切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"
高级检索
中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版)

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (05) : 518 -520. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2019.05.028

所属专题： 文献；

论著

结肠内旁路保护低位直肠癌吻合口的手术技巧和疗效观察
杨联国1, 彭宗清1,†()   
  1. 1. 441021　湖北省襄阳市中心医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2018-09-06 出版日期:2019-10-26
  • 通信作者: 彭宗清

Surgical technique and efficacy of internal colon bypass in the protection of anastomotic stoma of low rectal cancer

Lianguo Yang1, Zongqing Peng1,†()   

  1. 1. Xiangyang City, Hubei Province Central Hospital, Hubei Province, Xiangyang, Hubei 441021, China
  • Received:2018-09-06 Published:2019-10-26
  • Corresponding author: Zongqing Peng
  • About author:
    Correspondent author: Peng Zongqing, Email:
全文 ( ) 下载PDF ( ) 导出引用
引用本文：

杨联国, 彭宗清. 结肠内旁路保护低位直肠癌吻合口的手术技巧和疗效观察[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(05): 518-520.

Lianguo Yang, Zongqing Peng. Surgical technique and efficacy of internal colon bypass in the protection of anastomotic stoma of low rectal cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(05): 518-520.

目的

探讨结肠内旁路保护低位直肠癌吻合口的手术技巧并评估其疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2012年1月至2018年5月期间140例拟行结肠内旁路低位直肠癌保肛手术患者(结肠内旁路组)以及同期收治的30例拟行回肠袢式造口低位直肠癌保肛手术患者(回肠造口组)资料。采用SPSS20.0统计软件分析，术中术后相关指标等用"均数±标准差"表示，采用独立t检验；术后Dukes分期比较、吻合口漏发生情况比较采用χ2分析；P<0.05代表差异有统计学意义。

结果

结肠内旁路组手术时间较回肠造口组明显缩短(P<0.05)；两组患者吻合口高度和术后Dukes分期差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结肠内旁路组术后首次肛门排气时间、首次进食时间、住院时间较回肠造口组明显缩短，住院费用较回肠造口组降低(P<0.05)。术后，结肠内旁路组明显低于回肠造口组(2.9% vs. 16.7%, χ2＝5.522, P<0.05)。结肠内旁路组吻合口漏后引流时间和术后2个月吻合口狭窄发生率均较回肠造口组明显降低(P<0.05)。

结论

结肠内旁路保护低位直肠癌吻合口手术是一种安全、有效的手术方式。

关键词: 直肠肿瘤, 外科吻合口, 空肠回肠旁路术, 治疗结果
Objective

To investigate the the surgical technique and evaluate the efficacy of internal colon bypass in the protection of anastomotic stoma of low rectal cancer.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was made on 140 patients who underwent anus-preserving operation for low rectal cancer combined with internal colon by-pass (the colonic bypass group) and 30 patients who underwent anus-preserving operation combined with loop ileostomy (the ileostomy group) from January 2012 to May 2018. SPSS20.0 statistical software was used to analyze. The intraoperative and postoperative related indicators were showed as " mean±standard deviation" , and compared with independent t test. Postoperative Dukes staging and anastomotic leakage were analyzed by chi square. P<0.05 meant a statistically significant difference.

Results

The operative time in the colon bypass group was significantly shorter than that in the ileostomy group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in anastomotic height and postoperative Dukes staging between the two groups (P>0.05). Compared with ileostomy group, the first anal exhaust time and first feeding time of colon bypass group were significantly longer, the hospitalization time was significantly shorter, and the hospitalization cost was significantly lower (P<0.05). The incidence of anastomotic leakage was 2.9% in the colon bypass group and 16.7% in the ileostomy group. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant(χ2=5.522, P<0.05). The drainage time after anastomotic leakage and the incidence of anastomotic stenosis 2 months after operation in the colon bypass group were significantly lower than those in the ileostomy group (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Colon bypass is a safe and effective way to protect anastomotic stoma in low rectal cancer.

