探讨Uncut Roux-en-Y吻合、Roux-en-Y吻合与Billroth-II吻合在远端胃癌根治术消化道重建中的应用效果。

方法

回顾性分析2016年1月至2019年1月94例行完全腹腔镜下胃癌根治术患者临床资料,根据不同消化道重建方式分组,其中A组28例行Uncut Roux-en-Y吻合、B组36例行Roux-en-Y吻合、C组30例行Billroth-II吻合。采用SPSS20.0统计软件进行数据分析,围术期指标等计量资料采用(±s)表示,用单因素方差分析,组间两两比较采用t检验;术后并发症等计数资料采用χ2检验。P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

A组在降低手术吻合时间和Roux淤滞综合征(RSS)明显优于B组(P<0.05);术中出血量和肛门恢复排气时间明显低于B组与C组(P<0.05);A组和B组在降低反流性胃炎和胆汁反流显著优于C组(P<0.05);在手术时间、恢复进食时间、术后住院时间、吻合口漏、溃疡、狭窄、出血及反流性食管炎等方面三组差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

Uncut Roux-en-Y吻合术在胃癌根治术中具有操作简单、安全可行、降低术后并发症等特点,有效改善患者术后生活质量,值得临床推广。

Objective

To explore the effect of Uncut Roux-en-Y anastomosis, Roux-en-Y anastomosis and Billroth-II anastomosis in the reconstruction of digestive tract in laparoscopic radical distal gastrectomy.

Methods

94 patients treated with complete laparoscopic radical gastrectomy from January 2016 to January 2019 were retrospectively analyzed, according to different digestive tract reconstruction methods they were divided into three groups. Among them, 28 patients in group A treated with Uncut Roux-en-Y anastomosis, 36 patients in group B treated with Roux-en-Y anastomosis, and 30 patients in group C treated with Billroth-II anastomosis. SPSS20.0 statistical software was used for data analysis. Perioperative indicators and other measurements were expressed by (±s). One-way ANOVA was used to compare the two groups by t test. Postoperative complications and other counting data were compared by χ2 test.

Results

The reduction of surgical anastomosis time and Roux-en-Y stasis syndrome (RSS) in group A was significantly better than those in group B (P<0.05). The intraoperative blood loss and anal recovery time were significantly lower than those in group B and Group C (P<0.05); the reducing reflux gastritis and bile reflux in group A and group B were significantly better than group C (P<0.05); There were no significant differences in the three groups in operative time, recovery time, postoperative hospital stay, anastomotic leakage. ulcer, stenosis, hemorrhage and reflux esophagitis (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Uncut Roux-en-Y anastomosis is simple, safe and feasible, and reduces postoperative complications in gastric cancer radical surgery. It is effective in improving postoperative quality of life and is worthy of clinical promotion.

表1 94例胃癌患者腹腔镜全胃切除术不同吻合方式三组一般资料比较[(±s),例]
表2 94例胃癌患者腹腔镜全胃切除术不同吻合方式三组患者围术期指标比较(±s)
表3 94例胃癌患者腹腔镜全胃切除术不同吻合方式三组术后6个月随访结果[例(%)]
[1]
左婷婷,郑荣寿,曾红梅,等.中国胃癌流行病学现状[J].中国肿瘤临床,2017, 44(1): 52-58.
[2]
Caruso S, Patriti A, Roviello F,et al.Robot-assisted laparoscopic vs open gastrectomy for gastric cancer : Systematic review and meta-analysis[J].World J Clin Oncol,2017,8(3): 273-284.
[3]
季加孚,王宇宸,肖琪严.中国胃癌腹腔镜手术临床研究现状[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2019,13(2): 109-113.
[4]
杨栋,苏同荣,何亮,等.腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术行非离断式Roux-en-Y吻合119例分析[J]. 中国实用外科杂志,2018,38(3): 312-315.
[5]
Kawase H, Ebihara Y, Shichinohe T,et al. Long-term outcome after laparoscopic gastrectomy: a multicenter retrospective study[J].Langenbecks Arch Surg,2017,402(1): 41-47.
[6]
Kanaji S, Harada H, Nakayama S,et al.Surgical outcomes in the newly introduced phase of intracorporeal anastomosis following laparoscopic distal gastrectomy is safe and feasible compared with established procedures of extracorporeal anastomosis[J].Surg Endosc, 2014, 28(4): 1250-1255.
[7]
沈华,洪楚原,邓一文,等.Uncut Roux-en-Y吻合在全腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术消化道重建中的应用[J].中国老年学杂志,2019,39(5): 1096-1099.
[8]
Bove V, Tringali A, Familiari P,et al.ERCP in patients with prior Billroth-II gastrectomy: report of 30 years’ experience[J].Endoscopy, 2015, 47(7): 611-616.
[9]
Kitasato Y, Midorikawa R, Uchino Y,et al.A case of retrograde intus-susception at Roux-en-Y anastomosis 10 years after total gastrectomy:review of the literature[J].Surg Case Rep, 2016, 2(1): 123.
[10]
毛须平,毛晓俊,王鹏,等.改良uncut Roux-en-Y吻合在腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术中的应用分析[J].南京医科大学学报(自然科学版),2018,38(10): 1432-1434,1450.
[11]
Schneider R, Gass JM, Kern B,et al.Linear compared to circular stapler anastomosis in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass leads to comparable weight loss with fewer complications: a matched pair study[J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2016, 401(3): 307-313.
[12]
王立平,杨宏,崔明,等.全腹腔镜非离断式Roux-en-Y吻合术应用于远端胃癌根治术的近期疗效[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2018,21(7): 819-821.
[13]
王财庆,陈功,徐莆保.毕Ⅱ式吻合与非离断式Roux-en-Y吻合在远端胃癌根治术中临床应用对照分析[J].湖南师范大学学报(医学版),2018,15(6): 167-170.
[14]
赵天天,鲍传庆,许炳华,等.非离断式Roux-en-Y吻合在腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术中的应用[J].中国微创外科杂志,2018,18(12): 1095-1098,1107.
[15]
倪庆锋,朱建伟.非离断式Roux-en-Y吻合在远端胃癌根治术中的应用研究[J].南通大学学报(医学版), 2018, 38(5): 353-355.
[1] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[2] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[3] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[4] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[5] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[6] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[7] 刘世君, 马杰, 师鲁静. 胃癌完整系膜切除术+标准D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[8] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[9] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[10] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[11] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[12] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
[13] 郭兵, 王万里, 何凯, 黄汉生. 腹腔镜下肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 143-143.
[14] 李凯, 陈淋, 苏怀东, 向涵, 张伟. 超微创器械在改良单孔腹腔镜巨大肝囊肿开窗引流及胆囊切除中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 144-144.
[15] 魏丽霞, 张安澜, 周宝勇, 李明. 腹腔镜下Ⅲb型肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 145-145.
阅读次数
全文


摘要