切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (03) : 256 -259. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2020.03.013

所属专题: 经典病例 经典病例 文献

论著

基于膜解剖的腹腔镜脾曲结肠癌根治术33例临床分析
杜峻峰1, 李世拥1,(), 陈纲1, 李涛1, 吕远1, 孙亮1, 袁强1, 蔡慧云1   
  1. 1. 100700 北京,解放军总医院第七医学中心普通外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-02-28 出版日期:2020-06-26
  • 通信作者: 李世拥

Clinical analysis of 33 cases of laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision for left colon cancer at splenic flexure based on membrane anatomy

Junfeng Du1, Shiyong Li1,(), Gang Chen1, Tao Li1, Yuan Lyv1, Liang Sun1, Qiang Yuan1, Huiyun Cai1   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, 7th Medical center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100700, China
  • Received:2020-02-28 Published:2020-06-26
  • Corresponding author: Shiyong Li
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Li Shiyong, Email:
  • Supported by:
    National natural science foundation of China(81870393、81571563)
引用本文:

杜峻峰, 李世拥, 陈纲, 李涛, 吕远, 孙亮, 袁强, 蔡慧云. 基于膜解剖的腹腔镜脾曲结肠癌根治术33例临床分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(03): 256-259.

Junfeng Du, Shiyong Li, Gang Chen, Tao Li, Yuan Lyv, Liang Sun, Qiang Yuan, Huiyun Cai. Clinical analysis of 33 cases of laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision for left colon cancer at splenic flexure based on membrane anatomy[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(03): 256-259.

目的

探讨基于膜解剖理论,腹腔镜下左半结肠完整系膜切除治疗脾区结肠癌的安全性、可行性及临床疗效。

方法

自2016年1月至2019年6月,我中心33例脾曲结肠癌患者接受了腹腔镜下左半结肠切除术,所有患者均于术前经结肠镜下行活检病理确诊,同时给予纳米碳和(或)钛夹标记,腹部增强CT/立位腹平片确认病变位于脾曲,术前TNM分期为Ⅰ期5例、Ⅱ期19例、Ⅲ期9例。根据膜解剖理论,术中采取头侧-中间-外侧入路相结合的方式进行,注意保持层面优先及结肠系膜的完整性,于根部结扎、切断左结肠动脉、结肠中动脉左支和肠系膜下静脉,清扫223和253淋巴结。计量资料包括患者一般资料、手术参数、术后康复数据以(±s)表示,术后并发症发生率以%表示,采用SPSS 20.0统计软件进行数据分析。

结果

33例手术均在腹腔镜下完成,无中转开腹。手术时间为(160.0±25.4) min,术中出血量为(70.6±46.4) ml,清扫淋巴结数目为(19.3±3.2)枚,标本肠管长度(23.0±2.8) cm,术后排气时间(4.5±1.2) d,术后进食时间(5.5±1.3) d,术后住院时间为(7.8±1.1) d。术后TNM分期为Ⅰ期4例、Ⅱ期21例、Ⅲ期8例。33例患者均未发生脾脏损伤,其中3例有不同程度的脾下极缺血,术后2例患者出现炎症性肠梗阻,保守治疗后康复出院。无术后腹腔出血、无吻合口漏、狭窄、出血等并发症发生。随访8~49个月(中位随访时间26个月),目前患者均健康存活,未见肿瘤复发、转移。

结论

对于脾曲结肠癌,在遵循膜解剖理论、层面优先原则的前提下,采用头侧-中间-外侧入路进行腹腔镜下左半结肠切除术,可以将操作化繁为简,具有安全、微创、可靠等优点,值得在临床推广应用。

Objective

To investigate the safety and feasibility and clinical outcome of laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision (CME) for left colon cancer at splenic flexure based on membrane anatomy.

Methods

From Jan 2016 to Jun 2019, 33 patients with left colon cancer at splenic flexure were enrolled in the present study, who underwent laparoscopic CME, and their clinical data were analyzed retrospectively. All of 33 patients received preoperative colonoscope and the lesions were labeled by using nano carbon and/or titanium clip, eventually they were all diagnosed by biopsy and pathological examination. The lesions were confirmed to be located at splenic flexure by preoperative examinations of abdominal enhanced CT and/or standing abdominal X-ray. There were 5 cases of stage Ⅰ, 19 cases of stage Ⅱ and 9 cases of stage Ⅲ in preoperative TNM staging evaluation. Based on the theories of membrane anatomy and CME, the operations were carried out by using a combined cephalic-middle-lateral approach. The roots of left colon artery, left branch of middle colon artery and inferior mesenteric vein were ligated and cut off respectively, then the 223 and 253 lymph nodes were dissected. Measurement data such as general data of patients, operation parameters and postoperative rehabilitation data were expressed as (±s). The incidence of postoperative complications were expressed as %. Statistical analysis were performed by using SPSS 20.0 software.