Key words: Rectal neoplasms, Surgical stomas, Jejunoileal bypass, Treatment outcome
表1 170例低位直肠癌保肛手术患者不同术式两组患者基线资料比较(±s)
组别 例数 性别(男/女) 年龄(岁) 肿瘤直径(cm) 肿块高度(cm)
回肠造口组 30 16/14 62.6±10.7 3.2 ±0.5 9.0±1.2
结肠内旁路组 140 73/67 62.9±10.3 3.2±0.6 9.0±1.3
χ2/t值 ? 0.203 0.645 0.399 0.906
P值 ? >0.05 >0.05 >0.05 >0.05
表2 170例低位直肠癌保肛手术患者不同术式两组患者术后相关指标比较(±s)
组别 例数 首次肛门排气时间(h) 首次进食时间(h) 住院时间(d) 住院费用(万元)
回肠造口组 30 96.8±11.2 106.7±13.6 21.0±3.8 3.6±0.6
结肠内旁路组 140 79.7±10.3 85.9±11.0 11.9±2.0 2.4±0.4
t值 ? 8.963 10.224 8.497 4.136
P值 ? <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
表3 170例低位直肠癌保肛手术患者不同术式两组患者术后Dukes分期比较[例(%)]
组别 例数 A B C D
回肠造口组 30 5(16.7) 14(46.7) 10(33.3) 1(3.3)
结肠内旁路组 140 31(22.1) 62(44.3) 36(25.7) 11(7.9)
χ2值 ? 1.023 0.967 0.879 1.225
P值 ? >0.05 >0.05 >0.05 >0.05
表4 170例低位直肠癌保肛手术患者不同术式两组患者术后恢复情况比较[例(%)]
组别 例数 吻合口漏 引流时间[(±s)，d] 术后2个月吻合口狭窄
回肠造口组 30 5(16.7) 15.2±2.1 9(30.0)
结肠内旁路组 140 4(2.9) 7.9±1.1 9(6.4)
χ2值 ? 5.522 8.796 10.158
P值 ? <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
[1]
叶锋. 结肠内旁路保护低位直肠癌吻合口的临床和动物实验研究[D]. 杭州：浙江大学，2016：1－141.
[2]
蒲志忠，王红兵．保护性回肠造瘘对低位直肠癌根治术患者的临床效果分析[J]. 结直肠肛门外科，2017, 23(2): 188－191.
[3]
Zeng J,Su G. High ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery during sigmoid colon and rectal cancer surgery increases the risk of anastomotic leakage: a meta－analysis[J]. World J Surg Oncol, 2018, 16(1): 157－157.
[4]
刘宝华．直肠狭窄的病因和外科治疗[J]. 临床外科杂志，2015, 23(4): 259－261.
[5]
Yamaoka Y,Yamaguchi T,Kinugasa Y, et al.Mesorectal fat area as a useful predictor of the difficulty of robotic－assisted laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer[J]. Surg Endosc, 2019, 33(2): 557－566.
[6]
Gu WL,Wu SW. Meta－analysis of defunctioning stoma in low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: evidence based on thirteen studies[J]. World J Surg Oncol, 2015, 13: 9－9.
[7]
Lee L,Kelly J,Nassif GJ, et al. Defining the learning curve for transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal adenocarcinoma[J]. Surg Endosc, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6360-4.
[8]
Matsunaga R,Nishizawa Y,Saito N, et al. Anal Function after Surgery for Low－Lying Rectal Cancer: Comparison of Mechanical and Hand－Sewn Coloanal Anastomosis[J]. Dig Surg, 2017, 34(6): 469－475.
[9]
Rsnen M,Renkonen－Sinisalo L,Carpelan－Holmstr？m M, et al. Low anterior resection combined with a covering stoma in the treatment of rectal cancer reduces the risk of permanent anastomotic failure[J]. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2015, 30(10): 1323－1328.
[10]
Cui Y,Li C,Xu Z, et al. Robot－assisted versus conventional laparoscopic operation in anus－preserving rectal cancer: a meta－analysis[J]. Ther Clin Risk Manag, 2017, 13(9): 1247－1257.
[11]
刘德洪，黄江平．低位直肠癌Dixon保肛手术联合预防性回肠造口的应用效果观察[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版)，2018, 12(3) : 254－257.
[12]
Lee CM,Huh JW,Park YA, et al. Risk factors of permanent stomas in patients with rectal cancer after low anterior resection with temporary stomas[J]. Yonsei Med J, 2015, 56(2): 447－453.
[1] 王宏宇. 固定与活动平台假体在全膝关节置换术中的应用价值[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 871-876.
[2] 许正文, 李振, 侯振扬, 苏长征, 朱彪. 富血小板血浆联合植骨治疗早期非创伤性股骨头坏死[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 773-779.
[3] 唐旭, 韩冰, 刘威, 陈茹星. 结直肠癌根治术后隐匿性肝转移危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 16-20.
[4] 张生军, 赵阿静, 李守博, 郝祥宏, 刘敏丽. 高糖通过HGF/c-met通路促进结直肠癌侵袭和迁移的实验研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 21-24.
[5] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[6] 陈垚, 徐伯群, 高志慧. 改良式中间上入路根治术治疗甲状腺癌的有效性安全性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 619-622.
[7] 张海涛, 康婵娟, 翟静洁. 胰管支架置入治疗急性胆源性胰腺炎效果观察[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 654-657.
[8] 李婷, 张琳. 血清脂肪酸代谢物及维生素D水平与结直肠癌发生的关系研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 661-665.
[9] 倪文凯, 齐翀, 许小丹, 周燮程, 殷庆章, 蔡元坤. 结直肠癌患者术后发生延迟性肠麻痹的影响因素分析[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 484-489.
[10] 范小彧, 孙司正, 鄂一民, 喻春钊. 梗阻性左半结肠癌不同手术治疗方案的选择应用[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 500-504.
[11] 杨红杰, 张智春, 孙轶. 直肠癌淋巴结转移诊断研究进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 512-518.
[12] 马慧颖, 凡新苓, 覃仕瑞, 陈佳赟, 曹莹, 徐源, 金晶, 唐源. 磁共振加速器治疗局部晚期直肠癌的初步经验[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 519-523.
[13] 关旭, 王锡山. 基于外科与免疫视角思考结直肠癌区域淋巴结处理的功与过[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 448-452.
[14] 顾睿祈, 方洪生, 蔡国响. 循环肿瘤DNA检测在结直肠癌诊治中的应用与进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 453-459.
[15] 卢艳军, 马健, 白鹏宇, 郭凌宏, 刘海义, 江波, 白文启, 张毅勋. 纳米碳在腹腔镜直肠癌根治术中253组淋巴结清扫的临床效果[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 473-477.
阅读次数
全文


摘要

版权所有 中华医学会 中华医学电子音像出版社有限责任公司  京ICP备14006079号-1  网络出版服务许可证：(署)网出证(京)字第075号