切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"
高级检索
中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版)

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (04) : 403 -406. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2020.04.024

所属专题： 文献；

论著

两种腹腔镜术与三镜联合术治疗胆囊结石并胆总管结石的临床比较
黎万芝1,†(), 刘鸿1, 蒋丹1, 石鑫2   
  1. 1. 641000　四川省内江市中区人民医院
    2. 050031　河北医科大学第一医院
  • 收稿日期:2019-08-15 出版日期:2020-08-26
  • 通信作者: 黎万芝

Clinical comparison of two kinds of laparoscopic surgery and combined three endoscopic surgery for the treatment of gallbladder stones and common bile duct stones

Wanzhi Li1,†(), Hong Liu1, Dan Jiang1, Xin Shi2   

  1. 1. Neijiang Central District People’s Hospital 641000
    2. The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University 050031
  • Received:2019-08-15 Published:2020-08-26
  • Corresponding author: Wanzhi Li
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Li Wanzhi, Email:
  • Supported by:
    Key Project of Medical Science Research in Hebei Province(20170476)
全文 ( ) 下载PDF ( ) 导出引用
引用本文：

黎万芝, 刘鸿, 蒋丹, 石鑫. 两种腹腔镜术与三镜联合术治疗胆囊结石并胆总管结石的临床比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(04): 403-406.

Wanzhi Li, Hong Liu, Dan Jiang, Xin Shi. Clinical comparison of two kinds of laparoscopic surgery and combined three endoscopic surgery for the treatment of gallbladder stones and common bile duct stones[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(04): 403-406.

目的

探究两种腹腔镜术与三镜联合术治疗胆囊结石并胆总管结石的临床效果。

方法

回顾性分析2014年3月至2017年12月收治的134例胆囊结石并胆总管结石的患者，根据所采取的治疗方案不同分为A、B、C三组，A组患者采取腹腔镜与十二指肠镜联合术(n＝41)，B组患者采取腹腔镜与胆道镜联合术(n＝46)，C组患者则采取腹腔镜、十二指肠镜、胆道镜三镜联合术(n＝47)。采用SPSS20.0软件进行统计学分析，术中术后各项指标以及生活质量评分等均以(±s)描述，采用t检验；术后并发症、术后结石复发、胆总管狭窄等采用χ2检验；则P<0.05差异有统计学意义。

结果

C组患者的术中术后恢复各项指标均明显优于A、B两组(P<0.05), A组与B组上述各指标间差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。C组患者并发症总发生率为4.3%，低于A组(24.4%)、B组(19.6%)患者(P<0.05)。术后6个月后随访结果显示：C组患者的结石复发率与胆总管狭窄率均为(0.0%)明显低于A组(12.2%，9.8%)与B组(13.0%，8.7% )，P<0.05；术后三组患者的生活质量评分均较治疗前明显提高(P<0.05)，但C组患者的各项评分均明显优于A组与B组(P<0.05)，而A组与B组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

三镜联合术治疗胆囊结石并胆总管结石的临床疗效显著，安全可行。该术式不仅降低了复发的风险，也减少了并发症发生，明显改善了患者的生活质量，值得临床进一步推广应用。

关键词: 胆囊结石病, 胆总管结石, 腹腔镜, 十二指肠镜, 疗效比较研究, 胆道镜
Objective

To investigate the clinical effects of two laparoscopic surgery and combined three endoscopic surgery for the treatment of gallbladder stones and common bile duct stones.

Methods

134 patients with gallstones and common bile duct stones admitted to our hospital from March 2014 to December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the treatment plan adopted, they were divided into three groups: A, B and C. Patients in group A underwent laparoscopic and duodenoscopy (n=41), group B underwent laparoscopic and choledochoscopy (n=46), and group C underwent laparoscopic, duodenoscopy, and choledochoscopy (n=47). The data were analyzed by SPSS20.0 software. The surgical index, postoperative recovery index and quality of life score were described by (±s) and analyzed by independent t test. Postoperative complications, postoperative calculus recurrence, and common bile duct stricture were described by (n, %), and compared with χ2 test, P<0.05 was statistically significant.

Results

The indexes of surgical and postoperative recovery in group C were significantly better than those in group A and B (P<0.05), and there was no significant difference between group A and group B (P>0.05). The total incidence of complications in group C was 4.3%, which was significant lower than that in group A (24.4%) and group B (19.6%) (P<0.05). The follow-up results after 6 months of treatment showed that the stone recurrence rate and common bile duct stenosis rate in group C (all 0%) were significant lower than those in group A (12.2%, 9.8%) and group B (13.0%, 8.7%) (P<0.05). After treatment, the quality of life scores of the three groups were significantly improved (P<0.05), but the scores of group C were significantly better than those of group A and group B (P<0.05), and there was no significant difference between group A and group B (P>0.05).

