切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (01) : 20 -23. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2021.01.005

所属专题: 述评/论坛 总编推荐 文献

专家论坛

中国腹腔镜直肠癌手术30年历程与成就
杜峻峰1, 李世拥1,()   
  1. 1. 100700 北京,解放军总医院第七医学中心普通外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-11-29 出版日期:2021-02-10
  • 通信作者: 李世拥

Evolution and achievements of laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery in China in the past 30 years

Junfeng Du1, Shiyong Li1,()   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, 7th Medical center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100700, China
  • Received:2020-11-29 Published:2021-02-10
  • Corresponding author: Shiyong Li
  • Supported by:
    National natural science foundation of China(81870393、81571563)
引用本文:

杜峻峰, 李世拥. 中国腹腔镜直肠癌手术30年历程与成就[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(01): 20-23.

Junfeng Du, Shiyong Li. Evolution and achievements of laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery in China in the past 30 years[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(01): 20-23.

1991年,第一例腹腔镜手术在中国大陆实施以来,微创手术在全国蓬勃兴起,技术及设备的量级提升使得微创、精准医学理念得到了实现。30年来,从2D,3D,HD到4K,成像设备不断升级,从经典的"五孔法"到"单孔法"腹壁创伤不断减少,从经腹入路到经肛门直肠全系膜切除术(TaTME)手段不断丰富,腹腔镜手术目前已经发展成为治疗直肠癌的成熟模式。与开腹手术相比,腹腔镜手术的优势明显,从根治性切除到功能保护,微创理念一以贯之,治愈率和保肛率均显著提高。在中国外科同道的共同努力下治疗理念和手术技术不断革新和进步。近年来我国学者提出的经自然腔道取标本手术(NOSES),在严格的指征把握下,该类手术将微创做到了极致,不增加术后并发症,并取得了满意的近期、远期临床效果,使患者无论在心理上还是生理上都得到了最大程度获益。在手术机器人逐渐普及的时代,相信在术中立体影像技术的导航下,未来的腹腔镜直肠癌手术将更为精准且模式化,为人类造福。

Since 1991, the first case of laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed in Chinese mainland, minimally invasive surgery has been booming in our country. With the upgrading level of technology and equipment, the concept of minimally invasive and precise medicine has been realized. In the past 30 years, from 2D, 3D, HD to 4K, imaging equipment has been constantly upgraded. From the classic " five hole method" to the " single hole method" , the abdominal trauma has been continuously reduced. From the abdominal approach to the transanal approach in the Total Mesocolic Excision (TME), laparoscopic surgery has been developed as a matural mode for the surgical treatment of rectal cancer. Compared with open surgery, laparoscopic surgery has obvious advantages. From radical resection to functional protection, minimally invasive concept is consistent, and the cure rate and anal preservation rate are significantly improved. With the joint efforts of Chinese surgical colleagues, the treatment concept and surgical techniques have been constantly innovated and improved, . In recent years, the Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery (NOSES) has been proposed by Chinese scholars, under the strict indications, this kind of operation will achieve the ultimate minimally invasive effect, without increasing postoperative complications, and could achieve satisfactory short-term and long-term clinical outcome, therefore patients could be benefit psychologically and physiologically. In the era of robot-assisted surgery and artificial intelligence (AI), it is believed that under the guidance of intraoperative stereo imaging technology, laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery in the future will be more accurate and patterned, which will benefit all of mankind.

