切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (06) : 637 -639. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2019.06.029.

所属专题: 文献

论著

不同病理类型甲状腺癌的TI-RADS分类应用探讨
李玲1,(), 罗霞1, 王毅1, 陈旭光1, 张玉梅1, 樊玲音1   
  1. 1. 839001 新疆哈密,新疆维吾尔自治区哈密市第二人民医院功能科
  • 收稿日期:2019-01-14 出版日期:2019-12-26
  • 通信作者: 李玲

Application of TI-RADS Classification in Different Pathologic Types of Thyroid Carcinoma

Ling Li1,(), Xia Luo1, Yi Wang1, Xuguang Chen1, Yumei Zhang1, Lingyin Fan1   

  1. 1. Department of function, the Second People’s hospital of Hami, Xinjiang Hami, 839000, china
  • Received:2019-01-14 Published:2019-12-26
  • Corresponding author: Ling Li
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Li Ling, Email:
引用本文:

李玲, 罗霞, 王毅, 陈旭光, 张玉梅, 樊玲音. 不同病理类型甲状腺癌的TI-RADS分类应用探讨[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(06): 637-639.

Ling Li, Xia Luo, Yi Wang, Xuguang Chen, Yumei Zhang, Lingyin Fan. Application of TI-RADS Classification in Different Pathologic Types of Thyroid Carcinoma[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(06): 637-639.

目的

探讨不同病理类型甲状腺癌的TI-RADS分类应用价值。

方法

回顾性分析2015年7月至2018年7月的120例甲状腺癌患者资料,患者均经超声诊断及手术病理证实为甲状腺癌患者。结节共计被检出200个,其中恶性结节为108个。利用统计学软件SPSS22.0对数据进行分析,甲状腺癌的病理类型诊断、TI-RADS分类与不同病理类型诊断结果对比采取χ2(%); P<0.05差异有统计学意义。

结果

病理结果显示,甲状腺乳头状癌108例,甲状腺滤泡癌4例,甲状腺髓样癌6例,甲状腺嗜酸性细胞肿瘤2例;应用超声TI-RADS分类的诊断效能检验显示:阳性似然比为3.35<10,而阴性似然比0.13>0.1;阳性预测值达91.82%,而阴性预测值达75.61%,以上表明超声TI-RADS分类对患者病理类型的诊断效能较高。

结论

TIRADS分类对于乳头状癌、结甲合并乳头状癌的诊断准确性较高,而对于髓样癌、滤泡癌、慢甲炎分类却不准确,临床应以鉴别诊断。

Objective

To investigate the application value of TI-RADS classification for different pathological types of thyroid carcinoma.

Methods

The data of 120 patients with thyroid cancer from July 2015 to July 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Thyroid cancer were confirmed in all patientsby ultrasonography and pathology. A total of 200 nodules were detected, including 108 malignant nodules. Statistical software SPSS22.0 was used to analyze. The results of pathological diagnosis, TI-RADS classification and different pathological types of thyroid cancer were compared by χ2(%); P<0.05 had significant difference.

Results

Pathological results showed that 108 cases of papillary thyroid cancer, 4 cases of follicular thyroid cancer, 6 cases of medullary thyroid cancer and 2 cases of eosinophilic thyroid tumors. The diagnostic efficacy of TI-RADS classification showed that the positive likelihood ratio was 3.35 < 10, while the negative likelihood ratio was 0.13 > 0.1; the positive predictive value was 91.82%, while the negative predictive value was 75.61%. These results indicated that TI-RADS classification was effective for patients. The diagnostic efficiency of pathological type is high.

Conclusion

The TIRADS classification is more accurate in the diagnosis of papillary carcinoma, nodular goiter combined with papillary carcinoma, and inaccurate in the classification of medullary carcinoma, follicular carcinoma, and chronic thyroiditis. Using TI-RADS to classify thyroid pathological types can effectively improve the diagnostic accuracy of thyroid nodules, and clinically related fields can be widely promoted and applied.

