双镜联合同期手术治疗老年胆囊结石并胆总管结石的疗效

doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2021.03.027

目的

探讨腹腔镜联合十二指肠镜同期(IO-ERCP/EST+LC)和腹腔镜联合术中胆道镜同期(LC/LCBDE+IOC)治疗老年胆囊结石并胆总管结石的疗效和安全性差异。

方法

回顾性分析2017年10月至2020年10月收治的80例老年胆囊结石并胆总管结石患者资料，根据手术方案不同，将其分为A组(IO-ERCP/EST+LC)和B组(LC/LCBDE+IOC)每组40例，数据分析采用SPSS 21.0进行统计处理，术中术后指标、肝功能指标等计量资料以(±s)表示，独立t检验；术后并发症、结石清除率、结石残留率等计数资料以χ²检验比较，P<0.05差异有统计学意义。

结果

A组手术时间短于B组，差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)；两组结石清除率、结石残留率、术后出血、穿孔、胆漏、胰腺炎、胆管炎等术后并发症发生情况比较，差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)；两组患者术前术后3 d，胆红素、ALT、AST、ALP肝功能水平比较，差异无统计学意义(P>0.05); A组术后排气时间短于B组，住院时间和住院费用均大于B组，差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

IO-ERCP/EST+LC治疗方案手术时间短、术后恢复快，但是住院费用相对较高，临床上可根据患者具体情况做出最合理最优的方案选择。

关键词: 胆囊结石病, 胆总管结石, 腹腔镜, 十二指肠镜, 胆道镜

Objective

To compare the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic combined with duodenoscope (IO-ERCP/EST+ LC) and laparoscopic combined with intraoperative choledochoscope (LC/LCBDE+ IOC) in the treatment of gallstones and choledocholithiasis in the elderly.

Methods

From October 2017 to October 2020, clinical data of 80 elderly patients with gallstones and choledocholithiasis were analyzed retrospectively. According to different surgical plans, 40 cases were divided into the group A (IO-ERCP/EST+ LC), and 40 cases were divided into group B (LC/LCBDE+ IOC). Statistical software SPSS21.0 were used for data analysis. Measurement data such as intraoperative and postoperative indicators, liver function indicators and other measurement data were expressed as (±s), and were examined by independent t test. Chi-square test were performed for the analysis of postoperative complications, stones Counting data such as clearance rate and stone residual rate. A P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant difference.

Results

The operation time in group A were significantly shorter than that of group B (P<0.05). There were no statistically significant difference between groups in terms of postoperative complications such as stone removal rate, residual stone rate, postoperative bleeding, perforation, bile leakage, pancreatitis and cholangitis (P>0.05). There were no statistically significant difference between groups in terms of liver function levels of bilirubin, ALT, AST, and ALPbefore and after the operation (P>0.05); The postoperative exhaust time of group A was shorter than that of group B, and the hospitalization time and cost of group A were higher than that of group B, with statistically significant differences (P<0.05).

Conclusions

The IO-ERCP/EST+ LC treatment has a shorter operation time and quicker postoperative recovery, however the hospitalization cost is relatively high. Clinically, the most reasonable and optimal program choice should be made according to the specific conditions of the patient.

Key words: Cholecystolithiasis, Choledocholithiasis, Laparoscopes, Duodenoscopes, Choledochoscopy

表1 80例老年胆囊结石并胆总管结石患者不同术式两组患者一般资料比较(±s)

组别	例数	年龄(岁)	性别	发热(例)	胆红素μmol/L
组别	例数	年龄(岁)	男/女	发热(例)	胆红素μmol/L
A组	40	68.9±5.1	16/24	8	22.6±6.1
B组	40	67.6±5.6	14/26	10	23.5±5.9
统计值		1.064	0.213	0.287	0.509
P值		0.145	0.644	0.592	0.306

表1 80例老年胆囊结石并胆总管结石患者不同术式两组患者一般资料比较(±s)

组别	例数	年龄(岁)	性别	发热(例)	胆红素μmol/L
组别	例数	年龄(岁)	男/女	发热(例)	胆红素μmol/L
A组	40	68.9±5.1	16/24	8	22.6±6.1
B组	40	67.6±5.6	14/26	10	23.5±5.9
统计值		1.064	0.213	0.287	0.509
P值		0.145	0.644	0.592	0.306

表2 80例老年胆囊结石并胆总管结石患者不同术式两组手术完成情况比较(±s)

组别	例数	结石清除率[例(%)]	结石残留率[例(%)]	术中出血量(ml)	手术时间(min)
A组	40	39(97.5)	1(2.5)	45.3±6.1	105.5±23.6
B组	40	38(95.0)	2(5.0)	47.3±6.7	130.3±25.3
t/χ²		0.346	1.476	4.492
P值		0.556	0.072	<0.001