Conclusion

The clinical efficacy of combined three endoscopic surgery for the treatment of gallbladder stones and common bile duct stones is significant and safe. This procedure not only reduces the risk of recurrence, but also reduces complications, which significantly improves the quality of life of patients, and is worthy of further clinical application.

Key words: Cholecystolithiasis, Choledocholithiasis, Laparoscopes, Duodenoscopes, Comparative effectiveness research, Choledochoscopy
表1 134例胆囊结石并胆总管结石患者不同疗法三组患者基线资料[()，例]
组别 例数 年龄(岁) 性别 胆总管直径(mm) 胆总管结石数(个) 临床表现
男/女 腹痛/发热/黄疸
A组 41 43.8±13.2 19/22 1.1±0.5 1.8±1.3 18/3/20
B组 46 44.7±12.9 22/24 1.2±0.4 1.9±1.2 20/4/24
C组 47 42.3±11.4 21/26 1.1±0.3 1.6±1.4 19/6/22
F/χ2值 ? 0.951 0.093 1.366 1.109 0.912
P值 ? >0.05 >0.05 >0.05 >0.05 >0.05
表2 134例胆囊结石并胆总管结石患者不同疗法三组患者的手术相关指标比较(±s)
组别 手术时间(min) 失血量(ml) 输液量(L) 引流时间(d)
A组 167.4±19.3 58.4±10.2 8.5±1.8 5.3±1.0
B组 174.2±20.1 53.7±11.7 8.3±1.8 5.5±1.1
C组 173.5±17.2 42.9±12.3 6.4±1.6 2.6±0.7
Ⅰ(t/P) 1.56/0.12 6.37/0.00 5.79/0.00 14.81/0.00
Ⅱ(t/P) 0.18/0.85 4.33/0.00 5.38/0.00 15.20/0.00
Ⅲ(t/P) 1.60/0.11 1.986/0.05 0.401/0.69 0.88/0.38
表3 134例胆囊结石并胆总管结石患者不同疗法三组患者术后恢复指标比较(±s)
组别 例数 住院时间(d) 排气时间(d) 下床活动时间(d)
A组 41 7.4±1.6 1.4±0.6 2.5±0.9
B组 46 7.2±1.4 1.6±0.7 2.7±1.1
C组 47 4.5±1.2 1.5±0.7 1.4±0.6
Ⅰ(t/P) ? 9.69/0.00 0.71/0.47 6.82/0.00
Ⅱ(t/P) ? 9.99/0.00 0.78/0.49 7.09/0.00
Ⅲ(t/P) ? 0.62/0.53 1.42/0.15 0.92/0.36
表4 134例胆囊结石并胆总管结石患者不同疗法三组患者术后并发症比较(例)
组别 例数 胆漏 残余结石 胆管损伤 肠梗阻 切口感染 急性胰腺炎 总发生率(%)
A组 41 1 4 1 0 2 2 10(24.4)
B组 46 1 3 1 1 2 1 9(19.6)
C组 47 0 0 1 0 1 0 2(4.3)
Ⅰ(χ2/P) ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 7.53/0.00
Ⅱ(χ2/P) ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 5.22/0.02
Ⅲ(χ2/P) ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 0.29/0.58
表5 134例胆囊结石并胆总管结石患者不同疗法三组患者治疗6个月后随访情况[例(%)]
组别 例数 结石复发率 胆总管狭窄率
A组 41 5(12.2) 4(9.8)
B组 46 6(13.0) 4(8.7)
C组 47 0(0.0) 0(0.0)
Ⅰ(χ2/P) ? 6.00/0.01 4.80/0.02
Ⅱ(χ2/P) ? 6.53/0.01 4.27/0.03
Ⅲ(χ2/P) ? 0.01/0.90 0.02/0.86
表6 134例胆囊结石并胆总管结石患者不同疗法三组患者术前和术后6个月生活质量评分比较(±s)
组别 时间 生理 心理 社会功能 物质生活
A组 术前 61.2±4.1 63.7±4.6 59.3±3.6 64.5±4.3
? 术后 73.3±4.4 75.2±4.8 73.2±3.9 77.9±5.2
B组 术前 61.7±4.2 63.9±4.7 59.8±3.8 64.9±4.5
? 术后 74.2±4.2 76.3±5.1 74.3±4.1 78.4±5.4
C组 术前 61.5±4.3 63.2±4.5 59.1±3.5 64.2±4.1
? 术后 83.4±4.5 86.7±5.0 83.8±5.2 88.2±5.1
Ⅰ(t/P) ? 10.61/0.00 10.96/0.00 10.68/0.00 9.36/0.00
Ⅱ(t/P) ? 9.86/0.00 9.93/0.00 9.77/0.00 8.99/0.00
Ⅲ(t/P) ? 0.97/0.33 1.03/0.30 1.27/0.20 0.43/0.66
[1]
Lee JJY, Keane MG, Pereira S．Diagnosis and treatment of gallstone disease[J]．Practitioner，2015，259(1783): 15-19.
[2]
Demirbas BT, Gulluoglu BM, Aktan AO.Retained abdominal gallstones after laparoscopic cholecystectomy：A systematic review[J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2015, 25(2): 97-99.
[3]
徐勇士，刘义武，凌晓明．腹腔镜和胆道镜治疗高龄胆囊合并胆总管结石分析[J/CD]．中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2016，10(1) : 70-72.
[4]
Evoy DA, Regan MC, Attwood SEA，et al.The role of ERCP and laparoscopic cholecystectomy in gallstone－related pancreatitis[J]．Mini Invas Ther，2016，3(3): 149-152.
