切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (02) : 144 -147. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2020.02.012

所属专题: 文献

论著

微波处理肝癌切除断面对术后肿瘤复发的影响
吴钧1, 陈瑞1, 殷凯1, 许建伟1, 陶立德2, 张立洪2,()   
  1. 1. 225400 江苏泰兴,扬州大学附属泰兴市人民医院肝胆外科
    2. 225012 江苏扬州,扬州大学附属医院肝胆外科
  • 收稿日期:2019-04-04 出版日期:2020-04-26
  • 通信作者: 张立洪

Curative effect of microwave ablation in treating residual liver after hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma

Jun Wu1, Rui Chen1, Kai Yin1, Jianwei Xu1, Lide Tao2, Lihong Zhang2,()   

  1. 1. Department of Hepatobiliary, Surgery, the People`s Hospital of Taixing city, Yangzhou University, Jiangsu 225400, China
    2. Department of Hepatobiliary, Surgery, the Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University, Jiangsu 225012, China
  • Received:2019-04-04 Published:2020-04-26
  • Corresponding author: Lihong Zhang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zhang Lihong , Email:
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China(NO.81702377)
引用本文:

吴钧, 陈瑞, 殷凯, 许建伟, 陶立德, 张立洪. 微波处理肝癌切除断面对术后肿瘤复发的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(02): 144-147.

Jun Wu, Rui Chen, Kai Yin, Jianwei Xu, Lide Tao, Lihong Zhang. Curative effect of microwave ablation in treating residual liver after hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(02): 144-147.

目的

探讨微波处理肝癌切除断面对患者术后肝功能恢复和术后肿瘤复发和生存率的影响。

方法

回顾性分析2012年1月至2016年12月86例肝癌行肝切除肿瘤切缘<1 cm患者的临床资料,其中42例患者在肝切除创面常规处理后加用微波烧灼(微波组),另44例肝切除断面仅常规处理(常规组)。应用SPSS 18.0软件进行分析,两组术中术后各相关指标用(±s)表示,采用独立t检验;并发症发生率采用四格表χ2检验;生存曲线采用KaplanMeier法绘制,组间比较采用Logrank检验。P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

两组患者术中平均失血量,输红细胞的量,肿瘤是否有包膜,侵犯血管的情况,手术方式,术后肝功能恢复以及术后并发症等方面均无明显差异(P>0.05);微波组与常规组患者1、3和5年总生存率分别为88.0%、61.4%、23.9%和86.1%、45.9%、19.2% (χ2=1.27, P=0.26);微波组与常规组患者1、3和5年无瘤生存率分别为68.4%、35.6%、18.5%和50.4%、22.4%、7.6% (χ2=5.13, P=0.02);微波组与常规组术后6个月、1年和3年累积复发率分别为6.2%、28.1%、56.2和11.4%、34.6%、83.3% (χ2=4.14, P=0.04)。

结论

肝癌术中应用微波处理<1 cm的肿瘤切缘不影响术后肝功能恢复,可以降低术后肿瘤复发率及提高患者无瘤生存率等方面有积极的临床意义,具有临床应用价值。

Objective

To explore the postoperative recovery of liver function, recurrence and metastasis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), who received microwave ablation after hepatectomy.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of clinical data were performed in 86 patients with HCC from January 2012 to December 2016, who underwent hepatectomy with resection margin of <1 cm. There were 42 cases in MWA group, who received microwave ablation after hepatectomy, while 44 cases in conventional group without microwave ablation. Statistical analysis were performed by using SPSS 18.0 software package. Measurement data such as intraoperative and postoperative indicators were expressed as (±s) and examined by using independent t-test. The complication rate were compared by using χ2 test. Survival were analyzed by using Kaplan Meier method, and were examined by using log rank test. A P value of <0.05 was considered as statistically significant difference.

Results

There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of average intraoperative blood loss, amount of infusion of red blood cells, invasion of tumor capsules or vessels, the surgical procedures, the recovery of postoperative liver function and postoperative complications (P>0.05). The overall survive rate of 1, 3 and 5-year were 88.0%, 61.4%and 23.9% in the MWA group, and 86.1%, 45.9% and 19.2% in the conventional group, with no significant difference between the two groups respectively (χ2=1.27, P=0.26). The disease free survive rate of 1, 3 and 5-year were 68.4%, 35.6% and 18.5% in the MWA group, and 50.4%, 22.4% and 7.6% in the conventional group, with significant difference between the two groups respectively (χ2=5.13, P=0.02). The 6-months, 1-year and 3-years cumulative recurrence rates were 6.2%, 28.1% and 56.2% in the MWA group and 11.4%, 34.6% and 83.3% in the conventional group, with significant difference between the two groups respectively (χ2=4.14, P=0.04).

Conclusion

The application of microwave ablation in treating residual liver after hepatectomy with resection margin of <1cm for HCC would not affect the recovery of postoperative liver function. However it could decrease recurrence rate and could improve tumor-free survival rate, with clinical significance.

