切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (05) : 558 -561. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2023.05.023

论著

腹腔镜保留脾脏胰体尾切除术治疗胰体尾部良性肿瘤及部分交界性肿瘤的临床效果
惠立良, 王成果(), 段东峰, 王健   
  1. 710038 西安,空军军医大学第二附属医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2022-10-18 出版日期:2023-10-26
  • 通信作者: 王成果

Clinical effect of laparoscopic splenic-preserving pancreaticocaudectomy in the treatment of benign tumors and some borderline tumors of the pancreatic body and tail

Liliang Hui, Chengguo Wang(), Dongfeng Duan, Jian Wang   

  1. Department of General Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Military Medical University, Xi’an Shaanxi Province 710038, China
  • Received:2022-10-18 Published:2023-10-26
  • Corresponding author: Chengguo Wang
  • Supported by:
    Key R&D Program of Shaanxi Province(2018F-154)
引用本文:

惠立良, 王成果, 段东峰, 王健. 腹腔镜保留脾脏胰体尾切除术治疗胰体尾部良性肿瘤及部分交界性肿瘤的临床效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 558-561.

Liliang Hui, Chengguo Wang, Dongfeng Duan, Jian Wang. Clinical effect of laparoscopic splenic-preserving pancreaticocaudectomy in the treatment of benign tumors and some borderline tumors of the pancreatic body and tail[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(05): 558-561.

目的

探究离断脾血管而保留胃短血管的胰体尾切除术(Warshaw法)和保留脾动静脉的胰体尾切除术(Kimura法)对胰体尾部良性肿瘤及部分交界性肿瘤的临床应用效果。

方法

回顾性分析2015年1月至2018年10月收治的60例因胰体尾部良性肿瘤及部分交界性肿瘤行腹腔镜保脾胰体尾切除术患者的临床资料,根据手术方式不同分为Kimura组(行Kimura法胰体尾切除术,n=34)和Warshaw组(行Warshaw法胰体尾切除术,n=26)。应用软件SPSS 23.0进行数据分析,术后并发症以[例(%)]表示,组间比较采用χ2检验;围手术期指标等计量资料用(

x¯
±s)表示,采用独立样本t检验。P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

Kimura组患者术中出血量多于Warshaw组(P<0.05),但两组患者手术时间、术后肛门通气时间和住院时间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);Kimura组患者并发症总发生率低于Warshaw组(5.9% vs. 34.6%,P<0.05);术后随访两组患者均无肿瘤复发及胃静脉曲张破裂出血发生。

结论

腹腔镜保留脾脏胰体尾切除术应用于治疗胰体尾部良性肿瘤及部分交界性肿瘤近远期效果优良。与Warshaw法相比,Kimura法出血量虽多,但有利于脾脏血供及功能保护,术后并发症更低,具有一定优势,值得在临床推广应用。

Objective

To investigate the clinical effects of Warshaw and Kimura resection of splenic arterio-venous resection in the treatment of benign and borderline pancreatic tumors.

Methods

Clinical data of 60 patients treated from January 2015 to October 2018 who underwent laparoscopic caudectomy due to benign pancreatic body and tail tumors and some borderline tumors were retrospectively selected and divided into Kimura group according to different surgical methods(Kimura method caudectomy,n=34 cases)and Warshaw group(Warshaw coyotectomy,n=26 cases). SPSS 23.0 software was used for data analysis. Postoperative complications were represented as[cases(%)],and χ2 test was used for comparison between groups. Measurement data such as perioperative indicators were represented by(

x¯
±s),and independent sample t test was used. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The amount of intraoperative blood loss in Kimura group was higher than that in Warshaw group(P<0.05),but there was no significant difference in operative time,postoperative anal ventilation time and hospital stay between the two groups(P>0.05). The total complication rate in Kimura group was lower than that in Warshaw group(5.9% vs. 34.6%,P<0.05). No tumor recurrence or gastric varicose bleeding occurred in both groups during postoperative follow-up.

Conclusion

Laparoscopic splenic-preserving pancreato-caudal resection is effective in the treatment of benign tumors and some borderline tumors. Compared with Warshaw method,Kimura method has more blood loss,but it is beneficial to spleen blood supply and functional protection,and has lower postoperative complications,which has certain advantages and is worthy of clinical application.