[5]
Gilsdorf D, Henrichsen JL, Liljestrand K，et al.Single－stage management of common bile duct stones with laparoscopic common duct exploration and cholecystectomy is safe and cost effective in a large multi－hospital health care system[J]．J Am Coll Surg，2015，221(4): S77.
[6]
彭颖，王立新，徐智，等．腹腔镜联合胆道镜经胆囊管汇入部微切开治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石[J]．中国微创外科杂志，2015，15(3): 224-227.
[7]
陈安平，胡铤，李华林，等．同期腹腔镜、胆管镜、十二指肠镜多入路治疗胆囊结石合并细径胆总管结石71例[J]．中国普外基础与临床杂志，2014，21(8): 946-950.
[8]
汤建军，奚剑波，张伟元．双镜联合胆总管探查取石术后胆总管一期缝合与T管引流疗效对比[J]. 肝胆胰外科杂志，2017, 29(5): 373-376.
[9]
陈安平，曾乾桃，周华波，等．腹腔镜下逐级导管扩张术治疗胆总管结石合并胆总管远端梗阻146例[J]. 肝胆胰外科杂志，2018, 30(2): 152-155.
[10]
张智勇，杜立学，郑伟，等．腹腔镜胆总管探查术与内镜下十二指肠乳头括约肌切开术治疗胆总管结石的临床对照研究[J]．中国普通外科杂志，2015，24(8): 1088-1092.
[11]
陈安平，罗聪，严朝成，等．同期两镜或同期三镜治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石2410例[J/CD]．中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(5): 511-514.
[12]
沈旦，郭庆渠，吴育连．腹腔镜联合十二指肠镜不同序贯次序治疗胆囊结石并胆总管结石效果对比研究[J]．中国内镜杂志，2015, 21(1): 90-93.
[13]
Heo J, Jung MK, Cho CM.Should prophylactic cholecystectomy be performed in patients with concomitant gallstones after endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones[J]．Surg Endosc，2015，29(6): 1574-1579.
[14]
Shakya JPS, Agrawal N, Kumar A，et al.Primary closure versus T－tube drainage after laparoscopic choledocholithotomy: a prospective randomized study [J]．Int Surg J，2017，4(5): 1762-1764.
[15]
秦仁义．全腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术路径选择和技术流程优化之我见[J]．中华外科杂志，2017，55(5): 343-345.
[16]
汤晓东，刘双海，陈达伟．腹腔镜、胆道镜、十二指肠镜三镜联合治疗细径胆总管结石105例[J]．肝胆胰外科杂志，2018，30(5): 407-409.
[17]
Wen SQ, Hu QH, Wan M，et al.Appropriate patient selection is essential for the success of primary closure after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration [J]．Dig Dis Sci，2017，62(5): 1321-1326.
[18]
秦胜旗．腹腔镜胆囊切除胆道探查术治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的临床效果[J/CD]．中国医学前沿杂志(电子版), 2016，8(4): 70-72.
[1] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[2] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[3] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[4] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[5] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[6] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[7] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[8] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[9] 李博, 贾蓬勃, 李栋, 李小庆. ERCP与LCBDE治疗胆总管结石继发急性重症胆管炎的效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 60-63.
[10] 韩戟, 杨力, 陈玉. 腹部形态CT参数与完全腹腔镜全胃切除术术中失血量的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 88-91.
[11] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[12] 冯旺, 马振中, 汤林花. CT扫描三维重建在肝内胆管细胞癌腹腔镜肝切除术中的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 104-107.
[13] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[14] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[15] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
阅读次数
全文


摘要

版权所有 中华医学会 中华医学电子音像出版社有限责任公司  京ICP备14006079号-1  网络出版服务许可证：(署)网出证(京)字第075号