切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (05) : 521 -524. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2019.05.029

所属专题: 文献

论著

复杂肝叶切除术中控制性低中心静脉压CLCVP的有效性观察
李江斌1, 杜锡林1, 董瑞1, 徐岩1, 鲁建国1,()   
  1. 1. 710038 西安,空军军医大学唐都医院普通外科
  • 收稿日期:2019-01-17 出版日期:2019-10-26
  • 通信作者: 鲁建国

Effectiveness of controlled low central venous pressure (CLCVP) in complex hepatic lobectomy

Jiangbin Li1, Xilin Du1, Rui Dong1, Yan Xu1, Jianguo Lu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Military Medical University, Shaanxi Xi’an 710038, China
  • Received:2019-01-17 Published:2019-10-26
  • Corresponding author: Jianguo Lu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Lu Jianguo, Email:
引用本文:

李江斌, 杜锡林, 董瑞, 徐岩, 鲁建国. 复杂肝叶切除术中控制性低中心静脉压CLCVP的有效性观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(05): 521-524.

Jiangbin Li, Xilin Du, Rui Dong, Yan Xu, Jianguo Lu. Effectiveness of controlled low central venous pressure (CLCVP) in complex hepatic lobectomy[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(05): 521-524.

目的

探讨复杂肝叶切除术中控制性低中心静脉压(CLCVP)的有效性。

方法

选取2015年9月至2017年9月120例施行复杂肝叶切除术的原发性肝癌患者进行前瞻性研究。按随机数字化法分为常规组和CLCVP组。常规组术中给予常规中心静脉压控制( 6~12 cmH2O),CLCVP组术中≤5 cmH2O。使用SPSS19.0统计软件进行数据处理,术中术后各项指标、肝肾功能指标、术前、术中、术后1 h及24 h的血红蛋白(HGB)用表示,采用独立t检验;计数资料比较采用χ2检验,以P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

CLCVP组术中术后状况显著优于常规组。常规组术中、术后1 h、术后24 h的HGB含量均低于CLCVP组同期水平(P<0.05)。术后1 d、4 d、7 d两组ALT、AST水平均较术前显著上升,CLCVP组术后1 d、4 d显著低于常规组(P<0.05)。两组TBIL、BUN、Cr水平术后组间比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

在复杂肝叶切除术中应用CLCVP技术能有效降低术中出血量,对肝功能影响较小。

Objective

To investigate the effectiveness of controlled low central venous pressure (CLCVP) in complex hepatic lobectomy.

Methods

A prospective study was conducted in 120 patients with primary hepatocellular carcinoma who underwent complex lobectomy from September 2015 to September 2017. The patients were divided into conventional group and CLCVP group according to random digitization method. Conventional control of central venous pressure (6~12 cmH2O) was given in the conventional group, while controlled low central venous pressure (≤5 cmH2O) was given in the CLCVP group. SPSS19.0 statistical software was used for data processing. The intraoperative and postoperative indicators, liver and kidney function indicators, preoperative, intraoperative, 1h and 24h hemoglobin indicators were expressed by , and compared with independent t test. The counting data were compared by χ2 test, P<0.05 showed significant difference.

Results

The patients’ intraoperative and postoperative status of CLCVP group was significantly better than that of conventional group. Compared with pre-operation, the hemoglobin content in both groups decreased significantly during operation and after operation, and the hemoglobin content in conventional group was lower than that in CLCVP group at the same time (P<0.05). The levels of ALT and AST in the two groups increased significantly on the 1st, 4th and 7th day, which in the CLCVP group were significantly lower than those in the conventional group on the 1st and 4th day after operation (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in TBIL, BUN and Cr levels between the two groups after operation (P>0.05).

Conclusion

The application of CLCVP in complex hepatic lobectomy can effectively reduce the amount of bleeding during operation, and has less effect on liver function.

