切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (03) : 351 -354. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2022.03.031

论著

腹腔镜下急性粪石性小肠梗阻切开取石26例分析
杨佩1, 刘鹏1, 郝少龙1, 刘勇1, 韩威1,()   
  1. 1. 101100 北京,首都医科大学附属北京潞河医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2021-12-08 出版日期:2022-04-26
  • 通信作者: 韩威

Analysis of 26 cases of acute coprolite small intestinal obstruction by laparoscopy

Pei Yang1, Peng Liu1, Shaolong Hao1, Yong Liu1, Wei Han1,()   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery,the Affiliated Beijing Luhe Hospital,Capital University of Medical Sciences,Beijing 101100,China
  • Received:2021-12-08 Published:2022-04-26
  • Corresponding author: Wei Han
  • Supported by:
    Science technology innovation special Fund of Tongzhou area(KJ2021CX008-22, KJ2021CX008-24)
引用本文:

杨佩, 刘鹏, 郝少龙, 刘勇, 韩威. 腹腔镜下急性粪石性小肠梗阻切开取石26例分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(03): 351-354.

Pei Yang, Peng Liu, Shaolong Hao, Yong Liu, Wei Han. Analysis of 26 cases of acute coprolite small intestinal obstruction by laparoscopy[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(03): 351-354.

目的

探讨腹腔镜下小肠切开取石联合术中小肠阻断在治疗急性粪石性小肠梗阻的临床价值

方法

回顾性分析2017年6月至2020年6月收治并进行手术治疗的48例急性粪石性小肠梗阻患者的临床资料,根据手术方式不同分为两组,腹腔镜组(n=26例)及开腹组(n=22例)。腹腔镜组患者急诊腹腔镜下小肠切开取石,术中在梗阻近端小肠行小肠阻断;开腹组患者急诊行剖腹探查,术中行小肠切开取石。应用SPSS 21.0统计软件进行数据统计分析,围手术期各项指标等计量资料以(

xˉ
±s)表示,采用独立样本t检验;术后并发症发生率等计数资料采用χ2检验。P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

腹腔镜组患者手术时间比开腹组长,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);术中出血量、排气时间、住院天数比开腹组患者明显减少,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。腹腔镜组患者术后并发症发生率(3.8%)明显少于开腹组(18.2%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

相对于开腹手术,腹腔镜手术联合术中小肠阻断在治疗粪石性小肠梗阻可明显减少术中出血、住院时间、术后并发症的发生,效果显著,是一种安全有效的治疗方法。

Objective

To investigate the clinical value of laparoscopic small bowel lithotomy combined with intraoperative small bowel blocking in the treatment of acute coprolitith small bowel obstruction.

Methods

The clinical data of 48 patients with acute bezoar-induced small bowel obstruction who were treated and operated from June 2017 to June 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. According to different operation methods,they were divided into two groups,laparoscopy group(n=26)and laparotomy group(n=22). In the laparoscopic group,emergency laparoscopic enterotomy for stone removal was performed,and small intestinal obstruction was performed at the proximal end of the small intestine. Patients in the laparotomy group received emergency exploratory laparotomy and small bowel incision for stone extraction. SPSS 21.0 statistical software was used for data statistical analysis.The perioperative indicators and other measurement data were expressed as(

xˉ
±s),and independent sample t test was used. χ2 test was used for isometric data of postoperative complications. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The operation time in laparoscopy group was longer than that of laparotomy group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05);Volume of blood loss,exhaust time and hospitalization time were significantly lower than those in the laparotomy group. The difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). The complication rate in laparoscopy group was 3.8%,which was significantly lower than that of laparotomy group(18.2%,),and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).

Conclusion

Compared with laparotomy,laparoscopic surgery combined with intraoperative small bowel obstruction can significantly reduce intraoperative bleeding,postoperative hospitalization time,and postoperative complications. It is a safe and effective treatment method.

表1 48例急性粪石性小肠梗阻不同术式两组患者一般资料比较[(
xˉ
±s),例]
表2 48例急性粪石性小肠梗阻不同术式两组患者围手术期各项指标和并发症比较[(
xˉ
±s),例]
[1]
姚璐,龚昱达,张波,等. 急性肠梗阻的病因及治疗分析[J]. 中华普通外科杂志201934(3):196-199.
[2]
胡建昆,张维汉. 急性肠梗阻发病现状及病因分析[J]. 中国实用外科杂志201939(12):1269-1272.
[3]
刘华锋,王振冉. 成人急性粪石性小肠梗阻手术指征多因素分析[J]. 华夏医学201932(5):91-94.
[4]
田晶,王峰,周竹萍,等. 成人急性机械性小肠梗阻患者临床特征及危险因子分析[J]. 中华全科医师杂志202120(8):873-880.
[5]
李勇,李耿,高霞. 手术治疗时机对成年急性肠梗阻治疗效果的影响[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版)201711(4):335-337.
[6]
王斌,吕龙,荀江,等. 成人急性粪石性小肠梗阻的诊断及治疗[J]. 中国现代普通外科进展201821(3):236-237,241.
[7]
沈阳,李瑜,章由贤,等. 复方泛影葡胺在机械性肠梗阻诊治中的应用体会——附415例临床分析[J]. 临床外科杂志202129(2):151-153.
[8]
王骅,李文煜. 粘连性小肠梗阻手术与SIRS因子临床相关性分析[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版)201913(1):61-64.
[9]
Long BRobertson JKoyfman A. Emergency Medicine Evaluation and Management of Small Bowel Obstruction:Evidence-Based Recommendations[J]. J Emerg Med201956(2):166-176.
[10]
张圣林,李守川,孙风波,等. 腹腔镜下推挤法治疗粪石性小肠梗阻的临床应用[J]. 中国现代普通外科进展201821(7):566-568.
[11]
Wang SYang XZheng Y,et al. Clinical characteristics and indications for surgery for bezoar-induced small bowel obstruction[J]. J Int Med Res202149(1):300060520979377.
[12]
Patel RBorad NPMerchant AM,et al. Comparison of outcomes following laparoscopic and open treatment of emergent small bowel obstruction:an 11-year analysis of ACS NSQIP[J]. Surgical Endoscopy201832(12):4900-4911.
[1] 燕速, 霍博文. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治性切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 13-13.
[2] 母德安, 李凯, 张志远, 张伟. 超微创器械辅助单孔腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 14-14.
[3] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[4] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[5] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[6] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[7] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[8] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[9] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[10] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[11] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[12] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
[13] 郭兵, 王万里, 何凯, 黄汉生. 腹腔镜下肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 143-143.
[14] 李凯, 陈淋, 苏怀东, 向涵, 张伟. 超微创器械在改良单孔腹腔镜巨大肝囊肿开窗引流及胆囊切除中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 144-144.
[15] 魏丽霞, 张安澜, 周宝勇, 李明. 腹腔镜下Ⅲb型肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 145-145.
阅读次数
全文


摘要