切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (04) : 393 -395. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2019.04.023

所属专题: 文献

论著

两种保留自主神经D3根治术治疗中低位直肠癌的安全性及生存质量比较
麦文豪1,(), 胡明1, 郑若1, 孙诒勇1, 孔香波1   
  1. 1. 570208 海口,中南大学湘雅医学院附属海口医院肛肠病科
  • 收稿日期:2018-08-28 出版日期:2019-08-26
  • 通信作者: 麦文豪

Comparison of the safety and quality of life of two kinds of D3 radical resection for middle and low rectal cancer with autonomic nerve preservation

Wenhao Mai1,(), Ming Hu1, Ruo Zheng1, Zhiyong Sun1, Xiangbo Kong1   

  1. 1. Anorectal Department of Central South Universily Xiangya School of Medicine Affiliated Haikou Hospital 570208
  • Received:2018-08-28 Published:2019-08-26
  • Corresponding author: Wenhao Mai
  • About author:
    Corresponding autho: Mai, Wenhao, Email:
引用本文:

麦文豪, 胡明, 郑若, 孙诒勇, 孔香波. 两种保留自主神经D3根治术治疗中低位直肠癌的安全性及生存质量比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(04): 393-395.

Wenhao Mai, Ming Hu, Ruo Zheng, Zhiyong Sun, Xiangbo Kong. Comparison of the safety and quality of life of two kinds of D3 radical resection for middle and low rectal cancer with autonomic nerve preservation[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(04): 393-395.

目的

比较腹腔镜保留自主神经D3根治术与开腹术治疗中低位直肠癌的安全性及生存质量差异。

方法

回顾性分析2015年6月至2017年8月间84例低位直肠癌患者资料,根据手术方式不同分为腹腔镜组(n=46)和开腹组(n=38),应用SPSS21.0软件完成数据分析。手术相关指标采用(±s)表示,独立样本t检验;并发症发生率、复发率及生存率等指标采用χ2检验;P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

腹腔镜组患者的手术时间长于开腹组(P<0.05),而术中出血量、住院时间、尿管保留时间、肛门排气时间均短于开腹组(均P<0.05)。腹腔镜组术后并发症总发生率为6.5%低于开腹组的26.3%(χ2=4.6517,P<0.05)。两组患者1年局部复发率及生存率差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。腹腔镜组患者术后10 d排尿功能、术后2个月勃起功能、术后2个月射精功能均优于开腹组(均P<0.05)。

结论

腹腔镜保留自主神经D3根治术治疗中低位直肠癌安全性较高,复发率及生存率与开腹术相当,并能显著提高患者的生存质量,值得推广应用。

Objective

To compare the safety and quality of life of laparoscopic and open D3 radical resection for middle and lower rectal cancer with autonomic nerve preservation.

Methods

The clinical data of 84 patients with middle and lower rectal cancer treated in our hospital from June 2015 to August 2017 were retrospectively selected. According to the different surgical methods, the patients were divided into laparoscopic group(n=46) and open group(n=38) respectively. Data analysis was performed by statistical software SPSS21.0. The surgery related indicators of the two groups was compared by two independent samples t-test. The complication rate, recurrence rate, index of quality of life of the two groups were compared by χ2 test, P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The operation time in the laparoscopic group was longer than that in the open group (P<0.05), the intraoperative blood loss, hospitalization time, urinary catheter retention time, and anal exhaust time were shorter than those in the open group (P<0.05). The total incidence of postoperative complications in the laparoscopic group was 6.5%, which was lower than 26.3% in the open group, the difference was statistically significant (χ2=4.6517, P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the 1-year local recurrence rate, and 1-year survival rate between the two groups (P>0.05). In the laparoscopic group, the urinary function at 10 days after operation, the erectile function at 2 months after operation, and the ejaculation function at 2 months after operation were better than those in the open group (all P<0.05).

Conclusion

The surgical effect of laparoscopic D3 radical resection for middle and lower rectal cancer with autonomic nerve preservation is significant, the safety is higher, the recurrence rate and survival rate are comparable to open surgery, and it can significantly improve the quality of life of patients, which is worthy of clinical promotion and application.

