切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (03) : 291 -294. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2024.03.015

论著

基于数字化微创技术对复杂性肝胆管结石患者胆道、肝静脉、门静脉解剖与变异情况及应用效果研究
唐浩1,(), 梁平2, 程千里1, 徐小江1, 曾凯1, 文拨辉1   
  1. 1. 571159 海南海口,联勤保障部队第九二八医院心胸肝胆外科
    2. 571159 海南海口,陆军军医大学第二附属医院肝胆外科
  • 收稿日期:2023-07-31 出版日期:2024-06-26
  • 通信作者: 唐浩

Study on the anatomy and variation of biliary tract, hepatic vein and portal vein in patients with complex hepatolithiasis and its application effect based on digital minimally invasive technique

Hao Tang1,(), Ping Liang2, Qianli Cheng1, Xiaojiang Xu1, Kai Zeng1, Bohui Wen1   

  1. 1. Department of Cardiothoracic Hepatobiliary Surgery, 928th Hospital of pla joint logisttcs support force, Haikou Hainan Province 571159, China
    2. Department of Hepatobiliary surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University, Haikou Hainan Province 571159, China
  • Received:2023-07-31 Published:2024-06-26
  • Corresponding author: Hao Tang
  • Supported by:
    Health Industry Research Project of Hainan Province(22A200180)
引用本文:

唐浩, 梁平, 程千里, 徐小江, 曾凯, 文拨辉. 基于数字化微创技术对复杂性肝胆管结石患者胆道、肝静脉、门静脉解剖与变异情况及应用效果研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 291-294.

Hao Tang, Ping Liang, Qianli Cheng, Xiaojiang Xu, Kai Zeng, Bohui Wen. Study on the anatomy and variation of biliary tract, hepatic vein and portal vein in patients with complex hepatolithiasis and its application effect based on digital minimally invasive technique[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(03): 291-294.

目的

探究数字化微创技术对复杂性肝胆管结石患者胆道、肝静脉、门静脉的解剖分型辨认及临床应用效果。

方法

回顾性选取2019年1月至2022年4月收治的基于数字化微创技术行肝切除术治疗的复杂性肝胆管结石患者30例作为研究组,另选择同期基于传统医学影像检查行腹腔镜肝切除术治疗的复杂性肝胆管结石患者30例作为对照组。采用SPSS 24.0完成数据分析。胆道、肝静脉、门静脉分型、术后并发症、结石残留和复发情况等计数资料采用[n%)]表示,组间比较行χ2检验;围手术期指标、肝功能指标等计量资料采用(Mean±SD)表示,组间比较行独立t检验。P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

研究组术前检查所见胆道、肝静脉及门静脉分型与术中所见符合率分别为96.7%、100.0%、100.0%,显著高于对照组的73.3%、76.7%、73.3%(P<0.05);研究组患者手术时间和术后住院时间显著短于对照组,术中出血量和输血量显著少于对照组(P<0.05);两组患者术后1个月ALT、AST、ALP、TBil水平较术前显著降低,且研究组明显低于对照组(P<0.05);研究组并发症总发生率明显低于对照组(6.7% vs. 26.7%,P<0.05),两组患者结石残留率和复发率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

复杂性肝胆管结石患者应用数字化微创技术指导治疗,可在术前精准辨析肝内胆管及脉管解剖与变异情况,相比传统手术治疗,明显减少了手术时间及术中出血量,可最大限度保护肝脏及其功能,减少术后并发症,加快患者恢复进程。

Objective

To explore the anatomical classification and clinical application effect of digital minimally invasive technique on biliary tract, hepatic vein and portal vein in patients with complex hepatolithiasis.

Methods

Thirty patients with complex hepatolithiasis who underwent hepatectomy based on digital minimally invasive technology from January 2019 to April 2022 were retrospectively selected as the study group, and another 30 patients with complex hepatolithiasis who underwent laparoscopic hepatectomy based on traditional medical imaging during the same period were selected as the control group. SPSS 24.0 was used to complete the data analysis. The classification of biliary tract, hepatic vein, portal vein, postoperative complications, stone residue and recurrence were represented by [n (%)]. χ2 test was performed for comparison between groups. Measurement data such as perioperative indexes and liver function indexes were represented by (Mean±SD), and independent t test was performed between groups. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The coincidence rates of preoperative biliary tract, hepatic vein and portal vein were 96.7%, 100.0% and 100.0%, respectively, which were significantly higher than that of control group (73.3%, 76.7% and 73.3%, P<0.05). The operation time and postoperative hospital stay in the study group were significantly shorter than those in the control group, and the amount of intraoperative blood loss and blood transfusion was significantly less than that in the control group (P<0.05). The levels of ALT, AST, ALP and TBil in two groups were significantly lower than before surgery one month after surgery, and the study group was significantly lower than the control group (P<0.05). The total complication rate of the study group was significantly lower than that of the control group (6.7% vs. 26.7%, P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in stone residual rate and recurrence rate between the two groups (P>0.05).

Conclusion

The application of digital minimally invasive technology to guide the treatment of patients with complex hepatolithiasis can accurately distinguish the intrahepatic bile duct and vascular anatomy and variation before surgery. Compared with traditional surgical treatment, the operation time and intraoperative blood loss are significantly reduced, which can protect the liver and its function to the maximum extent, reduce postoperative complications, and accelerate the recovery process of patients.

