切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (02) : 140 -143. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2020.02.011

所属专题: 文献

论著

腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗门脉高压症的对比研究
张杰1, 邢智2, 刘歆农3, 李萍3, 管文贤4,()   
  1. 1. 扬州大学附属医院普通外科;南京医科大学鼓楼临床医学院普通外科
    2. 扬州大学附属医院麻醉科
    3. 扬州大学附属医院普通外科
    4. 南京医科大学鼓楼临床医学院普通外科;南京大学医学院附属鼓楼医院普通外科
  • 收稿日期:2019-09-05 出版日期:2020-04-26
  • 通信作者: 管文贤
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(81871317)

Comparative observation of laparoscopic and laparotomy surgery in the treatment of portal hypertension

Jie Zhang1, Zhi Xing2, Xinnong Liu3, Ping Li3, Wenxian Guan4,()   

  1. 1. Department of general surgery, the Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University, Jiangsu 225012, Chinal; Department of general surgery, Drum Tower Clinical Medical College of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu 210008, China
    2. Department of anesthesiology, the Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University, Jiangsu 225012, China
    3. Department of general surgery, the Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University, Jiangsu 225012, China
    4. Department of general surgery, Drum Tower Clinical Medical College of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu 210008, China; Department of general surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, the Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Jiangsu 210008, China
  • Received:2019-09-05 Published:2020-04-26
  • Corresponding author: Wenxian Guan
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Guan Wenxian , Email:
引用本文:

张杰, 邢智, 刘歆农, 李萍, 管文贤. 腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗门脉高压症的对比研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(02): 140-143.

Jie Zhang, Zhi Xing, Xinnong Liu, Ping Li, Wenxian Guan. Comparative observation of laparoscopic and laparotomy surgery in the treatment of portal hypertension[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(02): 140-143.

目的

探讨腹腔镜与开腹手术行脾切除联合贲门周围血管离断术治疗门脉高压症的手术效果。

方法

回顾性分析2013年3月至2018年12月因门脉高压、脾大、脾功能亢进及食管胃底静脉曲张行脾切除术联合贲门周围血管离断术的患者资料,其中腹腔镜下手术21例(腹腔镜组),开腹手术50例(开腹组)。应用GraphPad Prism 6.0软件对所有数据进行分析。术中、术后相关指标采用(±s)表示,独立样本t检验;并发症发生率采用χ2检验。P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

与开腹组比较,腹腔镜组手术时间较长(P<0. 05),而术中出血量、切口长度、术后排气时间、镇痛药物使用次数、引流管拔除时间、术后住院时间、术后切口感染率均少于开腹组(P<0. 05);两组间的腹腔出血、腹、盆腔积液、肺部感染、胰瘘以及门静脉血栓形成差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

腹腔镜手术治疗门脉高压症行脾切除联合贲门周围血管离断术具有手术创伤小、术中出血少、术后恢复快、术后切口感染率低、住院时间短等优点,腹腔镜手术治疗门脉高压症是安全、可行的。

Objective

To observe and to compare the efficacy of laparoscopic and laparotomy splenectomy and pericardial devascularization in the treatment of portal hypertension.

Methods

From March 2013 to December 2018, clinical data of patients with portal hypertension for splenomegaly, hypersplenism and esophageal and gastric fundus varices were analyzed retrospectively, among them, 21 cases underwent laparoscopic splenectomy and pericardial devascularization (laparoscopic group) and 50 cases underwent laparotomy of splenectomy and pericardial devascularization (laparotomy group). Statistical analysis were performed by using GraphPad Prism 6.0 software. Measurement data such as intraoperative and postoperative indicators were expressed as (±s) and examined by using independent t-test. The complication rate were compared by using χ2 test. Survival were analyzed by using Kaplan Meier method, and were examined by using log rank test. A P value of <0.05 was considered as statistically significant difference.

Results

Compared with laparotomy group, in addition to much longer operating time(P<0.05), there were advantages observed in the laparoscopic group including intraoperative blood loss, length of incision, time of first postoperative flatus, usage of analgesics, removal time of drainage tube, postoperative hospital stay and postoperative incision infection rate (P<0.05). There were no significant differences between two groups in terms of abdominal bleeding, peritoneal and pelvic effusion, pulmonary infection, pancreatic fistula and portal vein thrombosis (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Laparoscopic splenectomy and pericardial devascularization for the treatment of portal hypertension has the advantages of less surgical trauma, less intraoperative bleeding, faster postoperative recovery, lower incidence of postoperative incision infection, and shorter hospital stay. Laparoscopic surgery for the treatment of portal hypertension is safe and feasible.

