切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (02) : 144 -147. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2020.02.012

所属专题: 文献

论著

微波处理肝癌切除断面对术后肿瘤复发的影响
吴钧1, 陈瑞1, 殷凯1, 许建伟1, 陶立德2, 张立洪2,()   
  1. 1. 225400 江苏泰兴,扬州大学附属泰兴市人民医院肝胆外科
    2. 225012 江苏扬州,扬州大学附属医院肝胆外科
  • 收稿日期:2019-04-04 出版日期:2020-04-26
  • 通信作者: 张立洪

Curative effect of microwave ablation in treating residual liver after hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma

Jun Wu1, Rui Chen1, Kai Yin1, Jianwei Xu1, Lide Tao2, Lihong Zhang2,()   

  1. 1. Department of Hepatobiliary, Surgery, the People`s Hospital of Taixing city, Yangzhou University, Jiangsu 225400, China
    2. Department of Hepatobiliary, Surgery, the Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University, Jiangsu 225012, China
  • Received:2019-04-04 Published:2020-04-26
  • Corresponding author: Lihong Zhang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zhang Lihong , Email:
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China(NO.81702377)
引用本文:

吴钧, 陈瑞, 殷凯, 许建伟, 陶立德, 张立洪. 微波处理肝癌切除断面对术后肿瘤复发的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(02): 144-147.

Jun Wu, Rui Chen, Kai Yin, Jianwei Xu, Lide Tao, Lihong Zhang. Curative effect of microwave ablation in treating residual liver after hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(02): 144-147.

目的

探讨微波处理肝癌切除断面对患者术后肝功能恢复和术后肿瘤复发和生存率的影响。

方法

回顾性分析2012年1月至2016年12月86例肝癌行肝切除肿瘤切缘<1 cm患者的临床资料,其中42例患者在肝切除创面常规处理后加用微波烧灼(微波组),另44例肝切除断面仅常规处理(常规组)。应用SPSS 18.0软件进行分析,两组术中术后各相关指标用(±s)表示,采用独立t检验;并发症发生率采用四格表χ2检验;生存曲线采用KaplanMeier法绘制,组间比较采用Logrank检验。P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

两组患者术中平均失血量,输红细胞的量,肿瘤是否有包膜,侵犯血管的情况,手术方式,术后肝功能恢复以及术后并发症等方面均无明显差异(P>0.05);微波组与常规组患者1、3和5年总生存率分别为88.0%、61.4%、23.9%和86.1%、45.9%、19.2% (χ2=1.27, P=0.26);微波组与常规组患者1、3和5年无瘤生存率分别为68.4%、35.6%、18.5%和50.4%、22.4%、7.6% (χ2=5.13, P=0.02);微波组与常规组术后6个月、1年和3年累积复发率分别为6.2%、28.1%、56.2和11.4%、34.6%、83.3% (χ2=4.14, P=0.04)。

结论

肝癌术中应用微波处理<1 cm的肿瘤切缘不影响术后肝功能恢复,可以降低术后肿瘤复发率及提高患者无瘤生存率等方面有积极的临床意义,具有临床应用价值。

Objective

To explore the postoperative recovery of liver function, recurrence and metastasis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), who received microwave ablation after hepatectomy.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of clinical data were performed in 86 patients with HCC from January 2012 to December 2016, who underwent hepatectomy with resection margin of <1 cm. There were 42 cases in MWA group, who received microwave ablation after hepatectomy, while 44 cases in conventional group without microwave ablation. Statistical analysis were performed by using SPSS 18.0 software package. Measurement data such as intraoperative and postoperative indicators were expressed as (±s) and examined by using independent t-test. The complication rate were compared by using χ2 test. Survival were analyzed by using Kaplan Meier method, and were examined by using log rank test. A P value of <0.05 was considered as statistically significant difference.

Results

There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of average intraoperative blood loss, amount of infusion of red blood cells, invasion of tumor capsules or vessels, the surgical procedures, the recovery of postoperative liver function and postoperative complications (P>0.05). The overall survive rate of 1, 3 and 5-year were 88.0%, 61.4%and 23.9% in the MWA group, and 86.1%, 45.9% and 19.2% in the conventional group, with no significant difference between the two groups respectively (χ2=1.27, P=0.26). The disease free survive rate of 1, 3 and 5-year were 68.4%, 35.6% and 18.5% in the MWA group, and 50.4%, 22.4% and 7.6% in the conventional group, with significant difference between the two groups respectively (χ2=5.13, P=0.02). The 6-months, 1-year and 3-years cumulative recurrence rates were 6.2%, 28.1% and 56.2% in the MWA group and 11.4%, 34.6% and 83.3% in the conventional group, with significant difference between the two groups respectively (χ2=4.14, P=0.04).

Conclusion

The application of microwave ablation in treating residual liver after hepatectomy with resection margin of <1cm for HCC would not affect the recovery of postoperative liver function. However it could decrease recurrence rate and could improve tumor-free survival rate, with clinical significance.

