切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (03) : 342 -345. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2024.03.028

论著

三镜与双镜联合清创术在感染坏死性胰腺炎中应用
韩智君1,(), 李春1, 艾力江·吾斯满1, 帕合尔丁·买买提1, 韩勇桥1, 塔依尔·塔里甫1, 西尔扎提·吐尔地1   
  1. 1. 830049 乌鲁木齐,新疆维吾尔自治区维吾尔医医院(自治区第二人民医院)普外科
  • 收稿日期:2023-11-30 出版日期:2024-06-26
  • 通信作者: 韩智君

Combined debridement with three and two mirrors in the treatment of infected necrotizing pancreatitis

Zhijun Han1,(), Chun Li1, Wusiman AIlijiang·1, Maimaiti Paheerding·1, Yongqiao Han1, Talifu Tayier·1, Tuerdi Xierzhati·1   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Uyghur Medical Hospital of Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region (The Second People’s Hospital of the Autonomous Region), Urumqi Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region 830049, China
  • Received:2023-11-30 Published:2024-06-26
  • Corresponding author: Zhijun Han
  • Supported by:
    Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region Natural Science Foundation Project(2021D01C270)
引用本文:

韩智君, 李春, 艾力江·吾斯满, 帕合尔丁·买买提, 韩勇桥, 塔依尔·塔里甫, 西尔扎提·吐尔地. 三镜与双镜联合清创术在感染坏死性胰腺炎中应用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 342-345.

Zhijun Han, Chun Li, Wusiman AIlijiang·, Maimaiti Paheerding·, Yongqiao Han, Talifu Tayier·, Tuerdi Xierzhati·. Combined debridement with three and two mirrors in the treatment of infected necrotizing pancreatitis[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(03): 342-345.

目的

比较三镜联合(腹腔镜+胆道镜+胃镜)与双镜联合(腹腔镜+胆道镜)清创术在感染坏死性胰腺炎患者中的应用效果。

方法

前瞻性选取2018年1月至2023年1月收治的181例感染坏死性胰腺炎患者作为研究对象,采用随机数字表法将患者分为三镜联合组(n=91例)与双镜联合组(n=90例)。三镜组患者采用腹腔镜+胆道镜+胃镜清创术治疗,双镜组患者采用腹腔镜+胆道镜清创术治疗。采用SPSS 27.0软件分析数据,围手术期指标等计量资料用()描述,采用独立样本t检验;术后并发症发生率、复发率等计数资料用[例(%)]表示,采用χ2检验。P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

三镜联合组患者住院时间、出血量明显少于双镜联合组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);但两组患者住院费用比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。三镜联合组患者中转开腹率明显低于双镜联合组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。三镜联合组术后并发症发生率明显低于双镜联合组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。随访6个月,三镜联合组患者复发率明显低于双镜联合组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

相较于腹腔镜联合胆道镜清创术,腹腔镜、胆道镜联合胃镜清创术可缩短患者住院时间、降低出血量、中转开腹率,减少术后并发症以及复发。

Objective

Combined debridement with three and two mirrors in the treatment of infected necrotizing pancreatitis.

Methods

A total of 181 patients with necrotizing pancreatitis admitted to hospital from January 2018 to January 2023 were prospectively selected as the study objects, and the patients were divided into a three-lens combined group (n=91 cases) and a two-lens combined group (n=90 cases) by random number table method. Laparoscopic + choledochoscope + gastroscope debridement was performed in the three-mirror group, and laparoscopic + choledochoscope debridement was performed in the two-mirror group. SPSS 27.0 software was used to analyze the data. Measurement data such as perioperative indicators were described by () and independent sample t test was used. The statistical data of postoperative complication rate and recurrence rate were expressed by [cases (%)] and χ2 test was used. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The length of hospital stay and blood loss in the three-lens combined group were significantly less than those in the two-lens combined group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference in hospitalization costs between the two groups (P > 0.05). The conversion rate of patients in the three-lens combination group was significantly lower than that in the two-lens combination group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications in the three-lens combined group was significantly lower than that in the two-lens combined group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). After 6 months of follow-up, the recurrence rate of patients in the three-lens combined group was significantly lower than that in the two-lens combined group, with statistical significance (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Compared with laparoscopic choledochoscopic debridement, laparoscopic, choledochoscopic debridement can shorten the length of hospital stay, reduce the amount of blood loss, the conversion rate of laparotomy, and reduce postoperative complications and recurrence.

