切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (01) : 35 -38. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2020.01.012

所属专题: 文献

论著

不同胰胃吻合方式对腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术后患者胃排空障碍影响研究
吴志科1,(), 吴佳伦2, 王甲甲3   
  1. 1. 620500 四川省眉山市第二人民医院普通外科
    3. 620000 四川省人民医院肝胆外科
  • 收稿日期:2019-05-29 出版日期:2020-02-26
  • 通信作者: 吴志科

Clinical analysis of the impact of pancreatic gastric or bowel anastomosis on gastric emptying disorder after laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy

Zhike Wu1,(), Jialun Wu2, Jiajia Wang3   

  1. 1. Department of General surgery, the 2nd people’s hospital of Meishan city, Sichuan 620500, China
    2. Department of Hepatobiliary surgery, Sichuan people’s Hospital, Sichuan 620000, China
  • Received:2019-05-29 Published:2020-02-26
  • Corresponding author: Zhike Wu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wu Zhike, Email:
  • Supported by:
    Scientific research project (universal application program) of sichuan provincial health and planning commission in 2018(No.18PJ119); Medical scientific research project of sichuan medical association in 2015(No.S15098)
引用本文:

吴志科, 吴佳伦, 王甲甲. 不同胰胃吻合方式对腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术后患者胃排空障碍影响研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(01): 35-38.

Zhike Wu, Jialun Wu, Jiajia Wang. Clinical analysis of the impact of pancreatic gastric or bowel anastomosis on gastric emptying disorder after laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(01): 35-38.

目的

探究胰胃吻合在腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术(LPD)的临床疗效,分析引起胃排空障碍(DGE)的影响因素。

方法

回顾性分析2015年1月至2018年3月60例接受LPD的资料,根据术中消化道重建方式不同分为胰胃吻合(PG)和胰肠吻合(PJ)两组。PG组28例,PJ组32例。使用SPSS 21.0统计学软件进行分析,围手术指标、营养指标等采用(±s)表示,采用独立t检验;并发症发生率采用χ2检验。利用单/多因素进行分析,探究影响胃排空障碍的危险因素,P<0.05认为差异有统计学意义。

结果

两组均顺利完成手术,无中转开腹病例;PG组近期并发症6例(21.4%),远期1例(3.6%);PJ组近期并发症12例(37.5%),远期4例(12.5%);PG组近、远期并发症少于PJ组(P<0.05); 60例PD患者术后共8例(13.3%)发生胃排空障碍,单因素分析发现,吻合方式、术后出血、胰瘘是引发胃排空障碍的影响因素(P<0.05)。多因素分析发现,胰瘘是引发胃排空障碍的独立危险因素(P<0.05),吻合方式是减少胃排空障碍的保护因素(P<0.05)。

结论

LPD术后PG较PJ对降低术后胰瘘、胃排空障碍更有优势,吻合方式及胰瘘与DGE的发生显著相关。

Objective

To investigate the gastric emptying disorder after laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy by using pancreatic gastric or bowel anastomosis.

Methods

Retrospective analysis were performed in 60 cases who underwent laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy from Jan 2015 to March 2018. According to different digestive tract reconstruction methods, the patients were divided into PG group and PJ group. Statistical analysis were performed by using SPSS 21.0 software. Measurement data, such as perioperative indicators and nutrition status were expressed as (±s), and were examined by one-way variance analysis and t test. Count data such as postoperative complications and the incidence of gallbladder stones were examined by chi square test. Univariate / Multivariate analysis were used to explore the risk factors of gastric emptying disorder. A P value <0.05 was considered as statistically significant difference.

Results

The operations were all successfully performed in both groups, with no conversion to laparotomy. In PG group, there were 6 cases (21.4%) of short-term complications and 1 case (3.6%) of long-term complications. In PJ group, there were 12 cases (37.5%) of short-term complications and 4 cases (12.5%) of long-term complications. The short-term and long-term complications in PG group were less than those in PJ group respectively (P<0.05) .There were 8 cases(13.3%) of gastric emptying after operation in 60 patients with PD, Univariate analysis showed that anastomosis method, postoperative bleeding and pancreatic fistula were the influencing factors of gastric emptying disorder (P<0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that pancreatic fistula was an independent risk factor for gastric emptying disorder (P<0.05), while anastomosis method was a protective factor for reducing gastric emptying disorder(P<0.05).