表1 86例HCC患者术中不同处理方法两组患者术前基线资料比较[(±s),例]
表2 86例HCC患者术中不同处理方法两组患者术中各项指标比较[(±s),例]
表3 86例HCC患者术中不同处理方法两组患者术后并发症比较(例)
表4 86例HCC患者术中不同处理方法两组患者术后肝功能情况(±s)
图1 86例HCC患者术中不同处理方法两组无瘤生存曲线比较(χ2=5.13, P=0.02)
图2 86例HCC患者术中不同处理方法两组累积复发率(χ2=4.14, P=0.04)
[1]
Zhu RX,Seto WK,Lai CL,et al.Epidemiology of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the Asia-Pacific Region[J].Gut Liver,2016,10(3):332-339.
[2]
Parikh ND,Fu S,Rao H,et al.Risk Assessment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients with Hepatitis C in China and the USA[J].Dig Dis Sci,2017,62(11):3243-3253.
[3]
Forner A,Reig M,Bruix J.Hepatocellular carcinoma[J].Lancet,2018,391(10127):1301-1314.
[4]
Piero F,Poniachik J,Ridruejo E,et al.Hepatocellular carcinoma in Latin America: Diagnosis and treatment challenges[J].World J Gastroenterol,2018,24(37): 4224-4229.
[5]
Vogel A,Cervantes A,Chau I,et al.Hepatocellular carcinoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up[J].Ann Oncol,2019,30(5):871-873.
[6]
武正山,王荇,王东,等.肝细胞癌切除术中微波处理肝断面对肿瘤复发的影响[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2015,37(12):909-912.
[7]
Saito R,Amemiya H,Hosomura N,et al.Prognostic Factors for Post-recurrent Survival in Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Curative Resection[J].Anticancer Res,2019,39(6):3033-3038.
[8]
王双佳,李秀东,苏旭,等.原发性肝癌患者术后肝外转移复发分析[J].中华肝胆外科杂志2018,24(5):341-343.
[9]
Lafaro K,Grandhi MS,Herman JM,et al.The importance of surgical margins in primary malignancies of the liver[J].J Surg Oncol,2016,113(3):296-303.
[10]
Ataide EC,Boin IF,Almeida JR,et al.Prognostic factors for hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence:experience with 83 liver transplantation patients[J].Transplant Proc,2011,43(4):1362-1364.
[11]
Chen QF,Jia ZY,Yang ZQ,et al.Transarterial Chemoembolization Monotherapy Versus Combined Transarterial Chemoembolization-Microwave Ablation Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Tumors ≤5 cm: A Propensity Analysis at a Single Center[J].Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol,2017,40(11):1748-1755.
[12]
Ryu T,Takami Y,Wada Y,et al.Hepatic resection versus operative microwave ablation for single hepatocellular carcinoma ≤5 cm: A propensity score-matched analysis[J].Surgery,2019,166(3):254-262.
[13]
王延明,王能,许赘,等.微波消融治疗7403例肝癌的严重并发症[J].中华肝胆外科杂志,2016,22(10):655-660.
[14]
张立洪,张传永,戴新征,等.术后复发性小肝癌微波消融与再次手术切除的疗效比较[J].中华普通外科杂志,2015,30(8):631-634.
[15]
沈裕厚,谢振斌,岳爱民,等.肝癌切除术中氩气刀处理残肝断面对术后肿瘤局部复发的影响[J].中华肿瘤防治杂志,2016,23(8):525-529.
[1] 章建全, 程杰, 陈红琼, 闫磊. 采用ACR-TIRADS评估甲状腺消融区的调查研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 966-971.
[2] 钟锴, 蒋铁民, 张瑞青, 吐尔干艾力·阿吉, 邵英梅, 郭强. 加速康复外科在肝囊型棘球蚴病肝切除术中的应用分析[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 425-429.
[3] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[4] 刘世君, 马杰, 师鲁静. 胃癌完整系膜切除术+标准D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[5] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[6] 常小伟, 蔡瑜, 赵志勇, 张伟. 高强度聚焦超声消融术联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的效果及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 56-59.
[7] 谢田伟, 庞于樊, 吴丽. 超声引导下不同消融术对甲状腺良性结节体积缩减率、复发率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 80-83.
[8] 冯旺, 马振中, 汤林花. CT扫描三维重建在肝内胆管细胞癌腹腔镜肝切除术中的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 104-107.
[9] 皮尔地瓦斯·麦麦提玉素甫, 李慧灵, 艾克拜尔·艾力, 李赞林, 王志, 克力木·阿不都热依木. 生物补片修补巨大复发性腹壁切口疝临床疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 624-628.
[10] 杭轶, 杨小勇, 李文美, 薛磊. 可控性低中心静脉压技术在肝切除术中应用的最适中心静脉压[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 813-817.
[11] 公宇, 廖媛, 尚梅. 肝细胞癌TACE术后复发影响因素及预测模型建立[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 818-824.
[12] 李一帆, 朱帝文, 任伟新, 鲍应军, 顾俊鹏, 张海潇, 曹耿飞, 阿斯哈尔·哈斯木, 纪卫政. 血GP73水平在原发性肝癌TACE疗效评价中的作用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 825-830.
[13] 刘敏思, 李荣, 李媚. 基于GGT与Plt比值的模型在HBV相关肝细胞癌诊断中的作用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 831-835.
[14] 韦巧玲, 黄妍, 赵昌, 宋庆峰, 陈祖毅, 黄莹, 蒙嫦, 黄靖. 肝癌微波消融术后中重度疼痛风险预测列线图模型构建及验证[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 715-721.
[15] 郭曌蓉, 王歆光, 刘毅强, 何英剑, 王立泽, 杨飏, 汪星, 曹威, 谷重山, 范铁, 李金锋, 范照青. 不同亚型乳腺叶状肿瘤的临床病理特征及预后危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 524-532.
阅读次数
全文


摘要