切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (02) : 178 -181. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2020.02.021

所属专题: 文献

论著

非离断式Roux-en-Y吻合在全腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术消化道重建中的可行性研究
王小林1, 马任远1,(), 尹金祥1, 高庆东1, 张哲1   
  1. 1. 719000 陕西,榆林市第二医院普通外科
  • 收稿日期:2019-04-26 出版日期:2020-04-26
  • 通信作者: 马任远

Feasibility study of uncut Roux-en-Y anastomosis in totally laparoscopic radical total gastrectomy and reconstruction of digestive tract

Xiaolin Wang1, Renyuan Ma1,(), Jinxiang Yin1, Qingdong Gao1, Zhe Zhang1   

  1. 1. General surgery department of yulin second hospital 719000
  • Received:2019-04-26 Published:2020-04-26
  • Corresponding author: Renyuan Ma
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Ma Renyuan , Email:
  • Supported by:
    Shaanxi provincial basic research program of natural science 2017(2017JM8109)
引用本文:

王小林, 马任远, 尹金祥, 高庆东, 张哲. 非离断式Roux-en-Y吻合在全腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术消化道重建中的可行性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(02): 178-181.

Xiaolin Wang, Renyuan Ma, Jinxiang Yin, Qingdong Gao, Zhe Zhang. Feasibility study of uncut Roux-en-Y anastomosis in totally laparoscopic radical total gastrectomy and reconstruction of digestive tract[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(02): 178-181.

目的

探究非离断式Roux-en-Y吻合在全腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术消化道重建中的安全性及可行性。

方法

回顾性分析2015年6月至2017年5月接受全腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术的75例胃癌患者临床资料,根据术中消化道重建术式不同进行分组,非离断组37例,行非离断式Roux-en-Y吻合,传统组38例行传统Roux-en-Y吻合。采用统计软件SPSS 20.0进行数据分析,围手术指标、血清营养指标等计量资料采用(±s)表示,行独立t检验;近远期并发症等行χ2检验或Fisher检验,P<0.05差异有统计学意义。

结果

非离断组在手术总时间、消化道重建时间、术中出血量、恢复排气时间、首次进食时间、住院时间方面明显优于传统组(P<0.05),两组术中均无中转开腹。传统组近、远期并发症总发生率(13.2%、21.1%)明显高于非离断组(2.7%、5.4%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。非离断组患者术后短期疗效及胆汁反流情况均优于传统组(P<0.05)。术后3个月两组血清营养指标逐渐恢复,非离断组高于传统组(P<0.05)。

结论

非离断式Roux-en-Y吻合应用于全腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术消化道重建中安全可行,值得临床推广使用。

Objective

To explore the safety and feasibility of uncut Roux-en-Y anastomosis in totally laparoscopic radical total gastrectomy and reconstruction of digestive tract.

Methods

The clinical data of 75 patients with gastric cancer who underwent totally laparoscopic radical total gastrectomy from June 2015 to May 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. They were divided into two groups according to different reconstruction methods of digestive tract. 37 patients in the uncut group were treated with uncut Roux-en-Y anastomosis, while 38 patients in the traditional group were treated with conventional Roux-en-Y anastomosis. Statistical software SPSS 20.0 was used for data analysis. Perioperative indicators, serum nutritional indicators and other measurement data were represented by (±s), and compared with independent t test. χ2 test or Fisher test was performed for the short and long term complications, and P<0.05 showed statistically significant difference.

Results

The uncut group was significantly superior to the traditional group in terms of total operation time, digestive tract reconstruction time, intraoperative blood loss, recovery of exhaust time, first feeding time and hospital stay (P<0.05). The total incidence of short-term and long-term complications in the traditional group (13.2%, 21.1%) was significantly higher than those in the uncut group (2.7%, 5.4%) (P<0.05). The short-term postoperative efficacy and bile reflux ratio of patients in the uncut group were better than those in the traditional group (P<0.05). Three months after the operation, the serum nutrition indexes of the two groups recovered gradually, and the difference between the uncut group and the traditional group was statistically significant, the former was better (P<0.05).

Conclusion

The uncut Roux-en-y anastomosis is safe and feasible in totally laparoscopic radical total gastrectomy and is worthy of clinical application.

表1 75例行完全腹腔镜全胃切除患者不同消化道重建术式两组患者一般资料比较[(±s),例]
表2 75例行完全腹腔镜全胃切除患者不同消化道重建术式两组围手术指标比较(±s)
表3 75例行完全腹腔镜全胃切除患者不同消化道重建术式两组术后疗效比较(例)
表4 75例行完全腹腔镜全胃切除患者不同消化道重建术式两组血清营养指标比较(±s)
[1]
陈万青,郑荣寿,张思维,等.2013年中国恶性肿瘤发病和死亡分析[J]. 中国肿瘤,2017,26(1):1-7.
[2]
袁传威,周毅,罗苏明,等.腹腔镜辅助与传统开放胃癌根治术治疗老年胃癌患者安全性及疗效比较的Meta分析[J].中国普外基础与临床杂志,2018,25(4):444-455.
[3]
季加孚,胡祥,陈凛,等. 胃切除术后消化道重建技术专家共识[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2014, 34(3):205-212.
[4]
徐泽宽,徐皓.全腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术消化道重建方式选择及技术要点[J].中国实用外科杂志,2016,36(9):938-941.
[5]
杨力,徐泽宽. 腹腔镜全胃切除术后消化道重建的经验与思考[J/CD]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版),2019,12(4):207-212.
[6]
马君俊,臧潞,胡伟国,等.全腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术胃空肠非离断式Roux-en-Y吻合51例疗效分析[J].中国实用外科杂志,2016,36(9):965-967,972.
[7]
Jang CE,Lee SI. Modified intracorporeal gastroduodenostomy in totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer:early experience[J].Ann Surg Treat Res,2015,89(6):306-312.
[8]
苏新颖.胃镜在诊断胆汁反流性胃炎中的临床应用[J].世界最新医学信息文摘,2017,17(56):117.
[9]
祝保玺,王云海.Roux-en-Y型消化道重建在胃癌根治性远端胃大部切除术中应用的疗效与安全性的Meta分析[J].医学综述,2015,21(8):1473-1476,1480.
[10]
赵天天,鲍传庆,许炳华,等.非离断式Roux-en-Y吻合在腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术中的应用[J].中国微创外科杂志,2018,18(12):1095-1098,1107.
[11]
罗建飞,闫瑞承,赫杰,等.全腹腔镜全胃癌根治术食管右侧近端空肠Roux-en-Y吻合消化道重建的临床应用[J].临床外科杂志,2017,25(10):765-767.
[12]
冯兴宇,杨力,朱甲明,等. 全腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术非离断式Roux-en-Y吻合与传统吻合疗效对照多中心研究[J]. 中国实用外科杂志,2016,36(9):961-964.
[13]
费挺,周恩呈. 腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术非离断式Roux-en-Y吻合术与Billroth Ⅱ吻合术临床疗效的比较[J]. 中华全科医师杂志, 2019,18(6):563-567.
[14]
徐泉,邵欣欣,刘松,等.全腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术胃空肠Roux-en-Y吻合的临床应用[J].中国医刊,2016,51(2):35-38.
[15]
杨栋,苏同荣,何亮,等.腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术行非离断式Roux-en-Y吻合119例分析[J].中国实用外科杂志,2018,38(3):312-315.
[16]
Park YS,Shin DJ,Son SY,et al.Roux Stasis Syndrome and Gastric Food Stasis After Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy with Uncut Roux-en-Y Reconstruction in Gastric Cancer Patients: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis[J].World J Surg,2018,42(12):4022-4032.
[17]
Sano T, Sasako M, Mizusawa J, et al. Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate Splenectomy in Total Gastrectomy for Proximal Gastric Carcinoma[J].Ann Surg,2017,265(2):277-283.
[1] 代莉, 邓恢伟, 郭华静, 黄芙蓉. 术中持续输注艾司氯胺酮对腹腔镜结直肠癌手术患者术后睡眠质量的影响[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 408-412.
[2] 李凯, 陈淋, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种U型记忆合金线在经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 15-15.
[3] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[4] 周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[5] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[6] 李凤仪, 李若凡, 高旭, 张超凡. 目标导向液体干预对老年胃肠道肿瘤患者术后血流动力学、胃肠功能恢复的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 29-32.
[7] 王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[8] 李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[9] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[10] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[11] 钱龙, 陆晓峰, 王行舟, 杜峻峰, 沈晓菲, 管文贤. 神经系统调控胃肠道肿瘤免疫应答研究进展[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 86-89.
[12] 曹迪, 张玉茹. 经腹腔镜生物补片修补直肠癌根治术后盆底疝1例[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 115-116.
[13] 叶晋生, 路夷平, 梁燕凯, 于淼, 冀祯, 贺志坚, 张洪海, 王洁. 腹腔镜下应用生物补片修补直肠术后盆底缺损的疗效[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 688-691.
[14] 夏松, 姚嗣会, 汪勇刚. 经腹腹膜前与疝环充填式疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的对照研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 702-705.
[15] 孙秀艳, 徐庆蕾, 马鹏涛, 胡志元, 郭传真, 祝成红. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术中患者体温变化与压力性损伤及受压部位微环境的相关性分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 480-484.
阅读次数
全文


摘要