切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (05) : 525 -527. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2019.05.030

所属专题: 文献

论著

不同手术治疗Ⅰ~Ⅱ期乳腺癌对保留肋间臂神经的影响比较
江卫兵1,()   
  1. 1. 242000 安徽省宣城市中心医院心胸乳腺外科
  • 收稿日期:2018-09-18 出版日期:2019-10-26
  • 通信作者: 江卫兵

Comparison of the effects of different surgical treatments for stage Ⅰ~Ⅱ breast cancer on the preservation of intercostobrachial nerve

Wei bing Jiang1,()   

  1. 1. Cardiothoracic surgery, Xuancheng Central Hospital, Anhui Province, 242000
  • Received:2018-09-18 Published:2019-10-26
  • Corresponding author: Wei bing Jiang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Jiang Weiping, Email:
引用本文:

江卫兵. 不同手术治疗Ⅰ~Ⅱ期乳腺癌对保留肋间臂神经的影响比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(05): 525-527.

Wei bing Jiang. Comparison of the effects of different surgical treatments for stage Ⅰ~Ⅱ breast cancer on the preservation of intercostobrachial nerve[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(05): 525-527.

目的

探究不同手术方法治疗Ⅰ~Ⅱ期乳腺癌对保留肋间臂神经( ICBN))的疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2016年1月至2018年1月72例早期乳腺癌患者,根据术式不同分为保乳组(n=38)与根治组(n=34),保乳组患者采取保乳手术治疗,根治组患者进行改良根治术治疗。采用SPSS19.0软件进行统计分析,围术期相关指标和术后乳腺功能评分等采用(±s)描述,独立t检验;术后并发症发生率及术后肢体感觉情况采用χ2检验分析,P<0.05差异有统计学意义。

结果

保乳组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、总引流量等围手术指标均明显少于根治组(P<0.05),淋巴结清扫数量两组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);保乳组患者的并发症总发生率为10.5%,显著低于根治组患者的29.4%(P<0.05);保乳组患者的术后灼痛、麻木、疼痛、感觉减退等肢体感觉情况和乳腺功能评分明显好于根治组(P<0.05)。

结论

保乳手术对Ⅰ~Ⅱ期乳腺癌患者的疗效良好,能有效保留患者的ICBN,改善其乳腺功能,值得临床应用。

Objective

To investigate the effect of different surgical treatments for stage Ⅰ~Ⅱ breast cancer on the preservation of intercostobrachial nerve (ICBN).

Methods

72 patients with early breast cancer treated in our hospital from January 2016 to January 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into breast-conserving group (n=38) and radical group (n=34) according to different surgical methods. Among them, patients in the breast-preserving group were treated with breast-conserving surgery, while those in the radical group were treated with modified radical mastectomy. The data were analyzed by SPSS19.0 software. The perioperative related indicators and postoperative mammary gland function scores were described by (±s) and compared with independent t test. The postoperative complication rate and postoperative limb sensation were described by (n, %), and compared with χ2 test. The difference was statistically significant when P<0.05.

Results

Compared with the radical group, the perioperative indexes such as operation time, intraoperative blood loss and total drainage volume were significantly lower in the breast-preserving group (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in the number of lymph node dissection between the two groups(P>0.05). In addition, the total incidence of complications in the breast-preserving group was 10.5%, which was significantly lower than that in the radical group (29.4%) (P<0.05). The incidences of postoperative burning pain, numbness, pain, sensory loss and no sensory feelings of the patients in the breast-preserving group were significantly lower than those in the radical group (P<0.05). The scores of breast function in the postoperative breast-preserving group were significantly better than those in the radical group (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Breast-conserving surgery has a good therapeutic effect on patients with stage Ⅰ~Ⅱ breast cancer, which can effectively preserve the patient’s ICBN and improve its mammary gland function, which is worthy of clinical recommendation.

表1 72例早期乳腺癌不同术式两组患者的基本临床资料(例)
表2 72例早期乳腺癌不同术式两组患者手术指标比较(±s)
表3 72例早期乳腺癌不同术式两组患者术后并发症情况比较[例(%)]
表4 72例早期乳腺癌不同术式两组术后肢体感觉对比[例(%)]
表5 72例早期乳腺癌不同术式两组术后FACT-B量表评分比较(±s)
[1]
Sekiguchi K,Akahane K,Ogita M, et a1. Efficacy of heparinoid moisturizer as a prophylactic agent for radiation dermatitis following radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Jpn J Clin Oncol, 2018, 48(5): 450-457.
[2]
李翔.保乳手术和改良根治术治疗早期乳腺癌的临床疗效分析[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(3): 222-225.
[3]
郭方东.保乳术与改良根治术对早期乳腺癌的疗效及术后生存质量比较[J].中国现代普通外科进展,2016, 19(1): 62-63.
[4]
杨德全,王军胜,刘高星.保乳术与改良根治术治疗早期乳腺癌I临床对比研究[J]. 中国实用医药,2016, 11(19): 50-51.
[5]
易瑛,蒋雪梅,雷海,等.保乳手术与改良根治术对早期乳腺癌患者生活质量的影响[J]. 临床肿瘤学杂志,2016, 21(7): 638-641.
[6]
王妍,原晓燕,邱衍哲,等.保乳手术和改良根治手术在乳腺癌患者临床治疗的效果研究[J]. 现代生物医学进展,2016, 16 (24): 4759-4762.
[7]
Marrazzo A,Damiano G,Taormina P, et a1. Does conservative surgery for breast careinoula still require axillary lymph node evaluation?A retrospective analysis of 1156 consecutive women with early breast cancer[J]. Clin Breast Cancer, 2017, 17(2): e53-e57.
[8]
陈大榕.保乳术治疗早期乳腺癌的临床疗效观察[J]. 临床合理用药杂志,2016, 9(12A): 138-139.
[9]
陆海涛.早期乳腺癌保乳手术与改良根治术的临床对比研究[J]. 中国现代药物应用,2016, 10(6): 101-101, 102.
[10]
李众,袁阳春.保乳术与改良根治术治疗乳腺癌的Ⅰ临床疗效比较[J].中国临床新医学,2017, 10(1): 62-64.
[11]
彭莉娜,李征毅,陈伟财,等.保乳手术与改良根治术治疗早期乳腺癌的临床对照分析[J].中国实用医药,2017, 12(14): 57-58.
[12]
Nasr MW,Habre SB,Jabbour H, et al.A randomized controlled trial of postoperative pain control after subpectoral breast augmentation using intercostal nerve block versus bupivacaine pectoralis major infiltration: a pilot study [J]. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg, 2015, 68(4): e83-e84.
[13]
赵冰,焦得闯,乔江华,等.保乳术与改良根治术治疗早期乳腺癌的效果及对患者术后生存质量的影响比较[J].河南医学研究,2017, 26(5): 806-807.
[14]
王芳,杜攀,刘磊,等.乳腺癌改良根治术与保乳术对乳腺癌患者存活质量、社会适应性及心理状态的影响[J].实用预防医学,2016, 23(10): 1236-1238.
[15]
祁峰.保留肋间臂神经在52例乳腺癌改良根治术中的临床应用效果观察[J]. 中国现代药物应用,2016, 10(2): 52-53.
[16]
伍传新,廖洪映,江泽勇,等.乳腺癌改良根治术保留肋间臂神经对患者预后的影响[J]. 海南医学,2018, 29(9): 1301-1302.
[17]
谌彪,刘新明,史新河. 保留肋间臂神经对乳腺癌术后患侧感觉的影响[J]. 中国现代普通外科进展,2017, 20(12): 978-979, 982.
[18]
杨忠义,李兰,柳朝晖,等. 保乳术与乳腺癌改良根治术对保留肋间臂神经的影响[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志,2018, 22(1): 14-17.
[1] 李洋, 蔡金玉, 党晓智, 常婉英, 巨艳, 高毅, 宋宏萍. 基于深度学习的乳腺超声应变弹性图像生成模型的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 563-570.
[2] 周荷妹, 金杰, 叶建东, 夏之一, 王进进, 丁宁. 罕见成人肋骨郎格汉斯细胞组织细胞增生症被误诊为乳腺癌术后骨转移一例[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 380-383.
[3] 河北省抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会护理协作组. 乳腺癌中心静脉通路护理管理专家共识[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 321-329.
[4] 刘晨鹭, 刘洁, 张帆, 严彩英, 陈倩, 陈双庆. 增强MRI 影像组学特征生境分析在预测乳腺癌HER-2 表达状态中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 339-345.
[5] 张晓宇, 殷雨来, 张银旭. 阿帕替尼联合新辅助化疗对三阴性乳腺癌的疗效及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 346-352.
[6] 邱琳, 刘锦辉, 组木热提·吐尔洪, 马悦心, 冷晓玲. 超声影像组学对致密型乳腺背景中非肿块型乳腺癌的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 353-360.
[7] 程燕妮, 樊菁, 肖瑶, 舒瑞, 明昊, 党晓智, 宋宏萍. 乳腺组织定位标记夹的应用与进展[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 361-365.
[8] 涂盛楠, 胡芬, 张娟, 蔡海峰, 杨俊泉. 天然植物提取物在乳腺癌治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 366-370.
[9] 朱文婷, 顾鹏, 孙星. 非酒精性脂肪性肝病对乳腺癌发生发展及治疗的影响[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 371-375.
[10] 葛睿, 陈飞, 李杰, 李娟娟, 陈涵. 多基因检测在早期乳腺癌辅助治疗中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 257-263.
[11] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[12] 韩萌萌, 冯雪园, 马宁. 乳腺癌改良根治术后桡神经损伤1例[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 117-118.
[13] 张志兆, 王睿, 郜苹苹, 王成方, 王成, 齐晓伟. DNMT3B与乳腺癌预后的关系及其生物学机制[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 624-629.
[14] 王玲艳, 高春晖, 冯雪园, 崔鑫淼, 刘欢, 赵文明, 张金库. 循环肿瘤细胞在乳腺癌新辅助及术后辅助治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 630-633.
[15] 赵林娟, 吕婕, 王文胜, 马德茂, 侯涛. 超声引导下染色剂标记切缘的梭柱型和圆柱型保乳区段切除术的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 634-637.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?