Conclusion

LPG after PD has more advantages than PJ in reducing postoperative pancreatic fistula and gastric emptying disorder. The anastomosis method and postoperative pancreatic fistula were significantly correlated with the occurrence of DGE.

表1 60例接受LPD不同吻合方法两组患者一般临床资料比较[(±s),例]
表2 60例接受LPD不同吻合方法两组患者围术期指标(±s)
表3 60例接受LPD不同吻合方法两组患者近远期并发率比较(例)
表4 8例胃排空障碍患者的单因素影响分析
表5 8例胃排空障碍患者的独立影响因素分析
[1]
张太平,申鹏,赵玉沛.不断提高胰腺癌诊治规范化水平[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志:电子版,2015,9(4):231-234.
[2]
谭宏涛,宗岩,赵战强,等.胰十二指肠切除术后胃排空延迟预后预测系统的建立和应用[J].中华外科杂志,2017,55(5):368-372.
[3]
El Nakeeb A, Askr W, Mahdy Y,et al.Delayed gastric emptyingafter pancreaticoduodenectomy. Risk factors, predictorsof severity and outcome. A single center experience of 588 cases[J]. J Gastrointest Surg,2015,19(6):1093-1100.
[4]
江寅,虞伟明,郑四鸣,等.胰十二指肠切除术后发生胃排空延迟的危险因素分析[J].中华胰腺病杂志,2016,16(6):361-365.
[5]
Menahem B, Guittet L, Mulliri A,et al.Pancreaticogastrostomy is superior topancreaticojejunostomy for prevention of pancreaticfistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: an updatedmeta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J].Ann Surg,2015,261(5):882-887.
[6]
程智猛,程南生,熊先泽,等.胰十二指肠切除术后胃瘫的危险因素分析[J].中国普外基础与临床杂志,2016,23(8):1018-1023.
[7]
苗毅,高文涛.腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除的规范化相关问题[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志:电子版,2015,9(4):240-242.
[8]
潘小强,陈金明,史赢.胰十二指肠切除术后胃排空障碍[J].中国现代普通外科进展,2016,19(5):415-417.
[9]
袁超杰,伍宏章,何仕青,等.返流性胆管炎的病因及诊治[J].广东医学院学报,2011,29(2):140-142.
[10]
李志臻,王许安,刘颖斌.胰十二指肠切除术中胰胃吻合研究进展[J].中国实用外科杂志,2016,36(5):579-581.
[11]
刘续宝,熊俊杰.从远期生活质量再议胰肠吻合与胰胃吻合合理选择[J].中国实用外科杂志,2016,36(8):839-843.
[12]
邵欣欣,田艳涛.预防胰十二指肠切除术后胰瘘的相关研究[J].肿瘤防治研究,2015,42(9):863-866.
[13]
梁兴,邵成浩.胰十二指肠切除术后远期并发症诊治[J].中国实用外科杂志,2018,38(7):813-815,819.
[14]
刘安成,苗寺利,程平,等.三种吻合方式对胰十二指肠切除术后胰瘘的影响[J].中国实用医刊,2015,42(12):90-91.
[15]
雷海鸣,侍杏华,韩扣兰,等.应用胰管外支架对术后胰瘘影响的Meta分析[J].南京医科大学学报:自然科学版,2016,36(10):1227-1282.
[1] 燕速, 霍博文. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治性切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 13-13.
[2] 母德安, 李凯, 张志远, 张伟. 超微创器械辅助单孔腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 14-14.
[3] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[4] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[5] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[6] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[7] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[8] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[9] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[10] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[11] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[12] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
[13] 郭兵, 王万里, 何凯, 黄汉生. 腹腔镜下肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 143-143.
[14] 李凯, 陈淋, 苏怀东, 向涵, 张伟. 超微创器械在改良单孔腹腔镜巨大肝囊肿开窗引流及胆囊切除中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 144-144.
[15] 魏丽霞, 张安澜, 周宝勇, 李明. 腹腔镜下Ⅲb型肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 145-145.
阅读次数
全文


摘要