表1 120例原发性肝癌术中不同CVP两组一般资料比较[(±s),例]
表2 120例原发性肝癌术中不同CVP两组术中各项指标比较(±s)
表3 120例原发性肝癌术中不同CVP两组在各时间点的血红蛋白含量[(±s), g/L]
图1 120例原发性肝癌患者不同CVP两组术前及术后肝肾功能指标比较
[1]
Sutton JM,Hoehn RS,Ertel AE, et al.Cost-Effectiveness in Hepatic Lobectomy: the Effect of Case Volume on Mortality, Readmission, and Cost of Care[J].J Gastrointest Surg, 2016, 20(2): 253-261.
[2]
Zatloukal J,Pradl R,Kletecka J, et al.Comparison of absolute fluid restriction versus relative volume redistribution strategy in low central venous pressure anesthesia in liver resection surgery: a randomized controlled trial[J].Minerva Anestesiol, 2017, 83(10): 1051-1060.
[3]
Pages PB,Delpy JP,Orsini B, et al.Propensity Score Analysis Comparing Videothoracoscopic Lobectomy With Thoracotomy: A French Nationwide Study[J].Ann Thorac Surg, 2016, 101(4): 1370-1378.
[4]
施伦波.肝硬化患者肝功能Child-Pugh分级与血小板参数及凝血指标变化的临床相关性探究[J].中华全科医学,2015,13(6): 941-943.
[5]
刘颜良,张智勇,蔡逊,等.超声引导下经皮经肝胆道穿刺引流术治疗胆肠吻合术后急性重症胆管炎的临床价值[J].临床外科杂志,2015,23(7): 520-522.
[6]
Karaaslan P,Gokay BV,Karakaya MA, et al.Comparison of the Trendelenburg position versus upper-limb tourniquet on internal jugular vein diameter[J].Ann Saudi Med, 2017, 37(4): 308-312.
[7]
陈熙,胡朝辉,彭永海,等.控制性低中心静脉压在腹腔镜肝切除中的应用:前瞻性随机对照研究[J].中国微创外科杂志,2018,18(7): 585-589.
[8]
江现强,俞渊,陆世锋.腹腔镜肝叶切除术常见并发症的危险因素分析及临床处理[J].实用肝脏病杂志,2017,20(2): 215-218.
[9]
中国中西医结合学会肝病专业委员会.第二十一次全国中西医结合肝病学术会议论文汇编[C].昆明:中国中西医结合学会肝病专业委员会,2012:1-214.
[10]
朱荣涛,郭文治,李捷,等.控制性低中心静脉压在腹腔镜肝叶切除术中的应用[J].中国普通外科杂志,2018,27(1): 42-48.
[11]
盛博,张帮健,杨昶.控制性低中心静脉压联合急性高容性血液稀释在右半肝切除术中的应用[J].四川医学,2017,38(12): 1403-1406.
[12]
张岭漪.特发性非肝硬化性门脉高压症:当前的观点[J].中华医学信息导报,2016,31(22): 20-20.
[13]
赵洪伟,王寅雪,张霄蓓,等.控制性低中心静脉压联合肝血流阻断在肝癌切除术中的应用[J].中国肿瘤临床,2015,42(24): 1174-1177.
[14]
郝杰,王博,刘学民,等.肝下下腔静脉阻断降低中心静脉压在肝切除手术中应用的系统评估[J].现代肿瘤医学,2016,24(4): 614-617.
[1] 钟锴, 蒋铁民, 张瑞青, 吐尔干艾力·阿吉, 邵英梅, 郭强. 加速康复外科在肝囊型棘球蚴病肝切除术中的应用分析[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 425-429.
[2] 冷建军, 朴成林, 司振铎. 胰十二指肠切除术联合小范围肝切除、血管切除重建[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 384-384.
[3] 朴成林, 蓝炘, 司振铎, 李强, 冯健, 安峰铎, 冷建军. 胰十二指肠切除联合肝切除术疗效分析:附5例报告(附视频)[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 363-367.
[4] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[5] 冯旺, 马振中, 汤林花. CT扫描三维重建在肝内胆管细胞癌腹腔镜肝切除术中的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 104-107.
[6] 赖全友, 高远, 汪建林, 屈士斌, 魏丹, 彭伟. 三维重建技术结合腹腔镜精准肝切除术对肝癌患者术后CD4+、CD8+及免疫球蛋白水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 651-654.
[7] 唐梅, 周丽, 牛岑月, 周小童, 王倩. ICG荧光导航的腹腔镜肝切除术临床意义[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 655-658.
[8] 胡森焱, 徐冬, 方健, 谢冬冬, 王财庆. ICG荧光显影Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性肝切除的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 513-516.
[9] 林巧, 周丽. RFA联合LAH术治疗原发性肝癌并门静脉癌栓的临床效果分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 521-524.
[10] 曾繁利, 齐秩凯, 杨贺庆. 两种经Glisson蒂鞘解剖路径肝切除术治疗原发性肝癌的肿瘤学疗效及风险比对[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 525-527.
[11] 张金华, 赵锁. 早期ICC腹腔镜肝切除术不同淋巴结清扫范围的近远期效果对比研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 578-581.
[12] 杭轶, 杨小勇, 李文美, 薛磊. 可控性低中心静脉压技术在肝切除术中应用的最适中心静脉压[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 813-817.
[13] 焦振东, 惠鹏, 金上博. 三维可视化结合ICG显像技术在腹腔镜肝切除术治疗复发性肝癌中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 859-864.
[14] 吴警, 吐尔洪江·吐逊, 温浩. 肝切除术前肝功能评估新进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 889-893.
[15] 吴雪云, 胡小军, 范应方. 肝切除术中剩余肝再生能力的评估与预测[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 894-897.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?