切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (01) : 56 -60. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2018.01.018

所属专题: 文献

论著

腹腔镜袖状胃切除+单吻合口十二指肠回肠旁路术(SADI-S)作为腹腔镜可调节胃束带术(LAGB)修正手术的短期疗效及安全性分析
吴安健1, 曹李1, 刘林1, 刘兢文1, 田靖波1, 金露佳1, 吴喜燕2, 刘志刚3, 董光龙1,()   
  1. 1. 100853 北京解放军总医院普通外科
    2. 556000 凯里黔东南红州儿童医院
    3. 137099 吉林省白城市医院普通外科
  • 收稿日期:2017-11-25 出版日期:2018-02-26
  • 通信作者: 董光龙

Single-anastomosis duodenoileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy(SADI-S)as the revisional surgery of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB): Short-term efficacy and safety

Anjian Wu1, Li Cao1, Lin Liu1, Jingwen Liu1, Jingbo Tian1, Lujia Jin1, Xiyan Wu2, Zhigang Liu3, Guanglong Dong1,()   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, General Hospital of PLA, Beijing 100853, China
    2. Qiandongnan Hongzhou children’s Hospital, Kaili556000, China
    3. Department of general surgery, Baicheng Hospital, Baicheng 137099, China
  • Received:2017-11-25 Published:2018-02-26
  • Corresponding author: Guanglong Dong
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Dong Guanglong, Email:
  • Supported by:
    The fund for capital clinic-oriented research and outcome application(grant number : Z151100004015209)
引用本文:

吴安健, 曹李, 刘林, 刘兢文, 田靖波, 金露佳, 吴喜燕, 刘志刚, 董光龙. 腹腔镜袖状胃切除+单吻合口十二指肠回肠旁路术(SADI-S)作为腹腔镜可调节胃束带术(LAGB)修正手术的短期疗效及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(01): 56-60.

Anjian Wu, Li Cao, Lin Liu, Jingwen Liu, Jingbo Tian, Lujia Jin, Xiyan Wu, Zhigang Liu, Guanglong Dong. Single-anastomosis duodenoileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy(SADI-S)as the revisional surgery of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB): Short-term efficacy and safety[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(01): 56-60.

目的

探讨腹腔镜袖状胃切除+单吻合口十二指肠回肠旁路术(SADI-S)作为腹腔镜可调节胃束带术(LAGB)的修正手术2年的疗效及安全性。

方法

2013年11月至2015年11月接收LAGB术后复胖患者共22例,对其实施修正手术SADI-S,并统计分析其术前及术后24个月临床资料。

结果

SADI-S手术时间(105.0±12.2) min,手术出血量(27.3±5.8) ml;术后第1、3、6、12、18、24个月多余体质量减少率(%EWL)依次为(20.55±9.10) %、(40.1±6.02) %、(63.52±10.43) %、(70.72±8.54) %、(78.34±9.25) %、(81.57±11.12) %;本研究糖尿病缓解以术后2年为截点评判,17例T2DM患者达到完全缓解(17/18),1例达到部分缓解(1/18);SADI-S术后Trocar孔疝1例,再次手术还纳,其他患者术中无中转开腹,术后无梗阻、切缘及吻合口漏的发生,术后常规长期补充复合维生素及微量元素,未见维生素及微量元素缺乏。

结论

SADI-S作为LAGB术后复胖的修正手术短期内安全有效。其长期疗效及安全性仍需多中心的、大样本量、长期的随机对照研究。

Objective

To explore the efficacy and safety of single-anastomosis duodenoileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy(SADI-S)as the revisional surgery of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB)according to the two-year follow-up results.

Methods

From November 2013 to November 2015, a total of 22 weight-regain patients that underwent previous LAGB, were given SADI-S as the revisional surgery at PLA General Hospital. Preoperative clinical characteristics as well as the data at the intervals of 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24months after operation were collected and analyzed.