[1]
Lange MML, Rutten HJ, van de Velde CJH. One hundred years of curative surgery for rectal cancer: 1908-2008[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol,2009,35(5): 456-463.
[2]
Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RD. The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery--the clue to pelvic recurrence? [J].Br J Surg,1982,69(10): 613-616.
[3]
Jeong SY, Park JW, Nam BH, et al. Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid-rectal or low-rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): survival outcomes of an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial [J].Lancet Oncol,2014,15(7): 764-774.
[4]
Bonjer HJ, Deijen CL, Abis GA, et al. A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer [J]. N Engl J Med,2015,372(14): 1324-1332.
[5]
Fleshman J, Branda M, Sargent DJ,et al.Effect of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection vs Open Resection of Stage II or III Rectal Cancer on Pathologic Outcomes: The ACOSOG Z6051 Randomized Clinical Trial [J].JAMA,2015,314(13): 1346-1355.
[6]
Stevenson ARL, Solomon MJ, Lumley JW, et al. Effect of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection vs Open Resection on Pathological Outcomes in Rectal Cancer: The ALaCaRT Randomized Clinical Trial [J]. JAMA, 2015,314(13): 1356-1363.
[7]
郑民华. 砥砺名行二十五载——鉴证中国腹腔镜外科1991-2016[M]. 第1版.北京:企业管理出版社,2016.
[8]
李世拥,崔伟,杜峻峰,等. 腹腔镜直肠癌前切除双吻合器吻合术103例临床分析[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2016,10(3): 201-203.
[9]
杜晓辉,方国吉,宁宁,等. 腹腔镜直肠癌全直肠系膜切除术的学习曲线研究[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志,2013,6(1): 12-14.
[10]
熊文俊,王亚楠,李国新.单孔腹腔镜结直肠手术的应用进展[J].南方医科大学学报,2014,34(4): 576-581.
[11]
李国新,李俊蒙,王亚楠,等. 单孔和减孔腹腔镜结直肠癌切除术发展现状及展望[J]. 中华外科杂志,2017,55(7): 486-490.
[12]
张忠涛,郑民华,姚宏伟,等. 直肠癌经肛全直肠系膜切除专家共识及手术操作指南[J]. 中国实用外科杂志,2017,37(9): 978-984.
[13]
李世拥,陈纲,陈光,等. 腹腔镜低位直肠癌切除经肛门套入式吻合保肛术首例报告[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2011,5(2): 151-155.
[14]
李世拥. 腹部无切口腹腔镜直肠癌经肛门切除吻合术的实践与发展[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2016,10(2): 91-93.
[15]
李世拥,陈纲,杜峻峰,等. 腹腔镜低位直肠癌根治腹部无切口经肛切除套入式吻合102例经验[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2018,12(1): 25-29.
[16]
李世拥,陈纲,杜峻峰,等. 腹腹腔镜低位直肠癌根治腹部无切口经肛门切除标本套入式吻合保肛术[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2015,18(6): 581-584.
[17]
李世拥,陈纲,杜峻峰,等.腹腔镜直肠癌根治术经肛门切除标本的套入式吻合临床疗效[J].中华消化外科杂志,2015,14(11): 930-934.
[18]
李世拥,陈纲,杜峻峰,等.腹部无切口腹腔镜直肠癌根治经肛切除套入式吻合术应用[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2017,11(2): 144-146.
[19]
黄颖,池畔.膜解剖引导下的腹腔镜直肠手术[J/CD].中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版),2017,10(6): 339-342.
[20]
龚建平. 外科膜解剖——新的外科学基础? [J]. 中华实验外科杂志,2015,32(2): 225-226.
[1] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[2] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[3] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[4] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[5] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[6] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[7] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[8] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[9] 吴晖, 佴永军, 施雪松, 魏晓为. 两种解剖入路下行直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 40-43.
[10] 周世振, 朱兴亚, 袁庆港, 刘理想, 王凯, 缪骥, 丁超, 汪灏, 管文贤. 吲哚菁绿荧光成像技术在腹腔镜直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫中的应用效果分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 44-47.
[11] 李博, 贾蓬勃, 李栋, 李小庆. ERCP与LCBDE治疗胆总管结石继发急性重症胆管炎的效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 60-63.
[12] 徐逸男. 不同术式治疗梗阻性左半结直肠癌的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 72-75.
[13] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[14] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[15] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?