表1 71例门脉高压症患者不同术式两组患者术前临床资料的比较(±s)
表2 71例门脉高压症患者不同术式两组手术情况的比较(±s)
表3 71例门脉高压症患者不同术式两组术后恢复情况的比较(±s)
表4 71例门脉高压症患者不同术式两组术后并发症的比较(例)
[1]
Delaitre B,Maignien B.Splenectomy by the laparoscopic approach. Report of a case[J].Presse Med,1991,20(44):2263.
[2]
Habermalz B,Sauerland S,Decker G,et al.Laparoscopic splenectomy: the clinical practice guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES)[J].Surg Endosc,2008,22(4):821-848.
[3]
许红兵,萧荫祺,李为民,等.电视腹腔镜脾切除术的初步报告[J].现代外科,1997,3(4):61-62.
[4]
中华医学会肝病学分会,中华医学会消化病学分会,中华医学会内镜学分会.肝硬化门静脉高压食管胃静脉曲张出血防治指南(2015) [J/CD].中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2015, 2(4):1-21.
[5]
许伟先,孙诚谊.门脉高压症的微创治疗现状[J].中国医学工程,2019,27(5):33-38.
[6]
朱海林,祁军安,王涛.腹腔镜门脉高压症脾切除的临床效果分析[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2017,11(3):198-201.
[7]
邓骏.全腹腔镜脾切除术联合贲门周围血管离断对脾功能亢进患者免疫功能的影响研究[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2019,13(4):362-365.
[8]
别平,陈健.腹腔镜脾切除术[J/CD].中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志,2015,4(3):142-145.
[9]
刘秀荃,张新宇.腹腔镜脾切除术的研究进展[J].中国普外基础与临床杂志,2018,25(1):113-117.
[10]
Han ES,You YK,Kim DG,et al.Clinical significance of single-port laparoscopic splenectomy: comparison of single-port and multiportlaparoscopic procedure[J].Ann Surg Treat Res,2015,89(2):55-60.
[11]
詹志林,唐慧鹏,李海宏,等.腹腔镜脾切除术在基层医院应用的初步体会[J].腹腔镜外科杂志,2016,21(4):300-303.
[12]
冯梦龙,钱玉元,潘定宇,等.腹腔镜与开腹脾切除加断流术的疗效对比[J].腹部外科,2017,30(1):61-64.
[13]
杨帅帅,李海玲,武德旺,等.完全3D腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗门脉高压症的对比研究[J].腹腔镜外科杂志,2017,22(2):119-122.
[14]
李栋,李晓峰,王芸.探讨腹腔镜与开腹脾切除贲门周围血管离断术治疗肝硬化门静脉高压脾肿大的临床对比[J].世界最新医学信息文摘,2019,19(54):59-61.
[15]
马双阳,戴兵,刘驰,等.腹腔镜与开腹脾切除贲门周围血管离断术治疗门静脉高压症的临床疗效分析[J].临床外科杂志,2019,27(7):592-594.
[16]
包汉康,韦秀丽.手助腹腔镜与开腹脾切除贲门周围血管离断术治疗肝硬化门脉高压症的疗效比较[J].临床军医杂志,2015,43(12):92-94,97.
[17]
杨镇,万赤丹,邓小荣.腹腔镜门静脉高压症外科治疗发展与新断流术[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2017,11(3):181-184.
[18]
王继才,邰升,乔海泉.腹腔镜微创技术在门脉高压症外科治疗中瓶颈与术式变迁[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2017,11(3):185-188.
[19]
陈斯聪,缪丁丁,刘宇斌.全腹腔镜下二级脾蒂离断法原位巨脾切除术的临床研究[J].岭南现代临床外科,2019,19(4):412-415.
[1] 燕速, 霍博文. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治性切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 13-13.
[2] 母德安, 李凯, 张志远, 张伟. 超微创器械辅助单孔腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 14-14.
[3] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[4] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[5] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[6] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[7] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[8] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[9] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[10] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[11] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[12] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
[13] 郭兵, 王万里, 何凯, 黄汉生. 腹腔镜下肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 143-143.
[14] 李凯, 陈淋, 苏怀东, 向涵, 张伟. 超微创器械在改良单孔腹腔镜巨大肝囊肿开窗引流及胆囊切除中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 144-144.
[15] 魏丽霞, 张安澜, 周宝勇, 李明. 腹腔镜下Ⅲb型肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 145-145.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?