Results

The operation time of SADI-S was (105±12.2) min, and the intraoperative blood loss was (27.3±5.8) ml. The excess weight loss rate (%EWL) was (20.55±9.10) %, (40.1±6.02) %, (63.52±10.43)%, (70.72±8.54) %, (78.34±9.25) %, and (81.57±11.12)% at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24months after the operation, respectively. The two-year complete remission rate of T2DM was 17/18, and the corresponding partial remission rate was 1/18 after operation. One case experienced trocar hernia and was repaired. There was no conversion to laparotomy. Vitamins and trace elements were administrated for these patients a long time after operation, and no patients experienced the deficiency of vitamin and trace element.

Conclusion

SADI-S is safe and effective as a revisional surgery for patients whose weight regain after LAGB. However, multicenter randomized controlled studies with large sample sizes are needed to explore the long-term efficacy and safety of SADI-S.

图2 距幽门约5 cm处开始以超声刀弓内离断胃网膜血管直至贲门左侧His角,分离胃后粘连
图4 以气囊胃管及标记为指引,进行切割闭合胃壁至His角
图6 距离幽门2 cm离断十二指肠
图8 置放引流管引流吻合口、切缘及胃底
图9 袖状胃切除+单吻合口十二指肠回肠旁路术(SADI-S)示意图
图10 22例LAGB术后患者因复胖接受SADI-S修正术后%EWL随时间变化趋势图
[1]
Fontaine KR, Redden DT, Wang C, et al. Years of life lost due to obesity [J]. Jama, 2003,289(2):187-193.
[2]
Mingrone G, Panunzi S, De Gaetano A, et al. Bariatric surgery versus conventional medical therapy for type 2 diabetes[J]. The New England journal of medicine, 2012,366(17):1577-1585.
[3]
Schauer PR, Bhatt DL, Kirwan JP, et al. Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy for diabetes--3-year outcomes [J]. The New England journal of medicine, 2014,370(21):2002-2013.
[4]
Hsu CC, Almulaifi A, Chen JC, et al. Effect of bariatric surgery vs medical treatment on type 2 diabetes in patients with body mass index lower than 35: Five-year outcomes [J]. JAMA surgery, 2015,150(12):1117-1124.
[5]
Arterburn DE, Bogart A, Sherwood NE, et al. A multisite study of long-term remission and relapse of type 2 diabetes mellitus following gastric bypass [J]. Obes Surg, 2013,23(1):93-102.
[6]
Brethauer SA, Aminian A, Romero-Talamas H, et al. Can diabetes be surgically cured? Long-term metabolic effects of bariatric surgery in obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus [J]. Annals of surgery, 2013,258(4):628-636.
[7]
Belachew M, Legrand MJ, Vincent V. History of lap-band: From dream to reality [J]. Obes Surg, 2001,11(3):297-302.
[8]
Courcoulas AP, Belle SH, Neiberg RH, et al. Three-year outcomes of bariatric surgery vs lifestyle intervention for type 2 diabetes mellitus treatment: A randomized clinical trial [J]. JAMA surgery, 2015,150(10):931-940.
[9]
Toolabi K, Golzarand M, Farid R. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: Efficacy and consequences over a 13-year period [J]. American journal of surgery, 2015,212(1):62-68.
[10]
Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Iovino P, et al. Bariatric surgery worldwide 2013 [J]. Obes Surg, 2015,25(10):1822-1832.
[11]
董光龙. 可调节胃束带减重术失败后修正手术的选择 [J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志,2016,21(10):721-723.
[12]
中国医师协会外科医师分会肥胖和糖尿病外科医师委员会. 中国肥胖和2型糖尿病外科治疗指南(2014) [J]. 糖尿病临床,2014, 8(11):499-504.
[13]
Brethauer SA, Kim J, el Chaar M, et al. Standardized outcomes reporting in metabolic and bariatric surgery [J]. Surgery for obesity and related diseases, 2015,11(3):489-506.