Results

All of 33 patients receive successful laparoscopic left colectomy without conversion, with the operation time of (160.0±25.4)min and intraoperative blood loss of (70.6±46.4)ml. The number of harvested lymph nodes were (19.3±3.2) and the length of specimens were (23.0±2.8) cm. Rapid recovery of patients were observed with the first exhaust time of(4.5±1.2) d, the oral feeding time of (5.5±1.3) d and postoperative hospital stay of(7.8±1.1) d. There were 4 cases of stage Ⅰ, 21 cases of stage Ⅱ and 8 cases of stage Ⅲ in postoperative TNM staging evaluation. There were 2 cases of inflammatory ileus after operation, who recovered after conservative treatment. No postoperative abdominal bleeding and anastomotic complications occurred. All the patients survived without tumor recurrence and metastasis during the followed-up of 8~49 months (median follow-up time of 26 months).

Conclusion

Based on the theories of membrane anatomy, for colon cancer at splenic flexure, the cephalic-middle-lateral approach makes it possible to clearly visualize the pancreas and origin of the transverse mesocolon, leading to safe splenic flexure mobilization and complete mesocolic excision. It appears to be safe and feasible and could be a promising method for selected patients with left colon cancer.

[1]
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics,2018[J].CA Cancer J Clin,2018,68(1):7-30.
[2]
Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD,et al.Cancer statistics in China,2015[J].CA Cancer J Clin,2016,66(2):115-132.
[3]
Hohenberger W, Weber K, Matzel K,et al.Standardized surgery for colonic cancer: complete mesocolic excision and central ligation--technical notes and outcome[J].Colorectal Dis,2009,11(4):354-364; discussion 364-365.
[4]
龚建平.外科膜解剖--新的外科学基础? [J].中华实验外科杂志,2015,32(2):225-226.
[5]
Coffey JC, O’Leary DP.The mesentery: structure, function, and role in disease[J].Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol,2016,1(3):238-247.
[6]
郑民华.腹腔镜左半结肠癌根治术[J].中国实用外科杂志,2011,31(9):858-860.
[7]
池畔,王枭杰.左半结肠切除术的争议和基于膜解剖的脾曲游离技巧[J/CD].中华结直肠疾病电子杂志,2017,6(4):284-289.
[8]
刁德昌,万进,王伟,等.横向入路法腹腔镜左半结肠癌根治术的临床应用[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2015,18(10):1056-1059.
[9]
陈纲,李世拥.腹腔镜直肠癌根治保留左结肠血管的技巧及意义[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2018,12(1):9-11.
[10]
李世拥,陈纲,杜峻峰,等.腹腔镜低位直肠癌根治腹部无切口经肛切除套入式吻合102例经验[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2018,12(1):25-29.
[11]
Kim NK, Kim YW, Han YD, et al.Complete mesocolic excision and central vascular ligation for colon cancer: Principle, anatomy, surgical technique, and outcomes[J]. Surg Oncol,2016,25(3):252-262.
[12]
吴康,崔刚.左半结肠切除一期吻合加回肠末端造瘘治疗老年梗阻性左半结肠癌的临床效果[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2019,13(1):99-101.
[13]
朱信强,黄海龙,蒋学通,等.左右半结肠癌临床病理特点差异分析[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2019,13(5):465-467.
[14]
姚永良,余凤,杨珮.腹腔镜下全系膜切除的结肠癌根治术对患者近远期预后的影响[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2019,13(6):622-624.
[15]
篠原尚,水野惠文,牧野尚彦,等.图解外科手术:从膜的解剖解读术式要点[M].第1版.沈阳:辽宁科学技术出版社,2013:1-482.
[16]
Kwon SH, Ahn HJ, Oh JH.Is It the Arc of Riolan or Meandering Mesenteric Artery? [J]. J Endovasc Ther,2015,22(5):825-826.
[17]
Lange JF, Komen N, Akkerman G,et al.Riolan’s arch: confusing, misnomer, and obsolete. A literature survey of the connection(s) between the superior and inferior mesenteric arteries[J].Am J Surg,2007,193(6):742-748.
[1] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[2] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[3] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[4] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[5] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[6] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[7] 刘世君, 马杰, 师鲁静. 胃癌完整系膜切除术+标准D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[8] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[9] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[10] 李博, 贾蓬勃, 李栋, 李小庆. ERCP与LCBDE治疗胆总管结石继发急性重症胆管炎的效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 60-63.
[11] 韩戟, 杨力, 陈玉. 腹部形态CT参数与完全腹腔镜全胃切除术术中失血量的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 88-91.
[12] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[13] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[14] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[15] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
阅读次数
全文


摘要