Abstract:
Objective
To compare the efficacy of laparoscopic radical gastrectomy (TLTG) with two different approaches in the treatment of overweight gastric cancer.
Methods
Clinical data of 105 patients with overweight gastric cancer who received TLTG from January 2019 to May 2023 and completed 2-year follow-up were retrospectively analyzed, and they were divided into left approach group (n=52 cases) and right approach group (n=53 cases) according to different surgical approaches.The data were analyzed with SPSS 25.0 software, and the measurement data such as perioperative indicators were expressed as (x± s ), and independent sample t test was performed.The count data were represented by [cases (%)] and χ2 test was performed.Disease recurrence and survival were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier curve.P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Compared with the left approach group, the right approach group had shorter operation time, less intraoperative blood loss, more lymph node dissection, shorter time for first anal exhaust and first getting out of bed, fewer disease recurrence cases within 2 years after surgery, and longer tumor free survival (P<0.05).There was no significant difference in postoperative complications, 2-year postoperative survival and overall survival between the two groups (P>0.05).
Conclusion
The safety and short-term survival of TLTG in the treatment of overweight gastric cancer under the two approaches are comparable.However, compared with the left approach,the right approach has shorter operation time, less intraoperative bleeding, more intraoperative lymph node dissection, faster postoperative recovery, and relatively fewer cases of disease recurrence 2 years after surgery.
Key words:
Stomach Neoplasms,
Overweight,
Laparoscopes,
Gastrectomy,
Approach,
Prognosis
Jie Xu, Yajun Li, Junwei Han. Comparison of the efficacy of radical laparoscopic total gastrectomy in the treatment of overweight gastric cancer with two approaches[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.