[14]
张鹏,郑成竹. 减重代谢手术治疗2型糖尿病全球联合指南解读 [J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志,2017, 20(4):372-377.
[15]
Collaborators GBDO, Afshin A, Forouzanfar MH, et al. Health effects of overweight and obesity in 195 countries over 25 years [J]. The New England journal of medicine, 2017,377(1):13-27.
[16]
Ogurtsova K, da Rocha Fernandes JD, Huang Y, et al. Idf diabetes atlas: Global estimates for the prevalence of diabetes for 2015 and 2040 [J]. Diabetes research and clinical practice, 2017,128:40-50.
[17]
Wang L, Gao P, Zhang M, et al. Prevalence and ethnic pattern of diabetes and prediabetes in china in 2013 [J]. Jama, 2017,317(24):2515-2523.
[18]
Rubino F, Nathan DM, Eckel RH, et al. Metabolic surgery in the treatment algorithm for type 2 diabetes: A joint statement by international diabetes organizations [J]. Obes Surg, 2017,27(1):2-21.
[19]
Sánchez-Pernaute A, Rubio Herrera MA, Perez-Aguirre E, et al. Proximal duodenal-ileal end-to-side bypass with sleeve gastrectomy: Proposed technique [J]. Obes Surg, 2007,17(12):1614-1618.
[20]
Reinhold RB. Critical analysis of long term weight loss following gastric bypass [J]. Surg Gynecol Obstet, 1982,155(3):385-394.
[21]
Sánchez-Pernaute A, Rubio MA, Cabrerizo L, et al. Single-anastomosis duodenoileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (sadi-s) for obese diabetic patients [J]. Surgery for obesity and related diseases , 2015,11(5):1092-1098.
[22]
Sánchez-Pernaute A, Rubio MA, Perez Aguirre E, et al. Single-anastomosis duodenoileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy: Metabolic improvement and weight loss in first 100 patients [J]. Surgery for obesity and related diseases, 2013,9(5):731-735.
[23]
Nelson L, Moon RC, Teixeira AF, et al. Safety and effectiveness of single anastomosis duodenal switch procedure: Preliminary result from a single institution [J]. Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva, 2016,29Suppl 1(Suppl 1):80-84.
[1] 王振宁, 杨康, 王得晨, 邹敏, 归明彬, 王雅楠, 徐明. 机器人与腹腔镜手术联合经自然腔道取标本对中低位直肠癌患者远期疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 437-442.
[2] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[3] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[4] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[5] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[6] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[7] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[8] 韩戟, 杨力, 陈玉. 腹部形态CT参数与完全腹腔镜全胃切除术术中失血量的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 88-91.
[9] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[10] 梁孟杰, 朱欢欢, 王行舟, 江航, 艾世超, 孙锋, 宋鹏, 王萌, 刘颂, 夏雪峰, 杜峻峰, 傅双, 陆晓峰, 沈晓菲, 管文贤. 联合免疫治疗的胃癌转化治疗患者预后及术后并发症分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 619-623.
[11] 孟令凯, 李大勇, 王宁, 王桂明, 张炳南, 李若彤, 潘立峰. 袖状胃切除术对肥胖伴2型糖尿病大鼠的作用及机制研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 638-642.
[12] 刘海旺, 施海, 尚利峰. 不同吻合器在腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术Roux-en-Y式吻合中的应用对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 643-646.
[13] 许月芳, 刘旺, 曾妙甜, 郭宇姝. 多粘菌素B和多粘菌素E治疗外科多重耐药菌感染临床疗效及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 700-703.
[14] 刘见, 杨晓波, 何均健, 等. 应用电钩三孔法腹腔镜袖状胃切除术[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(06): 363-364.
[15] 谢浩文, 丁建英, 刘小霞, 冯毅, 姚婧. 椎旁神经阻滞对微创胃切除肥胖患者术中血流、术后应激及康复质量的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 569-573.
阅读次数
全文


摘要