切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (02) : 195 -198. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2021.02.021

所属专题: 文献

论著

ERAS下腹腔镜辅助右半结肠癌扩大根治术的临床研究
徐国志1,(), 彭艺1, 陈龙1, 罗生1, 黄浪潮1   
  1. 1. 525300 广东省信宜市人民医院 肝胆胃肠外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-06-16 出版日期:2021-04-26
  • 通信作者: 徐国志

Clinical study of ERAS laparoscopic assisted enlarged radical resection of right colon carcinoma

Guozhi Xu1,(), Yi Peng1, Long Chen1, Sheng Luo1, Langchao Huang1   

  1. 1. Department of Hepatobiliary and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Xinyi People's Hospital, Guangdong 525300
  • Received:2020-06-16 Published:2021-04-26
  • Corresponding author: Guozhi Xu
  • Supported by:
    Guangdong Medical Research Fund Project(A2018090)
引用本文:

徐国志, 彭艺, 陈龙, 罗生, 黄浪潮. ERAS下腹腔镜辅助右半结肠癌扩大根治术的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(02): 195-198.

Guozhi Xu, Yi Peng, Long Chen, Sheng Luo, Langchao Huang. Clinical study of ERAS laparoscopic assisted enlarged radical resection of right colon carcinoma[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(02): 195-198.

目的

探讨加速康复外科(ERAS)应用于腹腔镜右半结肠癌扩大根治术患者的临床疗效。

方法

选取2017年1月至2019年12月行腹腔镜辅助右半结肠癌扩大根治术的进展期右半结肠癌患者50例,随机数字法将患者分为ERAS组和传统组,各25例。在围术期分别给予ERAS和传统处理措施,使用统计学软件SPSS 24.0进行临床数据分析,围术期指标等计量资料采用(±s)表示,组间采用独立t检验;术后并发症等计数资料采用χ2检验;以P<0.05为检验标准。

结果

ERAS组术后首次排气时间、首次排便时间、下床活动时间及住院时间均较传统组更短;ERAS组并发症总发生率低于传统组,分别为12.0%及36.0%,以上两组间差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组患者术前1 d的白细胞、Cor、CRP及IL-6指标比较无明显差异(P>0.05),术后3 d ERAS组患者上述4项指标均明显小于传统组(P<0.05)。两组患者入院时血清白蛋白及前白蛋白水平比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术前1 d及术后3 d,ERAS组患者血清白蛋白及前白蛋白水平均明显高于对照组患者(P<0.05)。

结论

围术期应用ERAS理念于腹腔镜辅助右半结肠癌扩大根治术患者安全可行且有效,可减少患者应激反应,降低术后并发症发生率,加速患者术后早期康复。

Objective

To observe the clinical effect of accelerated rehabilitation surgery (ERAS) laparoscopic enlarged radical resection of right colon cancer.

Methods

From January 2017 to December 2019, a total of 50 patients with advanced right colon cancer who underwent laparoscopic assisted enlarged radical resection of right colon cancer were randomly divided into ERAS group and traditional group, with 25 patients in each group . The patients were given ERAS measures and traditional treatment measures respectively during the perioperative period. SPSS 24.0 was used for clinical data analysis, Measurement data such as perioperative indicators were represented by (±s), the results were compared with t test, the statistical data of postoperative complications were tested by χ2 test. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Result

The first postoperative exhaust time, first defecation time, time of getting out-of-bed time and hospitalization time in ERAS group were shorter than those in the traditional group (12% and 36.0%, respectively), and the difference above between the two groups were statistically significant (P<0.05). There were no significant difference in WBC, COR, CRP and IL-6 between the two groups one day before surgery (P>0.05), and the above 4 indexes in ERAS group were significantly lower than those in the traditional group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in serum albumin and prealbumin levels between the two groups at admission (P>0.05). The levels of serum albumin and prealbumin in ERAS group were significantly higher than those in control group 1 day before operation and 3 days after operation (P<0.05).

Conclusion

ERAS is safety、feasible and effective in perioperative period for patients undergoing laparoscopic-assisted radical resection of right colon cancer, which can reduce the stress response of patients, reduce the incidence of postoperative complications and accelerate the early postoperative recovery of patients.

