切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (03) : 335 -338. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2022.03.027

论著

经直肠肛门外翻技术与前切除术治疗低位直肠癌的近中期随访比较
彭胜建1, 方锡才1, 崔巍2,()   
  1. 1. 242000 安徽宣城,宣城市人民医院肛肠科
    2. 242000 安徽宣城,宣城市人民医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2021-05-08 出版日期:2022-04-26
  • 通信作者: 崔巍

Short-and medium-term follow-up comparison between transrectal eversion and anterior resection for low rectal cancer

Shengjian Peng1, Xicai Fang1, Wei Cui2,()   

  1. 1. Department of Anus and Intestine,Xuancheng People’s Hospital,Xuancheng Anhui Province 242000,China
    2. Department of General Surgery,Xuancheng People’s Hospital,Xuancheng Anhui Province 242000,China
  • Received:2021-05-08 Published:2022-04-26
  • Corresponding author: Wei Cui
  • Supported by:
    Department of science and technology of Anhui Province(201904a07021)
引用本文:

彭胜建, 方锡才, 崔巍. 经直肠肛门外翻技术与前切除术治疗低位直肠癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(03): 335-338.

Shengjian Peng, Xicai Fang, Wei Cui. Short-and medium-term follow-up comparison between transrectal eversion and anterior resection for low rectal cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(03): 335-338.

目的

分析经直肠肛门外翻技术与前切除术治疗低位直肠癌的近、中期效果。

方法

回顾性分析2017年11月至2020年12月93例低位直肠癌患者临床资料,根据手术方式不同,将采用经直肠肛门外翻技术治疗的47例患者纳入外翻组,将采用低位直肠癌前切除术治疗的46例患者纳入前切除组。采用SPSS 23.0软件进行处理数据,手术相关指标、肛门失禁Wexner评分以(

xˉ
±s)表示,独立样本t检验;并发症发生率、肿瘤复发率用百分比表示,用χ2检验;生存率采用Log-Rank法检验。P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

外翻组手术时间、术中出血量低于前切除组,远切缘距肿瘤下缘距离大于前切除组(P<0.05);外翻组并发症发生率与前切除组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);术后6个月,外翻组Wexner评分低于前切除组(P<0.05);两组患者术后1年Wexner评分、1年及3年生存率、肿瘤复发率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

经直肠肛门外翻技术与前切除术治疗低位直肠癌近、中、远期预后相似,但前者手术时间更短,术中出血量更少,更利于达到理想的切缘、控制并发症、促进肛门功能恢复。

Objective

To analyze the effects of transrectal ectropion technique and anterior resection in the treatment of low rectal cancer.

Methods

The clinical data of 93 patients with low rectal cancer from November 2017 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. According to different surgical methods,47 patients treated with transrectal anal were included in the valgus group,and 46 patients treated with anterior resection were included in the anterior resection group. SPSS23.0 software was used for processing. Surgery indicators and Wexner score of anal incontinence were expressed as(

xˉ
±s),independent t test was performed. The complications and tumor recurrence rate were expressed by percentages χ2 test is used;the survival rate is tested by the Log-Rank method. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

In Eversion Group,the operation time,intraoperative blood loss were lower than that in anterior resection group,and the distance between distal margin and tumor inferior margin was greater than that of anterior resection group(P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the complication rate between the valgus group and the pre-resection group(P>0.05). 6 months after surgery,Wexner score in valgus group was lower than that in preresection group(P<0.05). There were no significant differences in 1-year Wexner score,1-year and 3-year survival rate and tumor recurrence rate between 2 groups(P>0.05).

Conclusion

The transrectal anal ectropion technique is similar to anterior resection in the near,medium and long-term prognosis,but the former has a shorter operation time and less intraoperative blood loss,better to achieve the ideal margin of resection,control complications,and promote the recovery of anal function.

