切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (01) : 53 -55. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2018.01.017

所属专题: 文献

论著

两种TME术式治疗超低位直肠癌疗效及安全性对比
盛波1,()   
  1. 1. 434000 湖北荆州市第一人民医院肿瘤外科
  • 收稿日期:2017-11-07 出版日期:2018-02-26
  • 通信作者: 盛波

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of two TME methods in the treatment of ultra low rectal cancer

Bo Sheng1,()   

  1. 1. Department of oncology, Jingzhou first people’s Hospital, Jingzhou Hubei 434000, China
  • Received:2017-11-07 Published:2018-02-26
  • Corresponding author: Bo Sheng
  • About author:
    Corresponding aurhor: Sheng Bo, Email:
引用本文:

盛波. 两种TME术式治疗超低位直肠癌疗效及安全性对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(01): 53-55.

Bo Sheng. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of two TME methods in the treatment of ultra low rectal cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(01): 53-55.

目的

研究两种直肠全系膜切除术(TME)对超低位直肠癌患者的治疗疗效和安全性的影响。

方法

选择2013年6月至2016年1月治疗的超低位直肠癌患者84例。根据患者治疗方案分为腹腔镜TME组和经肛直肠全系膜切除术(TaTME)组,各42例。两组患者治疗后随访1年,应用SPSS20.0进行数据分析,围手术期指标、PAC-QOL评分比较采用计量资料用(±s)表示,组间比较采用独立t检验;并发症发生率、死亡率、复发率、转移率计数资料用%表示,采用χ2检验,以P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

两组患者在术后镇痛时间、留置尿管时间、淋巴结清扫数目等方面差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),TaTME组在手术时间大于腹腔镜TME组,术中出血量、住院时间、肛门排气时间低于腹腔镜TME组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组患者在并发症发生率及死亡率比较差异无意义(P>0.05); TaTME组患者PAC-QOL评分为(36.8±3.0)分,低于腹腔镜TME组患者的(40.4±3.7)分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。腹腔镜TME组患者术后1年生存率为90.5%,低于TaTME组患者的生存率95.2%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),两组患者在局部复发、远处转移差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

经肛直肠全系膜切除术与腹腔镜直肠全系膜切除术相比,在改善患者生存质量、缩短患者住院时间、术中出血量上具有优势,并发症发生、复发、转移、死亡情况无明显差异。

Objective

To investigate the efficacy and safety of two kinds of total mesorectal excision in patients with ultra-low rectal cancer.

Methods

From June 2013 to January 2016, 84 patients with ultra-low rectal cancer treated in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into the laparoscopic TME group and the transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) group, each with 42 cases. After treatment, the two groups of patients were followed up for 1 year. The SPSS20.0 was used to analysis the data, perioperative index, PAC-QOL score were showed as (±s) and compared with independent t test; the incidence of complications, mortality, recurrence rate, metastasis rate were compared with χ2 test. P<0.05 meant the difference was statistically significant.

Results

There was no significant difference in the postoperative analgesia time, indwelling catheter time and the number of lymph node between two group (P>0.05). The operation time of group TaTME was longer than that of laparoscopic TME group, the amount of bleeding, hospitalization time, anal exhaust time was lower than that of laparoscopic TME group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The incidence of complications and mortality were not significant between the two groups (P>0.05); The TaTME group had PAC-QOL (36.8±3.0), which was lower than the laparoscopic group (40.4±3.7), the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Laparoscopic surgery in TME group after 1 year survival rate was 90.5%, which was lower than the patients in the TaTME group survival rate was 95.2%, but the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05), there was no significant difference in local recurrence and distant metastasis between the two groups (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Compared with laparoscopic total mesorectal excision, transanal total mesorectal excision has advantages in improving the quality of life, shortening the length of stay, and reducing the amount of bleeding during operation. There is no significant differences in incidence rate of complications, recurrence, metastasis and death.

