切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (04) : 438 -441. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2024.04.023

论著

腹腔镜下右半结肠癌D3根治术中SMA或SMV入路的选择
孙龙凤1, 侯高峰1, 王幼黎1, 刘磊1,()   
  1. 1. 100012 北京,航空总医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2023-07-26 出版日期:2024-08-26
  • 通信作者: 刘磊

Selection of SMA or SMV approach during laparoscopic D3 radical resection of right colon cancer

Longfeng Sun1, Gaofeng Hou1, Youli Wang1, Lei Liu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Aviation General Hospital, Beijing 100012, China
  • Received:2023-07-26 Published:2024-08-26
  • Corresponding author: Lei Liu
引用本文:

孙龙凤, 侯高峰, 王幼黎, 刘磊. 腹腔镜下右半结肠癌D3根治术中SMA或SMV入路的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 438-441.

Longfeng Sun, Gaofeng Hou, Youli Wang, Lei Liu. Selection of SMA or SMV approach during laparoscopic D3 radical resection of right colon cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(04): 438-441.

目的

探究腹腔镜下右半结肠癌D3根治术中肠系膜上动脉(SMA)或肠系膜上静脉(SMV)入路方式的选择问题。

方法

回顾性分析2019年1月至2022年5月80例右半结肠癌患者的临床资料,按照入路方式分为SMA组(采用肠系膜上动脉入路方式行腹腔镜下右半结肠癌D3根治术)和SMV组(采用肠系膜上静脉入路方式行腹腔镜下右半结肠癌D3根治术),每组患者各40例。采用SPSS 26.0软件分析数据,围手术期相关指标等计量资料以()表示,采用独立样本t检验;术后并发症等计数资料采用χ2检验;生存分析采用Kaplan-Meier法并行Log-Rank检验。P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

相比SMV组,SMA组患者术中出血量明显减少,淋巴结清扫数量、术后引流量、引流管留置时间明显增加,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组患者术后并发症发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);SMA组和SMV组患者术后1年总生存率(90.0% vs. 80.0%)和无进展生存率(85.0% vs. 72.5%)比较差异无统计学意义(Log-Rank χ2=2.235、2.638,P=0.152、0.071)。

结论

腹腔镜下右半结肠癌D3根治术中,相比SMV入路方式,SMA入路增加了淋巴结清扫数量,减少了术中出血量,在后续诊疗中具有重要意义。

Objective

To explore the choice of superior mesenteric artery (SMA) or superior mesenteric vein (SMV) approach in laparoscopic D3 radical operation for right colon cancer.

Methods

The clinical data of 80 patients with right hemicolonic carcinoma from January 2019 to May 2022 were retrospectively analyzed and divided into SMA group (laparoscopic D3 radical resection of right hemicolonic carcinoma by superior mesenteric artery approach) and SMV group (laparoscopic D3 radical resection of right hemicolonic carcinoma by superior mesenteric vein approach) according to the approach method. There were 40 patients in each group. SPSS 26.0 software was used to analyze the data. Measurement data such as perioperative indicators were expressed as (), and independent sample t test was used. The postoperative complications were counted by χ2 test. Kaplan-Meier method and Log-Rank test were used for survival analysis. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Compared with SMV group, the amount of intraoperative blood loss in SMA group was significantly reduced, and the number of lymph node dissection, postoperative drainage volume, and drainage tube retention time were significantly increased, with statistical significance (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in 1-year overall survival (90.0% vs. 80.0%) and progression-free survival (85.0% vs. 72.5%) between SMA and SMV groups (Log-Rank χ2=2.235, 2.638, P=0.152, 0.071).

Conclusion

Compared with the SMV approach, the SMA approach increased the number of lymph node dissection and reduced the amount of intraoperative blood loss during the D3 radical operation of the right half colon cancer under laparoscopy, which is of great significance in the follow-up diagnosis and treatment.

