切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (04) : 396 -399. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2019.04.024

所属专题: 文献

论著

腹腔镜经肛拖出根治术与传统开腹切除术治疗中低位直肠癌的临床比较
王清奎1, 吉丙阳1,()   
  1. 1. 710043 陕西省第四人民医院肛肠科
  • 收稿日期:2018-08-23 出版日期:2019-08-26
  • 通信作者: 吉丙阳

Clinical comparison of laparoscopic and transanal pull-through radical surgery and conventional open surgery for the treatment of mid-low rectal cancer

Qinkui Wang1, Bingyang Ji1,()   

  1. 1. Department of anal bowel, fourth people’s hospital of Shaanxi province 710443
  • Received:2018-08-23 Published:2019-08-26
  • Corresponding author: Bingyang Ji
  • About author:
    Corresponding autho: Ji Bingyang, Email:
引用本文:

王清奎, 吉丙阳. 腹腔镜经肛拖出根治术与传统开腹切除术治疗中低位直肠癌的临床比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(04): 396-399.

Qinkui Wang, Bingyang Ji. Clinical comparison of laparoscopic and transanal pull-through radical surgery and conventional open surgery for the treatment of mid-low rectal cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(04): 396-399.

目的

比较腹腔镜经肛拖出根治术与传统开腹切除术治疗中低位直肠癌的临床疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2014年6月至2018年4月103例中低位直肠癌患者的临床资料,根据手术方法不同分为研究组和开腹组,其中研究组患者49例,采用腹腔镜经肛拖出根治术;开腹组54例,采用传统开腹治疗。数据处理应用统计学软件SPSS22.0完成。本研究中并发症发生率、临床有效率分析采用四格表χ2检验;手术相关指标以(±s)表示,采用独立t检验;P<0.05为差异存在统计学意义。

结果

两组患者手术时间和淋巴结清扫数目差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05),研究组术中出血量、肠道功能恢复时间及住院时间明显低于开腹组患者(均P<0.05);研究组并发症发生率为8.2%,开腹组并发症发生率为11.1%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);研究组患者治疗有效率为95.9%明显高于开腹组83.3%(P<0.05),差异有统计学意义。

结论

与传统开腹切除术治疗中低位直肠癌的比较,腹腔镜经肛拖出根治术具有治疗效率高、出血少、肠道功能恢复快及住院时间短等优点,值得推广应用。

Objective

To compare clinical efficacy of laparoscopic and transanal pull-through radical surgery y and conventional open surgery for the treatment of mid-low rectal cancer.

Methods

The clinical data of 103 patients with middle and lower rectal cancer treated in our hospital from June 2014 to April 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the different surgical methods, they were divided into study group and control group, among them, 49 patients in the study group were treated with laparoscopic and transanal pull-through radical surgery, and 54 patients in the study group were treated with conventional open surgery. The relevant indicators of surgery, the incidence of complications and the efficiency of clinical treatment between the two groups were compared, among them, the independent sample t-test was used to compare the relevant indicators of surgery, Chi-square test was used to compare the incidence of complications and the efficiency of clinical treatment.

Results

There was no significant difference in the operation time and the number of lymph node dissection between the two groups (all P>0.05), the blood loss, intestinal function recovery time and hospitalization time in the study group were significantly lower than those in the control group (all P<0.05). The incidence of complications was 8.2% in the study group and 11.1% in the control group, there was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). The treatment effective rate was 95.9% in the study group and 83.3% in the control group, the treatment effective rate of the study group was significantly higher than that of the control group (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Compared with traditional open surgery for the treatment of middle and lower rectal cancer, laparoscopic and transanal pull-through radical surgery has the advantages of higher treatment efficiency, less bleeding, rapider recovery of intestinal function and shorter hospitalization time, it is worthy of popularization and application.

