切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (01) : 39 -41. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2020.01.013

所属专题: 文献

论著

改良三针法回肠末端预防性造口手术技巧的应用
王杰1, 沈凯文1, 汤东1, 王伟1, 汪刘华1, 梁家奎1, 嵇晋1, 王道荣1,()   
  1. 1. 225000 江苏扬州,扬州大学临床医学院普通外科
  • 收稿日期:2019-06-26 出版日期:2020-02-26
  • 通信作者: 王道荣

Clinical application of modified three-needle-method for preventive ileostomy

Jie Wang1, Kaiwen Shen1, Dong Tang1, Wei Wang1, Liuhua Wang1, Jiakui Liang1, Jin Ji1, Daorong Wang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Clinical Medical College, Yangzhou University, Jiangsu 225000, China
  • Received:2019-06-26 Published:2020-02-26
  • Corresponding author: Daorong Wang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wang Daorong, Email:
  • Supported by:
    Standardized Diagnosis and Treatment Project of Priority Diseases of Jiangsu Province(No. BE2015664); Yangzhou Social Development-Health Care(No.YZ2018087)
引用本文:

王杰, 沈凯文, 汤东, 王伟, 汪刘华, 梁家奎, 嵇晋, 王道荣. 改良三针法回肠末端预防性造口手术技巧的应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(01): 39-41.

Jie Wang, Kaiwen Shen, Dong Tang, Wei Wang, Liuhua Wang, Jiakui Liang, Jin Ji, Daorong Wang. Clinical application of modified three-needle-method for preventive ileostomy[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(01): 39-41.

目的

评价三针法预防性回肠末端造口术的应用效果。

方法

回顾性分析2018年4月至2018年8月期间收治的13例腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后行末端回肠预造口的患者资料,造口方式采用改良三针法固定造口,即一侧腹直肌前后鞘缝合1针,再连针带线穿过肠系膜无血管区,然后在另一侧腹直肌前后鞘再缝合1针,出针后将缝线再由无血管区穿回对侧,收紧缝线;再将造口远近端肠管各固定1针于腹直肌前后鞘。继而开放造瘘口,并将造口肠管全层与皮肤间断缝合。

结果

13例患者均顺利完成手术,平均手术时间(139.62±47.01) min,平均术中出血量(56.15±32.54) ml,有1例患者术后出现造口皮肤黏膜分离,保守治疗后好转。其余患者均未发生造口黏膜与皮肤分离、造口塌陷、造口脱垂、造瘘口肠管坏死、狭窄、感染等并发症。

结论

本术式操作简便、易于掌握,手术耗时相对减少,术后并发症少,便于还纳,进一步改进了回肠末端预防性造口的手术方式,一般情况良好,具有安全性和可行性。

Objective

To evaluate the clinical outcome of the modified three-needle method for preventive ileostomy.

Methods

From April 2018 to August 2018, a retrospective analysis was performed in 13 patients who underwent laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer. The preventive ileostomy was modified by the three-needle method. The procedure was as following. The first and second needle was all sutured between the rectus abdominis muscle, and the suture passed through the avascular zone of the mesentery on the both sides. We tighten the first suture; The second needle and the third needle was performed in the distal and proximal intestines of the stoma. Finally ostomy was opened and suture was made between the whole layer of the stoma to the skin.

Results

All the 13 patients were performed successfully. The average operation time was(139.62±47.01) min, , and the average intraoperative blood loss was (56.15±32.54) ml. One patient had ostomy skin mucosal separation after operation and recovered after conservative treatment. There were no complications such as stoma mucosal separation from the skin, stoma collapse, ostomy prolapse, fistula necrosis, stenosis, infection and other complications.

Conclusion

The operative procedure is simple and easy with less complications, and the operation time is relatively decreased, and it is easy for the close of stoma. The surgical procedure of the preventive ileostomy is further improved. The general condition is good, safe and feasible.

