Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (06): 577-580. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2020.06.013

Special Issue:

• Original Article • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comparison of short-term clinical efficacy of three surgical methods for hepatocellular carcinoma

Dan Tang1, Gongwei liu1, Yu Ao1, Yang Tan1, Xiuzhi Yang1, Xiongxiong Li1, Zhifang Cai1,(), Lijin Zhao2   

  1. 1. Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University 563000
    2. Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University 563003
  • Received:2020-03-20 Online:2020-12-26 Published:2020-12-26
  • Contact: Zhifang Cai
  • About author:
    Correspondence author: Cai Zhifang, Emil:
  • Supported by:
    Zunyi Science and Technology Bureau Zunyi Medical University City School Joint(Zun Shi Ke He HZ (2019) No.8); Major Research on Innovation Group of Education Department of Guizhou Province(Qiankehe KY 2016039)

Abstract:

Objective

To compare the short-term clinical efficacy of laparoscopic resection(LR), open resection(OR) and radiofrequency ablation under ultrasound localization for hepatocellular carcinoma(RFA).

Methods

The data of 152 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who underwent surgery in our hospital from June 2010 to June 2018 were retrospectively analyzed.71 patients who were treated with laparoscopic resection (LR) were included in the LR group, 52 patients who were treated with open resection (OR) were included in the OR group, and 29 patients who were treated with ultrasound-localized radiofrequency ablation (RFA) were included in the RFA group.SPSS 25.0 software package was used to verify the entire group of data. Measurement data such as surgery-related indicators and VAS scores were described by (±s) and t tests were performed. Frequency (n) and rate (%) were used for counting data such as recent efficacy and complications. Description, χ2 test was performed, and comparison among multiple groups was performed by one-way analysis of variance. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Comparing the total effective rate of three groups of patients 3 months after operation, LR group (76.1%) > OR group (73.1%) > RFA group (72.4%), but the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05); The operation time, total bleeding volume and hospitalization time of the three groups were compared, the OR group > Lr Group > RFA group (P<0.05) ; The Vas scores after 24 hours and 1 week after operation were compared, the overall incidence of complications in the OR group (36.5%) > LR group (29.6%) > RFA group (6.7%)(P<0.05) ; The comparison of the recurrence rate after 3 months of follow-up, OR group (7.7%) <LR group (8.5%) <RFA group (10.3%) (P>0.05).

Conclusion

For patients with hepatocellular carcinoma with early stage and small tumors treated with LR, OR, and RFA, the recent treatment results are comparable, but compared with LR and OR, RFA has less damage and faster postoperative recovery Advantages can reduce the degree of postoperative pain and higher safety. However, for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma with large tumors and close to important vascular bile ducts, individualized treatment is still needed.

Key words: Carcinoma, hepatocellular, Laparoscopes, Laparotomy, Radiofrequency ablation under ultrasound localization, Comparative effectiveness research

京ICP 备07035254号-3
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 66721881; 64049986 E-mail: zhpwkssx@126.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd