Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (05): 476-479. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2020.05.014

Special Issue:

• Original Article • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comparative analysis of two types of metabolic surgery for obese patients with type 2 diabetes

Xinqiang Zhu1, Xiaodong Shan2, Jilei Ma1, Hailong Huang1, Xuetong Jiang1, Jianqiang Wu1, Xitai Sun2,()   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Suqian Hospital, Xuzhou Medical University, Jiangsu 223800, China
    2. Department of General Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing University Medical School, Jiangsu 210008, China
  • Received:2020-03-06 Online:2020-10-26 Published:2020-10-26
  • Contact: Xitai Sun
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Sun Xitai, Email:
  • Supported by:
    The 5th " 333 project" of training fund of Jiangsu Province(BRA2019230)

Abstract:

Objective

To evaluate the advantages of types of metabolic surgery for obese patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM).

Methods

From January 2012 to February 2019, the clinical data of 64 cases of obesity with T2DM were retrospectively analyzed. According to the surgical intervention, 64 patients were divided into laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) group (n=30) and laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery (L-RYGB) group (n=34) . Statistical analysis were performed by using SPSS 17 software. Measurement data such as biochemical indicators were represented as (±s), and were examined by using independent t test. Postoperative complications and other count data were analyzed using χ2 test and logistic regression (stepwise) model to analyze the risk factors of diabetes remission. A P value of <0.05 was considered as statistically significant difference.

Results

Except for triglycerides, the blood lipid-related indexes in both two groups were not improved significantly one year after surgery. There were no significant difference in terms of BMI and blood glucose between two groups (P>0.05). In terms of remission rate of blood glucose, there was 88.2% in L-RYGB, which was better than76.7% in LSG group, with significant difference (P<0.05). One year after surgery, there were significant decrease in both groups in terms of HbA1c、systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure (P=0.016; P=0.029 and P=0.017 respectively). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that BMI, fasting blood glucose and HbA1c could be used as independent risk factors for diabetes remission at 1 year (P=0.001; P=0.001; P=0.008). There was a higher remission rate in L-RYGB group than that in LSG group, with significant difference (OR=1.79, 95%CI: 1.133~2.829, P=0.013). There was no death or gastrointestinal fistula within 30 days in either group. There was a higher incidence of deep vein thrombosis in L-RYGB group than that in LSG group (11.8% vs.3.3%, P=0.022).

Conclusion

In terms of diabetes remission one year after surgery, gastric bypass surgery is superior to sleeve gastrectomy. However, follow-up studies are still needed for long-term remission outcome.

Key words: Diabetes mellitus, type 2, Obesity, Gastric bypass, Gastrectomy, Comparative effectiveness research, Metabolic surgery

京ICP 备07035254号-3
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 66721881; 64049986 E-mail: zhpwkssx@126.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd