切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (01) : 27 -30. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2021.01.009

所属专题: 文献

论著

保留左结肠动脉的腹腔镜直肠癌D3根治术对中晚期直肠癌患者的临床效果分析
韩儒墨1,(), 姚宝福1, 冯国勋2   
  1. 1. 100095 北京老年医院肿瘤外科
    2. 100070 首都医科大学附属北京天坛医院普通外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-04-07 出版日期:2021-02-10
  • 通信作者: 韩儒墨

Clinical effect of laparoscopic rectal cancer D3 radical surgery with left colon artery preservation for patients with advanced colorectal cancer

Rumo Han1,(), Baofu Yao1, Guoxun Feng2   

  1. 1. Department of Oncology surgery, Beijing Geriatric Hospital, Beijing 100095, China
    2. Department of General surgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing 100070, China
  • Received:2020-04-07 Published:2021-02-10
  • Corresponding author: Rumo Han
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China(81372778)
引用本文:

韩儒墨, 姚宝福, 冯国勋. 保留左结肠动脉的腹腔镜直肠癌D3根治术对中晚期直肠癌患者的临床效果分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(01): 27-30.

Rumo Han, Baofu Yao, Guoxun Feng. Clinical effect of laparoscopic rectal cancer D3 radical surgery with left colon artery preservation for patients with advanced colorectal cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(01): 27-30.

目的

探讨保留左结肠动脉的腹腔镜直肠癌D3根治术(Dixon)对中晚期直肠癌患者的临床效果分析。

方法

选取2015年12月至2018年1月60例中晚期直肠癌患者资料,根据术式不同分为保留组和未保留组,其中保留组(n=32)采用保留左结肠动脉的Dixon术,未保留组(n=28)采用高位结扎的Dixon术。采用SPSS 22.00软件对数据资料进行处理,围术期各项指标用(±s)表示,采用独立t检验;术后并发症发生率、淋巴结清扫情况采用χ2Fisher检验,P<0.05表示差异有统计学意义。

结果

保留组肛门排气时间、边缘动脉弓压力显著少于未保留组(P<0.05),其余围术期指标比较均无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组清扫淋巴总数、转移淋巴结数及阳性淋巴结总数差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),但保留组清扫第253组淋巴结数目显著大于未保留组(P<0.05);保留组吻合口漏发生率3.1%(1/32)显著少于未保留组10.7%(3/28),(P<0.05);两组患者术后1年肿瘤复发、转移发生率差异无统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

相比于高位结扎的Dixon术,保留左结肠动脉不增加术后肿瘤复发转移概率,并且可有效降低吻合口漏的发生率,具有良好的应用前景。

Objective

To investigate the clinical effect of laparoscopic rectal cancer D3 radical surgery with left colon artery for patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

Methods

From December 2015 to January 2018, clinical data of 60 patients with advanced colorectal cancer were analyzed retrospectively, who were divided into the reserved group and the unreserved group according to the different surgical procedures. Patients in the reserved group (n=32) underwent laparoscopic rectal cancer D3 radical operation with preservation of left colon artery, while high-ligation of IMA was performed in the unreserved group (n=28). SPSS 22.0 software were used for statistical analysis. Measurement data such as the perioperative index, number of harvested lymph nodes were expressed as (±s) and were analyzed by using independent sample t test. Count data such as complication rate were expressed as percentage and were analyzed by using χ2 test or Fishers test. A P value of <0.05 was considered as statistically significant difference.

Results

The anal exhaust time and marginal arch pressure in the reserved group were significantly less than those in the unreserved group respectively (P<0.05), while in terms of the other perioperative indicators there were no significant difference (P>0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between two groups in terms of number of harvested lymph nodes and positive lymph nodes (P>0.05), however the number of 253 lymph nodes in the reserved group was significantly more than that in the unreserved group (P<0.05). The incidence of anastomotic leakage of 3.1% (1/32) in the reserved group was significantly less than 10.7% (3/28) in the unreserved group (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of incidence of recurrence and metastasis at 1 year after operation (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Compared with high-ligation of IMA in laparoscopic D3 radical surgery, preserving the left colon artery does not increase postoperative tumor recurrence and metastasis, and could effectively reduce the incidence of anastomotic leakage. It has good prospects.

表1 60例中晚期直肠癌患者不同术式两组患者基线资料比较[(±s),例]
表2 60例中晚期直肠癌患者不同术式两组患者围术期指标比较(±s)
表3 60例中晚期直肠癌患者不同术式两组患者清扫淋巴结数目比较[例(%)]
表4 60例中晚期直肠癌患者不同术式两组患者术后并发症发生率比较[例(%)]
[1]
陈万青,郑荣寿,张思维,等.2013年中国恶性肿瘤发病和死亡分析[J].中国肿瘤,2017,26(1): 1-7.
[2]
Jung KU, Yun SH, Cho YB,et al.Single incision and reduced port laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: initial ex-perience in 96 cases[J]. ANZ J Surg,2016,86(5): 403-407.
[3]
张忠涛,杨盈赤.腹腔镜直肠癌根治术难点与争议[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2018,12(1): 1-4.
[4]
陈纲,李世拥.腹腔镜直肠癌根治保留左结肠血管的技巧及意义[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2018,12(1) : 9-12.
[5]
许涛,胡江涛.肠系膜下动脉低位结扎和高位结扎对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术的疗效影响[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2018,12(2) : 144-147.
[6]
池畔,黄胜辉.直肠癌术后吻合口漏的分类和治疗策略[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2018,21(4): 365-371.
[7]
陈崇彬,李树斌,沈玲.结直肠癌患者病理特征与预后的相关性分析[J].中国肛肠病杂志,2019,39(10): 1-3.
[8]
Junginger T, Goenner U, Hitzler M, et al. Local excision followed by early radical surgery in rectal cancer: long-term outcome[J]. World J Surg Oncol,2019,17(1): 168.
[9]
Malakorn S, Sammour T, Bednarski B,et al. Three Different Approaches to the Inferior Mesenteric Artery during Robotic D3 Lymphadenectomy for Rectal Cancer[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2017,24(7): 1923.
[10]
宗亚光,王夫景,徐训政.全直肠系膜切除根治术中保留左结肠动脉的临床疗效观察[J].结直肠肛门外科,2017,23(2): 154-157.
[11]
骆洋,秦骏,陈建军,等.腹腔镜直肠癌手术中保留左结肠动脉与否疗效对比研究[J].中国实用外科杂志,2017,37(6): 660-664.
[12]
Kayano H, Nomura E, Ueda Y, et al. Short-term outcomes of OTSC for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic colorectal surgery[J]. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol, 2020, 1-8.
[13]
司牟博,李来元,田宏伟,等.肠系膜下动脉低位结扎伴D3淋巴结清扫术治疗乙状结肠与直肠癌疗效的Meta分析[J].腹腔镜外科杂志,2019,24(12): 898-905.
[14]
Witzel K, Hellinger A, Kaminski C,et al.Endoscopic thyroidectomy:the transoral approach[J].Gland Surg,2016,5(3): 336-341.
[15]
Jang JH, Kim HC, Huh JW, et al. Anastomotic Leak Does Not Impact Oncologic Outcomes After Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy and Resection for Rectal Cancer[J].Ann Surg,2019,269(4): 678-685.
[1] 王振宁, 杨康, 王得晨, 邹敏, 归明彬, 王雅楠, 徐明. 机器人与腹腔镜手术联合经自然腔道取标本对中低位直肠癌患者远期疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 437-442.
[2] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[3] 吴晖, 佴永军, 施雪松, 魏晓为. 两种解剖入路下行直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 40-43.
[4] 周世振, 朱兴亚, 袁庆港, 刘理想, 王凯, 缪骥, 丁超, 汪灏, 管文贤. 吲哚菁绿荧光成像技术在腹腔镜直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫中的应用效果分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 44-47.
[5] 徐逸男. 不同术式治疗梗阻性左半结直肠癌的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 72-75.
[6] 李代勤, 刘佩杰. 动态增强磁共振评估中晚期低位直肠癌同步放化疗后疗效及预后的价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 100-103.
[7] 郑民华, 蒋天宇, 赵轩, 马君俊. 中国腹腔镜直肠癌根治术30年发展历程与未来[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 591-595.
[8] 池畔, 黄胜辉. 中国腹腔镜直肠癌根治术30年来的巨大进步[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 596-600.
[9] 李明, 屠松, 闫鹏, 钱军, 高鹏程, 许文山, 杨发英, 胡振涛, 单永玮. 应用前列腺电切镜引导置管治疗直肠低位吻合口漏研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 603-606.
[10] 李玲, 刘亚, 李培玲, 张秀敏, 李萍. 直肠癌患者术后肠道菌群的变化与抑郁症相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 607-610.
[11] 赵梓竣, 兰运升. 改良一针法末端回肠造口术对低位直肠癌保肛术后应激反应及安全性的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 611-614.
[12] 吴胜伟, 王志伟, 陈贵进, 刘序, 吴晓翔. 系膜肥厚低位直肠癌患者改良NOSES Ⅰ式手术的临床效果评价[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 615-618.
[13] 庄宝雄, 邓海军. 单孔+1腹腔镜直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 601-601.
[14] 张朝军, 袁新普. 腹腔镜辅助低位直肠癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 602-602.
[15] 刘福成, 赵欣, 乔海朋, 刘晓峰, 张翀, 张宗明. 保留左结肠动脉的肠系膜下动脉根部淋巴结清扫对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术的疗效影响[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 647-653.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?