表1 84例低位直肠癌患者不同术式两组患者手术相关情况的比较(±s)
表2 84例低位直肠癌患者不同术式两组患者术后并发症发生率的比较(例)
表3 84例低位直肠癌患者不同术式两组患者术后生存质量的比较(例)
[1]
Jung KU, Yun SH, Cho YB, et al. Single incision and reduced port laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: initial experience in 96 cases[J]. ANZ J Surg, 2016, 86(5):403-407.
[2]
王亚儒,李超敏.中低位直肠癌根治术中保留盆腔自主神经对男性排尿及性功能的影响[J].中国现代普通外科进展,2016, 19(3):234-236.
[3]
Park EJ, Baik SH, Kang J, et al. The Impact of Postoperative Complications on Long-term Oncologic Outcomes After Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer[J]. Medicine(Baltimore), 2016, 95(14):e3271-e3271.
[4]
Samalavicius NE, Dulskas A, Aliukonis V, et al. Hybrid transanal and laparoscopic hand-assisted total mesorectal excision for low rectal cancer[J]. ANZ J Surg, 2017, 87(11):953-954.
[5]
Huang YM, Huang YJ, Wei PL. Outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for mid and low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy and the effect of learning curve[J]. Medicine, 2017, 96(40):e8171-e8171.
[6]
张鹏,张得春.腹腔镜下D3淋巴结清扫联合盆底自主神经保留术在直肠癌患者中应用的疗效及安全性[J].中国普外基础与临床杂志,2017, 24(7):843-847.
[7]
Yamaguchi T, Konishi T, Kinugasa Y, et al. Laparoscopic Versus Open Lateral Lymph Node Dissection for Locally Advanced Low Rectal Cancer: A Subgroup Analysis of a Large Multicenter Cohort Study in Japan[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2017, 60(9):954-964.
[8]
Wei HB, Fang JF, Zheng ZH, et al. Effect of preservation of Denonvilliers’ fascia during laparoscopic resection for mid-low rectal cancer on protection of male urinary and sexual functions[J]. Medicine(Baltimore), 2016, 95(24):e3925-e3925.
[9]
Zhu HB, Wang L, Li ZY, et al. Sphincter-preserving surgery for low-middle rectal cancer: Can we predict feasibility with high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging?[J]. Medicine(Baltimore), 2017, 96(29):e7418-e7418.
[10]
胡英斌,白飞,张剑.腹腔镜和开腹手术在男性低位直肠癌中盆腔自主神经功能保留的临床对比研究[J].中国现代手术学杂志,2016,20(1):1-4.
[11]
Yao HW, Wu GC, Yang YC, et al.Laparoscopic-assisted Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision for Middle-Low Rectal Carcinoma: A Clinical Study of 19 Cases[J]. Anticancer Res, 2017, 37(8):4599-4604.
[12]
王健,王永洪,王依宁,等.腹腔镜中低位直肠癌全直肠系膜切除术的临床分析[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志:电子版,2016, 10(4):311-314.
[13]
张海永,杨鹏远,兰海生,等.以盆腔自主神经为解剖标识的腹腔镜低位直肠癌根治术对男性患者术后排尿、性功能影响的研究[J].结直肠肛门外科,2018,24(1):22-26.
[14]
Malakorn S, Sammour T, Bednarski B, et al. Three Different Approaches to the Inferior Mesenteric Artery during Robotic D3 Lymphadenectomy for Rectal Cancer[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2017, 24(7):1923-1923.
[15]
钱正海,黄维贤,郎建华,等.腹腔镜中低位直肠癌直肠全系膜切除术的效果分析[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志:电子版,2016, 10(4):304-307.
[16]
Li Q, Li D, Jiang L, et al.Factors Influencing Difficulty of Laparoscopic Abdominoperineal Resection for Ultra-Low Rectal Cancer[J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2017, 27(2):104-109.
[17]
熊超.保留盆腔自主神经在男性腹腔镜直肠癌根治术中的临床效果[J].腹腔镜外科杂志,2017, 22(10):747-752.
[1] 王杰, 袁泉, 王玥琦, 乔佳君, 谭春丽, 夏仲元, 刘守尧. 溃疡油在糖尿病足溃疡治疗中的应用效果及安全性观察[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 480-484.
[2] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[3] 吴晖, 佴永军, 施雪松, 魏晓为. 两种解剖入路下行直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 40-43.
[4] 周世振, 朱兴亚, 袁庆港, 刘理想, 王凯, 缪骥, 丁超, 汪灏, 管文贤. 吲哚菁绿荧光成像技术在腹腔镜直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫中的应用效果分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 44-47.
[5] 徐逸男. 不同术式治疗梗阻性左半结直肠癌的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 72-75.
[6] 李代勤, 刘佩杰. 动态增强磁共振评估中晚期低位直肠癌同步放化疗后疗效及预后的价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 100-103.
[7] 庄宝雄, 邓海军. 单孔+1腹腔镜直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 601-601.
[8] 郑民华, 蒋天宇, 赵轩, 马君俊. 中国腹腔镜直肠癌根治术30年发展历程与未来[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 591-595.
[9] 严虹霞, 王晓娟, 张毅勋. 2 型糖尿病对结直肠癌患者肿瘤标记物、临床病理及预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 483-487.
[10] 赵磊, 刘文志, 林峰, 于剑, 孙铭骏, 崔佑刚, 张旭, 衣宇鹏, 于宝胜, 冯宁. 深部热疗在改善结直肠癌术后辅助化疗副反应及生活质量中的作用研究[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 488-493.
[11] 陈杰, 武明胜, 李一金, 李虎, 向源楚, 荣新奇, 彭健. 低位直肠癌冷冻治疗临床初步分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 494-498.
[12] 黄海洋, 邝永龙, 陈嘉胜. 基层医院结直肠肿瘤经自然腔道取标本手术30 例分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 510-518.
[13] 王灿, 樊昊, 张卫, 于冠宇. LARS 评分的研制回顾与应用现状[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 519-523.
[14] 韩加刚, 王振军. 梗阻性左半结肠癌的治疗策略[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 450-458.
[15] 梁轩豪, 李小荣, 李亮, 林昌伟. 肠梗阻支架置入术联合新辅助化疗治疗结直肠癌急性肠梗阻的疗效及其预后的Meta 分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 472-482.
阅读次数
全文


摘要