切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (04) : 421 -423. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2019.04.032

所属专题: 文献

论著

经肛肠减压后3D腹腔镜根治术治疗梗阻性结肠癌的临床观察
秦颖1,(), 张海涛1, 庄树彤1, 文剑锋1, 刘安文1   
  1. 1. 518035 深圳,深圳大学附属第一医院(深圳市第二人民医院) 胃肠外科
  • 收稿日期:2018-09-03 出版日期:2019-08-26
  • 通信作者: 秦颖

Clinical effect of 3D laparoscopic radical operation in treatment of obstructive colon cancer after anorectal decompression

Ying Qin1,(), Haitao Zhang1, Shutong Zhuang1, Jianfeng Wen1, Anwen Liu1   

  1. 1. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University (Shenzhen Second People’s Hospital), Shenzhen 518035, China
  • Received:2018-09-03 Published:2019-08-26
  • Corresponding author: Ying Qin
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Qin Ying, Email:
引用本文:

秦颖, 张海涛, 庄树彤, 文剑锋, 刘安文. 经肛肠减压后3D腹腔镜根治术治疗梗阻性结肠癌的临床观察[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(04): 421-423.

Ying Qin, Haitao Zhang, Shutong Zhuang, Jianfeng Wen, Anwen Liu. Clinical effect of 3D laparoscopic radical operation in treatment of obstructive colon cancer after anorectal decompression[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(04): 421-423.

目的

探讨经肛肠减压后3D腹腔镜根治术治疗梗阻性结肠癌的临床疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2015年6月至2018年6月收治的54例梗阻性结肠癌患者的临床资料,所有患者术前均经肛肠减压,根据手术方式分为3D组(25例)和开腹组(29例),所有数据均应用SPSS22.0软件进行统计学分析,围术期相关指标等计量资料以(±s)表示,采用独立样本t检验;术后并发症发生率组间比较采用χ2检验,P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

两组患者术前减压管放置时间、手术时间和淋巴结清扫数目比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);3D组术中出血量、首次通气时间以及平均住院时间均明显少于开腹组,但平均住院费用高于开腹组;两组患者术后并发症发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

经肛肠减压后实施3D腹腔镜根治术治疗梗阻性结肠癌是安全、有效的,术中出血量少、术后恢复快,值得在临床广泛推广应用。

Objective

To investigate the clinical efficacy of 3D laparoscopic radical operation in treatment of obstructive colon cancer after anorectal decompression.

Methods

The clinical data of 54 patients with obstructive colon cancer admitted into our hospital from June 2015 to June 2018 were analyzed retrospectively. All cases were received anorectal decompression before surgery, according to surgical procedures, the patients were divided into 3D group (25 patients) and laparotomy group (29 patients). Statistical analysis was performed by using SPSS 22.0 software, perioperative indicators were expressed as (±s) and examined by using t test. The post-operative complication rate was examined by chi square test. A P value of <0.05 was considered as significant difference.

Results

There were no significant difference in decompression tube indwelling time, operation time and number of dissected lymph nodes between the two groups(P>0.05). The intraoperative blood loss, first flatus time and average hospitalization time in 3D group were significantly less than those in laparotomy group, the hospitalization cost in 3D group was significantly higher than that in laparotomy group (P<0.05); No significant difference was observed in postoperative complication rate between the two groups (P>0.05).

Conclusion

3D laparoscopic radical operation in the treatment of obstructive colon cancer after anorectal decompression is feasible and safe, with less intraoperative bleeding and faster postoperative recovery, which is valuale to be applied in clinical.

表1 54例梗阻性结肠癌患者不同手术方法两组患者临床基线资料比较(例)
表2 54例梗阻性结肠癌患者不同手术方法两组患者围手术期相关指标比较(±s)
[1]
Aran V, Victorino AP, Thuler LC, et al.Colorectal Cancer: Epidemiology, Disease Mechanisms and Interventions to Reduce Onset and Mortality[J]. Clin Colorectal Cancer, 2016, 15(3):195-203.
[2]
许庆文,徐飞鹏,王妃凤,等.腹腔镜辅助与开腹结直肠癌根治术临床对比研究[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志:电子版,2016, 10(2):112-115.
[3]
Takahashi H, Okabayashi K, Tsuruta M, et al.Self-Expanding Metallic Stents Versus Surgical Intervention as Palliative Therapy for Obstructive Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-analysis[J].World J Surg, 2015, 39(8):2037-2044.
[4]
王国森,周建平,盛伟伟,等.手助腹腔镜手术与腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠癌的Meta分析[J].中国普通外科杂志,2016, 25(4):497-509.
[5]
白军伟,张超,薛焕洲.3D与2D腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术的疗效分析[J].中华消化外科杂志,2016, 15(9):897-901.
[6]
何子锐,臧潞,马君俊,等.3D腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术的应用现状与展望[J].中华消化外科杂志,2017, 16(8):804-807.
[7]
解龙,樊启明,郭磊,等.机器人辅助与腹腔镜结直肠癌手术疗效比较的Meta分析[J].中国普通外科杂志,2016, 25(10):1412-1419.
[8]
郑威强,章烈,程勇.梗阻性结直肠癌导管减压后3D腹腔镜与开腹手术的疗效比较[J].中国普通外科杂志,2017, 26(10):1286-1290.
[9]
迟岳峰.腹腔镜结直肠癌根治与传统根治手术疗效的临床效果对比分析[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志:电子版,2016, 10(2):130-132.
[10]
杨世斌,韩方海,肖隆斌,等.腹腔镜辅助右半结肠癌根治术与开放手术的临床应用比较[J].实用医学杂志,2016, 32(11):1819-1822.
[11]
朱群山,石磊,郑广万,等.肠道支架联合腹腔镜在急性梗阻性左半结肠癌治疗中的初步应用[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志,2017,22(12):914-918.
[12]
Moug SJ, Mc Carthy K, Coode-Bate J, et al.Laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer in the older person: A systematic review[J].Ann Med Surg (Lond),2015, 4(3):311-318.
[13]
Enomoto T, Saida Y, Takabayashi K, et al. Open surgery versus laparoscopic surgery after stent insertion for obstructive colorectal cancer[J]. Surgery Today, 2016, 46(12):1383-1386.
[1] 曹迪, 张玉茹. 经腹腔镜生物补片修补直肠癌根治术后盆底疝1例[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 115-116.
[2] 姚宏伟, 魏鹏宇, 高加勒, 张忠涛. 不断提高腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术的规范化[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 1-4.
[3] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[4] 周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[5] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[6] 王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[7] 李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[8] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[9] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[10] 燕速, 霍博文, 徐惠宁. 4K荧光腹腔镜扩大右半结肠CME+D3根治术及No.206、No.204组淋巴结清扫术[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 14-14.
[11] 李凯, 陈淋, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种U型记忆合金线在经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 15-15.
[12] 莫波, 王佩, 王恒, 何志军, 梁俊, 郝志楠. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术与改良胃癌根治术治疗早期胃癌的疗效[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 644-647.
[13] 鲁鑫, 许佳怡, 刘洋, 杨琴, 鞠雯雯, 徐缨龙. 早期LC术与PTCD续贯LC术治疗急性胆囊炎对患者肝功能及预后的影响比较[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 648-650.
[14] 孟飞龙, 华帅, 张莹, 路广海. 经脐单孔腹腔镜后鞘后入路在全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术中的应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 658-660.
[15] 程相阵. 腹茧症9例诊治分析并文献复习[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 968-971.
阅读次数
全文


摘要