表1 86例HCC患者术中不同处理方法两组患者术前基线资料比较[(±s),例]
表2 86例HCC患者术中不同处理方法两组患者术中各项指标比较[(±s),例]
表3 86例HCC患者术中不同处理方法两组患者术后并发症比较(例)
表4 86例HCC患者术中不同处理方法两组患者术后肝功能情况(±s)
图1 86例HCC患者术中不同处理方法两组无瘤生存曲线比较(χ2=5.13, P=0.02)
图2 86例HCC患者术中不同处理方法两组累积复发率(χ2=4.14, P=0.04)
[1]
Zhu RX,Seto WK,Lai CL,et al.Epidemiology of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the Asia-Pacific Region[J].Gut Liver,2016,10(3):332-339.
[2]
Parikh ND,Fu S,Rao H,et al.Risk Assessment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients with Hepatitis C in China and the USA[J].Dig Dis Sci,2017,62(11):3243-3253.
[3]
Forner A,Reig M,Bruix J.Hepatocellular carcinoma[J].Lancet,2018,391(10127):1301-1314.
[4]
Piero F,Poniachik J,Ridruejo E,et al.Hepatocellular carcinoma in Latin America: Diagnosis and treatment challenges[J].World J Gastroenterol,2018,24(37): 4224-4229.
[5]
Vogel A,Cervantes A,Chau I,et al.Hepatocellular carcinoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up[J].Ann Oncol,2019,30(5):871-873.
[6]
武正山,王荇,王东,等.肝细胞癌切除术中微波处理肝断面对肿瘤复发的影响[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2015,37(12):909-912.
[7]
Saito R,Amemiya H,Hosomura N,et al.Prognostic Factors for Post-recurrent Survival in Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Curative Resection[J].Anticancer Res,2019,39(6):3033-3038.
[8]
王双佳,李秀东,苏旭,等.原发性肝癌患者术后肝外转移复发分析[J].中华肝胆外科杂志2018,24(5):341-343.
[9]
Lafaro K,Grandhi MS,Herman JM,et al.The importance of surgical margins in primary malignancies of the liver[J].J Surg Oncol,2016,113(3):296-303.
[10]
Ataide EC,Boin IF,Almeida JR,et al.Prognostic factors for hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence:experience with 83 liver transplantation patients[J].Transplant Proc,2011,43(4):1362-1364.
[11]
Chen QF,Jia ZY,Yang ZQ,et al.Transarterial Chemoembolization Monotherapy Versus Combined Transarterial Chemoembolization-Microwave Ablation Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Tumors ≤5 cm: A Propensity Analysis at a Single Center[J].Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol,2017,40(11):1748-1755.
[12]
Ryu T,Takami Y,Wada Y,et al.Hepatic resection versus operative microwave ablation for single hepatocellular carcinoma ≤5 cm: A propensity score-matched analysis[J].Surgery,2019,166(3):254-262.
[13]
王延明,王能,许赘,等.微波消融治疗7403例肝癌的严重并发症[J].中华肝胆外科杂志,2016,22(10):655-660.
[14]
张立洪,张传永,戴新征,等.术后复发性小肝癌微波消融与再次手术切除的疗效比较[J].中华普通外科杂志,2015,30(8):631-634.
[15]
沈裕厚,谢振斌,岳爱民,等.肝癌切除术中氩气刀处理残肝断面对术后肿瘤局部复发的影响[J].中华肿瘤防治杂志,2016,23(8):525-529.
[1] 王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[2] 崔占斌, 乔军利, 张丽丽, 韩明强. 尿碘水平与甲状腺乳头状癌患者术后复发危险度分层的相关性[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 615-618.
[3] 陈垚, 徐伯群, 高志慧. 改良式中间上入路根治术治疗甲状腺癌的有效性安全性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 619-622.
[4] 阿冲罗布, 陈颖, 谢德坤. 腹腔镜外囊完整剥离术治疗肝包虫病效果及对患者肝功能、预后的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 666-669.
[5] 索郎多杰, 高红桥, 巴桑顿珠, 仁桑. 腹腔镜下不同术式治疗肝囊型包虫病的临床疗效分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 670-673.
[6] 汤海琴, 郭秀枝, 朱晓素, 赵世娣. “隧道法”腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术的临床安全性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 674-677.
[7] 唐浩, 梁平, 徐小江, 曾凯, 文拨辉. 三维重建指导下腹腔镜右半肝加尾状叶切除治疗Bismuth Ⅲa型肝门部胆管癌的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 688-692.
[8] 魏小勇. 原发性肝癌转化治疗焦点问题探讨[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 602-607.
[9] 张其坤, 商福超, 李琪, 栗光明, 王孟龙. 联合脾切除对肝癌合并门静脉高压症患者根治性切除术后的生存获益分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 613-618.
[10] 严庆, 刘颖, 邓斐文, 陈焕伟. 微血管侵犯对肝癌肝移植患者生存预后的影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 624-629.
[11] 段文忠, 白延霞, 徐文亭, 祁虹霞, 吕志坚. 七氟烷和丙泊酚在肝切除术中麻醉效果比较Meta分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 640-645.
[12] 张文华, 陶焠, 胡添松. 不同部位外生型肝癌临床病理特点及其对术后肝内复发和预后影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 651-655.
[13] 韩宇, 张武, 李安琪, 陈文颖, 谢斯栋. MRI肝脏影像报告和数据系统对非肝硬化乙肝患者肝细胞癌的诊断价值[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 669-673.
[14] 唐灿, 李向阳, 秦浩然, 李婧, 王天云, 柯阳, 朱红. 原发性肝脏神经内分泌肿瘤单中心12例诊治与疗效分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 674-680.
[15] 符梅沙, 周玉华, 李慧, 薛春颜. 淋巴细胞免疫治疗对复发性流产患者外周血T淋巴细胞亚群分布与PD1/PD-L1表达的影响及意义[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 726-730.
阅读次数
全文


摘要