切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (04) : 427 -429. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2020.04.031

所属专题: 文献

论著

腹腔镜下胆管癌手术患者的生存状况分析
何战洋1,(), 应学翔2, 范秋红1, 高海德1, 俞晓峰1   
  1. 1. 215010 江苏苏州,苏州高新区人民医院
    2. 200233 上海,上海交通大学附属上海市第六人民医院
  • 收稿日期:2019-07-01 出版日期:2020-08-26
  • 通信作者: 何战洋

Analysis of survival status of patients with laparoscopic surgery for cholangiocarcinoma

Zhanyang He1,(), Xuexiang Ying2, Qiuhong Fan1, Haide Gao1, Xiaofeng Yu1   

  1. 1. People’s Hospital of Suzhou High-tech Zone 215010, China
    2. Shanghai Sixth People’s Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University 200233, China
  • Received:2019-07-01 Published:2020-08-26
  • Corresponding author: Zhanyang He
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: He Zhanyang, Email:
引用本文:

何战洋, 应学翔, 范秋红, 高海德, 俞晓峰. 腹腔镜下胆管癌手术患者的生存状况分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(04): 427-429.

Zhanyang He, Xuexiang Ying, Qiuhong Fan, Haide Gao, Xiaofeng Yu. Analysis of survival status of patients with laparoscopic surgery for cholangiocarcinoma[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(04): 427-429.

目的

探讨胆管癌行腹腔镜下手术患者的短期和长期生存状况。

方法

回顾性分析2012年1月至2014年1月接受治疗的96例胆管癌患者(分型为Ⅲa、Ⅲb和Ⅳ)的临床资料,按照手术方法分为2组,引流组应用经肝胆道引流治疗,手术组应用腹腔镜下根治术治疗。采用SPSS23.0软件进行统计学分析。两组计量资料比较采用t检验。术后并发症和近期疗效比较用卡方检验(常规资料)和秩和检验(等级资料)。生存分析模型为Kaplanmeier乘积限模型,两组生存率比较为Logrank检验。P<0.05差异有统计学意义。

结果

引流组共有10例完全缓解,21例部分缓解,手术组共有17例完全缓解,27例部分缓解,手术组近期疗效总有效率91.7%,显著高于引流组近期疗效总有效率64.6%(P<0.05)。手术组术后并发症发生率6.3%,明显低于引流组术后并发症发生率29.2%(P<0.05)。引流组1年、3年、5年生存率为39.6%、14.6%和10.4%低于手术组1年、3年、5年生存率为60.4%、22.9%和16.7%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

胆管癌行腹腔镜下手术患者近期疗效较经肝胆道引流治疗显著,且术后并发症发生较少,长期生存率较高,适合临床推广应用。

Objective

To explore the short-term and long-term survival status of patients with laparoscopic surgery for cholangiocarcinoma.

Methods

A clinical data of 96 patients with cholangiocarcinoma treated in our hospital from January 2012 to January 2014 were divided into two groups according to the different surgical methods. The drainage group was treated with hepatic biliary drainage and the operation group was treated with laparoscopic radical operation. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 23.0 software. The t test was used to compare the two groups of measurement data. Postoperative complications and short-term efficacy were compared using chi-square test (conventional data) and rank sum test (grade data). The survival analysis model was the Kaplan-Meier product limit model, and the survival rate of the two groups was compared with the Logrank test, and P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

There were 10 cases of complete remissions in the drainage group and 21cases of partial remissions. There were 17 cases of complete remission in the operation group and 27 cases of partial remission. The total effective rate of the short-term effect in the operation group was 91.7%, which was significantly higher than the total effective rate of the drainage group with 64.6% (P<0.05). The postoperative complication rate was 6.3% in the operation group, which was significantly lower than that in the drainage group of 29.2% (P<0.05). The 1-year survival rate in the drainage group was 39.6%, the 3-year survival rate was 14.6%, and the 5-year survival rate was 10.4%. The 1-year survival rate in the surgery group was 60.4%, the 3-year survival rate was 22.9%, and the 5-year survival rate was 16.7%. The postoperative survival rates between the two groups was statistically significant (P<0.05).

Conclusion

The short-term curative effect of laparoscopic surgery for cholangiocarcinoma is significantly better than that of transhepatic biliary drainage. The postoperative complications are less and the long-term survival rate is higher, which is suitable for clinical application.

表1 96例胆管癌患者不同疗法两组患者基线资料对比[(±s),例]
表2 96例胆管癌患者不同疗法两组患者近期疗效对比[例(%)]
表3 96例胆管癌患者不同疗法两组患者术后并发症发生对比[例(%)]
图1 96例胆管癌患者不同疗法两组患者生存率曲线
表4 96例胆管癌患者不同疗法两组患者5年生存状况对比[n(%)]
[1]
段小辉,毛先海,蒋波,等.腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术治疗远端胆管癌的临床疗效[J].中华消化外科杂志,2018,17(3): 304-309.
[2]
段小辉,毛先海.腹腔镜远端胆管癌根治术中的腹腔淋巴结清扫[J].中华消化外科杂志,2019,18(2): 123-127.
[3]
Jung CFM, Lavole J, Barret M, et al. Local Therapy in Advanced Cholangiocarcinoma: A Review of Current Endoscopic, Medical, and Oncologic Treatment Options[J]. Oncology,2019,97(4): 191-201.
[4]
罗柳平,李建伟,曹利,等.腹腔镜肝切除术治疗肝内胆管癌的临床疗效[J].中华消化外科杂志,2019,18(2): 169-175.
[5]
陈华.腹腔镜胆管癌根治术的临床疗效及对患者应激反应和生活质量的影响[J].中国普通外科杂志,2018,27(8): 1072-1076.
[6]
Dumitra?cu T, Ionescu MI. Caudate Lobectomy for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma-Current Evidence[J]. Chirurgia (Bucur),2019,114(3): 317-325.
[7]
Jiang F, Ling X. The Advancement of Long Non-Coding RNAs in Cholangiocarcinoma Development[J]. J Cancer,2019,10(11): 2407-2414.
[8]
陈勋,周进学,李庆军,等.腹腔镜下肝门部胆管癌根治术四例报告[J].中华肝胆外科杂志,2018,24(10): 705-708.
[9]
刘学青,冯峰,王文斌,等.32例腹腔镜肝门部胆管癌根治术的临床研究[J].中华肝胆外科杂志,2019,25(3): 200-206.
[10]
金巍巍,鲁超,牟一平,等.腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除时邻近器官病变的处理策略[J].中华外科杂志,2018,56(7): 522-527.
[11]
Li O, Yi W, Yang P, et al. Long non-coding RNA UCA1 promotes proliferation and invasion of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma cells through targeting microRNA-122[J]. Exp Ther Med,2019,18(1): 25-32.
[12]
Mahipal A, Tella SH, Kommalapati A, et al. FGFR2 genomic aberrations: Achilles heel in the management of advanced cholangiocarcinoma[J]. Cancer Treat Rev,2019,78: 1-7.
[13]
Raoof M, Singh G. Rising trends in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma incidence and mortality: getting at the root cause[J]. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr,2019,8(3): 301-303.
[14]
Tian MX, Luo LP, Liu WR, et al. Development and validation of a prognostic score predicting recurrence in resected combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma[J]. Cancer Manag Res,2019,11: 5187-5195.
[1] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[2] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[3] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[4] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[5] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[6] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[7] 刘世君, 马杰, 师鲁静. 胃癌完整系膜切除术+标准D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[8] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[9] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[10] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[11] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[12] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
[13] 郭兵, 王万里, 何凯, 黄汉生. 腹腔镜下肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 143-143.
[14] 李凯, 陈淋, 苏怀东, 向涵, 张伟. 超微创器械在改良单孔腹腔镜巨大肝囊肿开窗引流及胆囊切除中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 144-144.
[15] 魏丽霞, 张安澜, 周宝勇, 李明. 腹腔镜下Ⅲb型肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 145-145.
阅读次数
全文


摘要