切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (01) : 84 -87. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2025.01.023.

论著

不同手术空间建立方法的经口腔前庭入路腔镜甲状腺术对比研究
王伟伟1, 费建平1, 王璋瑜1,()   
  1. 1.215028 江苏苏州,上海交通大学医学院苏州九龙医院
  • 收稿日期:2024-01-03 出版日期:2025-02-26
  • 通信作者: 王璋瑜

A comparative study of endoscopic thyroidectomy through oral vestibular approach with different methods of space establishment

Weiwei Wang1, Jianping Fei1, Zhangyu Wang1,()   

  1. 1.Suzhou Kowloon Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Suzhou Jiangsu Province 215028,China
  • Received:2024-01-03 Published:2025-02-26
  • Corresponding author: Zhangyu Wang
引用本文:

王伟伟, 费建平, 王璋瑜. 不同手术空间建立方法的经口腔前庭入路腔镜甲状腺术对比研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 84-87.

Weiwei Wang, Jianping Fei, Zhangyu Wang. A comparative study of endoscopic thyroidectomy through oral vestibular approach with different methods of space establishment[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(01): 84-87.

目的

对比不同手术空间建立方法的经口腔前庭入路腔镜甲状腺术(TOETVA)的应用效果。

方法

收集2020年6月至2023年6月接受TOETVA治疗的120例甲状腺疾病患者作为研究对象,并将入组患者按照随机数字表法随机分为A组和B组,每组各60例。A组采用常规法建立手术空间, B组则采用膨胀液水分离法建立手术空间。使用SPSS 22.0统计学软件进行分析数据,围手术期相关指标、SSA及VHI评分等计量资料采用(x ± s)表示,行独立样本t检验;术后并发症等计数资料采用[例(%)]表示,行χ2检验分析。P<0.05表示差异有统计学意义。

结果

A组建腔时间明显低于B组,手术时间及术中出血量却明显高于B组(P<0.05);两组患者引流管拔除时间、术后住院时间及术后美观满意度比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。B组患者并发症总发生率较A组略低(15.0% vs.23.3%),但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后1周、1个月B组患者VHI-10评分和SSA评分均明显低于A组(P<0.05)。

结论

常规手术操作空间建立法虽步骤少、时间短,但膨胀液水分离法层次更清晰,可有效缩短手术时间,减少术中出血,更有利于保护喉返神经功能,更值得于临床推广。

Objective

To compare the effect of transvestibular approach endoscopic thyroid surgery(TOETVA) with different methods of space establishment.

Methods

A total of 120 patients with thyroid disease who received TOETVA treatment from June 2020 to June 2023 were collected as research objects, and the enrolled patients were randomly divided into group A and group B according to random number method,with 60 patients in each group.Surgical space was established in group A by conventional method, and in group B by dilatant liquid-water separation method.Statistical software SPSS 22.0 was used to analyze the data.Measurement data such as perioperative indicators, SSA and VHI scores were expressed by (x ± s), and independent sample t test was performed.The statistical data of postoperative complications were expressed by[ cases (%)] and analyzed by χ2 test.P<0.05 indicated that the difference was statistically significant.

Results

The time of lumen formation in group A was significantly lower than that in group B, but the operative time and intraoperative blood loss were significantly higher than those in group B (P<0.05).There were no significant differences in drainage tube removal time, postoperative hospitalization time and postoperative aesthetic satisfaction between the two groups (P>0.05).The total incidence of complications in group B was slightly lower than that in group A (15.0% vs.23.3%), but the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05).The VHI-10 score and SSA score of group B were significantly lower than those of group A at 1 week and 1 month after surgery (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Although the conventional operation space establishment method has few steps and short time, the dilatation liquid water separation method has a clearer level, can effectively shorten the operation time, reduce intraoperative bleeding, and is more conducive to protecting the function of recurrent laryngeal nerve, and is worthy of clinical promotion.