表1 84例超低位直肠癌患者不同术式两组一般资料比较(例)
表2 84例超低位直肠癌患者不同术式两组患者围手术期指标比较(±s)
表3 84例超低位直肠癌患者不同术式两组患者术后并发症及PAC-QOL评分比较(例)
[1]
池畔,王枭杰.机器人和腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术中Denonvilliers筋膜解剖的意义及技巧[J].中国实用外科杂志,2017,37(6):609-615.
[2]
杨盈赤,金岚,张忠涛.完全经肛门TME腹腔镜直肠癌手术的实践与技巧[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志:电子版,2016,10(2):97-100.
[3]
康亮,汪建平.经肛直肠癌全直肠系膜切除术实践与策略[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志:电子版,2016,10(2):101-105.
[4]
苏轶男.开腹和腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术治疗中低位直肠癌的疗效对比[J].临床和实验医学杂志,2014,13(1):58-60.
[5]
汪建平.低位直肠癌术式选择及评价[J].中国实用外科杂志,2017,37(6):593-595.
[6]
Bhardwaj H, Stephens M, Bhatt M, et al. Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen PET/CT Findings for Hepatic Hemangioma[J]. Clin Nucl Med, 2016,41(12):968-969.
[7]
Bara T Jr, Gurzu S, Jung I, et al. Giant Cavernous Hepatic Hemangioma Diagnosed Incidentally in a Perimenopausal Obese Female with Endometrial Adenocarcinoma: A Case Report[J]. Anticancer Res, 2016,36:769-772.
[8]
李想,傅仲学,贾诩.腹腔镜与开腹全直肠系膜切除保肛术治疗低位直肠癌的Meta分析[J].重庆医学,2015,44(12):1658-1661.
[9]
陈功,万德森.结直肠癌防治研究最新进展[J].广东医学,2016,37(22):3323-3328.
[10]
张昊,任宇鹏,刘放,等.新辅助治疗联合3D腹腔镜手术在局部晚期低位直肠癌中的应用体会[J].腹腔镜外科杂志,2016,21(12):899-902.
[11]
申力,赵立志,唐纪全,等.直肠癌TME术后吻合口漏32例治疗体会[J].结直肠肛门外科,2016,22(S2):95-96.
[12]
赵坤,杨筱玲,陶红发,等.单孔腹腔镜下TaTME术治疗直肠癌临床效果分析[J].中国现代普通外科进展,2017,20(2):140-142.
[13]
蒙珍琪,王延磊,戴勇.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术的发展及现状[J].腹腔镜外科杂志,2017,22(3):230-233.
[14]
南琼.3种术式治疗低位直肠癌的疗效比较[J].西南国防医药,2017,27(7):662-664.
[1] 李友, 唐林峰, 杜伟伟, 刘海亮, 余新水, 沈佳宇, 巨积辉. 皮瓣联合掌长肌腱折叠单排三点式固定治疗指背侧创面伴锤状指畸形的临床效果观察[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 485-490.
[2] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[3] 吴晖, 佴永军, 施雪松, 魏晓为. 两种解剖入路下行直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 40-43.
[4] 周世振, 朱兴亚, 袁庆港, 刘理想, 王凯, 缪骥, 丁超, 汪灏, 管文贤. 吲哚菁绿荧光成像技术在腹腔镜直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫中的应用效果分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 44-47.
[5] 徐逸男. 不同术式治疗梗阻性左半结直肠癌的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 72-75.
[6] 李代勤, 刘佩杰. 动态增强磁共振评估中晚期低位直肠癌同步放化疗后疗效及预后的价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 100-103.
[7] 孙莲, 马红萍, 吴文英. 局部进展期甲状腺癌患者外科处理[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 112-114.
[8] 庄宝雄, 邓海军. 单孔+1腹腔镜直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 601-601.
[9] 郑民华, 蒋天宇, 赵轩, 马君俊. 中国腹腔镜直肠癌根治术30年发展历程与未来[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 591-595.
[10] 池畔, 黄胜辉. 中国腹腔镜直肠癌根治术30年来的巨大进步[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 596-600.
[11] 李明, 屠松, 闫鹏, 钱军, 高鹏程, 许文山, 杨发英, 胡振涛, 单永玮. 应用前列腺电切镜引导置管治疗直肠低位吻合口漏研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 603-606.
[12] 李玲, 刘亚, 李培玲, 张秀敏, 李萍. 直肠癌患者术后肠道菌群的变化与抑郁症相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 607-610.
[13] 赵梓竣, 兰运升. 改良一针法末端回肠造口术对低位直肠癌保肛术后应激反应及安全性的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 611-614.
[14] 刘卓, 张宗明, 张翀, 刘立民, 赵月, 齐晖. 腹腔镜手术治疗高龄急性梗阻性化脓性胆管炎患者的安全性与术式选择[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 795-800.
[15] 刘福成, 赵欣, 乔海朋, 刘晓峰, 张翀, 张宗明. 保留左结肠动脉的肠系膜下动脉根部淋巴结清扫对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术的疗效影响[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 647-653.
阅读次数
全文


摘要