表2 80例老年胆囊结石并胆总管结石患者不同术式两组手术完成情况比较(±s)

组别	例数	结石清除率[例(%)]	结石残留率[例(%)]	术中出血量(ml)	手术时间(min)
A组	40	39(97.5)	1(2.5)	45.3±6.1	105.5±23.6
B组	40	38(95.0)	2(5.0)	47.3±6.7	130.3±25.3
t/χ²		0.346	1.476	4.492
P值		0.556	0.072	<0.001

表3 80例老年胆囊结石并胆总管结石患者不同术式两组术后并发症率比较[例(%)]

组别	例数	出血	穿孔	胆漏	胰腺炎	胆管炎	总发生率(%)
A组	40	0(0.0)	0(0.0)	0(0.0)	2(5.0)	0(0.0)	5.0
B组	40	0(0.0)	0(0.0)	2(5.0)	0(0.0)	2(5.0)	10.0
χ²值							0.721
P值							0.396

表3 80例老年胆囊结石并胆总管结石患者不同术式两组术后并发症率比较[例(%)]

组别	例数	出血	穿孔	胆漏	胰腺炎	胆管炎	总发生率(%)
A组	40	0(0.0)	0(0.0)	0(0.0)	2(5.0)	0(0.0)	5.0
B组	40	0(0.0)	0(0.0)	2(5.0)	0(0.0)	2(5.0)	10.0
χ²值							0.721
P值							0.396

表4 80例老年胆囊结石并胆总管结石患者不同术式两组术后肝功能指标比较(±s)

组别	时间	胆红素(μmol/L)	ALT(u/L)	AST(u/L)	ALP(u/L)
A组	术前	20.3±2.3	139.2±18.3	121.0±21.0	139.6±9.3
	术后	19.3±2.3	75.9±14.0	22.3±3.1	110.3±20.3
B组	术前	20.4±2.5	137.6±17.6	120.5±20.3	137.5±8.1
	术后	18.9±2.3^a	76.9±15.3^a	23.0±3.1^a	113.3±21.7^a

表4 80例老年胆囊结石并胆总管结石患者不同术式两组术后肝功能指标比较(±s)

组别	时间	胆红素(μmol/L)	ALT(u/L)	AST(u/L)	ALP(u/L)
A组	术前	20.3±2.3	139.2±18.3	121.0±21.0	139.6±9.3
	术后	19.3±2.3	75.9±14.0	22.3±3.1	110.3±20.3
B组	术前	20.4±2.5	137.6±17.6	120.5±20.3	137.5±8.1
	术后	18.9±2.3^a	76.9±15.3^a	23.0±3.1^a	113.3±21.7^a

表5 80例老年胆囊结石并胆总管结石患者不同术式两组术后恢复情况比较(±s)

组别	例数	术后排气时间(h)	住院时间(d)	住院费用(元)
A组	40	16.3±3.1	20.9±4.1	5.3±1.2
B组	40	20.1±3.4	13.0±4.6	3.6±1.1
t值		5.166	7.193	62.079
P值		<0.001	<0.001	<0.001

表5 80例老年胆囊结石并胆总管结石患者不同术式两组术后恢复情况比较(±s)

组别	例数	术后排气时间(h)	住院时间(d)	住院费用(元)
A组	40	16.3±3.1	20.9±4.1	5.3±1.2
B组	40	20.1±3.4	13.0±4.6	3.6±1.1
t值		5.166	7.193	62.079
P值		<0.001	<0.001	<0.001