表1 两组患者一般临床资料比较
表2 两组患者胆道、肝静脉、门静脉分型比较(例)
表3 两组患者围手术期指标比较(
表4 两组患者肝功能指标比较(
表5 两组患者并发症、结石残留及复发情况比较(例)
[1]
Zhang ZLi YLi K,et al. Value of multidisciplinary team(MDT)in minimally invasive treatment of complex intrahepatic bile duct stones[J]. Biosci Trends2021,15(3):161-170.
[2]
Parra-Membrives PMartínez-Baena DLorente-Herce JM,et al. Choledocholithiasis recurrence following laparoscopic common bile duct exploration[J]. Cir Esp(Engl Ed)2019,97(6):336-342.
[3]
Li WNXiong YZhu J,et al. The difficulties and surgical decision analysis of laparoscopic technique in treating complicated hepatolithiasis[J]. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi2021,59(4):279-283.
[4]
段文斌,尹新民,薛蓉,等.腹腔镜超声用于复杂肝胆管结石病腹腔镜术[J].中国介入影像与治疗学,2022,19(12):740-743.
[5]
Singh VNeelavalli JParvaze SP,et al. Relative contribution of susceptibility weighted imaging,compared to conventional MRI,in the detection of common bile-duct calculi[J]. Diagn Interv Radiol2022,28(2):131-137.
[6]
孙宏智,张波,李东伟,等.3D重建及打印技术在肝脏外科术前精准评估的作用研究[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2019,13(06):563-566.
[7]
中华医学会外科学分会胆道外科学组. 肝胆管结石病诊断治疗指南[J]. 中华消化外科杂志,2007,6(02):156-161.
[8]
吴黎雳,夏锋.肝胆管结石的分型及意义[J].肝胆外科杂志,2020,28(05):321-324.
[9]
何彦安,向鑫,严超,等.肝胆管结石肝切除术后结石残留的相关危险因素分析[J].四川医学,2021,42(06):567-570.
[10]
Angsuwatcharakon PRerknimitr R. Cracking Difficult Biliary Stones[J]. Clin Endosc2021,54(5):660-668.
[11]
韩云,韩莉,杨生虎,等.肝胆管结石经三维可视化辅助3D腹腔镜和胆道硬镜靶向治疗的效果[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2019,13(05):504-506.
[12]
Isayama HIshii SFujisawa T. Review:diagnosis of common bile duct stones[J]. Nihon Shokakibyo Gakkai Zasshi2021,118(4): 290-295.
[13]
Shu JWang XJLi JW,et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery for complex hepatolithiasis: a propensity score matching analysis[J]. Surg Endosc2019,33(8):2539-2547.
[14]
Xia HMeng XXin X,et al. Resection of extrahepatic bile ducts with partial hepatectomy for treating intra- and extrahepatic hepatolithiasis[J]. BMC Surg2021,21(1):420.
[15]
李云峰,尹新民.复杂肝胆管结石腹腔镜治疗的难点与对策[J].肝胆外科杂志,2020,28(01):1-4.
[1] 杨尹默, 陈依然, 田孝东. 努力提高腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术的规范化水平[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 237-242.
[2] 张太平, 刘悦泽. 腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术要点与原则[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 243-245.
[3] 王槐志, 孙丕绛, 崔上. 腹腔镜下胰十二指肠切除术的难点与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 246-248.
[4] 孟宇, 李金超, 刘金来, 刘晨, 王振勇. 新辅助化疗后LPD钩突切除中先动脉后静脉原则的安全性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 251-254.
[5] 宫向良, 刘征, 丁梅. 基于膜解剖D2+CME根治术治疗胃癌的近中期随访研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 267-270.
[6] 金田力, 袁文正, 付涛. 单孔腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术后尿管拔除时机探讨[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 271-274.
[7] 杜彦斌, 黄涛, 寇天阔, 石英. 双镜联合根治术与腹腔镜根治术在早期结肠癌患者中的应用效果[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 275-278.
[8] 张聃, 王毅, 冯文迪, 方兴中. 完整结肠系膜切除术与传统根治术治疗结肠癌对患者生存期的影响观察[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 279-282.
[9] 李凯, 张志远, 苏怀东, 向涵, 张伟. 一种可拆卸组装的腹腔镜手术器械在单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 250-250.
[10] 孙丕绛, 李剑波, 杨永君, 冉超, 王槐志. 腹腔镜下肠系膜上动脉优先入路扩大清扫的胰十二指肠切除术(en-bolc)[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 249-249.
[11] 胡剑平, 王振乾, 张龙, 尹任其, 陈涵, 赵任, 吕强. 尾侧中间联合入路与尾侧入路在腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术中的应用对比[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 196-199.
[12] 祝启路, 邹佳悦, 肖均喜, 侍阳. Easy First策略在新辅助化疗后腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术中的临床疗效研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 200-203.
[13] 颜帅, 胡旭, 苟晓梅, 谢铭. 腹腔镜胃袖状切除术后并发症处置策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 220-224.
[14] 张伟, 蒋童新, 尚培中, 王德淼, 吉玉洁. 3D腹腔镜TEP治疗单纯性腹股沟脂肪斜疝一例报道[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 233-234.
[15] 张丹, 蒋童新, 尚培中, 刘凌云, 苗建军. 网膜胆囊腹腔镜切除二例报道[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 235-236.
阅读次数
全文


摘要