图1 改良三针法回肠末端双腔造口术
[1]
Blok RD, Stam R, Westerduin E,et al.Impact of an institutional change from routine to highly selective diversion of a low anastomosis after TME for rectal cancer[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol,2018,44(8):1220-1225.
[2]
Hain E, Maggiori L, Manceau G,et al.Persistent Asymptomatic Anastomotic Leakage After Laparoscopic Sphincter-Saving Surgery for Rectal Cancer: Can Diverting Stoma Be Reversed Safely at 6 Months?[J].Dis Colon Rectum,2016,59(5):369-376.
[3]
Vasiliu EC, Zarnescu NO, Costea R,et al.Review of Risk Factors for Anastomotic Leakage in Colorectal Surgery[J].Chirurgia,2015,110(4):319-326.
[4]
Gu WL, Wu SW.Meta-analysis of defunctioning stoma in low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: evidence based on thirteen studies[J].World J Surg Oncol,2015,13:9.
[5]
Iwamoto M, Kawada K, Hida K,et al.Delayed anastomotic leakage following laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for lower rectal cancer: report of four cases and literature review[J].World J Surg Oncol,2017,15(1):143.
[6]
Pisarska M, Gajewska N, Ma?czak P,et al.Defunctioning ileostomy reduces leakage rate in rectal cancer surgery-systematic review and meta-analysis[J].Oncotarget,2018,9(29):20816-20825.
[7]
吴舟桥,石晋瑶,李子禹,等.对当前结直肠术后吻合口漏研究的思考[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2018,21(4):372-377.
[8]
张骞,陈庆民,王锡山.预防性回肠造口在低位直肠癌中的应用[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2016,19(4):469-471.
[9]
Haksal M, Okkabaz N, Atici AE,et al.Fortune of temporary ileostomies in patients treated with laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer[J].Ann Surg Treat Res,2017,92(1):35-41.
[10]
You X, Wang Y, Zhao X,et al. Application of protective appendicostomy after sphicter-preserving surgery for patients with low rectal carcinoma who are at high-risk of anastomotic leakage[J].Zhonghua wei chang wai ke za zhi,2015,18(6):573-576.
[11]
李薇,于威,刘铜军,等.临时回肠造口在预防低位直肠癌术后吻合口瘘中的应用价值[J].中华普通外科杂志,2016,31(1):64-65.
[12]
刘德洪,黄江平.低位直肠癌Dixon保肛手术联合预防性回肠造口的应用效果观察[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2018,12(3):254-257.
[13]
黄平,蔡国豪.一针法手术技巧在预防性回肠末端造瘘术中的应用[J].海南医学,2017,28(20):3389-3390.
[14]
刘静,陈杰,申英末,等. 腹壁韧带样纤维瘤的术后腹壁重建的治疗研究[J/CD].中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2018,12(1):22-25.
[15]
韩亚东,朱孝成,李向农,等.直肠癌保肛手术预防性造瘘的指征分析[J].中国肿瘤外科杂志,2015,7(2):69-73.
[1] 康夏, 田浩, 钱进, 高源, 缪洪明, 齐晓伟. 骨织素抑制破骨细胞分化改善肿瘤骨转移中骨溶解的机制研究[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 329-339.
[2] 代莉, 邓恢伟, 郭华静, 黄芙蓉. 术中持续输注艾司氯胺酮对腹腔镜结直肠癌手术患者术后睡眠质量的影响[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 408-412.
[3] 王得晨, 杨康, 杨自杰, 归明彬, 屈莲平, 张小凤, 高峰. 结直肠癌微卫星稳定状态和程序性死亡、吲哚胺2,3-双加氧酶关系的研究进展[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 462-465.
[4] 唐旭, 韩冰, 刘威, 陈茹星. 结直肠癌根治术后隐匿性肝转移危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 16-20.
[5] 张生军, 赵阿静, 李守博, 郝祥宏, 刘敏丽. 高糖通过HGF/c-met通路促进结直肠癌侵袭和迁移的实验研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 21-24.
[6] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[7] 李婷, 张琳. 血清脂肪酸代谢物及维生素D水平与结直肠癌发生的关系研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 661-665.
[8] 付振保, 曹万龙, 刘富红. 腹腔镜直肠癌低位前切除术中不同缝合方法的回肠双腔造口术临床效果研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 684-687.
[9] 贺亮, 王松林, 周业江. 两种预防性回肠造口在腹腔镜ISR术治疗超低位直肠癌的效果对比研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 697-700.
[10] 关旭, 王锡山. 基于外科与免疫视角思考结直肠癌区域淋巴结处理的功与过[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 448-452.
[11] 顾睿祈, 方洪生, 蔡国响. 循环肿瘤DNA检测在结直肠癌诊治中的应用与进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 453-459.
[12] 卢艳军, 马健, 白鹏宇, 郭凌宏, 刘海义, 江波, 白文启, 张毅勋. 纳米碳在腹腔镜直肠癌根治术中253组淋巴结清扫的临床效果[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 473-477.
[13] 倪文凯, 齐翀, 许小丹, 周燮程, 殷庆章, 蔡元坤. 结直肠癌患者术后发生延迟性肠麻痹的影响因素分析[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 484-489.
[14] 范小彧, 孙司正, 鄂一民, 喻春钊. 梗阻性左半结肠癌不同手术治疗方案的选择应用[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 500-504.
[15] 杨红杰, 张智春, 孙轶. 直肠癌淋巴结转移诊断研究进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 512-518.
阅读次数
全文


摘要