切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (01) : 91 -94. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2022.01.026

论著

两种经腋窝入路腔镜单孔甲状腺手术的临床疗效对比研究
陈智杰1, 陈成1, 李强1, 宋艾红1,()   
  1. 1. 431600 湖北汉川,汉川市人民医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-11-24 出版日期:2022-02-26
  • 通信作者: 宋艾红

Comparative study on clinical effects of two kinds of endoscopic single-port thyroid surgery via axillary approach

Zhijie Chen1, Cheng Chen1, Qiang Li1, Aihong Song1,()   

  1. 1. General Surgery, Hanchuan People’s Hospital, Hanchuan Hubei Province 431600, China
  • Received:2020-11-24 Published:2022-02-26
  • Corresponding author: Aihong Song
  • Supported by:
    Joint Fund project of Hubei Provincial Health Commission(WJ2019H238)
引用本文:

陈智杰, 陈成, 李强, 宋艾红. 两种经腋窝入路腔镜单孔甲状腺手术的临床疗效对比研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(01): 91-94.

Zhijie Chen, Cheng Chen, Qiang Li, Aihong Song. Comparative study on clinical effects of two kinds of endoscopic single-port thyroid surgery via axillary approach[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(01): 91-94.

目的

对比改良无充气腋窝入路与常规经腋窝入路腔镜单孔甲状腺手术的临床效果。

方法

前瞻性研究2019年1月至2020年6月的62例行甲状腺肿瘤切除术的患者,数字随机法分为两组,行常规单孔腔镜腋窝入路甲状腺手术(常规组)31例,行改良无充气腋窝入路甲状腺手术(改良组)31例,采用软件SPSS 23.0进行统计学分析。两组围术期指标、切口疼痛评分、美容满意度评分等计量资料采用(

xˉ
±s)表示,采用独立t检验;并发症等计数资料采用χ2检验分析。P<0.05表示差异有统计学意义。

结果

两组患者手术时间、术后引流量、引流管拔除时间、平均住院时间差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);改良组并发症发生率明显低于常规组(6.5% vs. 32.3%,P<0.05),术后3 d、5 d、15 d改良组患者切口疼痛评分均显著低于常规组(P<0.05),术后切口美容满意度评分显著高于常规组(P<0.05),随访4~17个月,所有患者均未出现病情复发和转移情况。

结论

改良无充气腋窝入路应用于甲状腺手术具有视野清晰、并发症少、美容效果好等优势,但两种手术方式均安全可行。

Objective

To compare the clinical effect of modified non-inflatable axillary approach and conventional transaxillary endoscopic single hole thyroid surgery.

Methods

A prospective study of 62 patients who underwent thyroid tumor resection from January 2019 to June 2020 were divided into two groups:31 patients who received routine single-hole endoscopic thyroid surgery via axillary approach(conventional group)and 31 patients who received modified non-aerated axillary approach(improved group). SPSS23.0 was used for statistical analysis. Perioperative indicators,incision pain score,aesthetic satisfaction score and other measurement data of the two groups were represented by(

xˉ
±s),and independent T test was used. Statistical data of complications were analyzed by χ2 test. P<0.05 indicated statistically significant difference.

Results

There were no significant differences in operative time,postoperative drainage volume,drainage tube removal time and average hospital stay between 2 groups(P>0.05);The complication rate in the modified group was significantly lower than that in the conventional group(6.5% vs. 32.3%,P<0.05),the incision pain score in the modified group was significantly lower than that in the conventional group at 3 d,5 d and 15 d after surgery(P<0.05),and the incision aesthetic satisfaction score was significantly higher than that in the conventional group(P<0.05). The follow-up period was 4~17 months,no recurrence or metastasis occurred in all patients.

Conclusion

The modified air-free axillary approach in thyroid surgery has the advantages of clear vision,less complications and good cosmetic effect,but the two surgical methods are safe and feasible.