图1 超声诊断甲状腺结节TI-RADS分类[① TI-RADS Ⅲ类②TI-RADS Ⅳa类③TI-RADS Ⅳb类④TI-RADS Ⅳc类⑤TI-RADSⅤ类]
表1 200个甲状腺结节超声TI-RADS分类与不同病理类型诊断结果对照[例(%)]
表2 200个甲状腺结节应用超声TI-RADS分类的诊断效能检验(例)
[1]
Migda B, Migda M, Migda AM, et al. Evaluation of Four Variants of the Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TIRADS) Classification in Patients with Multinodular Goiter[J]. Endokrynol Pol,2018, 69(2): 156-162.
[2]
Zhang W, Long C, Lin S, et al. Application value of TI-RADS classification and ultrasonic Doppler blood flow signal in differentiated thyroid carcinoma[J]. China Medicine and Pharmacy, 2016,6(19): 18-22.
[3]
Nie F, Wang Y, Geng X, et al. The Value of Different TI-RADS Classification Standards for Thyroid Carcinoma[J]. Chinese Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, 2016,32(11): 967-970.
[4]
王怡,张群霞,冉海涛.美国放射学院与Kwak甲状腺影像报告和数据系统的比较[J].中国医学影像学杂志,2017,25(12): 881-884.
[5]
聂芳,汪延芳,耿祥亮,等.不同标准TI-RADS分级对甲状腺癌的价值探讨[J]. 中国超声医学杂志,2016, 32(11): 967-970.
[6]
张微微,龙春艳,林少建.TI-RADS分类及超声多普勒血流信号在分化型甲状腺癌中的应用价值[J].中国医药科学,2016, 6(19): 18-22.
[7]
段洪梅,张梅,林琳,等. TI-RADS分级标准在甲状腺微小癌诊断中的应用研究[J].中国地方病防治杂志,2017,32(1): 67-69.
[8]
李兆明.TI-RADS系统中恶性超声征象在甲状腺癌中的诊断价值[J].实用临床医药杂志,2016, 20(23): 183-184.
[9]
蔡丽萍,吴杨,王琳,等.改良甲状腺TI-RADS分级在健康人群中筛查甲状腺癌的价值[J].现代仪器与医疗,2016, 22(6): 1-3.
[10]
余小琴,郭莉,何惠丽,等.TI-RADS分类系统联合超声造影对甲状腺结节良恶性鉴别诊断价值[J].医学影像学杂志,2017, 27(6): 1056-1059,1072.
[11]
黄淑麟,刘亮,张超杰.甲状腺癌超声诊断为TI-RADS2-3类原因分析[J].医学临床研究,2016, 33(12): 2298-2300.
[12]
曾红春,周元,刘玉琦,等.不同分类方法在甲状腺结节风险评估中的比较研究[J].中国超声医学杂志,2017,33(10): 865-867.
[13]
刘淼,沈燕,傅晓红,等.声触诊组织成像和定量技术在不同直径的甲状腺TI-RADS 4类结节中的诊断价值[J].中国临床医学影像杂志,2017, 28(11): 764-769.
[1] 伍先权, 张立果, 周璇, 梁建深. 乳腺包裹性乳头状癌的临床病理与手术策略联系[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 294-297.
[2] 孙莲, 马红萍, 吴文英. 局部进展期甲状腺癌患者外科处理[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 112-114.
[3] 麻紫月, 王贞文, 张强, 赵代伟, 张翊伦. 右侧喉不返神经1例报告[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 115-116.
[4] 顾雯, 凌守鑫, 唐海利, 甘雪梅. 两种不同手术入路在甲状腺乳头状癌患者开放性根治性术中的应用比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 687-690.
[5] 田文. 甲状腺癌功能性根治颈淋巴结清扫术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 482-482.
[6] 王宇, 徐芳泉, 周旋, 姚晓峰, 李强. 不断提高分化型甲状腺癌根治性切除规范化[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 473-476.
[7] 孙辉, 李长霖. 分化型甲状腺癌根治性切除术中的关键考量与策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 477-481.
[8] 高一飞, 刘根祥, 孙长华, 周广军. 喉返神经监测在无充气腋窝入路腔镜单侧甲状腺切除+中央区淋巴结清扫术中的应用效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 483-486.
[9] 李云龙, 夏旭良, 江志强, 刘伟, 刘凯, 唐立, 刘昊中, 张思远. 三种方法治疗分化型甲状腺癌的临床疗效[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 487-489.
[10] 韩婧, 郝少龙, 康骅. 北京市单中心甲状腺癌患者临床特征的回顾分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 490-493.
[11] 何羽. 腔镜微创手术治疗分化型甲状腺癌的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 456-458.
[12] 宋红霞, 吴玩呈. 内镜下甲状腺手术切口入路发展的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 470-472.
[13] 游涛建, 任林, 马宇. cT1-2N0期PTMC经口腔前庭入路腔镜甲状腺切除术后引流与否的可行性研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 311-314.
[14] 吴波, 郑永明, 杜世强. SPECT/CT及血清sTg水平预测甲状腺癌术后131I治疗患者淋巴结转移风险的价值分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 212-216.
[15] 刘通, 李菲, 朱莹, 王蓓. 剪切波弹性成像对甲状腺癌术后放射性碘治疗损伤唾液腺腺体的评估[J/OL]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2024, 12(02): 80-84.
阅读次数
全文


摘要