表1 50例右半结肠癌扩大根治术患者不同围手术期处理两组患者一般临床资料比较[(±s),例]
图2 腹腔镜根治性右半结肠切除术(解剖肠系膜上静脉外科干)
图3 腹腔镜根治性右半结肠切除术(解剖显露结肠中动脉)
图4 腹腔镜根治性右半结肠切除术(右半结肠血管解剖)
表2 50例右半结肠癌扩大根治术患者不同围术期处理两组术后各项指标比较(±s)
表3 50例右半结肠癌扩大根治术患者不同围术期处理两组患者并发症发生情况比较(例)
表4 50例右半结肠癌扩大根治术患者不同围术期处理两组术后应激反应指标比较(±s)
表5 50例右半结肠癌扩大根治术患者不同围术期处理两组患者术后营养状况比较(±s)
[1]
国家卫生计生委医政医管局,中华医学会肿瘤学分会.中国结直肠癌诊疗规范(2017年版)[J/CD].中华普通外科学文献(电子版),2018,12(3):145-159.
[2]
Tan EC-H, Yang M-C, Chen C-C.Effects of Laparoscopic Surgery on Survival, Quality of Care and Utilization in Patients With Colon Cancer: A Population-Based Study[J]. Curr Med Res Opin, 2018, 34(9): 1663-1671.
[3]
Kehlet H. Multimodal Approach to Control Postoperative Pathophysiology and Rehabilitation[J]. Br J Anaesth, 1997, 78(5): 606-617.
[4]
Sibbern T, Sellevold VB, Steindal SA, et al.Patients' Experiences of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies[J]. J Clin Nurs, 2017, 26(9-10): 1172-1188.
[5]
Song W, Wang k, Zhang RJ, et al.The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Program in Liver Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials[J]. Springerplus, 2016, 5: 207.
[6]
Jeong O, Ryu SY, Park YK.Postoperative Functional Recovery After Gastrectomy in Patients Undergoing Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: A Prospective Assessment Using Standard Discharge Criteria[J]. Medicine(Baltimore), 2016, 95(14): e3140.
[7]
Stowers MDJ, Manuopangai L, Hill AG, et al.Enhanced Recovery After Surgery in Elective Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Reduces Length of Hospital Stay[J]. ANZ J Surg, 2016, 86(6): 475-479.
[8]
江志伟,李宁,黎介寿.快速康复外科的概念及临床意义[J].中国实用外科杂志,2007,27(2):131-133.
[9]
中国加速康复外科专家组.中国加速康复外科围术期管理专家共识(2016版)[J].中华消化外科杂志,2016,15(6):527-533.
[10]
中华医学会外科学分会,中华医学会麻醉学分会.加速康复外科中国专家共识暨路径管理指南(2018)[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2018,38(1):8-13.
[11]
ERAS Compliance Group.The Impact of Enhanced Recovery Protocol Compliance on Elective Colorectal Cancer Resection: Results From an International Registry[J]. Ann Surg, 2015.261(6): 1153-1159.
[12]
LiL, Jin J, Min S, et al.Compliance With the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol and Prognosis After Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Prospective Cohort Study[J]. Oncotarget, 2017, 8(32): 53531-53541.
[13]
Gustafsson UO, Oppelstrup H, Thorell A, et al.Adherence to the ERAS Protocol Is Associated With 5-Year Survival After Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study[J]. World J Surg, 2016, 40(7): 1741-1747.
[14]
Pisarska M, Pedziwiatr M, Matczak P, et al.Do We Really Need the Full Compliance With ERAS Protocol in Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery? A Prospective Cohort Study[J]. Int J Surg, 2016, 36(Pt A): 377-382.
[15]
浙江省结直肠肿瘤加速康复外科研究工作组.基于临床多中心研究的结直肠癌加速康复外科综合治疗模式浙江共识[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2016,19(3):241-245.
[16]
Weijs TJ, Kumagai K, Berkelmans GHK, et al.Nasogastric Decompression Following Esophagectomy: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis[J]. Dis Esophagus, 2017, 30(3): 1-8.
[17]
Voldby AW, Brandstrup B. Fluid Therapy in the Perioperative Setting-A Clinical Review[J]. J Intensive Care, 2016, 4: 27.
[18]
潘锋.多模式镇痛是加速康复外科疼痛管理的发展趋势--访浙江大学医学院附属第二医院严世贵教授[J].中国当代医药,2019,26(12):1-3.
[19]
林天胜,张庆洪,蔡桦立,等.术前营养支持在腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术快速康复治疗中的临床意义[J].中国微创外科杂志,2017,17(8):683-687.
[1] 燕速, 霍博文, 徐惠宁. 4K荧光腹腔镜扩大右半结肠CME+D3根治术及No.206、No.204组淋巴结清扫术[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 14-14.
[2] 李凯, 陈淋, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种U型记忆合金线在经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 15-15.
[3] 曹迪, 张玉茹. 经腹腔镜生物补片修补直肠癌根治术后盆底疝1例[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 115-116.
[4] 姚宏伟, 魏鹏宇, 高加勒, 张忠涛. 不断提高腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术的规范化[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 1-4.
[5] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[6] 周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[7] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[8] 王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[9] 李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[10] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[11] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[12] 唐健雄, 李绍杰. 不断推进中国腹腔镜疝手术规范化[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 591-594.
[13] 田文, 杨晓冬. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术式选择及注意事项[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 595-597.
[14] 李涛, 陈纲, 李世拥. 腹腔镜下右侧腹股沟斜疝修补术(TAPP)[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 598-598.
[15] 易明超, 汪鑫, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种T型记忆金属线在经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 599-599.
阅读次数
全文


摘要