表1 两组患者一般临床资料比较
表2 两组患者围手术期相关指标比较
表3 两组患者术后1个月并发症比较[例(%)]
图1 两组患者术后1年生存情况对比 注:A=两组患者术后1年总生存率比较;B=两组患者术后1年无进展生存率比较。
[1]
Di Buono GBuscemi SCocorullo G,et al. Feasibility and Safety of Laparoscopic Complete Mesocolic Excision(CME)for Right-sided Colon Cancer: Short-term Outcomes. A Randomized Clinical Study[J]. Ann Surg2021, 274(1): 57-62.
[2]
Crafa FVanella SNeola B,et al. Hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision: description of an open and laparoscopic approach - A video vignette[J]. Colorectal Dis2021, 23(5): 1280-1281.
[3]
雷跃华,陈文兴,王邓超. 单孔加一孔与传统多孔腹腔镜用于右半结肠癌根治术的中远期随访比较[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版)2022, 16(01): 99-102.
[4]
Vulasala SSRSutphin PDKethu S,et al. Interventional radiological therapies in colorectal hepatic metastases[J]. Front Oncol2023, 13: 963966.
[5]
Xu WZhou J. The value of mesenteric closure after laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a scoping review[J]. BMC Surg2023, 23(1): 134.
[6]
Hou JZhao RCai T,et al. Temporal Trends in Clinical Evidence of 5-Year Survival Within Electronic Health Records Among Patients With Early-Stage Colon Cancer Managed With Laparoscopy-Assisted Colectomy vs Open Colectomy[J]. JAMA Netw Open2022, 5(6): e2218371.
[7]
朱潇逸,沈展,阮航,等. 以肠系膜上动脉为导向的腹腔镜下完整结肠系膜切除治疗右半结肠癌的可行性及近期效果[J]. 浙江医学2021, 43(20): 2226-2228, 2278.
[8]
刁德昌,廖伟林. 结直肠手术器官功能保护——腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术中的神经保护[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志2021, 24(04): 310-311.
[9]
马占君,李振国,王欢,等. 基于液相色谱-串联质谱的结肠癌血清氧固醇标志物筛选[J]. 色谱2022, 40(06): 541-546.
[10]
林媚媚,卢密密. 延续性功能锻炼结合心理护理对结肠癌根治术后患者病情的影响[J]. 重庆医学2022, 51(S01): 343-344.
[11]
李乐平,靖昌庆,连国栋. 中国腹腔镜结肠癌手术20年发展、问题与对策[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版)2021, 15(05): 477-481.
[12]
Lu CHKao WYChang CC,et al. A rare cause of hematochezia: colonic extranodal marginal zone lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue(MALToma): A case report and literature review[J]. Medicine(Baltimore)2023, 102(21): e33869.
[13]
Gude SSVeeravalli RSVejandla B,et al. Colorectal Cancer Diagnostic Methods: The Present and Future[J]. Cureus2023, 15(4): e37622.
[14]
Moon JYKye BHKo SH,et al. Sulfur Metabolism of the Gut Microbiome and Colorectal Cancer: The Threat to the Younger Generation[J]. Nutrients2023, 15(8): 1966.
[15]
Ji-SeonKimSe-Jin,et al. Impact of D3 lymph node dissection on upstaging and short-term survival in clinical stage I right-sided colon cancer[J]. Asian J Surg2021, 44(10): 1278-1282.
[16]
Patel DDiperi TCox B,et al. A National Cancer Database(NCDB)analysis of the impact of nonmetastatic colon cancer sidedness on survival[J]. J Clinic Oncol2021, 39(3_suppl): 139.
[17]
Tay PWLXiao JLLim WH,et al. 207 Laparoscopic versus Open Surgery for Locally Advanced Colon Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study[J]. BJS2021, 108(Supplement_2): ii57.
[18]
Vilsan JMaddineni SAAhsan N,et al. Open,Laparoscopic,and Robotic Approaches to Treat Colorectal Cancer: A Comprehensive Review of Literature[J]. Cureus2023, 15(5): e38956.
[19]
马松,席浩,杨建伟. 以肠系膜上动脉左侧为右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫内侧界的可行性研究[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志2021, 26(04): 277-281.
[1] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[2] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[3] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[4] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[5] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[6] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[7] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[8] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[9] 李博, 贾蓬勃, 李栋, 李小庆. ERCP与LCBDE治疗胆总管结石继发急性重症胆管炎的效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 60-63.
[10] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[11] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[12] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
[13] 郭兵, 王万里, 何凯, 黄汉生. 腹腔镜下肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 143-143.
[14] 李凯, 陈淋, 苏怀东, 向涵, 张伟. 超微创器械在改良单孔腹腔镜巨大肝囊肿开窗引流及胆囊切除中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 144-144.
[15] 魏丽霞, 张安澜, 周宝勇, 李明. 腹腔镜下Ⅲb型肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 145-145.
阅读次数
全文


摘要