[1]	Tsai T-J, Chan H-H, Lai K-H，et al. Gallbladder function predicts subsequent biliary complications in patients with common bile duct stones after endoscopic treatment？[J]. BMC Gastroenterol, 2018, 18(1): 32.
[2]	Liu D-Q, Zhang H, Xiao L，et al. Single-operator cholangioscopy for the treatment of concomitant gallbladder stones and secondary common bile duct stones[J]. J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2019, 34(5): 929-936.
[3]	Zhang C, Ma YF, Yang YL，et al. Clinical evaluation of gallbladder and common bile duct stones treated though cholecystostomy tube[J]. Zhonghua yi xue za zhi，2019, 99(4): 288-290.
[4]	Hassan A, Abdelaziz A, Esmat MEE, et al. One-stage lapro-endoscopic procedure in the management of concomitant gallbladder and common bile duct stones: institutional experience[J]. International Surgery Journal, 2019, 6(5): 1447.
[5]	杨健康，周茂旭. 二种手术方法对胆囊合并胆总管结石患者凝血功能及应激反应的影响分析[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2020，14(3): 322-324.
[6]	姜鹏飞，顾澄宇. LC术联合不同手术时机ERCP对胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的效果[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2019，13(5): 479-481.
[7]	罗泽斌，陈龙林，杨贤杰，等. 腹腔镜联合胆道镜钬激光碎石术治疗胆管结石的效果[J]. 中国医师杂志，2020，22(3): 453-455.
[8]	许明友，杨先芬，陈西兰，等. 胆囊结石合并肝外胆管结石三种手术方式疗效分析[J]. 中国中西医结合外科杂志，2020, 26(1): 117-121.
[9]	于千乐，余铖. 腹腔镜联合内镜治疗胆囊结石并肝外胆管结石的疗效及对预后的影响[J]. 现代消化及介入诊疗，2018，23(4): 519-521.
[10]	严骏. 腹腔镜与胆道镜联合治疗胆囊结石合并肝外胆管结石的临床疗效观察[J]. 安徽医药，2017, 21(12): 2194-2196.
[11]	王京京. 双镜同期治疗胆结石并肝外胆管结石的可行性及对免疫功能的影响[J]. 河北医药，2018, 40(13): 1976-1978，1982.
[12]	梁丁保，戴结，胡炳德，等. ERCP治疗老年胆总管结石的效果及其术后并发症的危险因素分析[J]. 安徽医学，2018，39(7): 819-822.
[13]	张海斌，卢启国. 一期LC联合LCBDE与分期ERCP联合LC治疗胆囊结石并肝外胆管结石的疗效对比[J]. 山西医药杂志，2018, 47(14): 1707-1708.
[14]	Hu Y, Kou DQ, Guo SB.The influence of periampullary diverticula on ERCP for treatment of common bile duct stones[J]. Sci Rep，2020，10(1): 11477.
[15]	Enliang L, Rongshou W, Shidai S，et al. Simple resection of the lesion bile duct branch for treatment of regional hepatic bile duct stones[J]. Medicine, 2017, 96(27): e7414.
[16]	Tsutsumi K, Kato H, Yabe S，et al. A comparative evaluation of treatment methods for bile duct stones after hepaticojejunostomy between percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopy and peroral, short double-balloon enteroscopy[J]. Therap Adv Gastroenterol，2017，10(1): 54-67.
[17]	Gao Y-C, Chen J, Qin Q，et al. Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic bile duct exploration versus endoscopic sphincterotomy for concomitant gallstones and common bile duct stones[J]. Medicine, 2017, 96(37): e7925.
[18]	Huang Y, Feng Q, Wang K，et al. The safety and feasibility of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for treatment patients with previous abdominal surgery[J]. Sci Rep, 2017, 7(1): 15372.
[19]	黄伟，李大勇，姚远，等. 腹腔镜联合胆道镜治疗肝外胆管结石[J]. 肝胆外科杂志，2019，27(2): 131-134.
[20]	邹治义. 腹腔镜联合胆道镜治疗老年患者肝外胆管结石的疗效分析[J]. 肝胆外科杂志，2017, 25(2): 137-139.

[1]	曹迪, 张玉茹. 经腹腔镜生物补片修补直肠癌根治术后盆底疝1例[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 115-116.
[2]	李凯, 陈淋, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种U型记忆合金线在经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 15-15.
[3]	杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[4]	周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[5]	张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[6]	王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[7]	李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[8]	甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[9]	逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[10]	唐健雄, 李绍杰. 不断推进中国腹腔镜疝手术规范化[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 591-594.
[11]	田文, 杨晓冬. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术式选择及注意事项[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 595-597.
[12]	李涛, 陈纲, 李世拥. 腹腔镜下右侧腹股沟斜疝修补术（TAPP）[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 598-598.
[13]	易明超, 汪鑫, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种T型记忆金属线在经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 599-599.
[14]	马涛, 叶春伟, 刘滔, 彭文希, 李志鹏. 腹腔镜与开放性离断式肾盂成形术治疗小儿肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻的比较[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 605-610.
[15]	刘成, 赖聪, 黄健, 王建辰, 罗茜芸, 许可慰. EDGE SP1000单孔手术机器人辅助腹腔镜下猪输尿管部分切除联合端端吻合术的可行性研究[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 642-646.

阅读次数

全文

摘要

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

Clinical analysis of the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic combined with duodenoscope or with choledochoscope surgery in the treatment of gallstones and choledocholithiasis in the elderly

模态框（Modal）标题

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

Clinical analysis of the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic combined with duodenoscope or with choledochoscope surgery in the treatment of gallstones and choledocholithiasis in the elderly