表1 103例中低位直肠癌患者不同术式两组患者基本资料比较(±s)
表2 103例中低位直肠癌患者不同术式两组患者术中术后指标比较(±s)
表3 103例中低位直肠癌患者不同术式两组患者术后并发症发生率的比较[例(%)]
表4 103例中低位直肠癌患者不同术式两组患者临床有效率比较[例(%)]
[1]
张忠涛,杨盈赤.腹腔镜直肠癌根治术难点与争议[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2018,12(1):1-4.
[2]
姚宏伟,张忠涛.腹腔镜直肠癌经肛门全直肠系膜切除技巧及疗效评价[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2018,12(1):12-14.
[3]
Silva-Velazco J, Dietz DW, Stocchi L, et al.Considering Value in Rectal Cancer Surgery: An Analysis of Costs and Outcomes Based on the Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Approach for Proctectomy[J]. Ann Surg, 2017, 265(5):960-968.
[4]
林恒军,邱学科,袁航.经肛拖出式全腹腔镜直肠癌前切除在直肠癌患者中的临床价值[J].中国内镜杂志,2017, 23(1):1-5.
[5]
李世拥,陈纲,杜峻峰,等.腹腔镜低位直肠癌根治腹部无切口经肛切除套入式吻合102例经验[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2018,12(1):25-29.
[6]
Okabe H, Tsunoda S, Obama K, et al.Feasibility of Laparoscopic Radical Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer of Clinical Stage II or Higher: Early Outcomes in a Phase II Study (KUGC04)[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2016, 23(Suppl 4):516-523.
[7]
Eto K, Kosuge M, Ohkuma M, et al.Comparison of Transumbilical and Conventional Defunctioning Ileostomy in Laparoscopic Anterior Resections for Rectal Cancer[J]. Anticancer Res, 2016, 36(8):4139-4144.
[8]
Yamaguchi T, Konishi T, Kinugasa Y, et al. Laparoscopic Versus Open Lateral Lymph Node Dissection for Locally Advanced Low Rectal Cancer: A Subgroup Analysis of a Large Multicenter Cohort Study in Japan[J].Dis Colon Rectum, 2017, 60(9):954-964.
[9]
王健,王永洪,王依宁,等.腹腔镜中低位直肠癌全直肠系膜切除术的临床分析[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志:电子版,2016, 10(4):311-314.
[10]
Abdollah F, Dalela D, Sood A, et al. Intermediate-term cancer control outcomes in prostate cancer patients treated with robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a multi-institutional analysis[J].World J Urol,2016, 34(10):1357-1366.
[11]
Samalavicius NE, Dulskas A, Aliukonis V, et al.Hybrid transanal and laparoscopic hand-assisted total mesorectal excision for low rectal cancer[J].ANZ J Surg,2017, 87(11):953-954.
[12]
沈晓明,刘如钱,鲍传庆.腹腔镜下全直肠系膜切除术联合经肛管括约肌间切除术在超低位直肠癌保肛手术中的应用效果分析[J].实用临床医药杂志,2017, 21(17):131-132.
[13]
郭校锡,邓建中,林义办,等.腹腔镜侧方淋巴结清扫术治疗中低位直肠癌48例疗效分析[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2018,12(1):35-38.
[14]
Nonaka T, Fukuda A, Maekawa K, et al.Clinical and Oncological Outcomes of Laparoscopic Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Advanced Lower Rectal Cancer: Single-institution Experience[J].Anticancer Res, 2017, 37(9):5095-5100.
[15]
Xu J, Wei Y, Feng Q, et al.Robot-Assisted vs Laparoscopic vs Open Abdominoperineal Resections for Low Rectal Cancer: Short-Term Outcomes of a Single-Center Randomized Controlled Trial[J].Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 2016, 223(4S):e88-e89.
[16]
张永康,张剑,廖晓锋.腹腔镜下直肠经肛门拖出式手术与直肠前切除术治疗低位直肠癌的比较[J].中国微创外科杂志,2016, 16(8):736-739.
[17]
Park EJ, Baik SH, Kang J, et al.The Impact of Postoperative Complications on Long-term Oncologic Outcomes After Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer[J].Medicine(Baltimore), 2016, 95(14):e3271-e3271.
[18]
李春田,房修椢,阎英.腹腔镜经肛门括约肌间径路超低位直肠癌根治术患者的应激及免疫功能变化[J].结直肠肛门外科,2016,22(3):263-267.
[19]
Martínez-Pérez A, Carra MC, Brunetti F, et al.Pathologic Outcomes of Laparoscopic vs Open Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis[J]. JAMA Surg, 2017, 152(4):e165665-e165665.
[20]
何志威,李苏明,章晓路.腹腔镜全系膜切除术联合经肛内括约肌切除保肛术在非外括约肌侵犯性超低位直肠癌中的应用[J].海南医学,2018,29(1):112-114.
[1] 王振宁, 杨康, 王得晨, 邹敏, 归明彬, 王雅楠, 徐明. 机器人与腹腔镜手术联合经自然腔道取标本对中低位直肠癌患者远期疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 437-442.
[2] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[3] 吴晖, 佴永军, 施雪松, 魏晓为. 两种解剖入路下行直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 40-43.
[4] 周世振, 朱兴亚, 袁庆港, 刘理想, 王凯, 缪骥, 丁超, 汪灏, 管文贤. 吲哚菁绿荧光成像技术在腹腔镜直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫中的应用效果分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 44-47.
[5] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[6] 徐逸男. 不同术式治疗梗阻性左半结直肠癌的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 72-75.
[7] 李代勤, 刘佩杰. 动态增强磁共振评估中晚期低位直肠癌同步放化疗后疗效及预后的价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 100-103.
[8] 庄宝雄, 邓海军. 单孔+1腹腔镜直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 601-601.
[9] 许月芳, 刘旺, 曾妙甜, 郭宇姝. 多粘菌素B和多粘菌素E治疗外科多重耐药菌感染临床疗效及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 700-703.
[10] 郑民华, 蒋天宇, 赵轩, 马君俊. 中国腹腔镜直肠癌根治术30年发展历程与未来[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 591-595.
[11] 池畔, 黄胜辉. 中国腹腔镜直肠癌根治术30年来的巨大进步[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 596-600.
[12] 李明, 屠松, 闫鹏, 钱军, 高鹏程, 许文山, 杨发英, 胡振涛, 单永玮. 应用前列腺电切镜引导置管治疗直肠低位吻合口漏研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 603-606.
[13] 李玲, 刘亚, 李培玲, 张秀敏, 李萍. 直肠癌患者术后肠道菌群的变化与抑郁症相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 607-610.
[14] 韩加刚, 王振军. 梗阻性左半结肠癌的治疗策略[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 450-458.
[15] 梁轩豪, 李小荣, 李亮, 林昌伟. 肠梗阻支架置入术联合新辅助化疗治疗结直肠癌急性肠梗阻的疗效及其预后的Meta 分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 472-482.
阅读次数
全文


摘要