表1 两组患者一般资料比较
表2 两组患者围手术期相关指标比较(±s
表3 两组患者并发症情况比较[例(%)]
表4 两组患者VHI-10和SSA评分比较(±s
[1]
王艺超, 游薇, 赵婉君, 等.经口腔前庭入路腔镜甲状腺切除术的研究进展[J].中国普外基础与临床杂志, 2020, 27(02):221-225.
[2]
Wang Y, Zhou S, Liu X, et al.Transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach vs conventional open thyroidectomy: Metaanalysis [J].Head Neck, 2021, 43(1): 345-353.
[3]
Karakas E, Klein G, Schopf S.Transoral thyroid surgery vestibular approach: does size matter anymore[J]? J Endocrinol Invest,2020, 43(5): 615-622.
[4]
孙海清, 郑海涛.经口腔前庭入路甲状腺手术的操作技巧及新进展[J].腹腔镜外科杂志, 2022, 27(03): 161-164.
[5]
Park JH, Bilegsaikhan SE, Suh YJ.A Novel Technique for Performing Transoral Endoscopic Thyroidectomy Vestibular Approach (TOETVA): A Single-port Platform[J].Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2020, 30(1): e4-e7.
[6]
Wang Y, Zhang Z, Zhao Q, et al.Transoral endoscopic thyroid surgery via the tri-vestibular approach with a hybrid spacemaintaining method: A preliminary repor[tJ].Head Neck, 2018,40(8): 1774-1779.
[7]
王平, 吴国洋, 田文, 等.经口腔前庭入路腔镜甲状腺手术专家共识(2018版[)J].中国实用外科杂志, 2018, 38(10): 1104-1107.
[8]
王存川, 翟贺宁, 刘卫军, 等.经口腔前庭腔镜甲状腺切除术6例经验[J].中国内镜杂志, 2013, 19(04): 363-366.
[9]
Wang D, Wang Y, Zhou S, et al.Transoral thyroidectomy vestibular approach versus non-transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy: a comprehensive systematic review and metaanalysis[ J].Surg Endosc, 2022, 36(3): 1739-1749.
[10]
曾兴玲, 廖雪英, 江志强, 等.86例经口腔前庭腔镜下甲状腺切除术的经验探讨[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2021, 15(05): 570-573.
[11]
Deroide G, Honigman I, Berthe A, et al.Trans oral endoscopic thyroidectomy (TOETVA): First French experience in 90 patients[J].J Visc Surg, 2021, 158(2): 103-110.
[12]
Wang Y, Fu Y, Wu G, et al.Initial Experience With Transoral Endoscopic Thyroidectomy via the Submental and Vestibular Approach for the Treatment of Thyroid Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study[ J].Front Surg, 2022, 9: 882150.
[13]
檀谊洪, 张永泉, 陈晓意, 等.经口腔前庭腔镜下甲状腺手术空间建立方法的改进[J].中国现代普通外科进展, 2023,26(01): 38-40+51.
[14]
林佳伟, 林炘, 杨熙鸿.甲状腺癌手术喉返神经损伤的影响因素分析及预防[J].中国耳鼻咽喉颅底外科杂志, 2021,027(06): 702-705.
[15]
梁龙, 苏民富, 李嘉根.甲状腺腺叶切除术两种显露喉返神经方法的临床疗效[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2021, 15(06): 680-682.
[1] 刘畅, 蒋洁, 胥雪冬, 崔立刚, 王淑敏, 陈文. 北京市海淀区医疗机构甲状腺超声检查及TIRADS分类基线调查[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(07): 693-697.
[2] 杨敬武, 周美君, 陈雨凡, 李素淑, 何燕妮, 崔楠, 刘红梅. 人工智能超声结合品管圈活动对低年资超声医师甲状腺结节风险评估能力的作用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 522-526.
[3] 谢田伟, 庞于樊, 吴丽. 超声引导下不同消融术对甲状腺良性结节体积缩减率、复发率的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 80-83.
[4] 顾雯, 凌守鑫, 唐海利, 甘雪梅. 两种不同手术入路在甲状腺乳头状癌患者开放性根治性术中的应用比较[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 687-690.
[5] 田文. 甲状腺癌功能性根治颈淋巴结清扫术[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 482-482.
[6] 王宇, 徐芳泉, 周旋, 姚晓峰, 李强. 不断提高分化型甲状腺癌根治性切除规范化[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 473-476.
[7] 孙辉, 李长霖. 分化型甲状腺癌根治性切除术中的关键考量与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 477-481.
[8] 高一飞, 刘根祥, 孙长华, 周广军. 喉返神经监测在无充气腋窝入路腔镜单侧甲状腺切除+中央区淋巴结清扫术中的应用效果[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 483-486.
[9] 李云龙, 夏旭良, 江志强, 刘伟, 刘凯, 唐立, 刘昊中, 张思远. 三种方法治疗分化型甲状腺癌的临床疗效[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 487-489.
[10] 韩婧, 郝少龙, 康骅. 北京市单中心甲状腺癌患者临床特征的回顾分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 490-493.
[11] 杨菲, 刘腾飞, 赵志军, 李睿聪, 张颉, 刘妍, 赵珍. 血清维生素水平与分化型甲状腺癌的关联性研究[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 633-640.
[12] 王曦娅, 尹弘青, 丁伟, 徐滨, 于海源, 马东升, 邵军. 桥本背景下甲状腺乳头状癌多参数分析预测大容量淋巴结转移[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 548-554.
[13] 马云霞, 于金勇, 魏淑凤, 韩臣子. 耳穴疗法对肝气郁结型甲状腺结节合并焦虑抑郁的临床疗效观察[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 348-354.
[14] 卫星彤, 李昊昌, 赵欣. 甲状腺木乃伊结节于多模态超声下的研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 415-419.
[15] 杭中霞, 王朝霞, 孙琴, 李妮. 血清Irisin、TSH 及Hcy 在妊娠期甲状腺功能减退症诊断中的应用[J]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 265-269.
阅读次数
全文


摘要