表1 93例低位直肠癌不同术式两组患者基线资料比较[(
xˉ
±s),例]
表2 93例低位直肠癌不同术式两组患者手术相关指标比较(
xˉ
±s
表3 93例低位直肠癌不同术式两组患者并发症比较[例(%)]
表4 93例低位直肠癌不同术式两组患者Wexner评分比较[(
xˉ
±s),分]
表5 93例低位直肠癌不同术式两组患者生存率、肿瘤复发率比较[例(%)]
[1]
Shi HChen SYXie ZF,et al. Peroral traction-assisted natural orifice trans-anal flexible endoscopic rectosigmoidectomy followed by intracorporeal colorectal anastomosis in a live porcine model[J]. World J Gastrointest Endosc202012(11):451-458.
[2]
Galli RRosenberg R. Chirurgische Behandlung des Kolon- und Rektumkarzinoms[Surgical treatment of colorectal cancer][J]. Ther Umsch201875(10):607-614.
[3]
吴建忠,沈根海,黄维贤,等. 全腹腔镜下低位直肠癌根治术:新荷包技术联合经肛门外翻切除标本[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志201823(7):515-518.
[4]
李智永,尚卿,杜太平. 经肛拖出式全腹腔镜直肠前切除术与腹腔镜直肠前切除术治疗中低位直肠癌疗效比较[J]. 新乡医学院学报201936(4):376-378.
[5]
国家卫生计生委医政医管局中华医学会肿瘤学分会. 中国结直肠癌诊疗规范(2017年版)[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志201821(1):92-106.
[6]
贾凌威,王曼,陈礼升. 腹腔镜下直肠癌前切除术治疗低位直肠癌对手术指标的影响及并发直肠阴道瘘相关因素分析[J]. 河北医学202127(3):461-466.
[7]
陈振伟,曹晨曦,胡毕文,等. 预防性回肠造瘘对直肠癌患者低位前切除术后肛门功能的影响[J]. 浙江医学202042(2):175-177.
[8]
Wang ZLiang JChen J,et al. Effectiveness of a Transanal Drainage Tube for the Prevention of Anastomotic Leakage after Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer[J]. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev202021(5):1441-1444.
[9]
梁平. 腹腔镜下直肠低位前切除术与直肠经肛门拖出切除术治疗直肠癌的效果比较[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版)201812(1):46-48.
[10]
王世磊,胡艳瑞. 腹腔镜辅助经腹直肠前切除术治疗高龄低位直肠癌患者的效果观察[J]. 医药论坛杂志201940(7):128-130.
[11]
刘高升,张华然,刘全国. 经肛拖出式全腹腔镜直肠癌前切除术对低位直肠癌患者术后胃肠功能及生活质量的影响[J]. 医药论坛杂志201839(9):95-96.
[12]
刘娟,宋美. 经肛拖出式腹腔镜直肠癌前切除术治疗低位直肠癌的临床效果观察[J]. 结直肠肛门外科201824(6):533-537.
[13]
宋云鹏,陈少轩,姚力. 腹腔镜辅助直肠外翻技术对行低位直肠癌保肛手术患者的疗效及预后分析[J]. 临床和实验医学杂志201817(19):2110-2112.
[14]
黄亮,余壮明,李军,等. 腹部无切口腹腔镜低位直肠癌前切除经肛门取出标本的临床分析[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版)201711(3):237-239.
[15]
Shalaby MThabet WRulli F,et al. Anastomotic leakage following laparoscopic resection of low and mid rectal cancer[J]. Ann Ital Chir201990:57-67.
[16]
胡军红,周世灿,张权,等. 抵钉座体外置入法经肛门外翻切除标本腹部无辅助切口腹腔镜低位直肠癌根治术的近期疗效[J]. 中国肿瘤外科杂志201911(1):21-25.
[17]
亓军,周童,刘伟,等. 腹部无切口经肛门外翻切除的腹腔镜下低位直肠癌根治术的疗效分析[J]. 中国现代普通外科进展202023(7):515-517,522.
[18]
唐翔. 腹腔镜辅助直肠外翻技术治疗低位直肠癌保肛手术的疗效及预后分析[J]. 山西医药杂志201847(3):306-309.
[1] 王振宁, 杨康, 王得晨, 邹敏, 归明彬, 王雅楠, 徐明. 机器人与腹腔镜手术联合经自然腔道取标本对中低位直肠癌患者远期疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 437-442.
[2] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[3] 吴晖, 佴永军, 施雪松, 魏晓为. 两种解剖入路下行直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 40-43.
[4] 周世振, 朱兴亚, 袁庆港, 刘理想, 王凯, 缪骥, 丁超, 汪灏, 管文贤. 吲哚菁绿荧光成像技术在腹腔镜直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫中的应用效果分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 44-47.
[5] 徐逸男. 不同术式治疗梗阻性左半结直肠癌的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 72-75.
[6] 李代勤, 刘佩杰. 动态增强磁共振评估中晚期低位直肠癌同步放化疗后疗效及预后的价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 100-103.
[7] 郑民华, 蒋天宇, 赵轩, 马君俊. 中国腹腔镜直肠癌根治术30年发展历程与未来[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 591-595.
[8] 池畔, 黄胜辉. 中国腹腔镜直肠癌根治术30年来的巨大进步[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 596-600.
[9] 严虹霞, 王晓娟, 张毅勋. 2 型糖尿病对结直肠癌患者肿瘤标记物、临床病理及预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 483-487.
[10] 赵磊, 刘文志, 林峰, 于剑, 孙铭骏, 崔佑刚, 张旭, 衣宇鹏, 于宝胜, 冯宁. 深部热疗在改善结直肠癌术后辅助化疗副反应及生活质量中的作用研究[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 488-493.
[11] 陈杰, 武明胜, 李一金, 李虎, 向源楚, 荣新奇, 彭健. 低位直肠癌冷冻治疗临床初步分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 494-498.
[12] 黄海洋, 邝永龙, 陈嘉胜. 基层医院结直肠肿瘤经自然腔道取标本手术30 例分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 510-518.
[13] 王灿, 樊昊, 张卫, 于冠宇. LARS 评分的研制回顾与应用现状[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 519-523.
[14] 韩加刚, 王振军. 梗阻性左半结肠癌的治疗策略[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 450-458.
[15] 梁轩豪, 李小荣, 李亮, 林昌伟. 肠梗阻支架置入术联合新辅助化疗治疗结直肠癌急性肠梗阻的疗效及其预后的Meta 分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 472-482.
阅读次数
全文


摘要