表1 两组患者一般资料比较
表2 两组患者围手术期指标比较(
表3 两组患者术后并发症比较[例(%)]
图1 两组患者复发曲线分析
[1]
隋宇航,孙备. 感染性胰腺坏死分型的初探与外科干预策略的再思考[J]. 中华外科杂志202159(07): 601-607.
[2]
刘洋(译),赵义军(审校). 感染坏死性胰腺炎:立即或延迟引流[J]. 肝胆外科杂志202230(02): 160.
[3]
柴振中,冯文明,黄三雄,等. 胆道镜联合肾镜辅助经皮窦道清除重症急性胰腺炎胰周坏死组织[J]. 肝胆胰外科杂志202032(01): 48-52.
[4]
王兴鹏,李兆申,袁耀宗,等. 中国急性胰腺炎诊治指南(2013年,上海)[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志201329(09): 656-660.
[5]
Guda NMMuddana VWhitcomb DC,et al. Recurrent acute pancreatitis:international state-of-the-science conference with recommendations[J]. Pancreas201847(6): 653-666.
[6]
徐鹏,谢东方,袁琛,等. 手术时机对胆囊结石并重症急性胆源性胰腺炎二年随访结果的影响[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版)202014(06): 593-596.
[7]
杨娟,杨先芹,张岚,等. 两种清创术治疗急性胰腺炎所致感染性胰腺坏死的临床效果研究[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版)202115(06): 668-671.
[8]
陈玉辉,蔡守旺,刘志伟,等. 经皮肾镜清创联合经胃经皮穿刺引流治疗重症急性胰腺炎合并包裹性坏死一例[J]. 中华肝胆外科杂志202026(05): 387-388.
[9]
王鹏飞,黄华杰,刘志伟,等. 经皮经胃置管引流在治疗急性胰腺炎合并包裹性坏死肾镜清创引流术后胰瘘中的应用[J]. 中国实用内科杂志202141(01): 45-49.
[10]
Boxhoorn Lvan Dijk SMvan Grinsven J,et al. Immediate versus Postponed Intervention for Infected Necrotizing Pancreatitis[J]. N Engl J Med2021385(15): 1372-1381.
[11]
Zerem EKurtcehajic AKunosic S,et al. Current trends in acute pancreatitis:Diagnostic and therapeutic challenges[J]. World J Gastroenterol202329(18): 2747-2763.
[12]
Strand DSLaw RJYang D,et al. AGA Clinical Practice Update on the Endoscopic Approach to Recurrent Acute and Chronic Pancreatitis:Expert Review[J]. Gastroenterology2022163(4): 1107-1114.
[13]
Nabi ZLakhtakia S. Endoscopic management of chronic pancreatitis[J]. Dig Endosc202133(7): 1059-1072.
[14]
Onnekink AMBoxhoorn LTimmerhuis HC,et al. Endoscopic Versus Surgical Step-Up Approach for Infected Necrotizing Pancreatitis(ExTENSION):Long-term Follow-up of a Randomized Trial[J]. Gastroenterology2022163(3): 712-722.e14.
[15]
Jain SPadhan RBopanna S,et al. Percutaneous Endoscopic Step-Up Therapy Is an Effective Minimally Invasive Approach for Infected Necrotizing Pancreatitis[J]. Dig Dis Sci202065(2): 615-622.
[1] 燕速, 霍博文. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治性切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 13-13.
[2] 母德安, 李凯, 张志远, 张伟. 超微创器械辅助单孔腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 14-14.
[3] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[4] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[5] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[6] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[7] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[8] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[9] 刘世君, 马杰, 师鲁静. 胃癌完整系膜切除术+标准D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[10] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[11] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[12] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
[13] 郭兵, 王万里, 何凯, 黄汉生. 腹腔镜下肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 143-143.
[14] 李凯, 陈淋, 苏怀东, 向涵, 张伟. 超微创器械在改良单孔腹腔镜巨大肝囊肿开窗引流及胆囊切除中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 144-144.
[15] 魏丽霞, 张安澜, 周宝勇, 李明. 腹腔镜下Ⅲb型肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 145-145.
阅读次数
全文


摘要