表1 60例胰体尾部良性肿瘤及部分交界性肿瘤不同手术方式两组患者一般资料比较[(
x¯
±s),例]
表2 60例胰体尾部良性肿瘤及部分交界性肿瘤不同手术方式两组患者围手术期指标比较(
x¯
±s)
表3 60例胰体尾部良性肿瘤及部分交界性肿瘤不同手术方式两组患者术后并发症发生情况比较[例(%)]
[1]
Aoki TKoizumi TMansour DA,et al. Virtual reality with three-dimensional image guidance of individual patients' vessel anatomy in laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy[J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg2020405(3):381-389.
[2]
Sugimachi KIguchi TOhta M,et al. Laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy for a solid-cystic intraabdominal desmoid tumor at a gastro-pancreatic lesion:a case report[J]. BMC Surg202020(1):24.
[3]
闵琦,刘剑. 不同分度脾脏破裂行全脾切除术后患者凝血功能变化临床研究[J]. 陕西医学杂志202251(07):828-830,834.
[4]
Kimura KOhira GAmano R,et al. A case of complete splenic infarction after laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy[J]. BMC Surg201818(1):22.
[5]
Paiella SDe Pastena MKorrel M,et al. Long term outcome after minimally invasive and open Warshaw and Kimura techniques for spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy:International multicenter retrospective study[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol201945(9):1668-1673.
[6]
Li BQQiao YXLi J,et al. Preservation or Ligation of Splenic Vessels During Spleen-Preserving Distal Pancreatectomy:A Meta-Analysis[J]. J Invest Surg201932(7):654-669.
[7]
Park DJHan IWHan SH,et al. Splenic vessel patency:is it real menace to perform laparoscopic splenic vessel-preserving distal pancreatectomy[J]. Ann Surg Treat Res201996(3):101-106.
[8]
陈军强,俞世安,许龙堂. 腹腔镜保脾胰体尾切除治疗胰腺良性及交界性肿瘤[J]. 中华肝胆外科杂志201824(05):329-332.
[9]
马婉玲,赵娓娓,宦怡,等. IVIM-DWI在胰腺癌和神经内分泌肿瘤诊断和鉴别中的应用价值[J]. 中国临床医学影像杂志201728(01):49-54.
[10]
谢锐杰,曾林涓,练国达,等. 肿瘤分期及不同治疗方式对胰腺癌患者生存期的影响[J]. 中华胰腺病杂志201818(03):159-162.
[11]
刘峥嵘. 脾脏保留对胰体尾切除术治疗胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤预后的影响[J]. 中国普通外科杂志201524(09):1241-1244.
[12]
陈佰文,王海彪,裘铠杰,等. 完全脾动静脉阻断的腹腔镜下保留脾脏的胰体尾切除术[J]. 中华普通外科杂志201934(09):806-807.
[13]
Maggino LMalleo GBassi C,et al. 958 - Splenectomy During Distal Pancreatectomy:What are we Really Doing?[J]. Gastroenterology2018154(6):S-1297.
[14]
李冠群,陈华,孙备. 腹腔镜保留脾脏的胰体尾切除术的意义与评价[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),201812(04):283-286.
[15]
Zhang RCMa JMou YP,et al. Short-and Long-Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Organ-Sparing Resection for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms[J]. World J Surg202044(11):3795-3800.
[16]
Zhang HXu QTan C,et al. Laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal versus central pancreatectomy for tumors in the pancreatic neck and proximal body[J]. Medicine(Baltimore)201998(34):e16946.
[17]
Kwon WJang JYKim JH,et al. An Analysis of Complications,Quality of Life,and Nutritional Index After Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy with Regard to Spleen Preservation[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A201626(5):335-342.
[18]
Malleo GDamoli IMarchegiani G,et al. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy:analysis of trends in surgical techniques,patient selection,and outcomes[J]. Surg Endosc201529(7):1952-1962.
[1] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[2] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[3] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[4] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[5] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[6] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[7] 刘世君, 马杰, 师鲁静. 胃癌完整系膜切除术+标准D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[8] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[9] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[10] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[11] 常小伟, 蔡瑜, 赵志勇, 张伟. 高强度聚焦超声消融术联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的效果及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 56-59.
[12] 李博, 贾蓬勃, 李栋, 李小庆. ERCP与LCBDE治疗胆总管结石继发急性重症胆管炎的效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 60-63.
[13] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[14] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[15] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?