表1 62例行甲状腺肿瘤切除术患者不同术式两组患者一般资料比较[(
xˉ
±s),例]
图1 改良无充气腋窝入路腔镜甲状腺术后恢复期手术切口(术后瘢痕与腋窝褶皱融合)
表2 62例行甲状腺肿瘤切除术患者不同术式两组围术期指标比较(
xˉ
±s
表3 62例行甲状腺肿瘤切除术患者不同术式两组并发症发生率比较(例)
表4 62例行甲状腺肿瘤切除术患者不同术式两组术后切口疼痛评分和美容满意度评分比较[
xˉ
±s,分]
[1]
Nguyen XH,,Nguyen XH,,Mai TKN,et al. Feasibility and Safety of Endoscopic Thyroidectomy Via a Unilateral Axillobreast Approach for Unilateral Benign Thyroid Tumor in Vietnam[J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech201929(6):447-450.
[2]
Battistella E,,Pomba L,,Mattara G,et al. Metastases to the thyroid gland:review of incidence,clinical presentation,diagnostic problems and surgery,our experience[J]. J Endocrinol Invest202043(11):1555-1560.
[3]
Lee InA,,Kim K,,Kim JK,et al. Comparison of Surgical Outcomes between Robotic Transaxillary and Conventional Open Thyroidectomy in Pediatric Thyroid Cancer[J].Cancers(Basel)202113(13):3293.
[4]
叶卫东,郭伯敏,樊友本. 腔镜甲状腺手术多种入路的探索和未来发展[J]. 外科理论与实践201924(6):498-502.
[5]
高超,乔雷,宋海涛,等. 经口腔镜单孔与三孔入路甲状腺手术临床疗效的比较[J]. 川北医学院学报202035(5):805-808.
[6]
康鸿斌,李江涛,李鑫. 三种术式治疗甲状腺癌的疗效比较[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版)201913(2):186-189.
[7]
Llorente PM,,Laguado EAG,,Prats MA,et al. Surgical approaches to thyroid[J]. Cir Esp(Engl Ed)202199(4):267-275.
[8]
徐加杰,张李卓,张启弘,等. 无充气经腋窝腔镜甲状腺手术的临床应用[J]. 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志202055(10):913-920.
[9]
Shuai Y,,Yue K,,Duan Y,et al. Surgical Extent of Central Lymph Node Dissection for Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma Located in the Isthmus:A Propensity Scoring Matched Study[J]. Front Endocrinol(Lausanne)202112:620147.
[10]
Shen S,,Hu X,,Qu R,et al. Comparing quality of life between patients undergoing trans-areola endoscopic thyroid surgery and trans-oral endoscopic thyroid surgery[J]. BMC Surg202121(1):277.
[11]
高金亮,赵楠,张浩,等. 不同术式治疗甲状腺结节的手术疗效与指标观察[J]. 中国临床医生杂志201947(6):686-688.
[12]
Nguyen XH,,Nguyen XH,,Mai TKN,et al. Feasibility and Safety of Endoscopic Thyroidectomy Via a Unilateral Axillobreast Approach for Unilateral Benign Thyroid Tumor in Vietnam[J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech201929(6):447-450.
[13]
Song CM,,Ji YB,,Bang HS,et al. Postoperative pain after robotic thyroidectomy by a gasless unilateral axillo-breast or axillary approach[J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech201925(6):478-482.
[14]
徐麟,石鑫,李盖天,等. 经腋乳入路机器人与腔镜甲状腺切除术近期疗效的对比研究[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志201924(4):249-252,257.
[15]
温莉莉,项洋锋,沈祝苹,等. 无充气经腋窝入路和经胸乳入路治疗甲状腺疾病的效果观察及护理[J]. 实用医学杂志201935(7):1187-1189.
[1] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[2] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[3] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[4] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[5] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[6] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[7] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[8] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[9] 李博, 贾蓬勃, 李栋, 李小庆. ERCP与LCBDE治疗胆总管结石继发急性重症胆管炎的效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 60-63.
[10] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[11] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[12] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
[13] 郭兵, 王万里, 何凯, 黄汉生. 腹腔镜下肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 143-143.
[14] 李凯, 陈淋, 苏怀东, 向涵, 张伟. 超微创器械在改良单孔腹腔镜巨大肝囊肿开窗引流及胆囊切除中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 144-144.
[15] 魏丽霞, 张安澜, 周宝勇, 李明. 腹腔镜下Ⅲb型肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 145-145.
阅读次数
全文


摘要